Name: bilateral assessment of the corticospinal pathways of the ankle muscles using navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation
Uploaded: 2019-02-19T14:00:00
Description: Watch this Scientific Journal Video about Bilateral Assessment of the Corticospinal Pathways of the Ankle Muscles Using Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation at JoVE.com

The authors thank Dr. Jesse C. Dean for helping with methodological development and providing feedback on a draft of the manuscript. This work was supported by a VA Career Development Award-2 RR&#38;D N0787-W (MGB), an Institutional Development Award from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the NIH under grant number P20-GM109040 (SAK) and P2CHD086844 (SAK).&#160;The content does not represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government.

All experimental procedures presented in this protocol have been approved by the local Institutional Review Board and are in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
1. Consent Process and Safety Questionnaires
<ol>
	<li>Prior to any experiment, explain to each subject the aim(s) of the study, the main experimental procedures, and any potential risk factors associated with participating in the study. After answering any questions or concerns that subjects may have, ask subjects to acknow...

Given the emerging interest in how the motor cortex contributes to the motor control of leg muscles during dynamic tasks in various cohorts, a standardized TMS protocol that describes the thorough assessment of these muscles is needed. Therefore, for the first time, the present protocol provides standardized methodological procedures on bilateral assessment of two ankle antagonistic muscles, SOL and TA, during two muscle states (rest and TVA) using a single pulse TMS with neuronavigation.
The ...

Tibialis anterior (TA) and soleus (SOL) are ankle antagonistic muscles located in the anterior and posterior compartment of the lower leg, respectively. Both muscles are uniarticular, while the main function of TA and SOL is to dorsiflex and plantarflex the talocrural joint, respectively1. Furthermore, TA is more functional for long muscle excursions and less important for force production, whereas SOL is an antigravity muscle designed to generate high force with small excursion of the muscle2. Both muscles are especially relevant during upright postural and dynamic tasks (e.g., walking)3,4. Regarding neural control, the motorneuron pools of both muscles receive neural drive from the brain via the motor descending pathways5,6, in addition to varying degrees of sensory drive.
The main motor descending pathway is the corticospinal tract, which originates from the primary, premotor and supplementary motor areas and terminates in the spinal motorneuron pools7,8. In humans, the functional state of this tract (corticomotor response - CMR) can be feasibly assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), a non-invasive brain stimulation tool9,10. Since the introduction of TMS and given their functional significance during upright postural task and walking, CMR of TA and SOL have been assessed in various cohorts and tasks11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32.
In contrast to the assessment of CMR in upper-extremity muscles33, no universal TMS protocol has been established for the assessment of CMR in lower-extremity muscles. Due to the lack of an established protocol and the large methodological variability across the previous studies (e.g., type of coil, use of neuronavigation, level of tonic activation, testing side and muscle, use and calculation of CMR measures, etc.), the interpretation of results across studies and cohorts can be cumbersome, complicated, and inaccurate. As the measures are functionally relevant in various motor tasks, an established TMS protocol specific to lower extremity CMR assessment will allow motor neuroscientists and rehabilitation scientists to systematically assess the CMR in these muscles across sessions and various cohorts.
Therefore, the objective of this protocol is to describe the bilateral assessment of TA and SOL CMR using single pulse TMS and neuronavigation system. In contrast to previous work, this protocol aims to maximize rigor of the experimental procedures, data acquisition, and data analysis by employing methodological factors that optimize the validity and duration of the experiment, and standardize the CMR assessment of these two lower extremity muscles. Given that the CMR of a muscle depends on whether the muscle is fully relaxed or is partially activated, this protocol describes how the TA and SOL CMR can be assessed during rest and tonic voluntary activation (TVA). The following sections will thoroughly describe the present protocol. Finally, representative data will be presented and discussed. The protocol described here is derived from that in Charalambous et al. 201832.

<table>
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td>2 Magstim stimulators (Bistim module)</td>
			<td>The Magstim Company Limited; Whitland, UK</td>
			<td></td>
			<td>Used to elicit bilateral motor evoked potentials in tibialis anterior and soleus muscles.</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Adaptive parameter estimation by sequential testing (PEST) for TMS</td>
			<td>http://www.clinicalresearcher.org/software.htm</td>
			<td></td>
			<td>Used to determine motor thresholds.</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Amplifier</td>
			<td>Motion Lab Systems; Baton Rouge, LN, USA</td>
			<td>MA-300</td>
			<td>Used to amplify EMG data.</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Data Aqcuisition Unit</td>
			<td>Motion Lab Systems; Baton Rouge, LN, USA</td>
			<td>Micro 1401</td>
			<td>Used to aqcuire EMG data.</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Double cone coil</td>
			<td>The Magstim Company Limited; Whitland, UK</td>
			<td>PN: 9902AP</td>
			<td>Used to elicit bilateral motor evoked potentials in tibialis anterior and soleus muscles.</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Polaris</td>
			<td>Northen Digital Inc.; Waterloo, Ontario, Canada</td>
			<td></td>
			<td>Used to track the reflectiive markers located on subject tracker and coil tracker.</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Signal</td>
			<td>Cambridge Electronics Design Limited; Cambridge, UK</td>
			<td>version 6</td>
			<td>Used to collect motor evoked potentials during rest and TVA.</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Single double differential surface EMG electrodes</td>
			<td>Motion Lab Systems; Baton Rouge, LN, USA</td>
			<td>MA-411</td>
			<td>Used to record EMG signals.</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>TMS Frameless Stereotaxy Neuronavigation Sytem</td>
			<td>Brainsight 3, Rouge Research, 
			Montreal, Canada</td>
			<td></td>
			<td>Used to navigate coil position during TMS assessment.</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Walker boot</td>
			<td>Mountainside Medical Equipment, Marcy, NY</td>
			<td></td>
			<td>Used to stabilize ankle joint.</td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>

bilateral assessment of the corticospinal pathways of the ankle muscles using navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation

Distal leg muscles receive neural input from motor cortical areas via the corticospinal tract, which is one of the main motor descending pathway in humans and can be assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Given the role of distal leg muscles in upright postural and dynamic tasks, such as walking, a growing research interest in the assessment and modulation of the corticospinal tracts relative to the function of these muscles has emerged in the last decade. However, methodological parameters used in previous work have varied across studies making the interpretation of results from cross-sectional and longitudinal studies less robust. Therefore, use of a standardized TMS protocol specific to the assessment of leg muscles&#39; corticomotor response (CMR) will allow for direct comparison of results across studies and cohorts. The objective of this paper is to present a protocol that provides the flexibility to simultaneously assess the bilateral CMR of two main ankle antagonistic muscles, the tibialis anterior and soleus, using single pulse TMS with a neuronavigation system. The present protocol is applicable while the examined muscle is either fully relaxed or isometrically contracted at a defined percentage of maximum isometric voluntary contraction. Using each subject&#39;s structural MRI with the neuronavigation system ensures accurate and precise positioning of the coil over the leg cortical representations during assessment. Given the inconsistency in CMR derived measures, this protocol also describes a standardized calculation of these measures using automated algorithms. Though this protocol is not conducted during upright postural or dynamic tasks, it&#160;can be used to assess bilaterally any pair of leg muscles, either antagonistic or synergistic, in both neurologically intact and impaired subjects.

Figures 2-4 present data from a representative neurologically intact 31 year old male with height and weight of 178 cm and 83 kg, respectively.
Figure 2 presents the bilateral hot spots and RMT of each ankle muscle. Using the spot located on the center of the leg area in each hemisphere (see squares in Figure 1B), the intensity of 45% MSO was bilaterally used for the hot spot hunting. The hot spot location for each muscle differed between hemi...

Watch this Scientific Journal Video about Bilateral Assessment of the Corticospinal Pathways of the Ankle Muscles Using Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation at JoVE.com

Bilateral Assessment of the Corticospinal Pathways of the Ankle Muscles Using Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

The present protocol describes the simultaneous, bilateral assessment of the corticomotor response of the tibialis anterior and soleus during rest and tonic voluntary activation using a single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation and neuronavigation system.

Distal leg muscles receive neural input from motor cortical areas via the corticospinal tract, which is one of the main motor descending pathway in humans ...

This protocol is critically important because it standardizes an approach with a very difficult task of detecting motor-evoked potentials in the distal lower extremity muscles. The main advantage of this technique is that it consolidates the literature associated with lower extremity stimulation, which often focuses only on the tibialis anterior and uses a variety of techniques. We've studied this technique in neurologically healthy individuals as well as those with stroke.However, the importance of the technique is in standardizing lower extremity assessments. The technique allows for the opportunity to identify the gaps in our understanding of motor control during gait and revisits research that did not allow for the control of interfering factors. Demonstrating the procedure will be John Kindred, PhD, a postdoctoral scholar, and Brian Cence, a research coordinator, both from our research laboratory.Begin by uploading the subject's MRI files into a neuronavigation system. Then, manually co-register the MRI to anterior and posterior commissures, so that the Montreal Neurological Institute Atlas can be used. Next, reconstruct the skin and full curvilinear brain model by adjusting the bounding box around the skull and brain tissues.Identify four anatomical landmarks using the skin model, including the tip of the nose, nasion, and supratragic notch of the right and left ear. Now, place a rectangular grid over the leg motor area in each hemisphere. Position the centered row of the grid at the center and over the gyrus of the leg motor cortical area.Then, position the medial column of the grid parallel and adjacent to the medial wall of the ipsilateral hemisphere. This grid will be used to find the hot spot. For motor mapping, use larger grids, either by adding more spots or increasing the distance between spots as needed.Perform placements of electrodes while the subject is in a standing position. First, prepare the areas where each electrode will be placed by first shaving and then lightly exfoliating any dead skin cells and oils using alcohol swabs. Next, ask the subject to lift their toes upwards and then place the electrode at the upper third of the line between the head of the fibula and medial malleolus.Do this bilaterally for placement on the tibialis anterior. Now, attach electrodes bilaterally on the lateral soleus. Ask the subject to raise their heel and then place the electrode at the lower third of the line between the lateral femoral condyle and lateral malleolus below the gastrocnemius muscle belly.Also, attach the ground reference passive electrode either on the patella or lateral malleolus bilaterally or unilaterally, depending on the EMG acquisition unit in use. Test the electrode placement by asking the subject to either dorsiflex or plantarflex the ankle in an upright posture while displaying the raw EMG signal of all muscles tested on a computer screen. If an electrode is misplaced, remove and replace it until clear detectable EMG bursts with minimal background noise are seen.Then, with the subject seated with their muscles at rest, test the signal quality by discharging a few TMS pulses while the coil is held away from the subject. The most crucial step in this technique is verifying that the EMG signal is as clear of noise as possible. Failure to do this adequately makes data analysis incredibly difficult.Next, check that the baseline signal for each EMG channel is close to zero. If noise is present in a channel, remove the corresponding electrode and repeat the skin preparation procedures. If the noise is still present, adjust the reference electrode's position and replace the electrolyte gel.Once a good signal is verified, wrap all electrodes using light foam pre-wrap tape to hold them in place and to reduce motion artifact from the EMG. Now, seat the subject in a chair and, to ensure consistent feet placement across subjects, secure both feet in walking boots that allow the ankle range of motion to be adjusted to a specific position and provide resistance during tonic voluntary action. Also, adjust both hip and knee angles to avoid subject discomfort and instruct the subject to remain still throughout the experiment.Begin tonic voluntary activation testing by first determining the maximum voluntary isometric contraction of each muscle bilaterally. For each motion, instruct the subject to maximally contract the contralateral examined muscle four times. Next, verify the position of the motion capture camera by placing the subject tracker, pointer, and the coil tracker in its capture volume space.Then, perform the subject image registration by placing the tip of the pointer on the four anatomical landmarks. Now, determine the hot spot of both muscles bilaterally. First, find the suprathreshold intensity by applying a single stimulus over the centered spot next to the interhemispheric fissure.Next, start at low intensity and gradually increase the TMS intensity by five percent increments until reaching an intensity that elicits a motor-evoked potential with a peak to peak amplitude greater than 50 microvolts in all contralateral examined muscles or three consecutive stimuli and repeat for each muscle. Apply one TMS pulse on each spot of the grid. Then, transfer the amplitude values of each spot for all contralateral muscles in a spreadsheet and sort amplitude from high to low.Identify the hot spot of the contralateral tibialis anterior and soleus muscles as a location in the grid with the largest amplitude and the shortest latency. Select the grid spot in the neuronavigation system that corresponds to one of the muscle's hot spots. Next, set the initial intensity and step size at 45 and six percent maximum stimulator output.Then, use an adaptive threshold hunting method for resting motor threshold determination. Do this twice for each muscle and use the average for the sunsequent corticomotor response assessment. Now, to assess bilateral corticomotor response during rest, select the grid spot in the neuronavigation system that corresponds to the examined muscle's hot spot.Prior to each stimulus, instruct the subject to stay still and relax the examined muscles bilaterally and monitor the activity of all muscles using a real time visual feedback. Apply ten single TMS pulses at 120%of resting motor threshold of the examined muscle. If any muscle is active before or after TMS, discard that trial and apply an additional single pulse.Repeat this until 10 waveforms for each contralateral examined muscle at rest have been collected. Next, assess the corticomotor response during tonic voluntary activation bilaterally. Select the same grid spots in the neuronavigation system that were used during resting conditions.Ask subjects to contract the examined muscle at approximately 15%maximum muscle activity value and apply 10 single TMS pulses at 120%of resting motor threshold. Ask them to keep the displayed smooth moving line of the examined muscle within the two horizontal cursors and to sustain that contraction at that level for a few seconds. When tibialis anterior is the examined muscle, ask subjects to pull slightly up against the boot straps for the leg contralateral to stimulated hemisphere.When soleus is the examined muscle, ask subjects to push slightly down against the boot on the contralateral leg. Monitor the muscle activity of the active and resting muscles using real time visual feedback. If the examined muscle's activity is below or above the predetermined range, or if any other muscle is activated, discard the stimulus and apply an additional single pulse.Collect 10 trials while the examined muscle is activated at the predetermined range. This figure shows bilateral tibialis anterior and soleus hot spots. Here, bar plots represent the mean resting motor threshold of two assessments for each muscle, while the values below denote the number of stimuli applied.The dashed line indicates the intensity used for the hot spot hunting. This figure shows the bilateral responses of tibialis anterior and soleus when their hot spot was stimulated during rest. The bilateral EMG average waveform of each muscle is shown.If a motor-evoked potential was present, the values of the peak to peak amplitude and latency are presented. Here, we see bilateral responses when the hot spots were stimulated during tonic voluntary action. The EMG of the bilateral muscles were collected while the examined contralateral muscle was activated at about 15%maximum voluntary isometric contraction.Additional analysis can be conducted to help answer questions regarding the cortical spinal tract post-stroke since the data in the protocol are collected in agonist and antagonist muscle groups bilaterally. Research continues using this technique to determine the individual contributions of multiple factors to corticomotor responses in order to increase our overall understanding of the motor control of walking. It should be noted that there are risk factors due to the high magnetic field that should be accounted for by screening subjects prior to this procedure.

Research

JoVE Journal

Neuroscience

A Novel Approach for Documenting Phosphenes Induced by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Stimulation of the human visual cortex produces a transient perception of light, known as a phosphene. Phosphenes are induced by invasive electrical ...

Combining Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and fMRI to Examine the Default Mode Network

The default mode network is a group of brain regions that are active when an individual is not focused on the outside world and the brain is at "wakeful ...

Electrode Positioning and Montage in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a technique that has been intensively investigated in the past decade as this method offers a ...

The Use of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy as a Tool for the Measurement of Bi-hemispheric Transcranial Electric Stimulation Effects on Primary Motor Cortex Metabolism

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a neuromodulation technique that has been increasingly used over the past decade in the treatment of ...

Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on the Primary Motor Cortex by Online Combined Approach with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) is a neuromodulatory technique able to act through sinusoidal electrical waveforms in a specific ...

Online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocol for Measuring Cortical Physiology Associated with Response Inhibition

We describe the development of a reproducible, child-friendly motor response inhibition task suitable for online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) ...

Combined Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Electroencephalography of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive method that produces neural excitation in the cortex by means of brief, time-varying magnetic ...

Stimulation Location Determination using a 3D Digitizer with High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

The abundance of neuroimaging data and rapid development of machine learning has made it possible to investigate brain activation patterns. However, ...

Measuring and Manipulating Functionally Specific Neural Pathways in the Human Motor System with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Understanding interactions between brain areas is important for the study of goal-directed behavior. Functional neuroimaging of brain connectivity has ...