A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Method Article
Here we describe and compare two positions for obtaining the apical four-chamber view in mice. These positions enable the quantification of the right ventricular function, provide comparable results, and can be used interchangeably.
Diastolic dysfunction is a prominent feature of right ventricular (RV) remodeling associated with conditions of pressure overload. However, the RV diastolic function is rarely quantified in experimental studies. This might be due to technical difficulties in the visualization of the RV in the apical four-chamber view in rodents. Here we describe two positions facilitating the visualization of the apical four-chamber view in mice to assess the RV diastolic function.
The apical four-chamber view is enabled by tilting the mouse fixation platform to the left and caudally (LeCa) or to the right and cranially (RiCr). Both positions provide images of comparable quality. The results of the RV diastolic function obtained from two positions are not significantly different. Both positions are comparably easy to perform. This protocol can be incorporated into published protocols and enables detailed investigations of the RV function.
Diastolic dysfunction is a prominent feature of right ventricular (RV) remodeling1 and is associated with pressure-overload conditions2. Echocardiography (EchoCG) can be used for the characterization of RV diastolic dysfunction3,4. Despite recent developments in small animal echocardiography, measurements of diastolic parameters are rarely reported. In contrast, measurements of the systolic function are widely used for the characterization of transgenic mice5, as well as for the evaluation of a treatment response6.
This can be partly explained by the difficulties in the measurement of diastolic parameters from the apical four-chamber view. Visualization of the heart in this position can be facilitated by tilting the fixation platform LeCa or RiCr. Even if these manipulations are used, echocardiographers do not report them in their manuscripts4,7. Therefore, it remains unclear whether these manipulations provide comparable results. Moreover, this also precludes a development of standardized nomenclature of this position for mice.
The aim of this study was to describe two positions for apical four-chamber view visualization and compare their results. To determine the differences between the two positions, we have utilized the mouse pulmonary artery banding (PAB) model, in which a tantalum clip leads to a partial occlusion of the pulmonary artery. This occlusion results in right ventricle remodeling and dysfunction. Full details of the PAB operation can be found in previously published work3. Sham-operated mice, where the clip was placed next to the pulmonary artery, were used for comparison. EchoCG investigations were performed three weeks post-operation using the imaging system with a 30 MHz scan head (see Table of Materials for both). Nomenclature for the description of the positions and orientations between the mouse and the ultrasound beam is used as described by Zhou et al.7.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The study was performed according to national regulations for animal experimentation and EU Directive 2010/63. Prepare equipment as described previously by Brittain et al.8.
1. Mouse Preparation
2. Image Acquisition
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The apical four-chamber view is difficult to obtain in mice. Therefore, manipulations of the platform position can help to visualize the heart by changing its position in the thorax. The tilting of the platform to the left and to the right improved the acoustic window and provided images of comparable quality in B-mode (Figure 1). After obtaining the correct positions, measurements in PW-, M-, and TDI-modes provided images of comparable quality (
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The echocardiographic RV function and dimension assessment from parasternal positions have been well described. In contrast, the apical position in mouse echocardiography has been neglected partly due to technical difficulties. Using a horizontal platform position, it is difficult to obtain a sufficient acoustic window for four-chamber view imaging. To facilitate the imaging of this position, the platform can be tilted to the left, a manipulation similar to the left-sided positioning of patients. This should result in a ...
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The study was funded by the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Lung Vascular Research.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
RMV-707B scan head 30 MHz | Visual Sonics | P/N 11459 | mouse scan head |
VisualSonics Vevo 770® High-Resolution Imaging System | Visual Sonics | 770-230 | ultrasound machine |
Veet depilation creme for sensitive skin | Veet | 07768307 | |
Surgical tape Durapore 3M | 3M Deutschland GmbH | 1538-1 | for fixation |
Askina Brauncel cellulose swabs | B.Braun | 9051015 | |
Aquasonic ultrasound gel | Parker Laboratories Inc. | BT025-0037L | |
Electrode Gel | GE medical systems information technologies Inc. | 2034731-002 | apply to extremities for countinous ECG and heart rate monitoring |
Thermasonic gel warmer | Parker Laboratories Inc. | 82-04-20 | to reduce heat loss warm up the ultrasound gel before use |
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved