A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

Quantitative 3D oxygen maps of murine tumors were imaged noninvasively using Pulse Electron Paramagnetic Resonance. Ultrasound B-mode and Power Doppler were used for anatomy and vascular structure. Images from both modalities were superimposed enabling multi-parametric tumor analysis.

Abstract

The precise and real-time measurement of oxygen partial pressure (pO2) brings valuable information in many pathologies, including cancer. Low tumor pO2 (i.e., hypoxia) is connected to tumor aggressiveness and poor response to therapy. The quantification of tumor pO2 allows the evaluation of treatment effectiveness. Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Imaging (EPRI), particularly Pulse EPRI, has emerged as an advanced three-dimensional (3D) method of assessing tissue oxygenation in vivo. This innovation was enabled by the technological developments in EPR (Electron Paramagnetic Resonance) and the application of the water-soluble oximetric spin probes from the triaryl family, offering fast and sensitive oxygenation data. The relaxation time of the spin probe (T1 and/or T2) provides accurate information about pO2 in selected voxels.

Human glioblastoma LN229 tumors were grown in the interscapular fad pad of BALB/c nude mice. Ultrasound (US) imaging was used as a reference for tumor anatomical information. To image tissue pO2, the animals were placed in a fixed position in the animal bed with fiducials, enabling registration between the imaging modalities. After the OX071 contrast agent was administered, EPRI was performed, followed by US B-mode. Because of the low spin probe toxicity, the procedure can be repeated during tumor growth or treatment. Following imaging, the registration process was carried out using software written in MATLAB. Ultimately, the hypoxic fraction can be calculated for a specific tumor, and the histogram of pO2 tissue distribution can be compared over time. EPRI combined with ultrasound is an excellent tool for oxygen mapping of tumors in the preclinical setting.

Introduction

Comprehending the tumor microenvironment (TME), with its complex spatial and dynamic interactions, brings a fuller understanding of tumor biology. Hypoxia, or low oxygen levels, is the key component of TME and plays a critical role in the development of other life-threatening conditions, including cardiovascular diseases, metabolic disorders such as diabetes, and chronic kidney disease1,2,3. Tissue oxygenation is a fundamental factor, particularly in the context of cancer, where partial tissue oxygen pressure (pO2) is correlated with therapy resistance. A pO2 level exceeding 10 mm Hg is associated with an increase in the effectiveness of low Linear Energy Transfer (LET) radiotherapy (oxygen enhancement effect).

Recent studies using Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Imaging (EPRI) have demonstrated that oxygen-guided radiation therapy can result in a twofold improvement in survival rates in different cancers in murine models4,5. This is similar to human subjects whose tumor pO2 was measured with multiple Eppendorf Electrode measurements and found to have median or mean pO2 values below 10 torr6. Besides radiotherapy, tumor hypoxia has been directly correlated with tumor aggressiveness and the outcome of other therapies, such as immune therapy7,8. This association underscores the importance of precise oxygen measurements in enhancing therapeutic outcomes and understanding the pathophysiology of diseases.

Optimal in vivo oximetry necessitates a direct measurement of partial tissue oxygen pressure independent of factors such as tissue perfusion and hemoglobin saturation. The procedure should be noninvasive, with a brief and precise imaging time to avoid potential impacts on the organism, such as prolonged anesthesia, alterations in tissue temperature, or significant changes in tissue pressure and pH. Tissue oximetry should exhibit high accuracy and reliability, ensuring consistent measurements regardless of variations in the tissue microenvironment, including differences in pH and redox state. For effective therapy planning, real-time image data reconstruction and straightforward interpretation are crucial. This entails not only achieving spatial resolution preferably less than 1 mm, but also enabling fast data collection to monitor dynamic changes in tissue oxygen status, such as cycling hypoxia.

In this context, various techniques for measuring molecular oxygen or assessing hypoxia have been developed, each with unique applicability and advantages. The platinum electrode, considered the "gold standard" for cellular and live animal tissue oximetry, offers consistent measurements through precise insertion into tissues. Other approaches, such as optical methods using fluorescent probes, photoacoustics, monitoring of the effects of hypoxia through gene or protein expression, or comet assays, are easy to use but are indirect or limited by optical path in tissues. Promising alternatives to assess hypoxia and/or oxygenation appear to be magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-OE-MRI10 -- or MOBILE11, positron emission tomography (PET) with various hypoxia-sensitive probes12, or electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR).

EPR has a long history in the field of biomedicine. The phenomenon itself was first reported in 1944 and was widely adopted as a tool for analyzing chemical structures and more recently, for biological systems and materials with unpaired electrons13. EPR spectroscopy has been used to study the dynamics and structure of biological systems such as photosynthesis, metalloproteins, radical enzymes, and phospholipid membranes14,15,16. Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) spectroscopy and tomography have emerged as pivotal non-invasive methods for studying tumor oxygenation and microenvironment with a spatial resolution of ~1 mm, temporal resolution of 1-10 min, and pO2 resolution of 1-3 torr5,17,18.

Continuous Wave (CW) EPR methods remain widely used in most applications due to the simplicity of recording and interpreting spectra. The oxygen-spin probe interactions work by assessing alterations in EPR signal intensity or line shape, providing insights into oxygen levels within the sample. CW EPR has a notable advantage in sensitivity to a wider range of pO2 compared to pulse methods. By applying various pulse sequences, information such as electron spin-spin relaxation times, spin-lattice relaxation times, and interactions with neighboring spins can be elucidated18,19. Pulse EPR techniques, such as inversion recovery with electron spin echo (IRESE) readout, measure spin lattice relaxation rates, avoiding the artifact from relaxation caused by spin probe-spin probe relaxation at low oxygen concentrations19,20. EPR can be used to monitor oxygen concentration changes with high temporal and spatial resolution; however, in oximetry at high oxygen concentrations, pulse EPR faces limitations due to the short relaxation times of transverse magnetization measured with electron spin echo (ESE). Ultimately, CW and pulse EPR are complementary, and a reliable understanding of the spin system requires the application of both methods.

EPR oximetry techniques rely upon the linear relationship between oxygen levels and the spin-lattice as well as spin-spin relaxation rates in solution. All oximetric probes are often divided into two types: soluble and particulate spin probes. Choosing the correct spin probe depends on the experimental setup and the information needed21,22,23. Soluble spin probes, such as nitroxides or the trityl derivatives24,25 such as OX063 and its deuterated form OX071, distributed throughout the tissue, provide information from the whole volume. Alternatively, for single-point measurement, and for prolonged and recurrent oxygen assessments, solid-state probes like LiPc, LiBuO or carbon derivatives may be used (see Table 1)22,23,26.

Ultrasonography B-mode imaging is widely used in the clinic for soft tissue imaging. The resolution depends on the transducer frequency used, and for preclinical studies, 18 MHz and higher provide sufficient resolution in the plane and the depth of the image. An additional advantage of ultrasonography is the possibility of obtaining functional vasculature images using Power Doppler mode. Here, we present electron paramagnetic resonance oxygen imaging (EPROI) as a method for generating 3D oxygen maps of tumors in living mice. Corresponding ultrasonography enables the necessary anatomical reference for tumor definition within EPROI. Multiple imaging sessions are possible for every animal. The last step is the analysis, including image reconstruction and registration between the modalities to obtain a pO2 histogram from the tumor volume.

Protocol

Mice were obtained from an approved animal breeding facility and all experiments were conducted in compliance with ethical guidelines (in our case - Permission No. 165/2023, First Local Ethics Committee, Kraków, Poland).

1. Animals and tumor line

NOTE: The mice were housed under standard laboratory conditions: Light/dark: 12 h/12 h, humidity: 60%, temperature: 23 °C. They were provided a standard chow diet with free access to drinking water in community cages.

  1. Murine glioblastoma multiforme LN229 cell line culture
    1. Culture LN229 cells in 25 cm2 tissue culture flasks in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) and penicillin-streptomycin at concentrations of 10 U/mL and 0.1 mg/mL, respectively.
    2. Maintain cells in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 at 37 °C, passaging every 48 h using 0.25% trypsin-EDTA and PBS without magnesium and calcium ions (pH 7.4).
  2. Tumor inoculation
    1. One week before inoculation, handle mice daily to familiarize them with the investigator.
    2. On the day of inoculation, weigh mice.
    3. Suspend 200,000 LN229 cells in 50 µL of extracellular matrix without growth factors. Using a 29 G needle, inoculate the cell mix subcutaneously into the intrascapular fat pad of 16-week-old BALB/c nude mice (N = 5).

2. Doppler US imaging

The overall timeline of tumor imaging is shown in Figure 1. Ultrasound imaging is used both for vasculature imaging by Doppler US and Anatomy US as a reference just before EPROI (Figure 2). B-mode anatomical imaging is essential for tumor oxygenation analysis by EPR and is described in section 3. While Doppler ultrasound imaging (section 2) is not mandatory for successful registration performance, it nevertheless provides valuable information about the optimal time window for the EPR study and allows for the determination of active vasculature in the tumor area.

  1. Mouse preparation
    1. Wait until tumors reach around 30 mm3. If necessary, shave the mice manually around the tumor site.
    2. Induce anesthesia using 2% isoflurane and maintain it with 1-1.5% isoflurane.
    3. Transfer the animal from the anesthesia chamber to a heating pad to maintain body temperature at 37 °C during preparation (based on the rectal temperature probe). Stabilize the animal temperature to obtain proper physiological parameter feedback.
  2. Ultrasonography
    1. Use the ultrasound system with a 57-25 MHz transducer for preclinical imaging (Figure 2, step 1).
    2. Acquire 3D B-mode measurements for tumor morphology visualization in a sagittal direction. Use 0.1 mm step size.
      NOTE: Do not move the animal or the transducer to preserve the exact same settings.
    3. Employ Power Doppler mode to visualize functional tumor vasculature with the following parameters: Velocity: 1.5 kHz, Wall filter: Low, Priority: 75%, Persistence: Medium, Step size 0.10 mm.
    4. Rotate the transducer to repeat steps 2.2.2 and 2.2.3 in an axial direction.
    5. Perform data analysis with the software provided by the ultrasound manufacturer. Mark the tumor border, upload it into a 3D image, and calculate the tumor volume and the percentage of vasculature.

3. EPROI

  1. Probe preparation
    1. Dissolve OX071 powder stored at -80 °C in injectable H2O to a final concentration of 1 g/10 mL (~70 mM).
  2. Mouse preparation
    1. Anesthetize the mice with 1%-3% isoflurane mixed with room air and position them on an animal holder. 
    2. Administer 1 mL of physiological saline subcutaneously to maintain the proper hydration level.
    3. Monitor the animal's breathing rate (80 ± 20 BPM) and temperature (37 ± 1 °C) using a respiratory pillow sensor and a surface thermometer attached to the mouse skin. Monitor the rectal temperature as a reference point (37 °C ± 1 °C).
    4. Insert polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tubing (0.7 mm external diameter) intraperitoneally for spin probe administration. Secure the cannula with the use of vinyl polysiloxane (VPS) to prevent it from falling out of the abdominal cavity.
    5. Insert a urine catheter (24 G) to collect the excreted spin probe.
    6. Secure the mouse in an animal bed using VPS dental clay for immobilization (Figure 2A).
  3. Anatomical US imaging for registration
    1. Turn on the 3D-controlled table and level bed. Set the platform temperature to 60 °C so that the temperature of the animal isolated by the plastic bed holder is maintained at 37 °C.
    2. Place the animal bed with the immobilized animal in the bed holder and transfer it to a 3D-controlled table for anatomical imaging before EPR measurement (Figure 2B). Make sure that the animal is secured within the bed holder and not touching the heating platform.
    3. Fix the position of the bed holder in three dimensions to prevent rotation, particularly XZ (sagittal plane) rotation, which is crucial for accurate registration.
    4. Place a position marker (fishing wire on the tape, 0.35 mm diameter) on the bed holder, marking the beginning of the resonator.
    5. Conduct B-mode imaging manually with a 1 mm step in both axial and sagittal directions towards the Y axis.
    6. Image the tumor structure with the following parameters dependent on the specific transducer frequency; for an 18 MHz transducer, depth 20 mm, dynamic range 84 dB, power 8 dB, gain 80%; for 40 MHz transducer, depth 20 mm, dynamic range 32 dB, gain 100%; for 57 MHz transducer, depth 13 mm, gain 6 dB, power 100%. Adjust the setting on the transducer focus according to the particular tumor location.
    7. At the end of anatomical imaging, wipe off the excess gel from the mouse and remove the immobilized mouse in the animal bed from the bed holder.
  4. EPR oxygen imaging
    1. Utilize the oxygen imager for Pulse EPR, operating within radio frequencies ranging from 685 MHz to 735 MHz. For setup, employ offset coils for 3D imaging and analysis of relaxation times. Use a horizontal resonator sized 32 mm x 35 m.
    2. Transfer the immobilized mouse in the animal bed promptly to the EPR imager after anatomical ultrasound (Figure 2C). Maintain the position of the animal bed carefully to minimize rotations within the resonator, similar to the procedure outlined in section 3.3.
    3. Reconnect the temperature probe to ensure continuous monitoring and maintenance of the animal's temperature, correlating it with the temperature inside the resonator.
    4. In the EPR spectrometer software, perform resonator tuning by using the tuning wheel to center the frequency around 725 MHz (Figure 3A).
      NOTE: A well matched resonator should have a dip of 25 dB or better.
    5. Optimize the microwave power to obtain a peak at 60 ns (Figure 3B) by adjusting the attenuation value from 20 dB to 3 dB.
    6. Tune the instrument so that the free induction decay (FID) of fiducials positioned within the animal bed is centered in the magnetic field and phased (Figure 3C).
    7. Administer 100 µL of OXO71 intraperitoneally through the previously inserted cannula, followed by a flush with 50-100 µL of saline solution.
    8. Using a programmed queue sequence, acquire measurements with set parameters; a typical sequence contains T1, T2 relaxation times, 3D Electron Spin Echo (ESE) for fiducial images, and 4D Inversion Recovery Electron Spin Echo (IRESE) for the animal image. Collect the IRESE imaging with a 1.5 G/cm gradient, repetition time of 55 µs, pretriggering -250 ns, t90 is 60 ns, and tau 400 ns; total acquisition time ~12 min. Repeat IRESE imaging at least for 30-40 min (3-4x) after the probe injection.
    9. After the imaging, transfer the mouse from the animal bed to the heating pad. Administer 1 mL of physiological saline subcutaneously to maintain the proper hydration level. Monitor until the mouse recovers upright locomotion.

4. Data analysis

  1. 4D reconstruction analysis in "ProcessGUI"
    1. Prior to reconstruction, apply baseline correction on the projections by selecting scenario "PulseRecon.scn" and loading the parameters file "IRESE_64pts_mouse_STANDARD_CHIRALITY.par" to analyze IRESE raw data.
    2. Filter each projection with a Gaussian filter of a width of 4 points, a default setting for selected scenario.
    3. Sub-sample the filtered projections to 64 points (Matrix size), a default setting for selected scenario.
    4. Further filter the projections with a Ram-Lak filter with apodization at 0.6 times the Nyquist frequency (click Reconstruction parameter | FilterCutOff).
    5. Back-project the filtered projections to produce a 4D spectral-spatial image.
    6. Utilize a fitting algorithm to extract the spin packet linewidth from the spectrum in each voxel. Section Fitting Parameters setup: Last point extender - 3, fitting method - default.
    7. Use the default settings for parameters in the fitting procedure, including the amplitude of the spectrum, the phase, spectral center, and the spectral spin packet linewidth.
  2. Registration between anatomical US and EPROI in "ArbuzGUI" (Figure 4)
    NOTE: The "ArbuzGUI" MATLAB procedure developed by Boris Epel from the University of Chicago was used for performing the registration. The software is available at EPR-IT https://github.com/o2mdev/eprit. The registration toolbox was explained previously elsewhere27. See the user manual for detailed step-by step instructions28.
    1. Load 2D US images as a stack with 1 mm step (step is strictly related to frame acquisition on B-mode imaging, point 3.3.7) to create 3D US images.
    2. Add collected pO2 images (reconstructed at step 4.1) as 3D image type set as "PO2_pEPRI" data. Store data in the project.
    3. Create a registration sequence and transformation by selecting Special | MRI-EPRI registration.
    4. Select the image that needs to be adjusted into EPRI data (e.g., US axial 3D) by selecting Sequence | add action. Use Stage 5:T2 for the best performance. In the outcome, a black plus symbol will appear in front of the name of the selected image.
    5. Open the US image in SliceMaskEditPLG. Adjust the scale of the US image based on the ruler presented on the images. Mark US position marker, animal outline, and tumor position based on selected frames.
    6. In the SliceMaskEditPLG, mark the pO2 map outline and fiducial in reconstructed 4D pO2 images.
    7. Using the figure viewer and RotateImagePLG toolbox, rotate the US image according to the US position marker versus fiducial positions to register pO2 map with US outline.
    8. Transform the tumor mask from the US image to the pO2 map.
    9. Visualize the tumor mask in the pO2 map of the mouse and export pO2 values for each voxel.

Results

A representative cross section from the ultrasound image of an LN229 tumor growing in the intrascapular fat pad, together with vasculature is shown in Figure 5. Some vasculature is seen outside the tumor border. Unexpectedly, the percentage of tumor vasculature volume did not decrease and remained stable with tumor growth.

As outlined in Figure 2, step 2 involves immobilization of the mouse on the bed with all the accessories to ensur...

Discussion

There are a few critical steps in the described imaging protocol. First, to register the anatomy images with the oxygen maps, MRI might be a better choice than ultrasound due to better resolution and the ability to provide detailed 3D data19. Ultrasound with a high-frequency transducer provides excellent resolution and sufficient imaging depth for preclinical studies. Both MRI and US, however, require the use of fiducials to secure the tumor position across different imaging modalities.

Disclosures

Prof H. Halpern and B. Epel are cofounders of O2M Technologies. The other authors: G. Dziurman, A. Bienia, A. Murzyn, B. Płóciennik, J. Kozik, G. Szewczyk, M. Szczygieł, M. Krzykawska-Serda and M. Elas have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Acknowledgements

We thank O2M Technology for gracious technical support. Poland National Science Centre grants no 2020/37/B/NZ4/01313 (Jiva-25 imager) and NCBiR: ENM3/IV/18/RXnanoBRAIN/2022 (animal costs) are acknowledged. The purchase of VevoF2 ultrasound has been supported by the Faculty Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology under the Strategic Programme Excellence Initiative at Jagiellonian University.

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
aqua pro injectionePolpharma1280610-
ArbuzGUI O2M Technologies-accesible in the github repository
disodium phosphatePOCH S.A.799280115-
Dulbecco′s Modified Eagle′s Medium - high glucoseMerck Life ScienceD56484500 mg/L glucose and L-glutamine
fetal bovine serum Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific10500064-
fishing wireGood FishA-55A-035US position marker - 0.35 mm
GeltrexGibco, Thermo Fisher ScientificA1413302reduced growth factor basement membrane matrix
ibGUIO2M Technologies-accesible in the github repository
injectio natrii chlorati isotonicaPolpharmamultipe items were used9 mg/mL
insulin needles 29 G Becton, Dickinson and Companymultipe items were used-
Jiva 25O2M Technologies-EPROI
MATLABMathWorks-version R2021b
penicillin-streptomycinMerck Life ScienceP4333with 10,000 units penicillin and 10 mg streptomycin/mL
potassium chloridePOCH S.A.739740114-
potassium dihydrogen phosphatePOCH S.A.742020112-
ProcessGUIO2M Technologies-accesible in the github repository
PTFE tubing Cole Palmer Instrument Co06412-11-
sodium chloridePOCH S.A.794121116-
SpecMan4EPRFEMI Instruments-version 3.4 CS 64bit
Surflash I.V. CatheterTerumoSR*FF2419size: 24G x ¾"
tape3M multipe items were usedmicropore
Trypsin-EDTA Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific25200072-
UltrasonographyTelemed-Anatomical US
US gelKONIXNUG-0019-
VetfluraneVirbac1373171000 mg/g
Vevo F2FujiFilms, Visual Sonics-B-mode and Doppler
vinyl polysiloxane dental clay 3M ESPEmultiple items were used-

References

  1. Chen, P. -. S. Pathophysiological implications of hypoxia in human diseases. J Biomed Sci. 27, 63 (2020).
  2. Lopez-Pascual, A., Trayhurn, P., Martínez, J. A., González-Muniesa, P. Oxygen in metabolic dysfunction and its therapeutic relevance. Antioxid Redox Signal. 35 (8), 642-687 (2021).
  3. Vaupel, P., Mayer, A., Höckel, M. Tumor hypoxia and malignant progression. Methods Enzymol. 381, 335-354 (2004).
  4. Gertsenshteyn, I., et al. Absolute oxygen-guided radiation therapy improves tumor control in three preclinical tumor models. Front Med (Lausanne). 10, 1269689 (2023).
  5. Epel, B., et al. Oxygen-guided radiation therapy. Int J of Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 103 (3), 977-984 (2019).
  6. Hockel, M., et al. Association between tumor hypoxia and malignant progression in advanced cancer of the uterine cervix. Cancer Res. 56 (19), 4509-4515 (1996).
  7. Semenza, G. L. Intratumoral hypoxia and mechanisms of immune evasion mediated by hypoxia-inducible factors. Physiology (Bethesda). 36 (2), 73-83 (2021).
  8. Dewhirst, M. W., Mowery, Y. M., Mitchell, J. B., Cherukuri, M. K., Secomb, T. W. Rationale for hypoxia assessment and amelioration for precision therapy and immunotherapy studies. J Clin Invest. 129 (2), 489-491 (2019).
  9. Tatum, J. L., et al. Hypoxia: importance in tumor biology, noninvasive measurement by imaging, and value of its measurement in the management of cancer therapy. Int J Radiat Biol. 82 (10), 699-757 (2006).
  10. O'Connor, J. P. B., et al. Oxygen-enhanced MRI accurately identifies, quantifies, and maps tumor hypoxia in preclinical cancer models. Cancer Res. 76 (4), 787-795 (2016).
  11. Colliez, F., et al. Oxygen mapping within healthy and acutely infarcted brain tissue in humans using the NMR relaxation of lipids: A proof-of-concept translational study. PLoS One. 10 (8), e0135248 (2015).
  12. Gouel, P., et al. Advances in PET and MRI imaging of tumor hypoxia. Front Med (Lausanne). 10, 1055062 (2023).
  13. Płonka, P. M. Paramagnetomics. Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy in Medicine. , 189-221 (2019).
  14. Kavetskyy, T. S., et al. EPR study of self-organized magnetic nanoparticles in biomaterials. Semiconductor Physics, Quantum Electronics and Optoelectronics. 25, 146-156 (2022).
  15. Eaton, G. R., Eaton, S. S., Ohno, K. . EPR Imaging and in Vivo EPR. , (2018).
  16. Berliner, L. J. The evolution of biomedical EPR (ESR). Biomed Spectrosc Imaging. 5 (1), 5-26 (2017).
  17. Matsumoto, K. -. I., et al. EPR-based oximetric imaging: a combination of single point-based spatial encoding and T1 weighting. Magn Reson Med. 80 (5), 2275-2287 (2018).
  18. Kishimoto, S., et al. Pulsed electron paramagnetic resonance imaging: Applications in the studies of tumor physiology. Antioxid Redox Signal. 28 (5), 1378-1393 (2018).
  19. Epel, B., Halpern, H. J. In vivo pO2 imaging of tumors: Oxymetry with very low-frequency electron paramagnetic resonance. Methods Enzymol. 564, 501-527 (2015).
  20. Epel, B., et al. Absolute oxygen R1e imaging in vivo with pulse electron paramagnetic resonance. Magn Reason Med. 72 (2), 362-368 (2014).
  21. Ahmad, R., Kuppusamy, P. Theory, instrumentation, and applications of electron paramagnetic resonance oximetry. Chem Rev. 110 (5), 3212-3236 (2010).
  22. Kuppusamy, P., Berliner, L. J., Parinandi, N. L. Sense and sensibility of oxygen in pathophysiology using EPR oximetry. Measuring oxidants and oxidative stress in biological systems. , (2020).
  23. Flood, A. B., Satinsky, V. A., Swartz, H. M. Comparing the effectiveness of methods to measure oxygen in tissues for prognosis and treatment of cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol. 923, 113-120 (2016).
  24. Ardenkjær-Larsen, J. H., et al. EPR and DNP properties of certain novel single electron contrast agents intended for oximetric imaging. J Magn Reason. 133, 1-12 (1998).
  25. Reddy, T. J., Iwama, T., Halpern, H. J., Rawal, V. H. General synthesis of persistent trityl radicals for EPR imaging of biological systems. J Org Chem. 67 (14), 4635-4639 (2002).
  26. Kmiec, M. M., Tse, D., Kuppusamy, P. Oxygen-sensing paramagnetic probes for clinical oximetry. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1269, 259-263 (2021).
  27. Pandian, R. P., Parinandi, N. L., Ilangovan, G., Zweier, J. L., Kuppusamy, P. Novel particulate spin probe for targeted determination of oxygen in cells and tissues. Free Radic Biol Med. 35 (9), 1138-1148 (2003).
  28. O2M Technologies LLC. . JIVA-25 Oxygen Imager User Manual. , (2024).
  29. Epel, B., et al. Electron paramagnetic resonance oxygen imaging of a rabbit tumor using localized spin probe delivery. Med Phys. 37 (6 Part1), 2553-2559 (2010).
  30. Epel, B., Viswakarma, N., Sundramoorthy, S. V., Pawar, N. J., Kotecha, M. Oxygen imaging of a rabbit tumor using a human-sized pulse electron paramagnetic resonance imager. Mol Imaging Biol. 26 (3), 403-410 (2023).
  31. Epel, B., Redler, G., Tormyshev, V., Halpern, H. J. Towards human oxygen images with electron paramagnetic resonance imaging. Adv Exp Med Biol. 876, 363-369 (2016).
  32. Elas, M., et al. EPR oxygen images predict tumor control by a 50% tumor control radiation Dose. Cancer Res. 73 (17), 5328-5335 (2013).
  33. Elas, M., et al. Electron paramagnetic resonance oxygen images correlate spatially and quantitatively with Oxylite oxygen measurements. Clin Cancer Res. 12 (14), 4209-4217 (2006).
  34. Redler, G., Epel, B., Halpern, H. J. Principal component analysis enhances SNR for dynamic electron paramagnetic resonance oxygen imaging of cycling hypoxia in vivo. Magn Reson Med. 71 (1), 440-450 (2014).
  35. Naz, S., Kishimoto, S., Mitchell, J. B., Krishna, M. C. Imaging metabolic processes to predict radiation responses. Semin Radiat Oncol. 29 (1), 81-89 (2019).
  36. Yamamoto, K., et al. Molecular imaging of the tumor microenvironment reveals the relationship between tumor oxygenation, glucose uptake, and glycolysis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res. 80 (11), 2087-2093 (2020).
  37. Kawai, T., et al. Continuous monitoring of postirradiation reoxygenation and cycling hypoxia using electron paramagnetic resonance imaging. NMR Biomed. 35 (10), e4783 (2022).
  38. Takakusagi, Y., et al. Pyruvate induces transient tumor hypoxia by enhancing mitochondrial oxygen consumption and potentiates the anti-tumor effect of a hypoxia-activated prodrug TH-302. PLoS One. 9 (9), e107995 (2014).
  39. Li, T., et al. Evaluations of an early change in tumor pathophysiology in response to radiotherapy with oxygen enhanced electron paramagnetic resonance imaging (OE EPRI). Mol Imaging Biol. 26 (3), 448-458 (2024).
  40. Schaner, P. E., et al. First-in-human study in cancer patients establishing the feasibility of oxygen measurements in tumors using electron paramagnetic resonance with the OxyChip. Front Oncol. 11, 743256 (2021).
  41. Swartz, H. M., et al. How best to interpret measures of levels of oxygen in tissues to make them effective clinical tools for care of patients with cancer and other oxygen-dependent pathologies. Physiol Rep. 8 (15), 14541 (2020).
  42. Tseytlin, M., et al. A combined positron emission tomography (PET)-electron paramagnetic resonance imaging (EPRI) system: initial evaluation of a prototype scanner. Phys Med Biol. 63 (10), 105010 (2018).
  43. Kim, H., et al. Development of a PET/EPRI combined imaging system for assessing tumor hypoxia. J Instrum. 16 (03), P03031 (2021).
  44. Shen, J., et al. Development of isoindoline nitroxides for EPR oximetry in viable systems. Appl Magn Reason. 22, 357-368 (2002).
  45. Alecci, M., Ferrari, M., Quaresima, V., Sotgiu, A., Ursini, C. L. Simultaneous 280 MHz EPR imaging of rat organs during nitroxide free radical clearance. Biophys J. 67 (3), 1274-1279 (1994).
  46. Hyde, J. S., Subczynski, W. K. Simulation of ESR spectra of the oxygen-sensitive spin-label probe CTPO. J Magn Reson (1969). 56 (1), 125-130 (1984).
  47. Sarna, T., Dulȩba, A., Korytowski, W., Swartz, H. Interaction of melanin with oxygen. Arch Biochem Biophys. 200 (1), 140-148 (1980).
  48. Bratasz, A., Kulkarni, A. C., Kuppusamy, P. A highly sensitive biocompatible spin probe for imaging of oxygen concentration in tissues. Biophys J. 92 (8), 2918-2925 (2007).
  49. Gluth, T. D., et al. Biocompatible monophosphonated trityl spin probe, HOPE71, for in vivo measurement of pO2, pH, and [Pi] by electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy. Anal Chem. 92 (2), 946-954 (2022).
  50. Gluth, T. D., et al. Large-scale synthesis of a monophosphonated tetrathiatriarylmethyl spin probe for concurrent in vivo measurement of pO2, pH and inorganic phosphate by EPR. RSC Adv. 11 (42), 25951-25954 (2022).
  51. Vahidi, N., et al. In vivo and in vitro EPR oximetry with fusinite: A new coal-derived, particulate EPR probe. Magn Reson Med. 31 (2), 139-146 (1994).
  52. Gallez, B., et al. Small particles of fusinite and carbohydrate chars coated with aqueous soluble polymers: preparation and applications for in vivo EPR oximetry. Magn Reson Med. 40 (1), 152-159 (1998).
  53. James, P. E., et al. Gloxy: An oxygen-sensitive coal for accurate measurement of low oxygen tensions in biological systems. Magn Reson Med. 38 (1), 48-58 (1997).
  54. Goda, F., et al. In vivo oximetry using EPR and India ink. Magn Reson Med. 33 (2), 237-245 (1995).
  55. Liu, K. J., et al. Lithium phthalocyanine: a probe for electron paramagnetic resonance oximetry in viable biological systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci. USA. 90 (12), 5438-5442 (1993).
  56. Ilangovan, G., Zweier, J. L., Kuppusamy, P. Mechanism of oxygen-induced EPR line broadening in lithium phthalocyanine microcrystals. J Magn Reason. 170 (1), 42-48 (2004).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

Tumor HypoxiaOxygen Partial PressurePO2 MeasurementElectron Paramagnetic Resonance ImagingEPRIThree dimensional ImagingTissue OxygenationGlioblastomaOX071 Contrast AgentUltrasound ImagingSpin ProbesTumor Growth AssessmentPreclinical Research

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved