JoVE Logo

Sign In

Fisher's exact test is a statistical significance test widely used to analyze 2x2 contingency tables, particularly in situations where sample sizes are small. Unlike the chi-squared test, which approximates P-values and assumes minimum expected frequencies of at least five in each cell, Fisher's exact test calculates the exact probability (P-value) of observing the data or more extreme results under the null hypothesis. This feature makes it especially valuable when the assumptions of the chi-squared test are not met due to low expected frequencies.

This test is non-parametric, meaning it does not rely on the data following any specific distribution. Its exactness ensures accurate results, even in cases with sparse data. As a result, Fisher's exact test is often preferred in scenarios involving small sample sizes or low cell counts, where other methods may fail or provide unreliable outcomes.

Fisher's exact test is applicable when data can be represented in a 2x2 contingency table and one or both variables are categorical. It is particularly useful when expected cell counts are low, such as fewer than five observations in any cell of the table. Its ability to handle small datasets and its precision make it a robust alternative to the chi-squared test, especially in studies where obtaining large sample sizes is not feasible.

The test is used in various fields, including biology, medicine, and social sciences. For example, in medical research, it is commonly employed in small clinical trials to evaluate treatment effects. In biology, it is used to analyze genetic associations or experimental outcomes, while in social sciences, it helps examine relationships between categorical variables. Fisher's exact test is highly versatile, offering a reliable method to assess statistical significance when other tests might be unsuitable due to the limitations of sample size or data distribution.

In summary, Fisher's exact test is a precise and reliable tool for analyzing associations between categorical variables in small datasets. Its exact nature and robustness make it an essential method for researchers working with contingency tables where traditional approaches like the chi-squared test may falter.

From Chapter 13:

article

Now Playing

13.18 : Fisher's Exact Test

Nonparametric Statistics

29 Views

article

13.1 : Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics

Nonparametric Statistics

442 Views

article

13.2 : Ranks

Nonparametric Statistics

26 Views

article

13.3 : Introduction to the Sign Test

Nonparametric Statistics

391 Views

article

13.4 : Sign Test for Matched Pairs

Nonparametric Statistics

23 Views

article

13.5 : Sign Test for Nominal Data

Nonparametric Statistics

17 Views

article

13.6 : Sign Test for Median of Single Population

Nonparametric Statistics

15 Views

article

13.7 : Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs

Nonparametric Statistics

19 Views

article

13.8 : Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Median of Single Population

Nonparametric Statistics

24 Views

article

13.9 : Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test

Nonparametric Statistics

38 Views

article

13.10 : Bootstrapping

Nonparametric Statistics

430 Views

article

13.11 : The Anderson-Darling Test

Nonparametric Statistics

416 Views

article

13.12 : Spearman's Rank Correlation Test

Nonparametric Statistics

457 Views

article

13.13 : Kendall's Tau Test

Nonparametric Statistics

406 Views

article

13.14 : Kruskal-Wallis Test

Nonparametric Statistics

387 Views

See More

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved