A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
This article details the methodology for emulating in vivo muscle force production during ex vivo work loop experiments using an "avatar" muscle from a laboratory rodent to assess the contributions of strain transients and activation to the muscle force response.
Movement behaviors are emergent features of dynamic systems that result from muscle force production and work output. The interplay between neural and mechanical systems occurs at all levels of biological organization concurrently, from the tuning of leg muscle properties while running to the dynamics of the limbs interacting with the ground. Understanding the conditions under which animals shift their neural control strategies toward intrinsic muscle mechanics ('preflexes') in the control hierarchy would allow muscle models to predict in vivo muscle force and work more accurately. To understand in vivo muscle mechanics, ex vivo investigation of muscle force and work under dynamically varying strain and loading conditions similar to in vivo locomotion is required. In vivo strain trajectories typically exhibit abrupt changes (i.e., strain and velocity transients) that arise from interactions among neural activation, musculoskeletal kinematics, and loads applied by the environment. The principal goal of our "avatar" technique is to investigate how muscles function during abrupt changes in strain rate and loading when the contribution of intrinsic mechanical properties to muscle force production may be highest. In the "avatar" technique, the traditional work-loop approach is modified using measured in vivo strain trajectories and electromyographic (EMG) signals from animals during dynamic movements to drive ex vivo muscles through multiple stretch-shortening cycles. This approach is similar to the work-loop technique, except that in vivo strain trajectories are scaled appropriately and imposed on ex vivo mouse muscles attached to a servo motor. This technique allows one to: (1) emulate in vivo strain, activation, stride frequency, and work-loop patterns; (2) vary these patterns to match in vivo force responses most accurately; and (3) vary specific features of strain and/or activation in controlled combinations to test mechanistic hypotheses.
Moving animals achieve impressive athletic feats of endurance, speed, and agility in complex environments. Animal locomotion is particularly impressive in contrast to human-engineered machines-the stability and agility of current-legged robots, prostheses, and exoskeletons remain poor compared to animals. Legged locomotion in natural terrain requires precise control and rapid adjustments to alter the speed and maneuver environmental features that act as unexpected perturbations1,2,3,4. Yet, understanding non-steady locomotion is inherently c....
All animal studies were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Northern Arizona University. Extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscles from male and female wild-type mice (strain B6C3Fe a/a-Ttnmdm/J), aged 60-280 days, were used for the present study. The animals were obtained from a commercial source (see Table of Materials), and established in a colony at Northern Arizona University.
1. Selecting in vivo strain trajectory and p.......
The goal of the "avatar" experiments is to replicate in vivo force production and work output as closely as possible during ex vivo work loop experiments. This study chose to use mouse EDL as an "avatar" for rat MG because mouse EDL and rat MG are both comprised of mostly of fast-twitch muscles20,21. Both muscles are primary movers of the ankle joint (EDL ankle dorsiflexor, MG ankle plantarflexor) with similar pennation angles (m.......
While organisms move seamlessly across landscapes, the underlying loads and strains that the muscles experience vary drastically1,6,23. During both in vivo locomotion1,24 and in "avatar" experiments, muscles are stimulated submaximally under cyclical, non-steady conditions. The isometric force-length and isotonic force-velocity relationships are not well.......
We thank Dr. Nicolai Konow for providing the data used in this study. Funded by NSF IOS-2016049 and NSF DBI-2021832.
....Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Braided Non-Absorbable Silk Suture 4-0 | Mersilk | 734H | |
Calcium Chloride Dihydrate (CaCl2) | Sigma-Aldrich | 1086436 | Krebs-Henseleit solution |
Dextrose | Sigma-Aldrich | D9434 | Krebs-Henseleit solution |
HEPES | Sigma-Aldrich | PHR1428 | Krebs-Henseleit solution |
Hydorchloric Acid (HCl) | Sigma-Aldrich | 1.37055 | Krebs-Henseleit solution |
LabView Data Collection | Lab-View | ||
Magnesium Sulfate (MgSO4) | Sigma-Aldrich | M7506 | Krebs-Henseleit solution |
Potassium Chloride (KCl) | Sigma-Aldrich | P3911 | Krebs-Henseleit solution |
Potassium Phosphate Monobasic (KH2PO4) | Sigma-Aldrich | 5.43841 | Krebs-Henseleit solution |
S88 Stimulator | Grass | M643H05 | Available for purchase on Ebay |
Series 300B Lever System | Aurora | 1200A | includes water-jacket tissue bath |
Sodium Bicarbonate (NaHCO3) | Sigma-Aldrich | S5761 | Krebs-Henseleit solution |
Sodium Chloride (NaCl) | Sigma-Aldrich | S9888 | Krebs-Henseleit solution |
Sodium Hydroxide (NaOH) | Sigma-Aldrich | S5881 | Krebs-Henseleit solution |
Wild Type Mice | Jackson Laboratory | B6C3Fe a/a Ttn mdm/J |
Explore More Articles
This article has been published
Video Coming Soon
ABOUT JoVE
Copyright © 2024 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved