This research was supported by the Institute for Translational Health Sciences pilot project grant opportunity (UL1TR000423), the University of Washington Center on Human Development and Disability, and the University of Washington Animal Behavior Core and Brain Imaging Core. We would like to acknowledge Dr. Warren Ladiges for his role in the development and dissemination of the original Radial Water Tread maze design and protocol presented here. We also thank Toby Cole for his assistance with this project.

All procedures and animal handling were conducted in accordance with the animal care guidelines issued by the National Institutes of Health and by the University of Washington Animal Care and Use Committee.
1. Surgery
<ol>
	<li>Anesthetize the mouse at 5% isoflurane in an induction box until unconscious. Confirm anesthesia by a reduction in the breathing rate and the absence of a withdrawal reflex following toe-pinch.</li>
	<li>Maintain anesthesia via nose cone at 2-2.5% throughout surgery. Monitor the breathing rate throughout surgery to ensure the mouse remains unconscious.</li>
	<li>Place the mouse prone on a heating pad and position the mouse in the stereotactic device using ear bars, ensuring that the head is secure and flat.</li>
	<li>Remove hair from the scalp using hair removal cream. Rinse the scalp thoroughly with saline.</li>
	<li>Clean the surgical site with an alternating iodine and 70% ethanol wash.</li>
	<li>Administer a subcutaneous injection of Lidocaine and Bupivacaine (1 mg/kg) at the scalp.</li>
	<li>With surgical scissors, make a longitudinal midline incision, and retract the skin to reveal the skull.</li>
	<li>Using a 5 mm trephine saw preform a craniotomy over the left frontoparietal cortex with center point at 2.5 mm behind bregma and 2.5 mm left of the midline. Carefully remove the circle of bone to expose the brain.</li>
	<li>Set the impactor device to a velocity of 6 m/s and 200 ms dwell time.</li>
	<li>Position the impactor device until the 3 mm convex impact tip is lightly touching the surface of the brain at 2.5 mm behind bregma and 2.55 mm left of the midline. Retract the impact tip, and lower by 1 mm (impact depth). When ready, fire the device, generating the desired impact.</li>
	<li>Cover the craniotomy with a sterile polypropylene disc cemented to derma with tissue adhesive, and suture the incision closed.</li>
	<li>Remove the mouse from anesthesia, and give IP injection of Buprenorphine (0.5 mg/kg).</li>
	<li>Allow the mouse to recover in a clean cage, warmed by a heating pad.&#160;The mouse should be monitored for signs of pain or distress over the next 24 h. 
	NOTE: Sham controls should receive identical treatment as above, with steps 1.8-1.9 omitted.</li>
</ol>
2. Radial Water Tread Maze Construction
<ol>
	<li>Bore 9 exit holes, large enough to accommodate 1-1/2 inch ABS DWV SPG x SJ trap adapters, at equal intervals around the circumference of a 32 inch diameter galvanized steel tub. Center these exit holes roughly 2-1/4 inches above the floor of the tub.</li>
	<li>Fit a 1-1/2 inch ABS DWV SPG x SJ trap adapter into each of the exit holes, and secure with the included ring nuts.</li>
	<li>With rubber stoppers, cap eight of the nine exits from the exterior of the apparatus. The final, uncapped exit will serve as the escape route. It does not matter which exit is designated as the escape route.</li>
	<li>Attach a 90&#176; ABS elbow to the exterior end of the remaining exit. The 90&#176; bend serves to prevent test subjects from visually determining the correct escape route from inside the maze.</li>
	<li>Construct the escape box from any opaque box capable of being sanitized and roughly 30 cm x 15 cm x 15 cm in size. Cut a hole on the side of the box, directly above the floor, large enough to accommodate a the 90&#176; ABS elbow.</li>
	<li>Attach the escape box to the terminal end of the 90&#176; ABS elbow.</li>
	<li>Slightly elevate the escape box (less than one inch) above the surface of the floor. This allows ample room for an electric heating pad, or other heating source, to be placed beneath the escape box.</li>
	<li>Print and laminate at least 5 unique, visual cues. Use simple, high contrast images that can be easily discerned from within the apparatus. Black and white clipart shapes (triangle, square, circle) are recommended.</li>
	<li>Using magnets, adhere the visual cues to the inner walls of the apparatus. Cues should be roughly equal distance apart, around the circumference of the apparatus.</li>
</ol>
3. Radial Water Tread Maze Protocol
NOTE: Water maze testing should begin only after the surgical site has healed (roughly one week post-surgery).
<ol>
	<li>Preparing for testing.
	<ol>
		<li>Allow mice to acclimate to the testing room for at least 30 min prior to commencing testing.</li>
		<li>Sanitize the apparatus using a 70% ethanol spray.</li>
		<li>Fill the apparatus with roughly 1 inch of cold (12-14 &#176;C) water.</li>
		<li>Place an electric heating pad, or other heating source, directly underneath the escape box. Keep the escape box dark and warm throughout the duration of testing.</li>
		<li>Position a bright light source over the apparatus. 
		NOTE: If using a lamp that might be visible to research animals from the apparatus itself, take care to ensure that the lamp is placed in the same position each day. The lamp itself might represent another visual cue for the mice to use to locate the escape box, and moving it drastically from day to day might complicate results.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Testing Protocol
	<ol>
		<li>Remove the mouse from its cage gently by the tail, and place in the center of the apparatus.</li>
		<li>As soon as the animal is in in the apparatus, begin timing.</li>
		<li>Once the animal has found the correct exit, and has located/entered the escape box, stop timing and record the number of seconds required to find the correct path.</li>
		<li>If the animal attempts to climb into a terminating hole and does not spontaneously reenter the maze after 10 s, guide the animal back into the center of the maze by hand.</li>
		<li>If the animal fails to find the correct path to the escape box within 3 min (180 s), score the trial as a failure and record as 180 s. Carefully guide the animal toward the correct path by hand.</li>
		<li>Allow the mouse to remain in the escape box for a 1 min, inter-trial rest.</li>
		<li>Once the 1 min rest has passed, remove the animal from the escape box and return to its home cage.</li>
		<li>Thoroughly sanitize the escape box and exits with a 70% ethanol spray to prevent the mouse from using olfactory cues to locate the correct escape route. This step should take no more than a few seconds.</li>
		<li>Return the mouse to the maze for the next trial.</li>
		<li>Repeat Steps 3.2.1-3.2.9 until the mouse has completed a total of three trials, and has either located or been led to the escape box three times.</li>
		<li>Following the final 1 min rest, return the mouse to its home cage.</li>
		<li>Drain and replace the water in the apparatus between animals to ensure consistent temperature throughout testing.</li>
		<li>Repeat steps 3.2.1-3.2.12 for each mouse to be tested.</li>
		<li>On the following day, repeat preparation steps 3.2.1-3.2.5. Take special care in ensuring that visual cues remain in consistent positions between testing days.</li>
		<li>Test animals using the above daily testing protocol for three trials a day for four days (training period), with a final three-trial test for memory retention on the fifth day. A sixth three-trial test (Long Term Memory retention) can be given on day twelve.</li>
		<li>Do not perform any tests between testing days five and twelve.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Analysis
	<ol>
		<li>If a mouse fails to complete the maze in under 180 s during any two-day period (i.e., a total of consecutive 6 trials all scored at 180 s), consider the mouse insufficiently motivated by the testing conditions, and remove from analysis.</li>
		<li>Calculate the mean latency to complete the maze for each subject by testing date by averaging their three daily trials for that day.</li>
		<li>Obtain group differences in memory retention using standard t-tests to compare groups at the fifth day test and long-term memory testing date. If more than two groups are being compared, one-way ANOVA followed by appropriate post-hoc analysis (such as Tukey&#39;s test) to follow up on any significance obtained should be employed instead.</li>
		<li>Obtain group differences in the acquisition period (days 1-4) via repeated measure analysis of variance.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>

<ol>
	<li>Levin, H. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Neurobehavioral+outcome+of+closed+head+injury:+Implications+for+clinical+trials.">Neurobehavioral outcome of closed head injury: Implications for clinical trials.</a> J. Neurotrauma. 12 (4), 601-610 (1995).</li><li>Schretlen, D., Shapiro, A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=A+quantitative+review+of+the+effects+of+traumatic+brain+injury+on+cognitive+functioning.">A quantitative review of the effects of traumatic brain injury on cognitive functioning.</a> Int Rev Psychiatry. 15 (4), 341-349 (2003).</li><li>Cline, M. M., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Novel+application+of+a+radial+water+tread+maze+can+distinguish+cognitive+deficits+in+mice+with+traumatic+brain+injury.">Novel application of a radial water tread maze can distinguish cognitive deficits in mice with traumatic brain injury.</a> Brain Res. 1657, 140-147 (2017).</li><li>Ellenbroek, B., Youn, J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Rodent+models+in+neuroscience+research:+Is+it+a+rat+race?.">Rodent models in neuroscience research: Is it a rat race?.</a> Dis. Model. Mech. 9 (10), 1079-1087 (2016).</li><li>Morris, R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Developments+of+a+water-maze+procedure+for+studying+spatial+learning+in+the+rat.">Developments of a water-maze procedure for studying spatial learning in the rat.</a> J. Neurosci Methods. 11 (1), 47-60 (1984).</li><li>Barnes, C. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Memory+deficits+associated+with+senescence:+A+neurophysiological+and+behavioral+study+in+the+rat.">Memory deficits associated with senescence: A neurophysiological and behavioral study in the rat.</a> J. Comp. Physiol. Psych. 93 (1), 74-104 (1979).</li><li>Frick, K., Stillner, E., Berger-Sweeney, J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Mice+are+not+little+rats:+Species+differences+in+a+one-day+water+maze+task.">Mice are not little rats: Species differences in a one-day water maze task.</a> Neuroreport. 11 (16), 3461-3465 (2000).</li><li>Whishaw, I., Tomie, J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Of+Mice+and+Mazes:+Similarities+Between+Mice+and+Rats+on+Dry+Land+But+Not+Water+Mazes.">Of Mice and Mazes: Similarities Between Mice and Rats on Dry Land But Not Water Mazes.</a> Physiol Behav. 60 (5), 1191-1197 (1995).</li><li>Francis, D., Zaharia, M., Shanks, N., Anisman, H. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Stress-induced+disturbances+in+Morris+water-maze+performance:+Interstrain+variability.">Stress-induced disturbances in Morris water-maze performance: Interstrain variability.</a> Physiol Behav. 58 (1), 57-65 (1995).</li><li>Wahlsten, D., Rustay, N., Metten, P., Crabbe, J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=In+search+of+a+better+mouse+test.">In search of a better mouse test.</a> Trends Neurosci. 26 (3), 132-136 (2003).</li><li>Crawley, , et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Behavioral+phenotypes+of+inbred+mouse+strains:+implications+and+recommendations+for+molecular+studies.">Behavioral phenotypes of inbred mouse strains: implications and recommendations for molecular studies.</a> Psychopharmacology. (Berl). 132 (2), 107-124 (1997).</li><li>Wahlsten, D., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Different+data+from+different+labs:+lessons+from+studies+of+gene-environment+interaction.">Different data from different labs: lessons from studies of gene-environment interaction.</a> J. Neurobiol. 54 (1), 283-311 (2002).</li><li>Rogers, D. C., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Use+of+SHIRPA+and+discriminant+analysis+to+characterise+marked+differences+in+the+behavioural+phenotype+of+six+inbred+mouse+strains.">Use of SHIRPA and discriminant analysis to characterise marked differences in the behavioural phenotype of six inbred mouse strains.</a> Behav Brain Res. 105 (2), 207-217 (1999).</li><li>Wolfer, D. P., Stagljar-Bozicevic, M., Errington, M. L., Lipp, H. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Spatial+Memory+and+Learning+in+Transgenic+Mice:+Fact+or+Artifact?.">Spatial Memory and Learning in Transgenic Mice: Fact or Artifact?.</a> Physiology. 13 (3), 118-123 (1998).</li><li>Koopmans, G., Blokland, A., Vannieuwenhuijzen, P., Prickaerts, J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Assessment+of+spatial+learning+abilities+of+mice+in+a+new+circular+maze.">Assessment of spatial learning abilities of mice in a new circular maze.</a> Physiol Behav. 79 (4-5), 683-693 (2003).</li><li>Deacon, R., Rawlins, N. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Learning+impairments+of+hippocampal-lesioned+mice+in+a+paddling+pool.">Learning impairments of hippocampal-lesioned mice in a paddling pool.</a> Behav Neurosci. 116 (3), 472-478 (2002).</li><li>Pettan-Brewer, C., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=A+novel+radial+water+tread+maze+tracks+age-related+cognitive+decline+in+mice.">A novel radial water tread maze tracks age-related cognitive decline in mice.</a> Pathobiol Aging Age Relat Dis. 3, 1-4 (2013).</li><li>Wiley, J., Pettan-Brewer, C., Ladiges, W. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Phenylbutyric+acid+reduces+amyloid+plaques+and+rescues+cognitive+behavior+in+AD+transgenic+mice.">Phenylbutyric acid reduces amyloid plaques and rescues cognitive behavior in AD transgenic mice.</a> Aging Cell. 10 (3), 418-428 (2011).</li><li>Enns, L., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Disruption+of+Protein+Kinase+A+in+Mice+Enhances+Healthy+Aging.">Disruption of Protein Kinase A in Mice Enhances Healthy Aging.</a> PLoS ONE. 4 (6), (2009).</li><li>Ivonen, H., Nurminen, L., Harri, M., Tanila, H., Puolivali, J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Hypothermia+in+mice+tested+in+Morris+water+maze.">Hypothermia in mice tested in Morris water maze.</a> Behav Brain Res. 141 (2), 207-213 (2003).</li><li>Shultz, S. R., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Granulocyte-macrophage+colony-stimulating+factor+is+neuroprotective+in+experimental+traumatic+brain+injury.">Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor is neuroprotective in experimental traumatic brain injury.</a> J Neurotrauma. 31 (10), 976-983 (2014).</li></ol>

The authors have nothing to disclose.

The RWT maze protocol presented here successfully distinguishes between CCI-induced TBI mice and sham controls, and represents a feasible, mouse-centric, alternative to the MWM and Barnes circular maze. While the results reported here speak only to the use of the RWT maze in a TBI mouse model, this apparatus has been used successfully in aged and transgenic models where stress-induced noncompliance resulting from swim-based testing made using the MWM impractical15,17</...

Memory impairments are among the most common symptoms reported by patients following traumatic brain injury (TBI)1,2. Accurate identification and assessment of analogous memory deficits in animal models of TBI, therefore, are essential to our understanding of this condition and its management. Here, we present a protocol to test spatial memory in a mouse model of TBI using a Radial Water Tread (RWT) maze. This apparatus was previously shown to assess cognitive deficits in mouse models of controlled cortical impact (CCI)-induced TBI3, and represents a potential alternative to rat-validated, swim-based tests of cognition.
The growing diversity and availability of transgenic mouse models has led to a recent increase in the use of mice over rats in scientific research4. Despite this shift, researchers continue to rely on behavioral and cognitive tasks that were originally designed and validated for rat use. The most common tests currently used to assess cognition in mice, the Morris Water Maze (MWM) and the Barnes circular maze, were specifically designed to capitalize on instinctual behaviors found in rats5,6. Considering the genetic, neuroethological, and cognitive differences that exist between these two species4, it is unsurprising that mice consistently underperform on these tasks7,8.
Species-dependent differences in testing ability are particularly concerning in swimming-based cognitive tests, such as the MWM. While both rats and mice are proficient swimmers, researchers have identified several mouse strains that perform remarkably poorly on swimming-based cognitive tasks9,10,11,12,13. Even in wild-type animals, rats generally outperform mice7,8. While this could be interpreted as a species-specific difference in spatial memory, analogous follow-up testing using a dry-land maze revealed no species-dependent differences in cognitive performance8. A number of factors unrelated to cognition could account for this finding, including species-dependent differences in either swimming ability or search strategy. Indeed, factor analysis of mouse-specific search strategies in the MWM show that noncognitive factors (in particular, thigomotaxis and passivity [i.e., floating]) may play a more significant role in MWM performance than spatial learning14.
Here, we demonstrate the use of a cognitive test designed to capitalize on the instinctual behavior of mice, and which does not require swimming, to measure spatial memory impairment in a mouse model of CCI-induced TBI. While the RWT maze (Figure 1A-B) was conceived as a novel hybrid of the MWM and Barnes circular maze, it was specifically designed to take advantage of thigmotactic behavior instinctual to mice15,16. The apparatus consists of a 32 inch diameter galvanized steel tub in which nine evenly spaced exit holes have been bored. The holes are centered 2-1/4 inches above the floor of the tub and are sized to fit commonly available 1-1/2 inch ABS DWV SPG x SJ trap adapters. Eight of the exits are capped from the outside and blinded to a depth of 1 inch with rubber stoppers. The ninth is connected by a 90&#176; acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) elbow to an opaque plastic box from which the mouse can be easily removed after testing. Over the course of a brief acquisition period, the mouse is trained to use the unique visual cues lining the maze to locate this escape box. During testing, the maze is filled with an inch of cold water (12-14 &#176;C), sufficiently aversive enough to promote escape, but not deep enough that the mouse is required to swim.
The RWT maze represents a low-cost, low-maintenance alternative to the MWM, and has been used successfully in aged and transgenic mice15,17,18,19, and CCI-induced mouse models of TBI3. The protocol outlined here represents a simple and effective method for measuring spatial memory impairment requiring no pre-injury training, and could be easily modified to suit the particular needs of a research laboratory.

<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="937">
	<tbody>
		<tr height="40">
			<td height="40" style="height:40px;width:304px;">35 Gal. Hot Dipped Steel Round Tub</td>
			<td style="width:123px;">Home Depot</td>
			<td style="width:344px;">&#160;Internet #206638142</td>
			<td style="width:167px;">Needed: 1</td>
		</tr>
		<tr height="40">
			<td height="40" style="height:40px;">1-1/2 in. ABS DWV SPG x SJ Trap Adapter</td>
			<td>Home Depot</td>
			<td>Internet #100344703, Store SKU #188956</td>
			<td>Needed: 9</td>
		</tr>
		<tr height="40">
			<td height="40" style="height:40px;">1-3/4 in. x 1-7/16 in. Black Rubber Stopper</td>
			<td>Home Depot</td>
			<td>Internet #100114974 Store SKU #755844</td>
			<td>Needed: 8</td>
		</tr>
		<tr height="40">
			<td height="40" style="height:40px;">1-1/2 in. ABS DWV 90 Degree Hub x Hub Elbow</td>
			<td>Home Depot</td>
			<td>Internet #100346663 Store SKU #188603</td>
			<td>Needed: 1</td>
		</tr>
		<tr height="40">
			<td height="40" style="height:40px;width:304px;">HDX 
			10 Gal. Storage Tote</td>
			<td>Home Depot</td>
			<td>Internet #202523587 Store SKU #258804 Store SO SKU #258804</td>
			<td>Needed: 1</td>
		</tr>
		<tr height="40">
			<td height="40" style="height:40px;">Impact One Stereotaxic Impactor for CCI</td>
			<td>Leica Biosystems&#160;</td>
			<td>39463920</td>
			<td>Needed: 1</td>
		</tr>
		<tr height="40">
			<td height="40" style="height:40px;">Vernier Stereotaxic w/ Manual Fine Drive Stereotaxic Instrument for Small Animals</td>
			<td>Leica Biosystems&#160;</td>
			<td>39463001</td>
			<td>Needed: 1</td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>

assessing spatial memory impairment in a mouse model of traumatic brain injury using a radial water tread maze

Despite the recent increase in use of mouse models in scientific research, researchers continue to use cognitive tasks that were originally designed and validated for rat use. The Radial Water Tread (RWT) maze test of spatial memory (designed specifically for mice and requiring no swimming) has been shown previously to successfully distinguish between controlled cortical impact-induced TBI mice and sham controls. Here, a detailed protocol for this task is presented. The RWT maze capitalizes on the natural tendency of mice to avoid open areas in favor of hugging the sides of an apparatus (thigmotaxis). The walls of the maze are lined with nine escape holes placed above the floor of the apparatus, and mice are trained to use visual cues to locate the escape hole that leads out of the maze. The maze is filled with an inch of cold water, sufficient to motivate escape but not deep enough to require that the mouse swim. The acquisition period takes only four training days, with a test of memory retention on day five and a long-term memory test on day 12. The results reported here suggest that the RWT maze is a feasible alternative to rat-validated, swimming-based cognitive tests in the assessment of spatial memory deficits in mouse models of TBI.

The RWT maze (Figure 1) was used to investigate injury-dependent spatial memory deficits in mice randomly assigned to receive&#160;either controlled cortical impact-induced TBI or sham surgery. The injury was generated using a solenoid-driven cortical impact with a 3 mm convex tip and the following injury parameters: 6 m/s strike velocity, 1 mm depth of penetration, and 200 ms contact time. Mice received cognitive testing starting at 35 days post-surgery, and...

Watch this Scientific Journal Video about Assessing Spatial Memory Impairment in a Mouse Model of Traumatic Brain Injury Using a Radial Water Tread Maze at JoVE.com

Assessing Spatial Memory Impairment in a Mouse Model of Traumatic Brain Injury Using a Radial Water Tread Maze

Here we present a protocol for a mouse-specific test of cognition that does not require swimming. This test can be used to successfully distinguish controlled cortical impact-induced traumatic brain injury mice from sham controls.

Despite the recent increase in use of mouse models in scientific research, researchers continue to use cognitive tasks that were originally designed and ...

assessing-spatial-memory-impairment-mouse-model-traumatic-brain

Research

JoVE Journal

Behavior

7.0K Views.  University of Washington. Here we present a protocol for a mouse-specific test of cognition that does not require swimming. This test can be used to successfully distinguish controlled cortical impact-induced traumatic brain injury mice from sham controls.

Video: Assessing Spatial Memory Impairment in a Mouse Model of Traumatic Brain Injury Using a Radial Water Tread Maze

Shallow Water (Paddling) Variants of Water Maze Tests in Mice

When Richard Morris devised his water maze in 19817, most behavioral work was done in rats. However, the greater understanding of mouse genetics led to the mouse becoming increasingly important. But researchers found that some strains of mutant mice were prone to problems like passively floating or diving when they were tested in the Morris water maze11. This was unsurprising considering their natural habitat; rats swim naturally (classically, the "sewer rat"), whereas mice evolved in the dry areas of central Asia.
To overcome these problems, it was considered whether shallow water would be a sufficient stimulus to provide escape motivation for mice. This would also avoid the problems of drying the small creatures with a towel and then putting them in a heated recovery chamber to avoid hypothermia, which is a much more serious problem than with rats; the large ratio of surface area to volume of a mouse makes it particularly vulnerable to rapid heat loss.
Another consideration was whether a more natural escape strategy could be used, to facilitate learning. Since animals that fall into water and swim away from the safety of the shore are unlikely to pass on their genes, animals have evolved a natural tendency to swim to the edge of a body of water. The Morris water maze, however, requires them to swim to a hidden platform towards the center of the maze - exactly opposite to their evolved behavior. Therefore the paddling maze should incorporate escape to the edge of the apparatus. This feature, coupled with the use of relatively non-aversive shallow water, embodies the "Refinement" aspect of the "3 Rs" of Russell and Burch8.
Various types of maze design were tried; the common feature was that the water was always shallow (2 cm deep) and escape was via a tube piercing the transparent wall of the apparatus. Other tubes ("false exits") were also placed around the walls but these were blocked off. From the inside of the maze all false exits and the single true exit looked the same. Currently a dodecagonal (12-sided) maze is in use in Oxford, with 12 true/false exits set in the corners. In a recent development a transparent paddling Y-maze has been tested successfully.

Shallow Water Paddling Variants of Water Maze Tests in Mice

Mice can swim, but many strains appear to find this activity stressful. To overcome this problem mazes have been devised where escape from shallow water is used to motivate behaviour. These have been demonstrated to support learning at least as good as the traditional and widely used Morris water maze.

When Richard Morris devised his water maze in 19817, most behavioral work was done in rats. However, the greater understanding of mouse genetics led to ...

Use of an Eight-arm Radial Water Maze to Assess Working and Reference Memory Following Neonatal Brain Injury

Working and reference memory are commonly assessed using the land based radial arm maze.&#160;However, this paradigm requires pretraining, food deprivation, and may introduce scent cue confounds. The eight-arm radial water maze is designed to evaluate reference and working memory performance simultaneously by requiring subjects to use extra-maze cues to locate escape platforms and remedies the limitations observed in land based radial arm maze designs. Specifically, subjects are required to avoid the arms previously used for escape during each testing day (working memory) as well as avoid the fixed arms, which never contain escape platforms (reference memory). Re-entries into arms that have already been used for escape during a testing session (and thus the escape platform has been removed) and re-entries into reference memory arms are indicative of working memory deficits. Alternatively, first entries into reference memory arms are indicative of reference memory deficits. We used this maze to compare performance of rats with neonatal brain injury and sham controls following induction of hypoxia-ischemia and show significant deficits in both working and reference memory after eleven days of testing. This protocol could be easily modified to examine many other models of learning impairment.

The eight-arm radial water maze is designed to evaluate reference and working memory performance simultaneously by requiring subjects to use extra-maze cues to locate escape platforms and remedies the limitations observed in land based radial arm maze designs.

Working and reference memory are commonly assessed using the land based radial arm maze.&#160;However, this paradigm requires pretraining, food ...

The Double-H Maze: A Robust Behavioral Test for Learning and Memory in Rodents

Spatial cognition research in rodents typically employs the use of maze tasks, whose attributes vary from one maze to the next. These tasks vary by their behavioral flexibility and required memory duration, the number of goals and pathways, and also the overall task complexity. A confounding feature in many of these tasks is the lack of control over the strategy employed by the rodents to reach the goal, e.g., allocentric (declarative-like) or egocentric (procedural) based strategies. The double-H maze is a novel water-escape memory task that addresses this issue, by allowing the experimenter to direct the type of strategy learned during the training period. The double-H maze is a transparent device, which consists of a central alleyway with three arms protruding on both sides, along with an escape platform submerged at the extremity of one of these arms.
Rats can be trained using an allocentric strategy by alternating the start position in the maze in an unpredictable manner (see protocol 1; &#167;4.7), thus requiring them to learn the location of the platform based on the available allothetic cues. Alternatively, an egocentric learning strategy (protocol 2; &#167;4.8) can be employed by releasing the rats from the same position during each trial, until they learn the procedural pattern required to reach the goal. This task has been proven to allow for the formation of stable memory traces.
Memory can be probed following the training period in a misleading probe trial, in which the starting position for the rats alternates. Following an egocentric learning paradigm, rats typically resort to an allocentric-based strategy, but only when their initial view on the extra-maze cues differs markedly from their original position. This task is ideally suited to explore the effects of drugs/perturbations on allocentric/egocentric memory performance, as well as the interactions between these two memory systems.

The goal of this protocol is to investigate spatial cognition in rodents. The double-H water maze is a novel test, which is particularly useful to elucidate the different components of learning, consolidation and memory, as well as the interplay of memory systems.

Spatial cognition research in rodents typically employs the use of maze tasks, whose attributes vary from one maze to the next. These tasks vary by their ...

Morris Water Maze Test: Optimization for Mouse Strain and Testing Environment

The Morris water maze (MWM) is a commonly used task to assess hippocampal-dependent spatial learning and memory in transgenic mouse models of disease, including neurocognitive disorders such as Alzheimer&#8217;s disease. However, the background strain of the mouse model used can have a substantial effect on the observed behavioral phenotype, with some strains exhibiting superior learning ability relative to others. To ensure differences between transgene negative and transgene positive mice can be detected, identification of a training procedure sensitive to the background strain is essential. Failure to tailor the MWM protocol to the background strain of the mouse model may lead to under- or over- training, thereby masking group differences in probe trials. Here, a MWM protocol tailored for use with the F1 FVB/N x 129S6 background is described. This is a frequently used background strain to study the age-dependent effects of mutant P301L tau (rTg(TauP301L)4510 mice) on the memory deficits associated with Alzheimer&#8217;s disease. Also described is a strategy to re-optimize, as dictated by the particular testing environment utilized.

This manuscript describes a Morris water maze (MWM) protocol tailored for use with a commonly used mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. The MWM is widely used in transgenic mouse models. Implementation of a procedure sensitive to the background strain of the mouse model is essential for detecting group differences.

 The Morris water maze (MWM) is a commonly used task to assess hippocampal-dependent spatial learning and memory in transgenic mouse models of disease, ...

Detecting Behavioral Deficits in Rats After Traumatic Brain Injury

With the increasing incidence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in both civilian and military populations, TBI is now considered a chronic disease; however, few studies have investigated the long-term effects of injury in rodent models of TBI. Shown here are behavioral measures that are well-established in TBI research for times early after injury, such as two weeks, until two months. Some of these methods have previously been used at later times after injury, up to one year, but by very few laboratories. The methods demonstrated here are a short neurological assessment to test reflexes, a Beam-Balance to test balance, a Beam-Walk to test balance and motor coordination, and a working memory version of the Morris water maze that can be sensitive to deficits in reference memory. Male rats were handled and pre-trained to neurological, balance, and motor coordination tests prior to receiving parasagittal fluid percussion injury (FPI) or sham injury. Rats can be tested on the short neurological assessment (neuroscore), the beam-balance, and the Beam-Walk multiple times, while testing on the water maze can only be done once. This difference is because rats can remember the task, thus confounding the results if repeated testing is attempted in the same animal. When testing from one to three days after injury, significant differences are detected in all three non-cognitive tasks. However, differences in the Beam-Walk task were not detectable at later time points (after 3 months). Deficits were detected at 3 months in the Beam-Balance and at 6 months in the neuroscore. Deficits in working memory were detected out to 12 months after injury, and a deficit in a reference memory first appeared at 12 months. Thus, standard behavioral tests can be useful measures of persistent behavioral deficits after FPI.

The goal of the behavioral tests presented here is to detect functional deficits in rats after traumatic brain injury. Four specific tests are presented that detect deficits in behaviors to reflect the damage to specific brain areas at times extending to one year after injury.

With the increasing incidence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in both civilian and military populations, TBI is now considered a chronic disease; however, ...

Using Laser Doppler Imaging and Monitoring to Analyze Spinal Cord Microcirculation in Rat

Laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) is a noninvasive method for blood flow (BF) measurement, which makes it preferable for measuring microcirculatory alterations of the spinal cord. In this article, our goal was to use both Laser Doppler imaging and monitoring to analyze the change of BF after spinal cord injury. Both the laser Doppler image scanner and the probe/monitor were being employed to obtain each readout. The data of LDPI provided a local distribution of BF, which gave an overview of perfusion around the injury site and made it accessible for comparative analysis of BF among different locations. By intensely measuring the probing area over a period of time, a combined probe was used to simultaneously measure the BF and oxygen saturation of the spinal cord, showing overall spinal cord perfusion and oxygen supply. LDF itself has a few limitations, such as relative flux, sensitivity to movement, and biological zero signal. However, the technology has been applied in clinical and experimental study due to its simple setup and rapid measurement of BF.

Here we present a combination of laser Doppler perfusion imaging (LDPI) and laser Doppler perfusion monitoring (LDPM) to measure spinal cord local blood flows and oxygen saturation (SO2), as well as a standardized procedure for introducing spinal cord trauma on rat.

Laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) is a noninvasive method for blood flow (BF) measurement, which makes it preferable for measuring microcirculatory ...

A Behavioral Assay for Investigating the Role of Spatial Memory During Instinctive Defense in Mice

Evolution has selected a repertoire of defensive behaviors that are essential for survival across all animal species. These behaviors are often stereotyped actions elicited in response to innately aversive sensory stimuli, but their success requires enough flexibility for adapting to different spatial environments, which can change rapidly. Here, we describe a behavioral assay to evaluate the influence of learned spatial knowledge on defensive behaviors in mice. We have adapted the widely used Barnes maze spatial memory assay to investigate how mice navigate to a shelter during escape responses to innately aversive sensory stimuli in a novel environment, and how they adapt to acute changes in the environment. This new assay is an ethological paradigm that does not require training and exploits the natural exploration patterns and navigation strategies in mice. We propose that the set of protocols described here are a powerful means of studying goal-directed behaviors and stimulus-triggered navigation, which should be of interest to both the fields of instinctive behaviors and spatial memory.

This protocol describes a behavioral assay, based on the Barnes maze test, to study how instinctive defensive actions are modified by the knowledge of spatial environment.

Evolution has selected a repertoire of defensive behaviors that are essential for survival across all animal species. These behaviors are often ...

Stress-Enhanced Fear Learning, a Robust Rodent Model of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

Fear behaviors are important for survival, but disproportionately high levels of fear can increase the vulnerability for developing psychiatric disorders such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). To understand the biological mechanisms of fear dysregulation in PTSD, it is important to start with a valid animal model of the disorder. This protocol describes the methodology required to conduct stress-enhanced fear learning (SEFL) experiments, a preclinical model of PTSD, in both rats and mice. SEFL was developed to recapitulate critical aspects of PTSD, including long-term sensitization of fear learning caused by an acute stressor. SEFL uses aspects of Pavlovian fear conditioning but produces a distinct and robust sensitized fear response far greater than normal conditional fear responses. The trauma procedure involves placing a rodent in a conditioning chamber and administering 15 unsignaled shocks randomly distributed over 90 minutes (for rat experiments; for mouse experiments, 10 unsignaled shocks randomly distributed over 60 minutes are used). On day 2, rodents are placed in a novel conditioning context where they receive a single shock; then, on day 3 they are placed back in the same context as on day 2 and tested for changes in freezing levels. Rodents that previously received the trauma display enhanced levels of freezing on the test day compared to those that received no shocks on the first day. Thus, with this model, a single highly stressful experience (the trauma) produces extreme fear of the stimuli associated with the traumatic event.

Here we describe the detailed methodology required to conduct stress-enhanced fear learning (SEFL) experiments, a preclinical model of post-traumatic stress disorder, in both rats and mice. The model utilizes aspects of Pavlovian fear conditioning and freezing as an index of enhanced fear in rodents.

Fear behaviors are important for survival, but disproportionately high levels of fear can increase the vulnerability for developing psychiatric disorders ...

Novel Object Recognition and Object Location Behavioral Testing in Mice on a Budget

Ethologically relevant behavioral testing is a critical component of any study that uses mouse models to study the cognitive effects of various physiological or pathological changes. The object location task (OLT) and the novel object recognition task (NORT) are two effective behavioral tasks commonly used to reveal the function and relative health of specific brain regions involved in memory. While both of these tests exploit the inherent preference of mice for the novelty to reveal memory for previously encountered objects, the OLT primarily evaluates spatial learning, which relies heavily on hippocampal activity. The NORT, in contrast, evaluates non-spatial learning of object identity, which relies on multiple brain regions. Both tasks require an open-field-testing arena, objects with equivalent intrinsic value to mice, appropriate environmental cues, and video recording equipment and the software. Commercially available systems, while convenient, can be costly. This manuscript details a simple, cost-effective method for building the arenas and setting up the equipment necessary to perform the OLT and NORT. Furthermore, the manuscript describes an efficient testing protocol that incorporates both OLT and NORT and provides typical methods for data acquisition and analysis, as well as representative results. Successful completion of these tests can provide valuable insight into the memory function of various mouse model systems and appraise the underlying neural regions that support these functions.

Here we provide a protocol which includes comprehensive instructions for the economical establishment of murine object location and novel object recognition behavioral testing, including the design, cost, and construction of required equipment as well as execution of behavioral testing, data collection, and analysis.

Ethologically relevant behavioral testing is a critical component of any study that uses mouse models to study the cognitive effects of various ...

Analysis of Learning and Memory Ability in an Alzheimer's Disease Mouse Model using the Morris Water Maze

A Morris water maze (MWM) experiment forces experimental animals to swim and learn to find a platform hidden in the water. It is widely used in scientific research to assess the learning and memory of animals. Due to the extensive use of the MWM test, visual experimental protocols are essential for researchers. This manuscript uses the latest studies to introduce the protocol of the MWM test. Alzheimer&#8217; Disease (AD) is characterized by a progressive loss of memory and cognitive function. An alternative and complementary treatment used for AD is Manual Acupuncture (MA). To assess the learning and memory ability of AD model mice, the MWM test was conducted. The visible platform trial, hidden platform trial, probe trial, and reversal trial of MWM were used to evaluate spatial learning and memory ability. In the visible platform trial, the swimming speed and escape latency of mice in different groups was not significantly different. In the hidden platform and reversal trials, the AD group showed a long escape latency. The escape latency decreased significantly after the MA treatment. Low platform crossover number and the proportion of time in the SW quadrant in the probe trial increased after the MA treatment (p &#60; 0.05 or p &#60; 0.01). The results of the MWM tests suggest that MA can effectively improve the spatial learning and memory abilities of AD model mice. Rigorous experimental operations provided assurance of the reliability of the results.

Herein, a protocol to conduct the Morris water maze tests to evaluate the ability of learning and memory of Alzheimer&#8217;s Disease model mice and to assess the effect of manual acupuncture for treating them is described.

A Morris water maze (MWM) experiment forces experimental animals to swim and learn to find a platform hidden in the water. It is widely used in scientific ...