This work was supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch project 1016879 and Maryland Agricultural Experiment Station via MAES Grant No. 2956952.

1. Preparation of dosage curve for effective mutagenesis
<ol>
	<li>Soak 100 seeds with the genotype of interest in six 250 mL glass flasks (100 in each flask) containing 50 mL of distilled water. Shake at 100 rpm for 8 h at room temperature (RT) for imbibition by the seeds.</li>
	<li>In a fume hood, prepare 50 mL of 0.4%, 0.6%, 0.8%, 1.0%, and 1.2% (w/v) ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) solution by dissolving 0.167, 0.249, 0.331, 0.415, and 0.498 mL of EMS in distilled water, respectively. 
	NOTE: EMS is liquid at RT with a density of 1.206 g/mL. 
	CAUTION: Use appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) while handling EMS.</li>
	<li>Decant the water out of five flasks and add 50 mL of EMS solution in each flask containing imbibed seed so that there are six different treatments with 0.0%, 0.4%, 0.6%, 0.8%, 1.0%, and 1.2% EMS solution. Shake flasks for 16 h at 75 rpm and RT.</li>
	<li>Decant the EMS solution and collect the treated seeds separately for each treatment using cheese cloth. Inactivate the used EMS solution by adding one volume of EMS-inactivating solution (0.1 M NaOH, 20% w/v Na2S2O3) for 24 h. Also treat the contaminated flasks and pipette tips with the EMS-inactivating solution for 24 h.</li>
	<li>Wash the EMS-treated seeds under running tap water for 2 h. Transplant each seed individually into root trainers containing potting soil.</li>
	<li>Grow plants at 20&#8211;25 &#176;C under a 16 h light period.</li>
	<li>Record data on plant survival after 15 days of transplantation. Use the following equation to calculate the survival rate for each treatment: 
	<img alt="Equation 1" src="/files/ftp_upload/59743/59743eq1.jpg" /> 
	NOTE: If the germination rate is lower than 100% in controls, accurate survival rates in all the treatments should be calculated after subtracting the number of seeds that failed to germinate in the controls. A survival rate of 40%&#8211;60% is desirable for effective mutagenesis. It may be required to perform a second round of dosage optimization with a modified concentration according to the survival of the treated seeds until achieving the desirable lethality rate of 40%&#8211;60%.</li>
</ol>
2. Mutagenesis and maintenance of mutant population
<ol>
	<li>Soak the final batch of at least 3,000 seeds dividing equally (600 seeds each) in five 1,000 mL flasks containing 300 mL distilled water. Shake for 8 h at 100 rpm under RT for imbibition. 
	NOTE: The final size of the desirable population will depend on the mutation frequency and ploidy level of the genotype, but it is advisable to use at least 3,000 seeds for hexaploids, 4,000 seeds for tetraploids, and more than 7,000 seeds for diploids.</li>
	<li>In a fume hood, prepare 1,500 mL of the optimized EMS concentration solution in distilled water.</li>
	<li>Decant the water out of the flasks and add 300 ml of the optimal concentration of EMS solution in each flask containing 600 imbibed seeds. Shake the flasks for 16 h at 75 rpm and RT.</li>
	<li>Decant the EMS and collect the treated seeds in cheese cloth. Inactivate the EMS solution and treatment containers with EMS-inactivating solution as done in step 1.4.</li>
	<li>Wash the EMS-treated seeds under running tap water for 2 h. Transplant each EMS-treated M1 seed individually into root trainers.</li>
	<li>Grow M1 plants (derived from M0 seeds) at 20&#8211;25 &#176;C under a 16 h light period. 
	NOTE: It may be required to vernalize the seedlings at the two leaf stage for 6 weeks at 4 &#176;C, if the genotype of interest has a winter-type growth habit.</li>
	<li>Allow the M1 plants to self-pollinate, and harvest the M2 seeds separately for each fertile M1 plant. 
	NOTE: To avoid chances of potential outcrossing, cover the spikes of M1 plants with pollination bags before anthesis.</li>
	<li>Plant a single M2 seed from each M1 plant to avoid genetic redundancy.</li>
	<li>Collect tissue from M2 plants at the two-leaf stage in 1.1 mL of racked 96 well microtubes. Collect around 80 mm of leaf tissue from each plant and record the ID of each sample in a tissue collection plan.</li>
	<li>Freeze-dry the leaf tissue using a lyophilizer and store at -80 &#176;C.</li>
	<li>Maintain the M2 plants at 20&#8211;25 &#176;C under a 16 h light period.</li>
	<li>Record data on mutant phenotypes of the M2 plants at regular intervals. The expected phenotypes are albino, chlorina, grassy shoot, variegated, partially fertile, sterile, etc.</li>
	<li>Allow the M2 plants to self-fertilize and mature. Separately harvest and save the M3 seeds of the M2 plants (Figure 1). 
	NOTE: M seeds are used for validating the phenotype in reverse genetics studies. Therefore, M should be carefully catalogued and stored under cool and dry conditions. Alternatively, if the seed must be increased in field, head rows can be planted for each M plant, and M seeds from each row can be harvested and saved separately as the TILLING population resource.</li>
</ol>
3. Cel-1 assay for genetic characterization of mutants
<ol>
	<li>Extract DNA from the leaf tissue of M2 using a plant DNA extraction kit with a DNA purification system (see Table of Materials) following the manufacturer&#8217;s recommendations.</li>
	<li>Quantify DNA using a spectrophotometer and normalize the DNA concentrations to 25 ng/&#181;L with nuclease-free water in 96 well blocks. 
	NOTE: It is important to check the quality of the DNA by running it on a gel, as low-quality DNA (smeared DNA) may result in false negatives in pooled samples.</li>
	<li>Create 4x DNA pools by combining DNA from four 96 well blocks into one plate, while maintaining the row and column identity of each sample. Add 50 &#181;L of DNA from each individual sample into the pool plate so that each pool plate well contains a total 200 &#181;L of DNA from four different 96 well blocks.</li>
	<li>Catalogue the identity of pooled DNA in the format of Pool Plate-Row-Column (e.g., Pool 1 A1 = Box1A1 + Box2A1 + Box3A1 + Box4A1).</li>
	<li>Design genome-specific primers [A1] for the gene of interest using the Genome Specific Primers (GSP) page &#60;https://probes.pw.usda.gov/GSP&#62; with default settings for polyploid species. For diploids, use Primer 3 &#60;http://primer3.ut.ee/&#62; for designing primers using default settings. Design multiple primers, if needed, to cover the entire coding region of the gene of interest. 
	NOTE: The latest IWGSC assembly can be used to obtain sequences for the gene of interest in wheat using the URGI BLAST tool &#60;https://wheat-urgi.versailles.inra.fr/Seq-Repository/BLAST&#62;. The optimal amplicon length is in the range of 800&#8211;1,500 bp. Table 1 shows examples of primers for waxy genes in hexaploid wheat.</li>
	<li>Run a PCR for gene-specific primers on pooled DNA as follows:
	<ol>
		<li>Add 5 &#181;L of PCR buffer, 2 &#181;L (each) of 4 &#181;M forward and reverse primers, 0.1 &#181;L of DNA polymerase (see Table of Materials), 5 &#181;L of pooled DNA template, then increase the volume to 25 &#181;L using nuclease-free water.</li>
		<li>Use a touch down profile to run the PCR reaction on a thermal cycler as follows: 95 &#176;C for 1 min, seven cycles of 95 &#176;C for 1 min, 67 &#176;C to 60 &#176;C for 1 min with temperature decreases of 1 &#176;C per cycle and 72 &#176;C for 2 min, followed by 30 cycles of 95 &#176;C for 1 min, 60 &#176;C for 1 min, 72 &#176;C for 2 min, and final extension at 72 &#176;C for 7 min. 
		NOTE: Above PCR profile works on wheat DNA template for most of the primers designed using primer 3 default settings. In case of non-specific amplification, PCR profile should be made stringent before moving to the next steps.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Generate heteroduplexes between mismatched DNA by incubating PCR products in thermal cycler using profile as follows: 95 &#176;C for 2 min, five cycles of 95 &#176;C for 1 s, 95 &#176;C to 85 &#176;C for 1 min with temperature decreases of 2 &#176;C per cycle, and 60 cycles of 85 &#176;C to 25 &#176;C with decreases of 1 &#176;C per cycle.</li>
	<li>Add 2.5 &#181;L of homemade Cel-1 endonuclease to the heteroduplexed PCR products and incubate for 45 min at 45 &#176;C. Terminate the Cel-1 reaction by adding 2.5 &#181;L of 0.5 M EDTA (pH 8.0). 
	NOTE: Cel-1 endonuclease can be extracted from fresh celery stalks using the protocol performed by Till et al.19 It is very important to test the activity and optimum amount of Cel-1 endonuclease, which can be tested using previously characterized mutants or a commercially available mutation detection kit.</li>
	<li>Run the Cel-1 treated products on a 3.0% agarose gel at 100 V for 2.5 h. The wells containing smaller and unique cleaved band(s), in addition to full-length uncleaved bands, will contain the mutant DNA sample.</li>
	<li>Denconvolute mutant pools.
	<ol>
		<li>Follow steps 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, and 3.9 for individual M2 DNA samples constituting the mutant pools identified in step 3.9.</li>
		<li>To determine the zygosity of mutants, run two PCR (as described in step 3.6) for individual M2 DNA, in which the first reaction contains 2.5 &#181;L of M2 DNA and 2.5 &#181;L of wild-type DNA and the second reaction contains only 5 &#181;L of M2 DNA. If the mutation is heterozygous, an additional cleaved band will be present in both reactions. On the other hand, additional cleaved bands will be found only in the first reaction if the mutant is homozygous.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>To identify the nature of the mutation, sequence the PCR products of the confirmed mutants using a Sanger sequencing platform following the manufacturer&#8217;s instructions.</li>
</ol>
4. Calculation of mutation frequency
NOTE: Mutation frequency of a TILLING population refers to the average physical distance in which one mutation occurs in the individuals of that population. For example, a mutation frequency of 1/35 kb in a TILLING population means that an average individual of that population possesses 1 mutation per every 35 kb in the genome.
<ol>
	<li>To determine the mutation frequency of a TILLING population, calculate the total number of bases screened.</li>
	<li>To calculate the total number of bases screened, multiply the PCR product size by the total number of individuals screened.</li>
	<li>Divide the total number of bases screened by the number of unique mutations observed using the following equation, which will yield the physical region possessing 1 mutation in the given TILLING population: 
	<img alt="Equation 2" src="/files/ftp_upload/59743/59743eq2.jpg" /> 
	NOTE: To account for the limitation in resolution of 50 bp at both the ends based on an agarose gel-based platform, subtract 100 bp from the product size in the calculation.</li>
</ol>

<ol><li>McCallum, C. M., Comai, L., Greene, E. A., Henikoff, S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Targeted+screening+for+induced+mutations%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nature+Biotechnology%22%5BJournal%5D)">Targeted screening for induced mutations.</a> Nature Biotechnology. 18 (4), 455-457 (2000).</li>
<li>Bentley, A., MacLennan, B., Calvo, J., Dearolf, C. R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Targeted+Recovery+of+Mutations+in+Drosophila%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Genetics%22%5BJournal%5D)">Targeted Recovery of Mutations in Drosophila.</a> Genetics. 156 (3), 1169-1173 (2000).</li>
<li>Tsai, H., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Discovery+of+Rare+Mutations+in+Populations%3A+TILLING+by+Sequencing%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Plant+Physiology%22%5BJournal%5D)">Discovery of Rare Mutations in Populations: TILLING by Sequencing.</a> Plant Physiology. 156 (3), 1257-1268 (2011).</li>
<li>Caldwell, D. G., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+structured+mutant+population+for+forward+and+reverse+genetics+in+Barley+%28Hordeum+vulgare+L.%29%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22The+Plant+Journal%22%5BJournal%5D)">A structured mutant population for forward and reverse genetics in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.).</a> The Plant Journal. 40 (1), 143-150 (2004).</li>
<li>Hazard, B., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Induced+Mutations+in+the+Starch+Branching+Enzyme+II+%28+SBEII+%29+Genes+Increase+Amylose+and+Resistant+Starch+Content+in+Durum+Wheat%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Crop+Science%22%5BJournal%5D)">Induced Mutations in the Starch Branching Enzyme II ( SBEII ) Genes Increase Amylose and Resistant Starch Content in Durum Wheat.</a> Crop Science. 52 (4), 1754-1766 (2012).</li>
<li>Rawat, N., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+diploid+wheat+TILLING+resource+for+wheat+functional+genomics%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22BMC+Plant+Biology%22%5BJournal%5D)">A diploid wheat TILLING resource for wheat functional genomics.</a> BMC Plant Biology. 12, 205(2012).</li>
<li>Rawat, N., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((TILL-D%3A+An+Aegilops+tauschii+TILLING+Resource+for+Wheat+Improvement%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Frontiers+in+Plant+Science%22%5BJournal%5D)">TILL-D: An Aegilops tauschii TILLING Resource for Wheat Improvement.</a> Frontiers in Plant Science. 9, (2018).</li>
<li>Rawat, N., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Wheat+Fhb1+encodes+a+chimeric+lectin+with+agglutinin+domains+and+a+pore-forming+toxin-like+domain+conferring+resistance+to+Fusarium+head+blight%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nature+Genetics%22%5BJournal%5D)">Wheat Fhb1 encodes a chimeric lectin with agglutinin domains and a pore-forming toxin-like domain conferring resistance to Fusarium head blight.</a> Nature Genetics. 48 (12), 1576-1580 (2016).</li>
<li>Kippes, N., Chen, A., Zhang, X., Lukaszewski, A. J., Dubcovsky, J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Development+and+characterization+of+a+spring+hexaploid+wheat+line+with+no+functional+VRN2+genes%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Theoretical+and+Applied+Genetics%22%5BJournal%5D)">Development and characterization of a spring hexaploid wheat line with no functional VRN2 genes.</a> Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 129 (7), 1417-1428 (2016).</li>
<li>Greene, E. A., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Spectrum+of+Chemically+Induced+Mutations+From+a+Large-Scale+Reverse-Genetic+Screen+in+Arabidopsis%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Genetics%22%5BJournal%5D)">Spectrum of Chemically Induced Mutations From a Large-Scale Reverse-Genetic Screen in Arabidopsis.</a> Genetics. 164 (2), 731-740 (2003).</li>
<li>Harwood, W. A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Advances+and+remaining+challenges+in+the+transformation+of+barley+and+wheat%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Journal+of+Experimental+Botany%22%5BJournal%5D)">Advances and remaining challenges in the transformation of barley and wheat.</a> Journal of Experimental Botany. 63 (5), 1791-1798 (2012).</li>
<li>Henikoff, S., Comai, L. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Single-Nucleotide+Mutations+for+Plant+Functional+Genomics%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Annual+Review+of+Plant+Biology%22%5BJournal%5D)">Single-Nucleotide Mutations for Plant Functional Genomics.</a> Annual Review of Plant Biology. 54 (1), 375-401 (2003).</li>
<li>Uauy, C., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+modified+TILLING+approach+to+detect+induced+mutations+in+tetraploid+and+hexaploid+wheat%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22BMC+Plant+Biology%22%5BJournal%5D)">A modified TILLING approach to detect induced mutations in tetraploid and hexaploid wheat.</a> BMC Plant Biology. 9 (1), 115(2009).</li>
<li>Uauy, C., Wulff, B. B. H., Dubcovsky, J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Combining+Traditional+Mutagenesis+with+New+High-Throughput+Sequencing+and+Genome+Editing+to+Reveal+Hidden+Variation+in+Polyploid+Wheat%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Annual+Review+of+Genetics%22%5BJournal%5D)">Combining Traditional Mutagenesis with New High-Throughput Sequencing and Genome Editing to Reveal Hidden Variation in Polyploid Wheat.</a> Annual Review of Genetics. 51 (1), 435-454 (2017).</li>
<li>Li, G., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+Sequences+of+1504+Mutants+in+the+Model+Rice+Variety+Kitaake+Facilitate+Rapid+Functional+Genomic+Studies%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22The+Plant+Cell%22%5BJournal%5D)">The Sequences of 1504 Mutants in the Model Rice Variety Kitaake Facilitate Rapid Functional Genomic Studies.</a> The Plant Cell. 29 (6), 1218-1231 (2017).</li>
<li>Jiao, Y., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+Sorghum+Mutant+Resource+as+an+Efficient+Platform+for+Gene+Discovery+in+Grasses%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22The+Plant+Cell%22%5BJournal%5D)">A Sorghum Mutant Resource as an Efficient Platform for Gene Discovery in Grasses.</a> The Plant Cell. 28 (7), 1551-1562 (2016).</li>
<li>Krasileva, K. V., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Uncovering+hidden+variation+in+polyploid+wheat%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Proceedings+of+the+National+Academy+of+Sciences%22%5BJournal%5D)">Uncovering hidden variation in polyploid wheat.</a> Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. , 201619268(2017).</li>
<li>Dong, C., Dalton-Morgan, J., Vincent, K., Sharp, P. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+Modified+TILLING+Method+for+Wheat+Breeding%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22The+Plant+Genome%22%5BJournal%5D)">A Modified TILLING Method for Wheat Breeding.</a> The Plant Genome. 2 (1), 39-47 (2009).</li>
<li>Till, B. J., Zerr, T., Comai, L., Henikoff, S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+protocol+for+TILLING+and+Ecotilling+in+plants+and+animals%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nature+Protocols%22%5BJournal%5D)">A protocol for TILLING and Ecotilling in plants and animals.</a> Nature Protocols. 1 (5), 2465-2477 (2006).</li>
<li>Wu, J. -L., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Chemical-+and+Irradiation-induced+Mutants+of+Indica+Rice+IR64+for+Forward+and+Reverse+Genetics%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Plant+Molecular+Biology%22%5BJournal%5D)">Chemical- and Irradiation-induced Mutants of Indica Rice IR64 for Forward and Reverse Genetics.</a> Plant Molecular Biology. 59 (1), 85-97 (2005).</li>
<li>Feldman, M., Levy, A. A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Genome+Evolution+Due+to+Allopolyploidization+in+Wheat%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Genetics%22%5BJournal%5D)">Genome Evolution Due to Allopolyploidization in Wheat.</a> Genetics. 192 (3), 763-774 (2012).</li>
<li>Comai, L. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+advantages+and+disadvantages+of+being+polyploid%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nature+Reviews+Genetics%22%5BJournal%5D)">The advantages and disadvantages of being polyploid.</a> Nature Reviews Genetics. 6 (11), 836-846 (2005).</li>
<li>Guo, H., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Development+of+a+High-Efficient+Mutation+Resource+with+Phenotypic+Variation+in+Hexaploid+Winter+Wheat+and+Identification+of+Novel+Alleles+in+the+TaAGP.L-B1+Gene%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Frontiers+in+Plant+Science%22%5BJournal%5D)">Development of a High-Efficient Mutation Resource with Phenotypic Variation in Hexaploid Winter Wheat and Identification of Novel Alleles in the TaAGP.L-B1 Gene.</a> Frontiers in Plant Science. 8, (2017).</li>
<li>Rakszegi, M., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Diversity+of+agronomic+and+morphological+traits+in+a+mutant+population+of+bread+wheat+studied+in+the+Healthgrain+program%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Euphytica%22%5BJournal%5D)">Diversity of agronomic and morphological traits in a mutant population of bread wheat studied in the Healthgrain program.</a> Euphytica. 174 (3), 409-421 (2010).</li>
<li>Tsai, H., Ngo, K., Lieberman, M., Missirian, V., Comai, L. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Tilling+by+Sequencing%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Plant+Functional+Genomics%3A+Methods+and+Protocols%22%5BJournal%5D)">Tilling by Sequencing.</a> Plant Functional Genomics: Methods and Protocols. , 359-380 (2015).</li>
</ol>

Authors declare no competing financial interests.

TILLING is a highly valuable reverse genetics tool for gene validation, especially for small grains where transformation-based approaches have serious bottlenecks11. Developing a mutagenized population with a high mutation frequency is one of the critical steps in conducting functional genomics studies. The most important step in developing a robust TILLING population is to determine the optimal concentration of EMS. The 40%-60% survival rate in the M1 has been found to be a good indica...

Point mutations in genomes can serve many useful purposes for researchers. Depending on their nature and location, these mutations can be used to assign functions to genes or even distinct domains of proteins of interest. On the other hand, as a source of novel genetic variation, useful mutations can be selected for desired traits using phenotyping screens and further used in crop improvement. TILLING is a powerful reverse genetics tool that includes chemical mutagenesis and detection of sequence variation in the target gene. First developed in Arabidopsis1 and Drosophilia melanogaster2, TILLING populations have been developed and utilized in many small grain crops such as hexaploid bread wheat (Triticum aestivum)3, barley (Hordeum vulgare)4, tetraploid durum wheat (T. dicoccoides durum)5, diploid wheat (T. monococcum)6 and the &#34;D&#34; genome progenitor of wheat Aegilops tauschii7. These resources have been used to validate the roles of genes in regulating abiotic and biotic stress tolerance8, regulating flowering time9, and developing nutritionally superior crop varieties5.
TILLING, along with the use of alkylating mutagenic agents such as ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS), sodium azide, N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU), and methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), has advantages over other reverse genetics tools for several reasons. First, mutagenesis can be conducted on practically any species or variety of plant10 and is independent of the transformation bottleneck, which is particularly challenging in the case of small grains11. Second, in addition to generating knockout mutations that can be obtained by other gene validation approaches, a range of missense and splicing mutations can be induced, which can discern functions of individual domains of the proteins of interest12. Moreover, TILLING generates an immortal collection of mutations throughout the genome; thus, a single population can be used for functional validation of multiple genes. In contrast, other reverse genetics tools generate resources specific to only the gene under study13. Useful mutations identified through TILLING can be deployed for breeding purposes and are not subject to regulation, unlike gene editing, whose non-transgenic classification is still uncertain in many countries. This becomes especially relevant to small grains that are internationally traded14.
TILLING is a simple and efficient gene validation strategy and requires mutagenized populations to be developed for investigating genes of interest. Developing an effective mutagenized population is key to determining the efficiency of a TILLING-based gene validation study. A TILLING population with a low overall mutation frequency indicates that an impractically large population must be screened for desired mutations, whereas a high mutagen concentration leads to high mortality in the population and an insufficient number of mutagenized individuals. Once a good population is developed, there are multiple ways to detect mutations in the genes of interest, and the choice of platform depends on the experimental scale and availability of resources. Whole genome sequencing and exome sequencing has been used to characterize all mutations in TILLING populations in plants with small genomes15,16. Exome sequencing of two TILLING populations has been performed in bread and durum wheat and is available to the public for identifying desirable mutations and ordering mutant lines of interest17. It is a great public resource in terms of availability of desirable mutations; however, in gene validation studies, the wild-type line should possess the candidate gene of interest. Unfortunately, it is still cost-prohibitive to sequence the exome of the entire TILLING population for reverse genetics-based validation of a few candidate genes in another background. Amplicon sequencing and Cel-1-based assays have been used in detecting mutations in targeted populations in wheat, and Cel-1 assays are simpler, requiring no computational knowledge, and are especially suitable for validation of a small number of genes with basic lab equipment6,18.
In the present article, described are methods for the development of a good TILLING population, including preparation of the dosage curve, mutagenesis and maintenance of the mutant population, and screening of the mutant population using the PCR-based Cel-1 assay. This protocol has already been implemented successfully in developing and utilizing mutagenized populations of Triticum aestivum, Triticum monoccocum6, barley, Aegilops tauchii7, and several others. Included are explicit details of these methods along with useful tips that will help researchers develop TILLING populations, using EMS as a mutagen in any small grain plant of choice.

<table><tbody><tr><td>96 well 1.1 ml microtubes in microracks</td><td>National Scientific</td><td>TN0946-08R</td><td>For collecting leaf tissues</td></tr><tr><td>Agarose I biotechnology grade</td><td>VWR</td><td>0710-500G</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Biosprint 96 DNA Plant Kit</td><td>Qiagen</td><td>941558</td><td>Kit for DNA extraction</td></tr><tr><td>Cel-1 endonuclease</td><td>Extracted as described by Till et al 2006</td><td></td><td>Single strand specific endonuclease</td></tr><tr><td>Centrifuge 5430 R</td><td>Eppendorf</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Ethyl methanesulfonate</td><td>Sigma Aldrich</td><td>M-0880-25G</td><td>EMS, Chemical mutagen</td></tr><tr><td>Freeze Dry/Shell freeze system</td><td>Labconco</td><td></td><td>For lyophilization of leaf tissue</td></tr><tr><td>Kingfisher Flex purification system</td><td>Thermo fisher scientific</td><td>5400610</td><td>High throughput DNA extraction robot</td></tr><tr><td>My Taq DNA Polymerase</td><td>Bioline</td><td>BIO-21107</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Nuclease free water</td><td>Sigma aldrich</td><td>W4502-1L</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>NuGenius gel imaging system</td><td>Syngene</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Orbit Environ-shaker</td><td>Lab-line</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>SPECTROstar Nano</td><td>BMG LABTECH</td><td></td><td>Nano drop for DNA quantification</td></tr><tr><td>T100 Thermal cycler</td><td>BIO-RAD</td><td>1861096</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

development of targeting induced local lesions in genomes (tilling) populations in small grain crops by ethyl methanesulfonate mutagenesis

Targeting Induced Local Lesions IN Genomes (TILLING) is a powerful reverse genetics tool that includes chemical mutagenesis and detection of sequence variation in target genes. TILLING is a highly valuable functional genomics tool for gene validation, especially in small grains in which transformation-based approaches hold serious limitations. Developing a robust mutagenized population is key to determining the efficiency of a TILLING-based gene validation study. A TILLING population with a low overall mutation frequency indicates that an impractically large population must be screened to find desired mutations, whereas a high mutagen concentration leads to high mortality in the population, leading to an insufficient number of mutagenized individuals. Once an effective population is developed, there are multiple ways to detect mutations in a gene of interest, and the choice of platform depends upon the experimental scale and availability of resources. The Cel-1 assay and agarose gel-based approach for mutant identification is convenient, reproducible, and a less resource-intensive platform. It is advantageous in that it is simple, requiring no computational knowledge, and it is especially suitable for validation of a small number of genes with basic lab equipment. In the present article, described are the methods for development of a good TILLING population, including preparation of the dosage curve, mutagenesis and maintenance of the mutant population, and screening of the mutant population using the PCR-based Cel-1 assay.

Figure 2 shows the dosage curve of hexaploid bread wheat cultivar Jagger, diploid wheat Triticum monococcum6, and a genome donor of wheat Aegilops tauschii7. The EMS doses for desired 50% survival rates were about 0.25%, 0.6% and 0.7% for T. monococcum, Ae. tauschii, and T. aestivum, respectively. The higher EMS tolerance of hexaploid wheat is due to its genome buffer...

Watch this Scientific Journal Video about Development of Targeting Induced Local Lesions IN Genomes TILLING Populations in Small Grain Crops by Ethyl Methanesulfonate Mutagenesis at JoVE.com

Development of Targeting Induced Local Lesions IN Genomes TILLING Populations in Small Grain Crops by Ethyl Methanesulfonate Mutagenesis

Described is a protocol for developing a Targeting Induced Local Lesions IN Genomes (TILLING) population in small grain crops with use of ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) as a mutagen. Also provided is a protocol for mutation detection using the Cel-1 assay.

Development of Targeting Induced Local Lesions IN Genomes (TILLING) Populations in Small Grain Crops by Ethyl Methanesulfonate Mutagenesis

Targeting Induced Local Lesions IN Genomes (TILLING) is a powerful reverse genetics tool that includes chemical mutagenesis and detection of sequence ...

development-targeting-induced-local-lesions-genomes-tilling

Research

JoVE Journal

Developmental Biology

11.6K Views.  University of Maryland, College Park. Described is a protocol for developing a Targeting Induced Local Lesions IN Genomes (TILLING) population in small grain crops with use of ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) as a mutagen. Also provided is a protocol for mutation detection using the Cel-1 assay.

Video: Development of Targeting Induced Local Lesions IN Genomes TILLING Populations in Small Grain Crops by Ethyl Methanesulfonate Mutagenesis

Optogenetic Random Mutagenesis Using Histone-miniSOG in C. elegans

Forward genetic screening in model organisms is the workhorse to discover functionally important genes and pathways in many biological processes. In most mutagenesis-based screens, researchers have relied on the use of toxic chemicals, carcinogens, or irradiation, which requires designated equipment, safety setup, and/or disposal of hazardous materials. We have developed a simple approach to induce heritable mutations in C. elegans using germline-expressed histone-miniSOG, a light-inducible potent generator of reactive oxygen species. This mutagenesis method is free of toxic chemicals and requires minimal laboratory safety and waste management. The induced DNA modifications include single-nucleotide changes and small deletions, and complement those caused by classical chemical mutagenesis. This methodology can also be used to induce integration of extrachromosomal transgenes. Here, we provide the details of the LED setup and protocols for standard mutagenesis and transgene integration.

Optogenetic Random Mutagenesis Using Histone-miniSOG in C. elegans

Genetically-encoded histone-miniSOG induces genome-wide heritable mutations in a blue&#160;light-dependent manner. This mutagenesis method is simple, fast, free of toxic chemicals, and well-suited for forward genetic screening and transgene integration.

Forward genetic screening in model organisms is the workhorse to discover functionally important genes and pathways in many biological processes. In most ...

Genetics

Targeted in Situ Mutagenesis of Histone Genes in Budding Yeast

We describe a PCR- and homologous recombination-based system for generating targeted mutations in histone genes in budding yeast cells. The resulting mutant alleles reside at their endogenous genomic sites and no exogenous DNA sequences are left in the genome following the procedure. Since in haploid yeast cells each of the four core histone proteins is encoded by two non-allelic genes with highly homologous open reading frames (ORFs), targeting mutagenesis specifically to one of two genes encoding a particular histone protein can be problematic. The strategy we describe here bypasses this problem by utilizing sequences outside, rather than within, the ORF of the target genes for the homologous recombination step. Another feature of this system is that the regions of DNA driving the homologous recombination steps can be made to be very extensive, thus increasing the likelihood of successful integration events. These features make this strategy particularly well-suited for histone gene mutagenesis, but can also be adapted for mutagenesis of other genes in the yeast genome.

Targeted in Situ Mutagenesis of Histone Genes in Budding Yeast

A strategy for generating mutations in histone genes at their endogenous location in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is presented.

We describe a PCR- and homologous recombination-based system for generating targeted mutations in histone genes in budding yeast cells. The resulting ...

A Standard Methodology to Examine On-site Mutagenicity As a Function of Point Mutation Repair Catalyzed by CRISPR/Cas9 and SsODN in Human Cells

Combinatorial gene editing using CRISPR/Cas9 and single-stranded oligonucleotides is an effective strategy for the correction of single-base point mutations, which often are responsible for a variety of human inherited disorders. Using a well-established cell-based model system, the point mutation of a single-copy mutant eGFP gene integrated into HCT116 cells has been repaired using this combinatorial approach. The analysis of corrected and uncorrected cells reveals both the precision of gene editing and the development of genetic lesions, when indels are created in uncorrected cells in the DNA sequence surrounding the target site. Here, the specific methodology used to analyze this combinatorial approach to the gene editing of a point mutation, coupled with a detailed experimental strategy to measuring indel formation at the target site, is outlined. This protocol outlines a foundational approach and workflow for investigations aimed at developing CRISPR/Cas9-based gene editing for human therapy. The conclusion of this work is that on-site mutagenesis takes place as a result of CRISPR/Cas9 activity during the process of point mutation repair. This work puts in place a standardized methodology to identify the degree of mutagenesis, which should be an important and critical aspect of any approach destined for clinical implementation.

This protocol outlines the workflow of a CRISPR/Cas9-based gene editing system for the repair of point mutations in mammalian cells. Here, we use a combinatorial approach to gene editing with a detailed follow-on experimental strategy for measuring indel formation at the target site&#8212;in essence, analyzing onsite mutagenesis.

Combinatorial gene editing using CRISPR/Cas9 and single-stranded oligonucleotides is an effective strategy for the correction of single-base point ...

An Array-based Comparative Genomic Hybridization Platform for Efficient Detection of Copy Number Variations in Fast Neutron-induced Medicago truncatula Mutants

Mutants are invaluable genetic resources for gene function studies. To generate mutant collections, three types of mutagens can be utilized, including biological such as T-DNA or transposon, chemical such as ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS), or physical such as ionization radiation. The type of mutation observed varies depending on the mutagen used. For ionization radiation induced mutants, mutations include deletion, duplication, or rearrangement. While T-DNA or transposon-based mutagenesis is limited to species that are susceptible to transformation, chemical or physical mutagenesis can be applied to a broad range of species. However, the characterization of mutations derived from chemical or physical mutagenesis traditionally relies on a map-based cloning approach, which is labor intensive and time consuming. Here, we show that a high-density genome array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) platform can be applied to efficiently detect and characterize copy number variations (CNVs) in mutants derived from fast neutron bombardment (FNB) mutagenesis in Medicago truncatula, a legume species. Whole genome sequence analysis shows that there are more than 50,000 genes or gene models in M. truncatula. At present, FNB-induced mutants in M. truncatula are derived from more than 150,000 M1 lines, representing invaluable genetic resources for functional studies of genes in the genome. The aCGH platform described here is an efficient tool for characterizing FNB-induced mutants in M. truncatula.

An Array-based Comparative Genomic Hybridization Platform for Efficient Detection of Copy Number Variations in Fast Neutron-induced Medicago truncatula Mutants

This protocol provides experimental steps and information about reagents, equipment, and analysis tools for researchers who are interested in carrying out whole genome array-based comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) analysis of copy number variations in plants.

Mutants are invaluable genetic resources for gene function studies. To generate mutant collections, three types of mutagens can be utilized, including ...

Gene-targeted Random Mutagenesis to Select Heterochromatin-destabilizing Proteasome Mutants in Fission Yeast

Random mutagenesis of a target gene is commonly used to identify mutations that yield the desired phenotype. Of the methods that may be used to achieve random mutagenesis, error-prone PCR is a convenient and efficient strategy for generating a diverse pool of mutants (i.e., a mutant library). Error-prone PCR is the method of choice when a researcher seeks to mutate a pre-defined region, such as the coding region of a gene while leaving other genomic regions unaffected. After the mutant library is amplified by error-prone PCR, it must be cloned into a suitable plasmid. The size of the library generated by error-prone PCR is constrained by the efficiency of the cloning step. However, in the fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, the cloning step can be replaced by the use of a highly efficient one-step fusion PCR to generate constructs for transformation. Mutants of desired phenotypes may then be selected using appropriate reporters. Here, we describe this strategy in detail, taking as an example, a reporter inserted at centromeric heterochromatin.

This article describes a detailed methodology for random mutagenesis of a target gene in fission yeast. As an example, we target rpt4+, which encodes a subunit of the 19S proteasome, and screen for mutations that destabilize heterochromatin.

Random mutagenesis of a target gene is commonly used to identify mutations that yield the desired phenotype. Of the methods that may be used to achieve ...

Identifying Mutations by High Resolution Melting in a TILLING Population of Rice

Target Induced Local Lesions In Genomes (TILLING) is a strategy of reverse genetics for the high-throughput screening of induced mutations. However, the TILLING system has less applicability for insertion/deletion (Indel) detection and traditional TILLING needs more complex steps, like CEL I nuclease digestion and gel electrophoresis. To improve the throughput and selection efficiency, and to make the screening of both Indels and single base substitions (SBSs) possible, a new high-resolution melting (HRM)-based TILLING system is developed. Here, we present a detailed HRM-TILLING protocol and show its application in mutation screening. This method can analyze the mutations of PCR amplicons by measuring the denaturation of double-stranded DNA at high temperatures. HRM analysis is directly performed post-PCR without additional processing. Moreover, a simple, safe and fast (SSF) DNA extraction method is integrated with HRM-TILLING to identify both Indels and SBSs. Its simplicity, robustness and high throughput make it potentially useful for mutation scanning in rice and other crops.

In this article, we present the protocol that is described as high-resolution melting analysis (HRM)-based Target Induced Local Lesions In Genomes (TILLING). This method utilizes fluorescence changes during the melting of the DNA duplex and is suitable for high-throughput screening of both insertion/deletion (Indel) and single base substition (SBS).

Target Induced Local Lesions In Genomes (TILLING) is a strategy of reverse genetics for the high-throughput screening of induced mutations. However, the ...

In Vitro Directed Evolution of a Restriction Endonuclease with More Stringent Specificity

Restriction endonuclease (REase) specificity engineering is extremely difficult. Here we describe a multistep protocol that helps to produce REase variants that have more stringent specificity than the parental enzyme. The protocol requires the creation of a library of expression selection cassettes (ESCs) for variants of the REase, ideally with variability in positions likely to affect DNA binding. The ESC is flanked on one side by a sequence for the restriction site activity desired and a biotin tag and on the other side by a restriction site for the undesired activity and a primer annealing site. The ESCs are transcribed and translated in a water-in-oil emulsion, in conditions that make the presence of more than one DNA molecule per droplet unlikely. Therefore, the DNA in each cassette molecule is subjected only to the activity of the translated, encoded enzyme. REase variants of the desired specificity remove the biotin tag but not the primer annealing site. After breaking the emulsion, the DNA molecules are subjected to a biotin pulldown, and only those in the supernatant are retained. This step assures that only ESCs for variants that have not lost the desired activity are retained. These DNA molecules are then subjected to a first PCR reaction. Cleavage in the undesired sequence cuts off the primer binding site for one of the primers. Therefore, PCR amplifies only ESCs from droplets without the undesired activity. A second PCR reaction is then carried out to reintroduce the restriction site for the desired specificity and the biotin tag, so that the selection step can be reiterated. Selected open reading frames can be overexpressed in bacterial cells that also express the cognate methyltransferase of the parental REase, because the newly evolved REase targets only a subset of the methyltransferase target sites.

Restriction endonucleases with new sequence specificity can be developed from enzymes recognizing a partially degenerate sequence. Here we provide a detailed protocol that we successfully used to alter the sequence specificity of NlaIV enzyme. Key ingredients of the protocol are the in vitro compartmentalization of the transcription/translation reaction and selection of variants with new sequence specificities.

Restriction endonuclease (REase) specificity engineering is extremely difficult. Here we describe a multistep protocol that helps to produce REase ...

Mutagenesis and Functional Selection Protocols for Directed Evolution of Proteins in E. coli

The efficient generation of genetic diversity represents an invaluable molecular tool that can be used to label DNA synthesis, to create unique molecular signatures, or to evolve proteins in the laboratory. Here, we present a protocol that allows the generation of large (>1011) mutant libraries for a given target sequence. This method is based on replication of a ColE1 plasmid encoding the desired sequence by a low-fidelity variant of DNA polymerase I (LF-Pol I). The target plasmid is transformed into a mutator strain of E. coli and plated on solid media, yielding between 0.2 and 1 mutations/kb, depending on the location of the target gene. Higher mutation frequencies are achieved by iterating this process of mutagenesis. Compared to alternative methods of mutagenesis, our protocol stands out for its simplicity, as no cloning or PCR are involved. Thus, our method is ideal for mutational labeling of plasmids or other Pol I templates or to explore large sections of sequence space for the evolution of activities not present in the original target. The tight spatial control that PCR or randomized oligonucleotide-based methods offer can also be achieved through subsequent cloning of specific sections of the library. Here we provide protocols showing how to create a random mutant library and how to establish drug-based selections in E. coli to identify mutants exhibiting new biochemical activities.

Mutagenesis and Functional Selection Protocols for Directed Evolution of Proteins in E. coli

Here we demonstrate a simple protocol to create a random mutant library for a given target sequence. We show how this method, which is performed in vivo in Escherichia coli, can be coupled with functional selections to evolve new enzymatic activities.

The efficient generation of genetic diversity represents an invaluable molecular tool that can be used to label DNA synthesis, to create unique molecular ...

Biology

The Lambda Select cII Mutation Detection System

A number of transgenic animal models and mutation detection systems have been developed for mutagenicity testing of carcinogens in mammalian cells. Of these, transgenic mice and the Lambda (&#955;) Select cII Mutation Detection System have been employed for mutagenicity experiments by many research groups worldwide. Here, we describe a detailed protocol for the Lambda Select cII mutation assay, which can be applied to cultured cells of transgenic mice/rats or the corresponding animals treated with a chemical/physical agent of interest. The protocol consists of the following steps: (1) isolation of genomic DNA from the cells or organs/tissues of transgenic animals treated in vitro or in vivo, respectively, with a test compound; (2) recovery of the lambda shuttle vector carrying a mutational reporter gene (i.e., cII transgene) from the genomic DNA; (3) packaging of the rescued vectors into infectious bacteriophages; (4) infecting a host bacteria and culturing under selective conditions to allow propagation of the induced cII mutations; and (5) scoring the cII-mutants and DNA sequence analysis to determine the cII mutant frequency and mutation spectrum, respectively.

The Lambda Select cII Mutation Detection System

We describe a detailed protocol for the Lambda Select cII mutation assay in cultured cells of transgenic rodents or the corresponding animals treated with a chemical/physical agent of interest. This approach has been widely used for mutagenicity testing of carcinogens in mammalian cells.

A number of transgenic animal models and mutation detection systems have been developed for mutagenicity testing of carcinogens in mammalian cells. Of ...

Immunology and Infection

Fluorescence-microscopy Screening and Next-generation Sequencing: Useful Tools for the Identification of Genes Involved in Organelle Integrity

This protocol describes a fluorescence microscope-based screening of Arabidopsis seedlings and describes how to map recessive mutations that alter the subcellular distribution of a specific tagged fluorescent marker in the secretory pathway. Arabidopsis is a powerful biological model for genetic studies because of its genome size, generation time, and conservation of molecular mechanisms among kingdoms. The array genotyping as an approach to map the mutation in alternative to the traditional method based on molecular markers is advantageous because it is relatively faster and may allow the mapping of several mutants in a really short time frame. This method allows the identification of proteins that can influence the integrity of any organelle in plants. Here, as an example, we propose a screen to map genes important for the integrity of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Our approach, however, can be easily extended to other plant cell organelles (for example see1,2), and thus represents an important step toward understanding the molecular basis governing other subcellular structures.

A fundamental quest in cell biology is to define the mechanisms that underlie the identity of the organelles that make eukaryotic cells. Here we propose a method to identify the genes responsible for the morphological and functional integrity of plant organelles using fluorescence microscopy and next-generation sequencing tools.

This protocol describes a fluorescence microscope-based screening of Arabidopsis seedlings and describes how to map recessive mutations that alter the ...

Development of Targeting Induced Local Lesions IN Genomes (TILLING) Populations in Small Grain Crops by Ethyl Methanesulfonate Mutagenesis

Summary

Explore More Videos

Optogenetic Random Mutagenesis Using Histone-miniSOG in C. elegans

Targeted in Situ Mutagenesis of Histone Genes in Budding Yeast

A Standard Methodology to Examine On-site Mutagenicity As a Function of Point Mutation Repair Catalyzed by CRISPR/Cas9 and SsODN in Human Cells

An Array-based Comparative Genomic Hybridization Platform for Efficient Detection of Copy Number Variations in Fast Neutron-induced Medicago truncatula Mutants

Gene-targeted Random Mutagenesis to Select Heterochromatin-destabilizing Proteasome Mutants in Fission Yeast

Identifying Mutations by High Resolution Melting in a TILLING Population of Rice

In Vitro Directed Evolution of a Restriction Endonuclease with More Stringent Specificity

Mutagenesis and Functional Selection Protocols for Directed Evolution of Proteins in E. coli

The Lambda Select cII Mutation Detection System

Fluorescence-microscopy Screening and Next-generation Sequencing: Useful Tools for the Identification of Genes Involved in Organelle Integrity