This work was funded by the NIH, grant number R01 AI130085, and the NIH Division of Intramural Research Program: AI001246.

<ol>
	<li>Luckhart, S., Lindsay, S. W., James, A. A., Scott, T. W. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Reframing+critical+needs+in+vector+biology+and+management+of+vector-borne+disease.">Reframing critical needs in vector biology and management of vector-borne disease.</a> PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 4 (2), e566 (2010).</li><li>Marcos-Marcos, J., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=economic+evaluation,+and+sustainability+of+integrated+vector+management+in+urban+settings+to+prevent+vector-borne+diseases:+a+scoping+review.">economic evaluation, and sustainability of integrated vector management in urban settings to prevent vector-borne diseases: a scoping review.</a> Infectious Disease of Poverty. 7 (1), 83 (2018).</li><li>Titus, R. G., Ribeiro, J. M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=The+role+of+vector+saliva+in+transmission+of+arthropod-borne+disease.">The role of vector saliva in transmission of arthropod-borne disease.</a> Parasitology Today. 6 (5), 157-160 (1990).</li><li>Ribeiro, J. M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Blood-feeding+arthropods:+live+syringes+or+invertebrate+pharmacologists.">Blood-feeding arthropods: live syringes or invertebrate pharmacologists.</a> Infect Agents and Disease. 4 (3), 143-152 (1995).</li><li>McManus, K. F., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Population+genetic+analysis+of+the+DARC+locus+(Duffy)+reveals+adaptation+from+standing+variation+associated+with+malaria+resistance+in+humans.">Population genetic analysis of the DARC locus (Duffy) reveals adaptation from standing variation associated with malaria resistance in humans.</a> PLOS Genetics. 13 (3), 1006560 (2017).</li><li>Crampton, J. M., Beard, C. B., Louis, C. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=.">.</a> The molecular biology of insect disease vectors: a methods manual. 1, 3-20 (1997).</li><li>Louradour, I., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Sand+Fly+(Phlebotomus+papatasi)+embryo+microinjection+for+CRISPR/Cas9+mutagenesis.">Sand Fly (Phlebotomus papatasi) embryo microinjection for CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis.</a> Journal of Visualized Experiments. (165), e61924 (2020).</li><li>Sharma, A., Pham, M., Harrell, R. A., Nuss, A. B., Gulia-Nuss, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Embryo+injection+technique+for+gene+editing+in+the+black-legged+tick,+Ixodes+scapularis.">Embryo injection technique for gene editing in the black-legged tick, Ixodes scapularis.</a> Journal of Visualized Experiments. (187), e64142 (2022).</li><li>Benetta, E. D., Chaverra-Rodriguez, D., Rasgon, J. L., Akbari, O. S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Pupal+and+adult+injections+for+RNAi+and+CRISPR+gene+editing+in+Nasonia+vitripennis.">Pupal and adult injections for RNAi and CRISPR gene editing in Nasonia vitripennis.</a> Journal of Visualized Experiments. (166), e61892 (2020).</li><li>Adolfi, A., Lynd, A., Lycett, G. J., James, A. A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Site-directed+&#966;C31-mediated+integration+and+cassette+exchange+in+Anopheles+vectors+of+malaria.">Site-directed &#966;C31-mediated integration and cassette exchange in Anopheles vectors of malaria.</a> Journal of Visualized Experiments. (168), e62146 (2021).</li><li>Poulton, B. C., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Using+the+GAL4-UAS+system+for+functional+genetics+in+Anopheles+gambiae.">Using the GAL4-UAS system for functional genetics in Anopheles gambiae.</a> Journal of Visualized Experiments. (170), e62131 (2021).</li><li>Williams, A., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Quantifying+fitness+costs+in+transgenic+Aedes+aegypti+mosquitoes.">Quantifying fitness costs in transgenic Aedes aegypti mosquitoes.</a> Journal of Visualized Experiments. (199), e65136 (2023).</li></ol>

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Blood-feeding arthropods such as mosquitoes, ticks, and sandflies transmit several medically relevant pathogens, many of which are understudied and lack adequate therapeutics. Therefore, preventing disease transmission often requires targeting the arthropod1. For example, integrated vector management (IVM) is a comprehensive framework that aims to increase the efficacy of traditional vector control methods, such as insecticides, by augmenting them with more innovative methods such as genetic control2. This special collection highlights a diverse array of transgenic arthropods being generated to study and control vector-borne diseases, and the technical and creative skills necessary to develop such genetically modified organisms.
Arthropod-pathogen-host relationships evolve over many years to shape the genetics of all affected species3,4,5. Model systems are typically inadequate to study blood-feeding arthropods because their biology and behaviors are species-specific. Molecular entomologists must recreate the complex environments that allow for blood feeding and reproduction so the individual species can be routinely maintained and studied in the laboratory under controlled conditions. Rearing hematophagous arthropods requires both biological expertise and the &#8220;meticulous attention of skilled individuals&#8221;6. For this reason, it is no wonder that vector biology is at the forefront of genetic innovation.
Although this special issue covers generating transgenic arthropods across diverse genera, one central theme emerges: the process requires a keen attention to detail, a sharp understanding of the organism&#8217;s biology, and an inventive mindset. Louradour et al.7 highlight the challenges of adapting embryonic microinjection techniques to the vectors of Leishmania parasites &#8211; namely, sandflies &#8211; that lay very small eggs. Freshly laid eggs are transferred to individual pieces of black filter paper on a microscope slide with a coverslip and are carefully lined up for microinjection. The humidity levels, the quality of the prepared materials, and the care with which the process is performed are just a few variables that determine whether the technique succeeds. Hard tick egg microinjection presents a distinct set of challenges &#8211; a thick external wax layer on the embryos, hard chorion, and high intra-oval pressure8. Sharma et al. describe procedures in Ixodes scapularis that overcome these obstacles by removing the wax layer, softening the chorion, and desiccating the eggs8. These include ablating the Gen&#233;&#39;s organ (wax gland) from egg-laying females, collecting the eggs within 24 h of laying, and then placing the eggs in a 1% (w/v) sodium chloride solution for approximately 1 h before microinjecting8.
It is possible to circumvent embryonic microinjections by injecting pupa or adults with the machinery that edits or silences genes. Benetta et al.&#160;describe this technique using two ovary delivery methods &#8211; Receptor-Mediated Ovary Transduction of Cargo (ReMOT Control) or Branched Amphiphilic Peptide Capsules (BAPC) &#8211; as well as two injection strategies (either a Femtojet or an aspirator tube) in the parasitic jewel wasp Nasonia vitripennis9. Pupae were lined up and attached to a microscope slide with glue to facilitate the injection process and reduce mortality9. Adults, on the other hand, were anesthetized on ice so that the user could support the female with forceps during the abdomen injection.
In addition to CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing, this issue covers other genetic engineering technologies used in arthropods, including site-directed &#966;C31 recombinase and GAL4-UAS. The former, described by Adolfi et al., achieves site-directed integration of attB-flanked transgenic cargo for single integration or recombinase-mediated cassette exchange in the malaria vectors Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles stephensi10. This technology allows for site-directed insertion into docking lines that have been previously established, which simplifies validation by avoiding positional effects and downstream mating schemes necessary for a stable genetic line10. The other technique, the bipartite GAL4-UAS system, is used by Poulton et al. to generate transgenic Anopheles gambiae that express transgene cassettes in a spatiotemporal, tissue-specific manner, even at the expense of severe fitness costs11. Because of its flexibility, this system lets investigators screen phenotypes and infer gene functions that may be impossible otherwise.
Indeed, transgenic cargo often confers fitness costs to the arthropod; therefore, Williams et al. laid out simple protocols for measuring fitness costs in transgenic Aedes aegypti mosquitoes12. These included fecundity, wing size and shape, fertility, sex ratio, viability, development times, male contribution, and adult longevity12. Such fitness measurements can be used to compare the health of transgenic mosquitoes generated across studies or to model the rate of transgene fixation in mathematical models.
The methodological details in these manuscripts are visually illustrated to facilitate reproduction. A variety of molecular and entomological techniques are presented: sexing and screening mosquito pupae for fluorescent markers11,12; combining and purifying donor and helper &#966;C31 plasmid mixes10; injecting adult jewel wasps intra-abdominally9; lining up sand fly eggs for microinjection7; and ablating tick wax glands8. Given the breadth of techniques covered in this special issue, both amateurs and experts are invited to glimpse the underpinnings of generating genetically modified arthropods. These techniques are the foundation for studying arthropod physiology and vector-pathogen interactions, which are essential for developing novel strategies that reduce vector-borne disease.

transgenic manipulation of arthropod vectors: tools to study vector-borne diseases

Read this Scientific Article Protocol about Transgenic Manipulation of Arthropod Vectors: Tools to Study Vector-Borne Diseases at JoVE.com

Transgenic Manipulation of Arthropod Vectors: Tools to Study Vector-Borne Diseases

transgenic-manipulation-arthropod-vectors-tools-to-study-vector-borne

Transgenic Manipulation of Arthropod Vectors: Tools to Study Vector-Borne Diseases

In This Article