Sign In

A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Representative Results
  • Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

Fission yeast is used here as a heterologous host to express bacterial cytoskeletal proteins such as FtsZ and MreB as translational fusion proteins with GFP to visualize their polymerization. Also, compounds that affect polymerization are identified by imaging using a fluorescence microscope.

Abstract

Bacterial cytoskeletal proteins such as FtsZ and MreB perform essential functions such as cell division and cell shape maintenance. Further, FtsZ and MreB have emerged as important targets for novel antimicrobial discovery. Several assays have been developed to identify compounds targeting nucleotide binding and polymerization of these cytoskeletal proteins, primarily focused on FtsZ. Moreover, many of the assays are either laborious or cost-intensive, and ascertaining whether these proteins are the cellular target of the drug often requires multiple methods. Finally, the toxicity of the drugs to eukaryotic cells also poses a problem. Here, we describe a single-step cell-based assay to discover novel molecules targeting bacterial cytoskeleton and minimize hits that might be potentially toxic to eukaryotic cells. Fission yeast is amenable to high-throughput screens based on microscopy, and a visual screen can easily identify any molecule that alters the polymerization of FtsZ or MreB. Our assay utilizes the standard 96-well plate and relies on the ability of the bacterial cytoskeletal proteins to polymerize in a eukaryotic cell such as the fission yeast. While the protocols described here are for fission yeast and utilize FtsZ from Staphylococcus aureus and MreB from Escherichia coli, they are easily adaptable to other bacterial cytoskeletal proteins that readily assemble into polymers in any eukaryotic expression hosts. The method described here should help facilitate further discovery of novel antimicrobials targeting bacterial cytoskeletal proteins.

Introduction

The widespread resistance to nearly all antibiotics presently employed to combat bacterial infections has created an immediate necessity for novel categories of antibiotics. A 2019 report indicated that antibiotic-resistant infections resulted in the loss of 1.27 million lives, contributing to an overall tally of 4.95 million deaths when considering complications from resistant bacterial infections1. While still effective in clinical practice, the current arsenal of antibiotics predominantly targets a narrow spectrum of cellular processes, primarily focusing on cell wall, DNA, and protein synthesis. Over the past half-century, fewer than 30 pro....

Protocol

1. Expression of GFP-tagged bacterial cytoskeleton proteins in S. pombe

NOTE: Please see Table 1 for information on all plasmids and strains used here. Please see Table 2 for all media compositions.

  1. Perform cloning of E. coli MreB with an N-terminal GFP fusion (GFP-MreB) and S. aureus FtsZ carrying a C-terminal GFP (SaFtsZ-GFP) into the S. pombe expression vector, pREP42 with a medium-strength t.......

Representative Results

Setting up the 96-well plate for the screening of drugs
Use of S. pombe to express a C- terminally GFP tagged S. aureus FtsZ from a vector (pREP42) containing the medium-strength thiamine repressible promoter nmt41has been previously established17 and similarly, the E. coli MreB tagged with N- terminal GFP was also expressed in S. pombe14. We have also shown that PC190723, a specific inhibitor of SaFtsZ and.......

Discussion

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a serious global health threat, and there is an urgent need for new antibiotics with novel targets. The bacterial cytoskeleton has emerged as an attractive target for developing new antibiotics, with small molecule inhibitors of the cell division protein FtsZ, such as TXA709, already in Phase-I clinical trials30. Several methods have been developed to identify inhibitors of FtsZ polymerization7,31. We have.......

Acknowledgements

SMP, SR and AKS acknowledge the fellowships received from the National Institute of Science Education and Research, Department of Atomic Energy. RS acknowledges intramural funding support from the Department of Atomic Energy, and this work is supported through a research grant to RS (BT/PR42977/MED/29/1603/2022) from the Department of Biotechnology (DBT). The authors also acknowledge V Badireenath Konkimalla for his comments, suggestions, and discussions throughout the development of the protocol.

....

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
96 Well CC2 Optical CVG Sterile, w/Lid. BlackThermo Scientificâ„¢160376
96-well plateCorning  CLS3370
A22 HydrochlorideSigma SML0471Dissolved in DMSO
AdenineFormediumTMDOC0229225 mg/L of media 
Concanavalin A Sigma C5275-5MG
DMSOSigma 317275
Edinburg minimal medium (EMM Agar or EMM Broth)FormediumTMPMD0210See below for composition
EDTA Sigma EDS-500G
epMotion® 96 with 2-position sliderEppendorf5069000101
HistidineFormediumTMDOC0144225 mg/L of media 
Leica DMi8 inverted fluorescence microscopeLeica MicrosystemsGerman company
LeucineFormediumTMDOC0157225 mg/L of media 
Lithium acetate Sigma 517992-100G
PC190723Merck 344580Dissolved in DMSO
Polyethylene glycol (PEG)Sigma 202398
ThiamineSigmaT4625Filter sterilised
Tris-HydrochlorideMP194855
UracilFormediumTMDOC0214225 mg/L of media, Store solution at 36°C
YES (Yeast extract + supplements) AgarFormediumTMPCM0410See below for composition
YES (Yeast extract + supplements) BrothFormediumTMPCM0310See below for composition
Yeast (S. pombe) media 
Yeast extract + supplements (YES)
Compositiong/L
Yeast extract5
Dextrose30
Agar17
Adenine0.05
L-Histidine0.05
L-Leucine0.05
L-Lysine HCl0.05
Uracil0.05
Edinburg minimal medium (EMM)
Compositiong/Lconcentration
potassium hydrogen phthallate 314.7mM
Na2HPO4 2.215.5 mM
NH4Cl 593.5 mM
glucose2% (w/v) or 20 g/L 111 mM
Salts (stock x 50)20 mL/L (v/v)
Vitamins (stock x 1000)1 mL/L (v/v)
Minerals (Stock x 10,000)0.1 mL/L (v/v)
Salts x 50 52.5 g/l MgCl2.6H20 (0.26 M) 52.50.26 M
0.735 mg/l CaCl2.2H20 (4.99 mM) 0.0007354.99 mM
50 g/l KCl (0.67 M) 500.67 M
2 g/l Na2SO4 (14.l mM)214.1 mM
Vitamins x 1000 1 g/l pantothenic acid 14.20 mM
10 g/l nicotinic acid 1081.2 mM
10 g/l inositol 1055.5 mM
10 mg/l biotin 0.0140.8 µM
Minerals x 10,000 boric acid580.9 mM
MnSO4  423.7 mM
ZnSO4.7H2O413.9 mM
FeCl2.6H2O  27.40 mM
molybdic acid 0.42.47 mM
KI 16.02 mM
CuSO4.5H2O 0.41.60 mM
citric acid 1047.6 mM
Strains/ Plasmids
StrainsDescriptionReference
CCD190Escherichia coli DH10β Invitrogen
CCDY4 MBY3532; CCDY346/pREP42- GFP-EcMreBSrinivasan et al., 2007
CCDY340CCDY346/pREP42- SaFtsZ-GFPSharma et al., 2023
CCDY346MBY192; Schizosaccharomyces pombe [ura4-D18, leu1-32, h-]Dr. Mithilesh Mishra (DBS, TIFR)
Plasmids
pCCD3pREP42-GFP-EcMreBSrinivasan et al., 2007
pCCD713pREP42-SaFtsZ-GFPSharma et al., 2023

References

  1. Antimicrobial Resistance Collaborators. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 399 (10325), 629-655 (2022).
  2. Haselbeck, R., et al.

Explore More Articles

Fission YeastAntibacterial Drug ScreensBacterial Cytoskeleton ProteinsFtsZMreBCell based AssayMacrocyclic CompoundsHelicobacter PyloriPseudomonas AeruginosaClostridium PerfringensHigh throughput ScreensStaphylococcus AureusEscherichia Coli

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2024 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved