Aby wyświetlić tę treść, wymagana jest subskrypcja JoVE. Zaloguj się lub rozpocznij bezpłatny okres próbny.
Method Article
Presented here is a phosphoproteomic approach, namely stop and go extraction tip based phosphoproteomic, which provides high-throughput and deep coverage of Arabidopsis phosphoproteome. This approach delineates the overview of osmotic stress signaling in Arabidopsis.
Protein phosphorylation is crucial for the regulation of enzyme activity and gene expression under osmotic condition. Mass spectrometry (MS)-based phosphoproteomics has transformed the way of studying plant signal transduction. However, requirement of lots of starting materials and prolonged MS measurement time to achieve the depth of coverage has been the limiting factor for the high throughput study of global phosphoproteomic changes in plants. To improve the sensitivity and throughput of plant phosphoproteomics, we have developed a stop and go extraction (stage) tip based phosphoproteomics approach coupled with Tandem Mass Tag (TMT) labeling for the rapid and comprehensive analysis of plant phosphorylation perturbation in response to osmotic stress. Leveraging the simplicity and high throughput of stage tip technique, the whole procedure takes approximately one hour using two tips to finish phosphopeptide enrichment, fractionation, and sample cleaning steps, suggesting an easy-to-use and high efficiency of the approach. This approach not only provides an in-depth plant phosphoproteomics analysis (> 11,000 phosphopeptide identification) but also demonstrates the superior separation efficiency (< 5% overlap) between adjacent fractions. Further, multiplexing has been achieved using TMT labeling to quantify the phosphoproteomic changes of wild-type and snrk2 decuple mutant plants. This approach has successfully been used to reveal the phosphorylation events of Raf-like kinases in response to osmotic stress, which sheds light on the understanding of early osmotic signaling in land plants.
High salinity, low temperature, and drought cause osmotic stresses, which is a major environmental factor that affects plant productivity1,2. Protein phosphorylation is one of the most significant post-translational modifications mediating signal perception and transduction in plant response to osmotic stress3,4,5. SNF1-related protein kinase 2s (SnRK2s) are involved in the osmotic stress signaling6. Nine of ten members of the SnRK2 family show significant activation in response to osmotic stress7,8. The snrk2.1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8/9/10 decuple (snrk2-dec) mutant having mutations in all ten SnRK2 displayed hypersensitivity to osmotic stress. In snrk2-dec mutant, the osmotic stress-induced accumulation of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3), abscisic acid (ABA) biosynthesis, and gene expressions are strongly reduced, highlighting the vital role of SnRK2s in osmotic stress responses6. However, it is still unclear how SnRK2s kinases regulate these biological processes. Profiling the phosphoproteomic changes in response to osmotic stress is an efficient way to bridge this gap and to delineate the osmotic stress-triggered defense mechanisms in plants.
Mass spectrometry (MS) is a powerful technique for mapping plant phosphoproteome9. Characterization of plant phosphoproteomics, however, remain a challenge due to the dynamic range of plant proteome and the complexity of plant lysate4. To overcome these challenges, we developed a universal plant phosphoproteomic workflow, which eliminates unwanted interferences such as from photosynthetic pigments and secondary metabolites, and enabling the deep coverage of plant phosphoproteome10. Several phosphopeptide enrichment methods such as immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography (IMAC) and metal oxide chromatography (MOC) have been developed for enriching phosphopeptides prior to MS analysis11,12,13,14,15,16. Acidic non-phosphopeptides co-purifying with phosphopeptides are the major interferences for phosphopeptide detection. Previously, we standardized the pH value and organic acid concentration of IMAC loading buffer to eliminate the binding of non-phosphopeptides, to obtain more than 90% enrichment specificity bypassing the pre-fractionation step11.
Sample loss in the multi-step process of phosphopeptide enrichment and fractionation hampers the sensitivity of phosphopeptide identification and the depth of phosphoproteomic coverage. Stop-and-go-extraction tips (stage tips) are pipette tips that contain small disks to cap the end of the tip, which can be incorporated with chromatography for peptide fractionation and cleaning17. Sample loss during the stage tip procedure can be minimized by avoiding sample transfer between the tubes. We have successfully implemented stage tip in Ga3+-IMAC and Fe3+-IMAC to separate low abundant multiple phosphorylated peptides from singly phosphorylated peptides, which improved the depth of human phosphoproteome15. In addition, the use of high pH reversed-phase (Hp-RP) stage tip has demonstrated the wider coverage of human membrane proteome compared to that of strong cation exchange (SCX) and strong anion exchange (SAX) chromatography18. Therefore, integrating IMAC and Hp-RP stage tip techniques can increase plant phosphoproteome coverage with simplicity, high specificity, and high throughput. We have demonstrated that this strategy identified more than 20,000 phosphorylation sites from Arabidopsis seedlings, representing an enhanced depth of plant phosphoproteome19.
Here, we report a stage tip-based phosphoproteomic protocol for phosphoproteomic profiling in Arabidopsis. This workflow was applied to study the phosphoproteomic perturbation of wild-type and snrk2-dec mutant seedlings in response to osmotic stress. The phosphoproteomic analysis revealed the phosphorylation sites implicated in kinase activation and early osmotic stress signaling. Comparative analysis of wild-type and snrk2-dec mutant phosphoproteome data leaded the discovery of a Raf-like kinase (RAF)-SnRK2 kinase cascade which plays a key role in osmore stress signaling in high plants.
1. Sample preparation
2. Tandem Mass Tag (TMT) labeling
3. Preparation of IMAC stage tip
4. Preparation of Hp-RP stage tip
5. Preparation of spin adaptor
6. Phosphopeptide enrichment using IMAC stage tip
7. Phosphopeptide fractionation using Hp-RP C18 stage tip
8. LC-MS/MS analysis and data analysis
To demonstrate the performance of this workflow, we exploited IMAC stage tip coupled with Hp-RP stage tip fractionation to measure the phosphoproteomic changes in wild-type and snrk2-dec mutant seedlings with or without mannitol treatment for 30 minutes. Each sample was performed in biological triplicates, and the experimental workflow is represented in Figure 1. The digested peptides (400 µg) of each sample were labeled with one TMT-6plex channel, pooled and desalted. The phos...
The dynamic range and complexity of plant proteome and phosphoproteome are still a limiting factor to depth of phosphoproteomics analyses. Despite the capability of single run LC-MS/MS analysis to identify 10,000 phosphorylation sites21,22, the coverage of the whole plant phosphoproteome is still limited. Therefore, a phosphoproteomic workflow that provides high sensitivity and superior separation efficiency is required in profiling the global view of plant signa...
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This work was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Grant XDB27040106.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
1.5 mL tube | eppendorf | 22431081 | Protein LoBind, 1.5 mL, PCR clean, colorless, 100 tubes |
200 µL pipet tip | Gilson | F1739311 | |
2-chloroacetamide | Sigma-Aldrich | C0267 | |
acetic acid | Sigma-Aldrich | 5438080100 | |
acetonitrile | Sigma-Aldrich | 271004 | |
ammonium hydroxide | Sigma-Aldrich | 338818 | |
ammonium phosphate monbasic | Sigma-Aldrich | 216003 | |
BCA Protein Assay Kit | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 23227 | |
blunt-ended needle | Hamilton | 90516 | Kel-F hub (KF), point style 3, gauge 16 |
C18-AQ beads | Dr. Maisch | ReproSil-Pur-C18-AQ 5 µm | |
C8 Empore disk | 3 M | 2214 | 47 mm |
Centrifuge | eppendorf | 22620444 | |
chloroform | Sigma-Aldrich | CX1058 | |
data analysis software | Perseus 1.6.2.1 | https://maxquant.net/perseus/ | |
ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) | Sigma-Aldrich | ||
formic acid | Sigma-Aldrich | 5330020050 | |
Frits | Agilent | 12131024 | Frits for SPE Cartridges |
Guanidine hydrochloride | Sigma-Aldrich | 50933 | |
H2O | Sigma-Aldrich | 1153334000 | |
HEPES | Sigma-Aldrich | H3375 | |
Iron (III) chloride | Sigma-Aldrich | 157740 | |
LTQ-orbitrap | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Velos Pro | |
mass spectrometer | Thermo Fisher Scientific | LTQ-Orbitrap Velos Pro | |
methanol | Sigma-Aldrich | 34860 | |
nano LC | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Easy-nLC 1000 | |
Ni-NTA spin column | Qiagen | 31014 | |
N-Lauroylsarcosine sodium salt | Sigma-Aldrich | L9150 | |
plunger | Hamilton | 1122-01 | Plunger assembly N, RN, LT, LTN for model 1702 (25 μl) |
search engine software | MaxQuant 1.5.4.1 | https://www.maxquant.org | |
SEP-PAK Cartridge 50 mg | Waters | WAT054960 | |
sodium deoxycholate | Sigma-Aldrich | D6750 | |
SpeedVac | Thermo Fisher Scientific | SPD121P | |
TMT 6-plex | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 90061 | |
Triethylammonium bicarbonate buffer | Sigma-Aldrich | T7408 | |
Trifluoroacetic acid | Sigma-Aldrich | 91707 | |
Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine hydrochloride | Sigma-Aldrich | C4706 | |
Trizma hydrochloride | Sigma-Aldrich | T3253 |
Zapytaj o uprawnienia na użycie tekstu lub obrazów z tego artykułu JoVE
Zapytaj o uprawnieniaThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone