JoVE Logo

S'identifier

8.10 : Optimal Arousal Theory

The optimal arousal theory suggests that performance is maximized when an individual experiences a moderate level of arousal. This theory is closely tied to the Yerkes-Dodson law, which illustrates an inverted U-shaped relationship between arousal and performance. The law, formulated by psychologists Robert Yerkes and John Dodson, implies an ideal arousal level for optimal performance, and deviations from this level can lead to declines in effectiveness.

Inverted U-Shaped Performance Curve

The Yerkes-Dodson law describes how performance improves with arousal up to a point, after which it begins to decline. The resulting curve is an inverted U shape, where the peak represents the optimal arousal level. If arousal is too low, such as when an individual feels overly relaxed or indifferent, performance suffers due to a lack of motivation or focus. This can lead to errors, slow processing, and minimal engagement. Conversely, excessive arousal, such as heightened anxiety or stress, also impairs performance. In this state, cognitive functions can become overwhelmed, resulting in forgetfulness, errors, or even a mental "freeze."

Individual and Task Variability

Optimal arousal levels can vary based on individual traits and the nature of the task. For instance, some people perform better under pressure, such as public speakers, who may benefit from high arousal to boost their energy and expressiveness. On the other hand, tasks that involve complex problem-solving typically require a calmer state to facilitate concentration and systematic thinking.

Sensation Seeking and Arousal

The theory also considers individual differences in sensation seeking. Sensation seekers naturally prefer higher levels of stimulation, thriving in complex and dynamic environments. Research indicates that students who study abroad, often exposed to novel experiences, tend to score higher on sensation-seeking scales compared to those who remain in their home country. This preference for heightened arousal aligns with their desire for diverse and stimulating activities.

Tags

Optimal Arousal TheoryPerformanceYerkes Dodson LawInverted U shaped CurveArousal LevelsIndividual VariabilitySensation SeekingCognitive FunctionsMotivationTask Complexity

Du chapitre 8:

article

Now Playing

8.10 : Optimal Arousal Theory

Motivation and Emotion

88 Vues

article

8.1 : Introduction to Motivation and Emotion

Motivation and Emotion

249 Vues

article

8.2 : Motivational Cycle

Motivation and Emotion

404 Vues

article

8.3 : Primary Motives: Hunger and Thirst

Motivation and Emotion

121 Vues

article

8.4 : Primary Motives: Sleep, Sex, and Pain Avoidance

Motivation and Emotion

320 Vues

article

8.5 : Secondary Motives: Power Motivation and Achievement Motivation

Motivation and Emotion

93 Vues

article

8.6 : Secondary Motives: Affiliation Motivation and Aggression Motivation

Motivation and Emotion

258 Vues

article

8.7 : Instinct Theory

Motivation and Emotion

164 Vues

article

8.8 : Drive-Reduction Theory: Push Theory of Motivation

Motivation and Emotion

189 Vues

article

8.9 : Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation

Motivation and Emotion

328 Vues

article

8.11 : Maslow's Need Hierarchy Theory

Motivation and Emotion

145 Vues

article

8.12 : Ryan and Deci's Self-Determination Theory

Motivation and Emotion

9.8K Vues

article

8.13 : Physiology of Emotion

Motivation and Emotion

469 Vues

article

8.14 : Emotional Expression

Motivation and Emotion

129 Vues

article

8.15 : Labeling Emotion

Motivation and Emotion

75 Vues

See More

JoVE Logo

Confidentialité

Conditions d'utilisation

Politiques

Recherche

Enseignement

À PROPOS DE JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Tous droits réservés.