determining-functional-status-corticospinal-tract-within-one-week

Determining the Functional Status of the Corticospinal Tract Within One Week of Stroke

High interindividual variability in the recovery of upper limb (UL) function after stroke means it is difficult to predict an individual&#39;s potential ...

University of Auckland

Auckland District Health Board

Repetitive mirror symmetric bilateral upper limb may be a suitable priming technique for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke. Here we demonstrate neurophysiological and behavioural after-effects in healthy participants after priming with 20 minutes of repetitive active-passive bimanual wrist flexion and extension in a mirror symmetric pattern with respect to the body midline (MIR) compared to an control priming condition with alternating flexion-extension (ALT). Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) indicated that corticomotor excitability (CME) of the passive hemisphere remained elevated compared to baseline for at least 30 minutes after MIR but not ALT, evidenced by an increase in the size of motor evoked potentials in ECR and FCR. Short and long-latency intracortical inhibition (SICI, LICI), short afferent inhibition (SAI) and interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) were also examined using pairs of stimuli. LICI differed between patterns, with less LICI after MIR compared with ALT, and an effect of pattern on IHI, with reduced IHI in passive FCR 15 minutes after MIR compared with ALT and baseline. There was no effect of pattern on SAI or FCR H-reflex. Similarly, SICI remained unchanged after 20 minutes of MIR. We then had participants complete a timed manual dexterity motor learning task with the passive hand during, immediately after, and 24 hours after MIR or control priming. The rate of task completion was faster with MIR priming compared to control conditions. Finally, ECR and FCR MEPs were examined within a pre-movement facilitation paradigm of wrist extension before and after MIR. ECR, but not FCR, MEPs were consistently facilitated before and after MIR, demonstrating no degradation of selective muscle activation. In summary, mirror symmetric active-passive bimanual movement increases CME and can enhance motor learning without degradation of muscle selectivity. These findings rationalise the use of mirror symmetric bimanual movement as a priming modality in post-stroke upper limb rehabilitation.

Mirror symmetric bimanual movement priming can increase corticomotor excitability and enhance motor learning.

The use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in stroke research has increased dramatically over the last decade with two emerging and potentially useful functions identified. Firstly, the use of single pulse TMS as a tool for predicting recovery of motor function after stroke, and secondly, the use of repetitive TMS (rTMS) as a treatment adjunct aimed at modifying the excitability of the motor cortex in preparation for rehabilitation. This review discusses recent advances in the use of TMS in both prediction and treatment after stroke. Prediction of recovery after stroke is a complex process and the use of TMS alone is not sufficient to provide accurate prediction for an individual after stroke. However, when applied in conjunction with other tools such as clinical assessment and MRI, accuracy of prediction using TMS is increased. rTMS temporarily modulates cortical excitability after stroke. Very few rTMS studies are completed in the acute or sub-acute stages after stroke and the translation of altered cortical excitability into gains in motor function are modest, with little evidence of long term effects. Although gains have been made in both of these areas, further investigation is needed before these techniques can be applied in routine clinical care. 

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in stroke: Ready for clinical practice?

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is used to examine corticospinal tract integrity after stroke, however, generating motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in the lower limb (LL) can be difficult. Previous studies have used activation of the target leg to facilitate MEPs in the LL but this may not be possible after stroke due to hemiplegia. The dominance of the target limb may also be important, however the neurophysiological effects of LL dominance are not known. We investigated whether voluntary activation of the non-target leg combined with optimal TMS coil orientation increases corticomotor excitability in healthy adults, and whether limb dominance influences these results. TMS was delivered to induce a posterior-anterior (PA) and a medial-lateral (ML) cortical current in 22 healthy adults. MEPs were recorded in tibialis anterior (TA) with the participant at rest and when activating the non-target leg. We found that non-target leg activation increased corticomotor excitability in the target leg (reduced rest motor threshold (RMT) and MEP latency, and increased recruitment curve slope). ML cortical current also reduced RMT and MEP latency. The degree of footedness correlated with the degree of RMT asymmetry, with a PA but not ML cortical current direction. In summary, cross-facilitation by activating the non-target leg in a task requiring postural stabilisation and inducing ML current increase corticomotor excitability regardless of limb dominance. This protocol may have practical application in testing CST integrity after stroke when paretic limb thresholds are high, by increasing the likelihood of eliciting a MEP.

Effects of non-target leg activation, TMS coil orientation, and limb dominance on lower limb motor cortex excitability.

Recovery of upper-limb motor impairment after first-ever ischemic stroke is proportional to the degree of initial impairment in patients with a functional corticospinal tract (CST). This study aimed to investigate whether proportional recovery occurs in a more clinically relevant sample including patients with intracerebral hemorrhage and previous stroke.

Proportional Motor Recovery After Stroke: Implications for Trial Design.

Several clinical measures and biomarkers are associated with motor recovery after stroke, but none are used to guide rehabilitation for individual patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the implementation of upper limb predictions in stroke rehabilitation, by combining clinical measures and biomarkers using the Predict Recovery Potential (PREP) algorithm.

Predicting Recovery Potential for Individual Stroke Patients Increases Rehabilitation Efficiency.

In people with preserved corticospinal tract (CST) function after stroke, upper limb impairment resolves by ≈70% within 3 months. This is known as the proportional recovery rule. Patients without CST function do not fit this rule and have worse upper limb outcomes. This study investigated resolution of motor impairment in the lower limb (LL).

Proportional Recovery From Lower Limb Motor Impairment After Stroke.

Recovery of motor function is important for regaining independence after stroke, but difficult to predict for individual patients. Our aim was to develop an efficient, accurate, and accessible algorithm for use in clinical settings. Clinical, neurophysiological, and neuroimaging biomarkers of corticospinal integrity obtained within days of stroke were combined to predict likely upper limb motor outcomes 3 months after stroke.

PREP2: A biomarker-based algorithm for predicting upper limb function after stroke.

There is growing interest in using biomarkers to predict motor recovery and outcomes after stroke. The PREP2 algorithm combines clinical assessment with biomarkers in an algorithm, to predict upper limb functional outcomes for individual patients. To date, PREP2 is the first algorithm to be tested in clinical practice, and other biomarker-based algorithms are likely to follow.

Marie-Claire Smith

Department of Medicine,
Centre for Brain Research

University of Auckland

Determining the Functional Status of the Corticospinal Tract Within One Week of Stroke

Marie-Claire Smith

Department of Medicine,Centre for Brain Research

University of Auckland

Determining the Functional Status of the Corticospinal Tract Within One Week of Stroke

Department of Medicine,
Centre for Brain Research