dissection-xenopus-laevis-neural-crest-for-vitro-explant-culture-or

Dissection of Xenopus laevis Neural Crest for in vitro Explant Culture or in vivo Transplantation

The neural crest (NC) is a transient dorsal neural tube cell population that undergoes an epithelium-to-mesenchyme transition (EMT) at the end of ...

Centre Universitaire

The retinoblastoma protein, pRb, plays important roles in many processes implicated in cell fate decisions, including cell cycle, differentiation and apoptosis. In cell cycle regulation, pRb interacts principally with the E2F transcription factor family members to inhibit the transcription of many genes controlling cell cycle progression. In this study, we focused on the role of pRb in apoptosis, which is much less clear than its role in cell cycle regulation. Indeed, pRb has been found to be either pro- or anti-apoptotic. To clarify how the proliferative status of the cells impacts the role of pRb in apoptosis, we used Drosophila to induce RBF (the pRb fly homologue) expression in different cellular and developmental contexts. We found that RBF expression induces apoptosis in different proliferative tissues in a caspase-dependent manner, whereas this effect was not observed in differentiated post-mitotic cells. Furthermore, RBF-induced apoptosis in proliferating cells was inhibited by co-expression of dE2F1, an antagonistic partner of RBF in cell cycle regulation. These results are in agreement with the view that the apoptotic properties of pRb are tightly linked to, and are probably a consequence of, an effect on cell cycle progression. Moreover, we show for the first time that RBF has a direct anti-apoptotic effect on Dmp53-induced cell death in post-mitotic cells only. Taken together, these data clearly show that RBF can exert a dual role in the control of apoptotic processes, and that its properties depend on the proliferative status of the cells.

The Drosophila retinoblastoma protein induces apoptosis in proliferating but not in post-mitotic cells.

The neural crest is a transient and multipotent cell population arising at the edge of the neural plate in vertebrates. Recent findings highlight that neural crest patterning is initiated during gastrulation, i.e. earlier than classically described, in a progenitor domain named the neural border. This chapter reviews the dynamic and complex molecular interactions underlying neural border formation and neural crest emergence.

Neural crest induction at the neural plate border in vertebrates.

Controling embryonic stem cell fate in vitro has been a major challenge in the past decade. Several protocols have been developed to obtain neural crest derivatives in culture, using more or less defined conditions. Here, we present various strategies used to date to obtain neural crest specification and the markers that can be used to identify human neural crest cells.

Embryonic stem cell strategies to explore neural crest development in human embryos.

Defining which key factors control commitment of an embryonic lineage among a myriad of candidates is a longstanding challenge in developmental biology and an essential prerequisite for developing stem cell-based therapies. Commitment implies that the induced cells not only express early lineage markers but further undergo an autonomous differentiation into the lineage. The embryonic neural crest generates a highly diverse array of derivatives, including melanocytes, neurons, glia, cartilage, mesenchyme, and bone. A complex gene regulatory network has recently classified genes involved in the many steps of neural crest induction, specification, migration, and differentiation. However, which factor or combination of factors is sufficient to trigger full commitment of this multipotent lineage remains unknown. Here, we show that, in contrast to other potential combinations of candidate factors, coactivating transcription factors Pax3 and Zic1 not only initiate neural crest specification from various early embryonic lineages in Xenopus and chicken embryos but also trigger full neural crest determination. These two factors are sufficient to drive migration and differentiation of several neural crest derivatives in minimal culture conditions in vitro or ectopic locations in vivo. After transplantation, the induced cells migrate to and integrate into normal neural crest craniofacial target territories, indicating an efficient spatial recognition in vivo. Thus, Pax3 and Zic1 cooperate and execute a transcriptional switch sufficient to activate full multipotent neural crest development and differentiation.

Pax3 and Zic1 drive induction and differentiation of multipotent, migratory, and functional neural crest in Xenopus embryos.

Neural crest development is orchestrated by a complex and still poorly understood gene regulatory network. Premigratory neural crest is induced at the lateral border of the neural plate by the combined action of signaling molecules and transcription factors such as AP2, Gbx2, Pax3 and Zic1. Among them, Pax3 and Zic1 are both necessary and sufficient to trigger a complete neural crest developmental program. However, their gene targets in the neural crest regulatory network remain unknown. Here, through a transcriptome analysis of frog microdissected neural border, we identified an extended gene signature for the premigratory neural crest, and we defined novel potential members of the regulatory network. This signature includes 34 novel genes, as well as 44 known genes expressed at the neural border. Using another microarray analysis which combined Pax3 and Zic1 gain-of-function and protein translation blockade, we uncovered 25 Pax3 and Zic1 direct targets within this signature. We demonstrated that the neural border specifiers Pax3 and Zic1 are direct upstream regulators of neural crest specifiers Snail1/2, Foxd3, Twist1, and Tfap2b. In addition, they may modulate the transcriptional output of multiple signaling pathways involved in neural crest development (Wnt, Retinoic Acid) through the induction of key pathway regulators (Axin2 and Cyp26c1). We also found that Pax3 could maintain its own expression through a positive autoregulatory feedback loop. These hierarchical inductions, feedback loops, and pathway modulations provide novel tools to understand the neural crest induction network.

Cecile Milet

Institut Curie,
Université Paris Sud,
CNRS UMR 3347,
INSERM U1021

Centre Universitaire

Dissection of Xenopus laevis Neural Crest for in vitro Explant Culture or in vivo Transplantation

Cecile Milet

.css-o250i3{font-size:18px;font-family:Open Sans,sans-serif;line-height:21.6px;}Institut Curie,Université Paris Sud,CNRS UMR 3347,INSERM U1021

Centre Universitaire

Dissection of Xenopus laevis Neural Crest for in vitro Explant Culture or in vivo Transplantation

Institut Curie,
Université Paris Sud,
CNRS UMR 3347,
INSERM U1021