A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Method Article
* These authors contributed equally
A reference interferometer technique, which is designed to remove undesirable laser jitter noise for nanodetection, is utilized for probing an ultra-high quality factor microcavity. Instructions for assembly, setup, and data acquisition are provided, alongside the measurement process for specifying the cavity quality factor.
A thermally and mechanically stabilized fiber interferometer suited for examining ultra-high quality factor microcavities is fashioned. After assessing its free spectral range (FSR), the module is put in parallel with a fiber taper-microcavity system and then calibrated through isolating and eliminating random shifts in the laser frequency (i.e. laser jitter noise). To realize the taper-microcavity junction and to maximize the optical power that is transferred to the resonator, a single-mode optical fiber waveguide is pulled. Solutions containing polystyrene nanobeads are then prepared and flown to the microcavity in order to demonstrate the system’s ability to sense binding to the surface of the microcavity. Data is post-processed via adaptive curve fitting, which allows for high-resolution measurements of the quality factor as well as the plotting of time-dependent parameters, such as resonant wavelength and split frequency shifts. By carefully inspecting steps in the time-domain response and shifting in the frequency-domain response, this instrument can quantify discrete binding events.
Research interest has risen significantly on the use of whispering-gallery mode (WGM) microcavities for the purpose of nanodetection and biosensing1-8. This involves ultra-high quality factor (Q) optical cavities that are proficient in identifying miniscule biological particles, down to the single-protein level2. That is, monitoring shifts in resonance and split frequency for transmission with extraordinary sensitivity9-11 can be enabled by the cavity’s confinement of light energy within a small mode volume. Variations in the optical properties of a resonator are the cause of these shifts, which in turn originate from the binding of discrete molecules or nanoparticles. A less sophisticated example of a three-dimensional WGM structure for such applications is a silica microsphere, which can be fabricated with a near atomically smooth surface by simply ablating a drawn optical fiber using a CO2 laser. As is known, high Q-factors on the order of 109 can be attained1.
The resonant frequency of a microcavity is conventionally monitored by scanning the optical frequency of a tunable laser source while simultaneously photo-detecting the optical transmission that is captured on an oscilloscope. An inherent drawback of this technique is the uncertainty associated with the location of drops in the transmission that arises from fluctuating laser wavelength or laser jitter. To overcome this complication, an interferometer can be used alongside a microcavity to produce a reference signal to cancel the laser jitter and increase the observed sensitivity2. Light input is split into two optical paths: the reference beam that passes through the interferometer (with a free spectral range or FSR large enough to prevent the laser from jittering past one FSR frequency spacing during measurement) and the detection beam that interacts with the WGM microresonator. This feature streamlines experiments in comparison to more advanced configurations, such as that of WGM sensing entailing the combination of a distributed feedback laser (DFB) and periodically poled lithium niobate (PPLN) doubler12. In this publication, an interferometer technique for ultra-high quality factor microcavity based monitoring of nanoscale matter is described3. The setup and data acquisition procedures that are required to accomplish this are outlined, illustrating how cavity quality factor can be determined through reference interferometry.
1. Reference Interferometer Construction and FSR Measurement
2. Fiber Pulling13
Preamble: The goal of this procedure is to approximately match the phase of photons travelling in the taper to those of the microcavity so that efficient coupling can occur. As the fiber is pulled, the central section that lies between the two clamps will transition from supporting a single mode within a regular fiber, to multiple modes within a waveguide formed by the original silica cladding becoming the core and air becoming the cladding, and then to a single mode. The silica core of the fiber will virtually vanish in the central section, wherein temporarily satisfied multimode propagation conditions will be counteracted by the continual shrinking of the fiber diameter.
3. Preparation and Delivery of Solutions
4. System Configuration and Interconnections
5. Nanoparticle Detection
To acquire data: Configure the oscilloscope’s trigger settings and, using homemade software, collect oscilloscope traces for further processing.
6. Post-Processing of Data
The collected data can be further processed by a self-written MATLAB program. The program should:
After following the protocol, the traces can be compiled and fitted. Figure 3a shows the typical resonance structure of the microsphere as presented in the video, for which frequency splitting is observed in a DPBS medium. A least-square fit to the double-Lorentzian function indicates that the quality factor of the left and right resonance dips are respectively 2.1 x 108 and 3.8 x 108 in an aqueous environment. The optical frequencies of the FWHM are obtained by comparing the cavity...
This current setup is capable of probing a variety of WGM microcavities, such as microdisks, microspheres, and microtoroids, without requiring any feedback control for the probe laser source. A considerable signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for detection can be obtained due to the step shift enhancements provided by path length and particle-induced backscattering effects. Given the simplicity and low cost of the reference interferometer itself, this method is an efficient technique for studying or exploiting the properties of ...
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The authors would like to thank Xuan Du for constructing the conceptual diagram of Figure 1. This work was funded by grants from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Polystyrene Microspheres | PolyScience | ||
Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline (DPBS) | Life Technologies | 14190 | |
Piezoelectric Nanopositioner System | Physik Instrumente | P-611.3S | |
Balanced Photodetector | Thorlabs | PDB120A | |
Photodetector | Newport | 1801-FC | |
3 dB Fiber Optical Directional Coupler | Thorlabs | FC632-50B | |
10 dB Fiber Optical Directional Coupler | Thorlabs | FC632-90B | |
Drop-In Polarization Controller | General Photonics | PLC-003-S-25 | |
Function Generator | Hewlett-Packard | 33120A | |
Fusion Splicer | Ericsson | FSU-925 | |
High-Speed Oscilloscope | Agilent | DS09404A | |
Motorized Translation Stage with Controller | Thorlabs | MTS25-Z8E | |
Single Mode Optical Fiber, 600-800 nm, Ø125 μm Cladding | Thorlabs | SM600 | |
Real-Time Electrical Spectrum Analyzer | Tektronix | RSA3408B | |
Optical Spectrum Analyzer | Agilent | 70951A | |
632.5 – 637 nm Tunable Laser | New Focus | TLB-6304 | |
Filtration Pump | KNF | ||
Ultrasonic Cleaner | Crest Ultrasonics | Powersonic 1100D | |
Mini Vortexer | VWR | VM-3000 | |
Centrifuge | Beckman Coulter | Microfuge 22R |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved