Войдите в систему

A market with observable quality allows both buyers and sellers to clearly assess the quality of goods being traded. This transparency enables both parties to make informed decisions, as they can evaluate the product’s condition, age, functionality, and appearance, leading to more accurate pricing and benefits for both sides. In economics, the terms "plums" and "lemons" are used to describe high- and low-quality products in such markets, where quality strongly impacts transaction benefits.

In the used car market, for example, plums represent high-quality cars, while lemons represent lower-quality cars. Low-quality cars may be recognizable due to visible damage from accidents, such as dents, paint mismatches, or frame damage, which affects both their appearance and safety. Conversely, high-quality cars are also identifiable in such a market. They typically have a clean accident history and a well-maintained exterior, free from dents or rust.

When quality is observable to both buyers and sellers, it influences the transaction dynamics as both parties align on the car's value.

For ease of analysis, it is assumed that plums and lemons each constitute half. The transparency of quality impacts price and value alignment. For high-quality cars, or plums, buyers are willing to pay $20,000. Sellers, who value plums at $16,000, set a price between $16,000 and $20,000. This price range benefits both parties: buyers purchase plums below their valuation, while sellers profit by selling above their minimum acceptable value.

For lemons, buyers are willing to pay $8,000, while sellers value them at $6,000. With quality being observable, lemons trade within a range of $6,000 to $8,000, allowing buyers to acquire the car for less than their valuation and sellers to receive more than their valuation.

Benefits of Observable Quality

With quality transparency, the market operates efficiently as transactions reflect mutual benefit. Buyers confidently pay for plums knowing they match the expected quality, while sellers gain from pricing that reflects higher-quality goods. For lemons, buyers adjust their expectations and payments to account for lower quality, preserving value alignment.

This scenario highlights the efficiency of markets with observable quality, which aligns buyers’ and sellers’ interests and ensures transactions that benefit both buyers and sellers.

Из главы 17:

article

Now Playing

17.2 : Observable Quality

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

15 Просмотры

article

17.1 : Complete Information and Asymmetric Information: Meaning

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

24 Просмотры

article

17.3 : The Lemons Problem: Sellers Have More Information

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

8 Просмотры

article

17.4 : The Lemons Problem: Adverse Selection in the Market for Used Cars

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

16 Просмотры

article

17.5 : Mitigating Lemons Problem I: Reducing Asymmetric Information

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

11 Просмотры

article

17.6 : Mitigating Lemons Problem II: Increasing the Average Quality in the Market

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

8 Просмотры

article

17.7 : Mitigating Lemons Problem III: Truthful Quality Reporting

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

9 Просмотры

article

17.8 : Adverse Selection When Buyers Have More Information: The Market for Insurance

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

9 Просмотры

article

17.9 : Mitigating Adverse Selection in the Market for Insurance

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

9 Просмотры

article

17.10 : Moral Hazard

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

12 Просмотры

article

17.11 : Moral Hazard in the Market for Insurance

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

10 Просмотры

article

17.12 : Moral Hazard in the Banking Sector

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

7 Просмотры

article

17.13 : Mitigating Moral Hazard

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

10 Просмотры

article

17.14 : Principal-Agent Relationships

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

9 Просмотры

article

17.15 : Incentives in the Principal-Agent Relationship

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

9 Просмотры

JoVE Logo

Исследования

Образование

О JoVE

Авторские права © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Все права защищены