A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Method Article
* These authors contributed equally
We describe a procedure for the detection of chemical elements present in situ in human cells as well as their in vitro quantification. The method is well-suited to any cell type and is particularly useful for quantitative chemical analyses in single cells following in vitro metal oxide nanoparticles exposure.
Micro-analytical techniques based on chemical element imaging enable the localization and quantification of chemical composition at the cellular level. They offer new possibilities for the characterization of living systems and are particularly appropriate for detecting, localizing and quantifying the presence of metal oxide nanoparticles both in biological specimens and the environment. Indeed, these techniques all meet relevant requirements in terms of (i) sensitivity (from 1 up to 10 µg.g-1 of dry mass), (ii) micrometer range spatial resolution, and (iii) multi-element detection. Given these characteristics, microbeam chemical element imaging can powerfully complement routine imaging techniques such as optical and fluorescence microscopy. This protocol describes how to perform a nuclear microprobe analysis on cultured cells (U2OS) exposed to titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Cells must grow on and be exposed directly in a specially designed sample holder used on the optical microscope and in the nuclear microprobe analysis stages. Plunge-freeze cryogenic fixation of the samples preserves both the cellular organization and the chemical element distribution. Simultaneous nuclear microprobe analysis (scanning transmission ion microscopy, Rutherford backscattering spectrometry and particle induced X-ray emission) performed on the sample provides information about the cellular density, the local distribution of the chemical elements, as well as the cellular content of nanoparticles. There is a growing need for such analytical tools within biology, especially in the emerging context of Nanotoxicology and Nanomedicine for which our comprehension of the interactions between nanoparticles and biological samples must be deepened. In particular, as nuclear microprobe analysis does not require nanoparticles to be labelled, nanoparticle abundances are quantifiable down to the individual cell level in a cell population, independently of their surface state.
Cellular homeostasis is determined by the uptake control, assimilation, and intracellular localization of different trace elements (ions, metals, exogenous inorganic compounds). These components are frequently in the form of traces, but nevertheless may have a considerable impact in the system physiology. Thus, the study of cell biochemistry in both normal and pathological/stressed situations is a key-step towards an overall understanding of cellular metabolic mechanisms. Therefore, the development of imaging and analytical techniques enabling the investigation of intracellular chemical abundances, structural organization and their related metabolic functions becomes necessary. Very few methods are able to provide an in situ quantitative piece of information concerning the overall chemical nature of a given sample. Apart from methods analyzing samples in the bulk form, in situ analyses consider biological samples in their integrality without losing mass and structural information, thereby preserving their constituent chemicals (trace elements and ions) and proteins. Furthermore, as the nanosciences continue to develop, improved imaging and analytical methods for environmental monitoring at the cellular scale will be necessary to observe and quantify nano-object behaviors and interactions.1
Nanoparticles (NPs) have been defined as objects exhibiting at least one facial dimension in the range 1 and 100 nm.2 Due to their particular physicochemical properties, NPs are extensively used in industry. NPs are employed in bio-applications and in nanomedicine.3,4 Despite the numerous physicochemical characteristics of NPs, they may generate some risks of adverse effects on human health and environment. These risks can be induced by both prolonged and repetitive exposures at various concentration levels and this has not yet been clearly established.5,6,7,8 In particular, the fate of NPs inside cells and the associated cellular responses are, to date, not fully described. This is in part due to the scarcity of methods that allow the detection and quantification of internalized NPs in a single cell.9
The classical analytical tools used to estimate the cellular dose of nanoparticles are microscopies, mass spectrometry (MS), inductively coupled plasma MS (ICP-MS)10,11 and liquid chromatography MS (LC-MS), but they only provide useful information at the macroscopic scale. None of them can provide a precise evaluation of the subcellular NPs content nor the NPs distribution without the use of fractionation methods. A systematic assessment of the dose-response is thus impossible with these methods, as opposed to methods based on atomic spectroscopy such as nuclear microprobe analysis12,13, synchrotron X-ray fluorescence microscopy14, and Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS).15,16 These methods are particularly interesting as they complement observations made using fluorescence microscopy, especially when NPs cannot be labeled with fluorescent molecules and are thus studied in their native state. To some extent, even when NPs are grafted with fluorophores, (i) quantification remains difficult because the tagging level per NP is unknown and (ii) the chemical modification of the NP surface may modify its cellular distribution.
In this article, we focus on a method based on a combination of nuclear microprobe techniques aiming at imaging the morphology and elemental composition of biological specimens in major, minor, and trace concentrations.
Nuclear microprobe analysis proves to be particularly suitable for the measurement of trace chemical elements in biological tissues. Both the beam lateral resolution (0.3 to 1 µm) and sensitivity in chemical element detection (from 1 to 10 µg.g-1 dry mass) are well suited for studies at the cellular level. Nuclear microprobe techniques are based on particles detection (photons, electrons, ions) emitted after the ion beam (typically running at MeV energies) interacts with atoms present in the sample. Interactions occurring in cells are mainly: 1) excitation/ionization of atoms followed by an emission of photons after atoms return to their fundamental state; and 2) diffusion of incoming particles leading to change in their energy and direction. The measurement of emitted particle energy allowsthe identification of atoms involved in the interaction. To perform mapping of elements, the ion microbeam is repeatedly scanned over the sample surface, often over an area of about 100 by 100 µm2 containing several cells. Emitted particles are detected and their energy is recorded for each beam position. Sorting of particles according to the beam position, thus identifying the structure responsible for the emission of such particles is the aim of data treatment. Here, we precisely describe an approach based on fluorescence microscopy and nuclear microprobe analysis to detect as well as to quantify exogenous NPs at the cellular and sub-cellular scales, in order to investigate the consequences of NP interactions with living systems. We shall particularly focus on the opportunities offered by this method in terms of in situ quantification of titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2 NPs) aggregates at the subcellular level.
1. Sample Holder Preparation
2. Growth of Cells in the Appropriate Sample Holder.
Caution: Protocol must be carried out in a biosafety laminar flow bench (Class II) to exclude contaminating micro-organisms. Handle antibiotics (e.g. penicillin, streptomycin) with gloves. Respect best practices when handling biological materials (Cell lines, genetically modified derived human cells).
Critical: The cell lines used should be checked to ensure that they are not infected with Mycoplasma.
3. Nanoparticles Preparation and Exposure
NOTE: Fluorescent dye-modified TiO2 NPs were designed, synthesized, and chemically modified with tetramethyl rhodamine isothiocyanate (TRITC).20,21 This surface modification allows nanoparticle detection, tracking and localization in situ and in cellulo in both living and fixed cells or in multicellular organisms.12,13,18
Caution: Nanomaterials and Nanoparticles must be handled with care. Avoid inhalation, ingestion or contact with skin. To prevent dissemination in air, nanoparticles are maintained in solution (ultrapure water).
4. Paraformaldehyde fixation and fluorescence microscopy.
5. "Plunge-Freezing" Fixation and Dehydration
6. Nuclear Microprobe Analysis
NOTE: Nuclear Microprobe Analysis was carried out at the microbeam line of AIFIRA (Applications Interdisciplinaires des Faisceaux d'Ions en Région Aquitaine) using the complementary ion beam analytical techniques Particle Induced X-ray Emission (µ-PIXE) and Scanning Transmission Ion Microscopy (µ-STIM). The facility is based on a 3.5 MV particle accelerator delivering light ion beams in the MeV energy range.22,23
Pause point: AIFIRA is an ion beam facility hosted by the University of Bordeaux that offers an access to national and international teams after scientific evaluation of the proposed experiment.
7. Data analysis
Cell culture and fluorescence imaging of fluorescently labeled TiO2 NPs
We designed a sample holder adapted for cell culture, cell handling as well as multimodal analysis. Specifically, it was important that the holder permitted routine optical microscopy as well as nuclear microprobe analysis and imaging. This sample holder is based on a 2-µm thick polycarbonate...
We describe a method providing useful information beyond what is possible with other imaging techniques, especially at the subcellular level. In addition to its imaging ability, nuclear microprobe analysis also offers possibilities of quantification of chemical elements entering in the composition of a biological sample. In the present work, we studied human cell populations and focused down to the analysis of a chosen region of interest based on a single cell exposed to TiO2 NPs. Its combination with other te...
The authors have nothing to disclose.
We thank Serge Borderes for directing and editing of the video. The French National Research Agency supports the research program TITANIUMS (ANR CES 2010, n° CESA 009 01). The CNRS and the European Community as an Integrating activity provided the "Support of Public and Industrial Research Using Ion Beam Technology (SPIRIT)" under the EC contract n° 227012. This work has been supported by Marie Curie Actions - Initial Training Networks (ITN) as an "Integrating Activity Supporting Postgraduate Research with Internships in Industry and Training Excellence" (SPRITE, D1.3) under EC contract no. 317169. The C'NANO Grand Sud Ouest and the Region Aquitaine support the research program TOX-NANO (n°20111201003) and the research program POPRA (n° 14006636-034).
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Cell culture | |||
U2OS | ATCC, LGC STANDARDS | ATCC HTB-96 | |
Medium MCCOY 5A w/o L-Glutamine | Dominique DUTSCHER | L0211-500 | |
FBS 500 mL | Dominique DUTSCHER | 500105U | |
Penicillin/Streptomycin | ThermoFisher Scientific | 11548876 | |
L-Glutamine 200 mM, 100 mL | Invitrogen | 25030024 | |
Geneticin, 20 mL | ThermoFisher Scientific | 10092772 | |
Trypsin-EDTA 0.25% (v/v) 500 mL | ThermoFisher Scientific | 11570626 | |
Viromer Red | Lipocalyx | VR-01LB-01 | |
Matrix-roGFP Plasmid | AddGene | #49437 | |
Hoechst 33342 | ThermoFisher Scientific | H3570 | Handle with care |
NPs preparation | |||
TiO2 P25 AEROXIDE | Degussa/Evonik | ||
Tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate (TRITC) | SIGMA-ALDRICH | T3163 | Surface modification of NPs |
Sample preparation | |||
Polycarbonate foil | Goodfellow | CT301020 | |
Polyether Ether Ketone support (PEEK) | Matechplast | A-239-4047 | |
Ethanol, ACS absolute | SIGMA-ALDRICH | 02860-6x1L | |
Chlorform, Anhydrous, 99% | SIGMA-ALDRICH | 372978-1L | Caution toxic |
Formvar 100 g | Agar Scientific | AGR1201 | Harmful. Use in a concentration of 10 µg per mL of chloroform |
NaOH | SIGMA-ALDRICH | S5881-500G | |
Sample fixation | |||
Powder, 95% Paraformaldehyde | SIGMA-ALDRICH | 158127-500G | Caution toxic. Use as a 4% solution in PBS |
PBS (pH 7.4, without Ca2+ and Mg2+) | ThermoFisher Scientific | 11503387 | |
Prolong Gold Antifade Reagent | ThermoFisher Scientific | P36934 | |
Triton X-100 | SIGMA-ALDRICH | 93443 | Harmful |
Sample cryofixation | |||
Liquid nitrogen | air liquids sante | Harmful | |
Methylbutane >=99% | SIGMA-ALDRICH | M32631-1L | Caution toxic |
Aluminium transfer plate | Home-made | ||
Distilled and deionized water | Home-made | Produced in the laboratory using the Barnstead Smart2Pure system | |
Parafilm | VWR | 52858-000 | |
Equipment | |||
Barnstead Smart2Pure | ThermoFisher Scientific | 50129870 | |
Biosafety bench, class II | ThermoFisher Scientific | MSC-Advantage | |
TC20 automated cell counter | Biorad | 145-0102SP | |
Counting slides 2 wells | Biorad | 1450016 | |
PIPS detector, 25 mm2, 12 keV energy resolution @5.5 MeV | Canberra | PD25-12-100AM | |
High-resolution Si (Li) solid-state detector,145-eVenergy resolution, @Mn-Kα | Oxford Instruments | ||
Everhart-Thornley type secondary electron detector (SED) | Orsay Physics | 1-SED | |
XRF Calibration Standard sodium or Chlorine as NaCl | Micromatter | 34381 | |
XRF Calibration Standard Magnesium as MgF2 | Micromatter | 34382 | |
XRF Calibration Standard Aluminium as Al metal | Micromatter | 34383 | |
XRF Calibration Standard Silicon as SiO | Micromatter | 34384 | |
XRF Calibration Standard Sulfur as CuSx | Micromatter | 34385 | |
XRF Calibration Standard Calcium as CaF2 | Micromatter | 34387 | |
XRF Calibration Standard Titanium as Ti metal | Micromatter | 34388 | |
XRF Calibration Standard Iron as Fe metal | Micromatter | 34389 | |
Sonicator 750W | Sonics Materials | 11743619 | |
3MM microprobe | Bioblock scientific | 220-05 | |
Lyophilizer in vacuum | Elexience | EK3147 | |
Optical microscope Zeiss AxioObserver Z1 | Carl Zeiss MicroImaging, GmbH | 431006-9901 | |
Motorized stage xy | Carl Zeiss MicroImaging, GmbH | 432031-9902 | |
EC Plan-Neofluar 20X, NA 0.50 Ph2 M27 objective | Carl Zeiss MicroImaging, GmbH | 420351-9910 | |
Plan-Apochromat 63X, NA 1,40 Ph3M27 objective | Carl Zeiss MicroImaging, GmbH | 420781-9910 | |
Zeiss filterset 02 | Carl Zeiss MicroImaging, GmbH | 488002-9901 | |
Zeiss filterset 38HE | Carl Zeiss MicroImaging, GmbH | 489038-9901 | |
Zeiss filterset 31 | Carl Zeiss MicroImaging, GmbH | 000000-1031-350 | |
Chemical fume hood | Erlab | Captair SD321 | |
Particle accelerator | HVEE | singletron | |
Software | |||
ImageJ software | National Institutes of health, USA | ImageJ 1.51 | |
SimNRA software | Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, Germany | SIMNRA 6.06 | |
Gupix software | Guelph university, Canada | GUPIXWIN 2.2.4 |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved