The Factorial Experiment
Source: Laboratories of Gary Lewandowski, Dave Strohmetz, and Natalie Ciarocco—Monmouth University
A factorial design is a common type of experiment where there are two or more independent variables. This video demonstrates a 2 x 2 factorial design used to explore how self-awareness and self-esteem may influence the ability to decipher nonverbal signals. This video leads students through the basics of a factorial design including, the nature of a factorial design and what distinguishes it from other designs, the benefits of factorial design, the importance and nature of interactions, main effect and interaction hypotheses, and how to conduct a factorial experiment.
1. Introduction of topic/research question
- Research question: Human behavior is complex, such that a person’s thoughts and behaviors are the results of several causes or factors. For example, if you wanted to know why some people are better at reading another person’s facial expressions, there are many factors that can influence that ability.
- Justifying a factorial design: Rather than test potential explanations one at a time, you can use a factorial design, which is unique because it al
After collecting data from 136 people, a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to test the two main effects and interactions. As shown in Figure 1, contrary to the hypothesized pattern, when participants had high self-awareness, they were more accurate when they had low self-esteem; however, when they had low self-awareness, they were more accurate when they had high self-esteem.
Beyond their influence on deciphering the meaning in a person’s eyes, gre
A factorial design is commonly used in psychology experiments. This design is beneficial for a variety of topics, ranging from pharmacological influences on fear responses to the interactions of varying levels of stress and types of exercise.
- Wicklund, R. A., & Duval, T. S. Opinion change and performance facilitation as a result of objective self-awareness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 7, 319-342 (1971).
- Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. The 'Reading the mind in the eyes' Test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 42 (2), 241-251. doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00715 (2001).
Skip to...
Videos from this collection:
Now Playing
The Factorial Experiment
Experimental Psychology
72.8K Views
From Theory to Design: The Role of Creativity in Designing Experiments
Experimental Psychology
17.5K Views
Ethics in Psychology Research
Experimental Psychology
28.8K Views
Realism in Experimentation
Experimental Psychology
8.1K Views
Perspectives on Experimental Psychology
Experimental Psychology
5.5K Views
Pilot Testing
Experimental Psychology
10.2K Views
Observational Research
Experimental Psychology
12.5K Views
The Simple Experiment: Two-group Design
Experimental Psychology
65.6K Views
The Multi-group Experiment
Experimental Psychology
22.6K Views
Within-subjects Repeated-measures Design
Experimental Psychology
22.7K Views
Self-report vs. Behavioral Measures of Recycling
Experimental Psychology
11.7K Views
Reliability in Psychology Experiments
Experimental Psychology
8.3K Views
Placebos in Research
Experimental Psychology
11.5K Views
Manipulating an Independent Variable through Embodiment
Experimental Psychology
8.4K Views
Experimentation using a Confederate
Experimental Psychology
17.7K Views
ABOUT JoVE
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved