Sign In

Leasing is a vital financial mechanism enabling businesses to acquire assets without substantial initial capital expenditure. Traditionally, leases were classified as off-balance-sheet transactions, allowing lessees to report lease obligations solely in the footnotes of financial statements. This approach minimized the appearance of liabilities on financial reports, creating an illusion of lower debt levels and stronger financial health.

In 1976, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) established new guidelines requiring certain leases to be recognized on the balance sheet. These were termed capital leases, necessitating that the present value of lease payments be recorded as both an asset and a liability. Meanwhile, operating leases remained off-balance-sheet items.

For a lease to qualify as a capital lease under the previous standards, it had to meet at least one of the following conditions: (1) transfer of ownership at the lease’s end, (2) the existence of a bargain purchase option, (3) lease duration covering a significant portion of the asset’s useful life, (4) lease payments approximating or exceeding the asset’s fair value, or (5) the asset being highly specialized for the lessee’s use.

In 2019, the FASB introduced updated lease accounting standards under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 842, requiring lessees to recognize both operating and finance leases on the balance sheet. This reform aimed to curb off-balance-sheet financing and enhance financial transparency.

Under the new guidelines, lessees must record a right-of-use (ROU) asset and a corresponding lease liability for all lease obligations exceeding 12 months. The distinction between finance and operating leases remains relevant for income statement presentation. Finance leases recognize interest and amortization expenses separately, whereas operating leases report a single lease expense.

These regulatory changes have significantly improved the accuracy of financial reporting, offering investors and stakeholders a clearer understanding of a company's financial position. By reducing the potential for accounting manipulation, the revised standards enhance comparability and foster more informed decision-making in financial markets.

From Chapter 17:

article

Now Playing

17.8 : Accounting and Leasing

Leasing

4 Views

article

17.1 : Leases and Lease Types

Leasing

5 Views

article

17.2 : Leasing vs. Buying

Leasing

10 Views

article

17.3 : Operating Leases

Leasing

2 Views

article

17.4 : Financial Leases

Leasing

2 Views

article

17.5 : Tax-Advantaged Leases

Leasing

13 Views

article

17.6 : Leveraged Leases

Leasing

18 Views

article

17.7 : Sale and Leaseback Agreements

Leasing

2 Views

article

17.9 : Taxes, the IRS, and Leases

Leasing

4 Views

article

17.10 : The Cash Flows from Leasing

Leasing

4 Views

article

17.11 : The Incremental Cash Flows

Leasing

2 Views

article

17.12 : Financial Decision-Making in Leasing

Leasing

8 Views

article

17.13 : Three Potential Pitfalls

Leasing

3 Views

article

17.14 : NPV Analysis

Leasing

5 Views

article

17.15 : A Misconception in Financial Decision-Making: Leasing vs. Buying

Leasing

3 Views

See More

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved