Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.

Building a Survival Tree

Constructing a survival tree begins with a dataset that includes covariates (predictor variables) and the survival time, along with a censoring indicator for each subject. The process involves the following steps:

  1. Data Preparation: The dataset is prepared by ensuring that all necessary covariates are included and appropriately formatted. Missing values can be handled using methods like imputation or treating them as a separate category.
  2. Tree Construction: The survival tree is built using a recursive partitioning process. At each step, the dataset is split into two subsets based on a covariate that best differentiates the survival outcomes. This is typically done using a splitting criterion such as the log-rank test, which compares the survival distributions between groups.
  3. Node Evaluation: Each node in the tree represents a subset of the data, and the terminal nodes (leaves) are evaluated based on the Kaplan-Meier estimate of the survival function. This provides an estimate of the survival probability for subjects falling into that node.
  4. Pruning: To avoid overfitting, the tree is pruned by removing nodes that do not provide significant improvement in model accuracy. This step ensures that the tree is generalizable to new data.

Advantages and Disadvantages

Advantages:

  1. Flexibility: Survival trees can handle a wide range of data types and are robust to outliers and missing values.
  2. Interpretability: The tree structure is easy to interpret, allowing for straightforward visualization of the relationship between covariates and survival time.
  3. Non-parametric Nature: They do not require assumptions about the distribution of the survival times or the functional form of the relationship between covariates and survival.

Disadvantages:

  1. Overfitting: Without proper pruning, survival trees can overfit the training data, leading to poor generalization.
  2. Instability: Small changes in the data can lead to significant changes in the tree structure, making them less stable compared to other methods like survival forests

Du chapitre 15:

article

Now Playing

15.15 : Survival Tree

Survival Analysis

15 Vues

article

15.1 : Introduction à l’analyse de survie

Survival Analysis

56 Vues

article

15.2 : Tables de mortalité

Survival Analysis

30 Vues

article

15.3 : Courbes de survie

Survival Analysis

28 Vues

article

15.4 : Approche actuarielle

Survival Analysis

25 Vues

article

15.5 : L’approche de Kaplan-Meier

Survival Analysis

33 Vues

article

15.6 : Hypothèses de l’analyse de survie

Survival Analysis

27 Vues

article

15.7 : Comparaison de l’analyse de survie de deux groupes ou plus

Survival Analysis

34 Vues

article

15.8 : Le test de log-rank de Mantel-Cox

Survival Analysis

108 Vues

article

15.9 : Applications des tables de mortalité

Survival Analysis

20 Vues

article

15.10 : Analyse de la survie au cancer

Survival Analysis

201 Vues

article

15.11 : Taux de danger

Survival Analysis

36 Vues

article

15.12 : Rapport de risque

Survival Analysis

34 Vues

article

15.13 : Troncature dans l’analyse de survie

Survival Analysis

59 Vues

article

15.14 : Censurer les données de survie

Survival Analysis

20 Vues

See More

JoVE Logo

Confidentialité

Conditions d'utilisation

Politiques

Recherche

Enseignement

À PROPOS DE JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Tous droits réservés.