A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
This research aimed to make a comparison between L1-L2-English and L1-L2 Portuguese to check how much the effect of a foreign accent accounts for both metrics and prosodic-acoustic parameters, as well as for the choice of the target voice in a voice lineup.
This research aims to examine both the prosodic-acoustic features and the perceptual correlates of foreign-accented English and foreign-accented Brazilian Portuguese and check how the speakers' productions of foreign and native accents are correlated to the listeners' perception. In the Methodology, we conducted a speech production procedure with a group of American speakers of L2 Brazilian Portuguese and a group of Brazilian speakers of L2 English, and a speech perception procedure in which we performed voice lineups for both languages.For the speech production statistical analysis, we ran Generalized Additive Models to evaluate the effect of the language groups on each class (metric or prosodic-acoustic) of features controlled for the smoothing effect of the covariate(s) of the opposite class. For the speech perception statistical analysis, we ran a Kruskal-Wallis test and a post-hoc Dunn's test to evaluate the effect of the voices of the lineups on the scores judged by the listeners. We nevertheless conducted acoustic (voice) similarity tests based on Cosine and Euclidean distances. Results showed significant acoustic differences between the language groups in terms of variability of the f0, duration, and voice quality. For the lineups, the results indicated that prosodic features of f0, intensity, and voice quality correlated to the listeners' perceived judgments.
The accent is a salient and dynamic aspect of communication and fluency, both in the native language (L1) and in a foreign language (L2)1. Foreign accent represents the L2 phonetic features of a target language, and it can change (over time)in response to the speaker’s L2 experience, speaking style, input quality, exposition, among other variables. A foreign accent can be quantified as a (scalar) degree of difference between L2 speech produced by a foreign speaker and a local or reference accent of the target language2,3,....
This work received approval from a human research ethics committee. Furthermore, informed consent was obtained from all participants involved in this study to use and publish their data.
1. Speech production
NOTE: We collected speech from a reading task on both 'L1 English-L2 BP' produced by Group 1: The American English (from the U.S.A.) Speakers (AmE-S), and on both 'L1 .......
Results for speech production
In this section, we described the performance of the statistically significant prosodic-acoustic features and rhythm metrics. Such prosodic features were speech, articulation, and pause rates, which are related to duration, and shimmer, which is related to voice quality. The rhythm metrics were standard deviation (SD) of syllable duration, SD of consonant, SD of vocalic or consonantal duration, and the variation coefficient of syllable duration (see the Supplem.......
The current protocol presents a novelty in the field of (forensic) phonetics. It is divided into two phases: one based on production (acoustic analysis) and one based on perception (judgement analysis). The production analysis phase comprises the Data preparation and Forced alignment, Realignment, and Automatic extraction of prosodic-acoustic features besides the statistics. This protocol connects the stage of data collection to the data analysis in a faster and more efficient way than the traditional protocols based on .......
This study was supported by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development - CNPq, grant no. 307010/2022-8 for the first author, and grant no. 302194/2019-3 for the second author. The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the participants of this research for their generous cooperation and invaluable contributions.
....Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
CreateLineup | Personal collection | # | Script for praat for voice lineups preparation |
Dell I3 (with solid-state drive - SSD) | Dell | # | Laptop computer |
Praat | Paul Boersma & David Weenink | # | Software for phonetic analysis |
Python 3 | Python Software Foundation | # | Interpreted, high-level, general-purpose programming language |
R | The R Project for Statistical Computing | # | Programming language for stattistical computing |
Shure Beta SM7B | Shure | # | Microphone |
SpeechRhythmExtractor | Personal collection | # | Script for praat for automatic extraction of acoustic features |
SurveyMonkey | SurveyMonkey Inc. | # | Assemble of free customizable surveys, as well as a suite of back-end programs that include data analysis, sample selection, debiasing, and data representation. |
Tascam DR-100 MKII | Tascam | # | Digital voice recorder |
The Munich Automatic Segmentation System MAUS | University of Munich | # | Forced-aligner of audio (.wav) and linguistic information (.txt) files |
VVUnitAligner | Personal collection | # | Script for praat for automatic realignment and post-processing of phonetic units |
This article has been published
Video Coming Soon
ABOUT JoVE
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved