JoVE Logo

Sign In

A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

This protocol describes the use of 3D planning and printing for reconstruction of bony defects. We use segmentation tools to create 3D models followed by 3D design software to create patient specific implants for reconstruction purposes concomitant to ablative surgery or as a second stage.

Abstract

We are in the midst of the 3D era in most aspects of life, and especially in medicine. The surgical discipline is one of the major players in the medical field using the constantly developing 3D planning and printing capabilities. Computer-assisted design (CAD) and computer assisted manufacturing (CAM) are used to describe the 3D planning and manufacturing of the product. The planning and manufacturing of 3D surgical guides and reconstruction implants is performed almost exclusively by engineers. As technology advances and software interfaces become more user-friendly, it raises a question regarding the possibility of transferring the planning and manufacturing to the clinician. The reasons for such a shift are clear: the surgeon has the idea of what he wants to design, and he also knows what is feasible and could be used in the operating room. It allows him to be prepared for any scenario/unexpected results during the operation and allows the surgeon to be creative and express his new ideas using the CAD software. The purpose of this method is to provide clinicians with the ability to create their own surgical guides and reconstruction implants. In this manuscript, a detailed protocol will provide a simple method for segmentation using segmentation software and implant planning using a 3D design software. Following the segmentation and stl file production using segmentation software, the clinician could create a simple patient specific reconstruction plate or a more complex plate with a cradle for bone graft positioning. Surgical guides can be created for accurate resection, hole preparation for proper reconstruction plate positioning or for bone graft harvesting and re-contouring. A case of lower jaw reconstruction following plate fracture and nonunion healing of a trauma sustained injury is detailed.

Introduction

Personalized medicine is developing rapidly in many fields of medicine1. Oncologic personalized treatment is a subject of much discussion and thus is well known to the general population. 3D printing was first introduced by Charles Hull showing 3D printing of objects using stereolithography2. Since then, different technologies for 3D printing were developed. The method used is selected based on the purpose of the device.

The surgical field is rapidly embracing personalized medicine. Personalized treatment in the surgical field requires virtual planning using a computer-assisted design (CAD) software. The first stage always includes segmentation to create a 3D stl file. Computer assisted manufacturing (CAM) is referred as the manufacturing process of the 3D designed part. The first utilization of the technology was used in pre-operative model printing for surgical planning and mock surgery3,4,5. With the development of technology, virtual planning of the surgeries followed by the planning and manufacturing of surgical guides to assist in the surgery itself and patient specific reconstruction implants fitted perfectly on the bone of the patient became more popular6,7,8,9,10. The purpose of this protocol is to provide clinicians with the ability to create their own surgical guides and reconstruction patient specific implants. This method is more accurate than using stock plates because it fits perfectly and can be designed based on the characteristics of the specific defect. It also reduces the dependency on the surgeon's experience and reduces operation time.

Protocol

This study followed the Declaration of Helsinki on medical protocol and ethics and the Institutional Ethical Review Board approved the study.

1. Segmentation using a segmentation software

NOTE: The import process of the DICOM files requires the orientation of the axial, coronal and sagittal planes in the pop-up window to finish the setup.

  1. In the Bone Segmentation menu, choose the General feature. Use the marker "-" for unwanted segments and "+" for the segment of interest. Add markers on the 3D reconstructed model or on the different cross sections when scrolling and moving throughout the scan.
  2. Choose the Set button that demonstrates the segmentation. At this point, correct the markings and add new ones for better accuracy. Press Apply to create the new segment. Multiple segments can be created this way.
  3. After segmentation is complete, export the files as stl 3D files for 3D printing or planning of 3D reconstruction implants in 3D design CAD programs.

2. Designing reconstruction implants using 3D design software

  1. After preforming the bone segmentation using the segmentation software, import the stl files into the 3D design software (see Table of Materials).
  2. If further separation is needed (e.g., if one part is intended to be moved separately), do so here. In the Sculpt Clay menu, use the shave tool to separate the bone into two parts. In the Select/Move Clay menu, select the clay and mark the part to work on. Then, copy this part and create a new identical object in the object list in order to manipulate its position as observed in the next stage.
  3. Perform segment movement at this stage. Make sure that the axis of rotation is set on the part of the bone to stay in the same position. In the Select/Move Clay menu, select Reposition and set the rotation axis as planned.
  4. As the human skull is mostly symmetrical, use the healthy side for guidance to obtain the right positioning/replacement of the missing/mal-positioned segment. Use a mirroring technique to create a mirroring image of the normal side. In the Construct Clay menu, use the Mirror Clay option and set the plane at the center of the skull.
  5. Based on the mirrored half, perform segment rotation if needed and reconstruct the avulsed bony part using the Add Clay tool in the Construct Clay menu. This reconstruction is performed in order to build a patient specific reconstruction implant in the next stages, which will reconstruct the correct facial contour.
  6. After reconstructing the bony segment, create the patient specific reconstruction implant. In the Curves menu, use the Draw Curve option and create a continuous outer shape of the desired implant.
  7. At this stage, duplicate the bony segment as it will be needed to perform a Boolean function to separate the constructed implant. This is performed in the object list window by right clicking the segment and pressing the Duplicate option.
  8. Work in the new duplicated segment. In the Detail Clay menu, use the Emboss With Curve option to create the volume of the reconstruction implant. Pick the outer form of the sketched implant, and then place the circle-shaped cursor inside the sketched implant, on the surface of the bone. Note that the emboss will work outwards or on the inside of the bone, depending on the placement of the cursor. Then, choose the desired parameters - most importantly, the distance option that controls the thickness of the implant.
  9. Separate the implant from the bony segment. In the object list, choose the previously duplicated object from step 2.7, right-click and select Boolean → Remove From. Then choose the object containing the created implant.
  10. In case holes for screw fixation or for allowing angiogenesis are required, select Planes Category → Create Plane to create a parallel plane in which the holes for the plate are designed. Using manual manipulation, place the planes in maximum parallelism to the implant. In the Sketch menu, choose a circle and create circles in the desired size and position. A second larger circle can be created, which will serve as the countersink for the head of the intendent screw.
  11. In the Curves menu, use the Project Sketch option and choose the sketches designated to be transferred from the plane to the implant.
  12. To generate the countersink for the screws, In the Detail Clay menu, use the Emboss With Curve option. Pick the outer circles of the sketch, place the circle-shaped cursor inside the marked circular area on the surface and enter the distance that controls the depths of the countersink (e.g., 0.3 mm). To complete the process, press Apply and Lower to make sure that the emboss is performed in a subtraction manner and not an additive one.
  13. To complete the holes, in the SubD Surfaces menu, use the Wire Cut SubD option to create rods perpendicular to the implant based on the small circles created in step 2.10.
  14. To create the holes using the rods, use Boolean > Remove From as in step 2.9. Choose one rod after the other, right click in the object list → Boolean → Remove From → Created Implant.
    NOTE: Alternatively, the desired screws can be created/scanned and the Boolean function can be used to create the desired holes.
  15. To create a mesh in the implant (allowing for angiogenesis for instance), first generate a sketch (using the curve option) of the planned mesh as in step 2.6.
    1. In the Detail Clay menu, use the Emboss with Wrapped Image option. Choose an image according to which the mesh will be created (there are several templates which come with the program). The white parts of the image will be subtracted in the mesh, and the black parts will be spared.
    2. Using manual control, adjust the direction and size of the design. Set the distance that represents the thickness of the holes generated and press Apply. The patient specific implant is ready for production.

Results

A 40 year old female patient with a broken, stock supplied, reconstruction fixation plate from a previous injury and a non-union fracture in the left body of her lower jaw presented to the department. Imaging shows the broken fixation plate and the mal-positioned left segment of the lower jaw (Figure 1). Using segmentation software, segmentation of the lower jaw was performed separating the broken fixation plate (Supplemental Figure 1 and

Discussion

With the constant developing use of computers for virtual planning of surgical procedures, the combination with another developing technology, 3D printing, led to a whole new era of surgical treatment. Accuracy is the goal of these technologies and patient specific care, as the future goal, is presented in the form of surgical guides and patient specific reconstruction implants. We discuss surgical guides as part of a different future protocol. In the current protocol, we discuss the segmentation of DICOM images into 3D ...

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

No funding was received for this work.

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
D2P (DICOM to Print)3D systemsSegmentation software to create 3D stl files
Geomagic Freeform3D systemsSculpted Engineering Design

References

  1. Goodsaid, F., Frueh, F., Burczynski, M. E., Hock, F., Gralinski, M. Personalized Medicine. Drug Discovery and Evaluation: Methods in Clinical Pharmacology. , (2019).
  2. Hull, C. W. Apparatus for production of three-dimensional objects by stereolithography. Google Patents. , (1986).
  3. Petzold, R., Zeilhofer, H. F., Kalender, W. Rapid prototyping technology in medicine--basics and applications. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics. 23 (5), 277-284 (1999).
  4. Schmauss, D., Gerber, N., Sodian, R. Three-dimensional printing of models for surgical planning in patients with primary cardiac tumors. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 145 (5), 1407-1408 (2013).
  5. Tam, M. D., Laycock, S. D., Bell, D., Chojnowski, A. 3-D printout of a DICOM file to aid surgical planning in a 6 year old patient with a large scapular osteochondroma complicating congenital diaphyseal aclasia. Journal of Radiology Case Reports. 6 (1), 31 (2012).
  6. Emodi, O., Shilo, D., Israel, Y., Rachmiel, A. Three-dimensional planning and printing of guides and templates for reconstruction of the mandibular ramus and condyle using autogenous costochondral grafts. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 55 (1), 102-104 (2017).
  7. Leiser, Y., Shilo, D., Wolff, A., Rachmiel, A. Functional reconstruction in mandibular avulsion injuries. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 27 (8), 2113-2116 (2016).
  8. Mazzoni, S., Bianchi, A., Schiariti, G., Badiali, G., Marchetti, C. Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing cutting guides and customized titanium plates are useful in upper maxilla waferless repositioning. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 73 (4), 701-707 (2015).
  9. Rachmiel, A., Shilo, D., Blanc, O., Emodi, O. Reconstruction of complex mandibular defects using integrated dental custom-made titanium implants. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 55 (4), 425-427 (2017).
  10. Xu, N., et al. Reconstruction of the upper cervical spine using a personalized 3D-printed vertebral body in an adolescent with Ewing sarcoma. Spine. 41 (1), E50-E54 (2016).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

3D PlanningPatient specific ImplantsBony DefectsSurgical GuideFixation PlatesVirtual TreatmentAccurate 3D ImagingTissue Anatomy RestorationBone RegenerationComputer assisted DesignSegmentation SoftwareSTL Files3D ReconstructionBone SegmentationMirror Clay Tool

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved