Name: biofilm removal using carbon dioxide aerosols without nitrogen purge
Uploaded: 2016-11-06T15:00:00
Description: Watch this Scientific Journal Video about Biofilm Removal Using Carbon Dioxide Aerosols without Nitrogen Purge at JoVE.com

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning (# 2015R1A2A2A01006446).

1. Preparation of Surface for Biofilm Formation
<ol>
	<li>Cut 1-mm-thick 304 stainless steel plates into chips (10 &#215; 10 mm2) with a mechanical cutter.</li>
	<li>Perform ultrasonic cleaning of the chips in acetone, methanol, and deionized (DI) water sequentially for 10 min each. Use a solvent-resistant container, made of substances such as glass, to remove organic contamination.</li>
	<li>Rinse the chips with flowing DI water for 3-5 sec.</li>
	<li>Dry the chips using N2 gas flow for 3-5 sec.<...

<ol>
	<li>Jain, A., Gupta, Y., Agrawal, R., Khare, P., Jain, S. K. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Biofilms+-+A+microbial+life+perspective:+A+critical+review.">Biofilms - A microbial life perspective: A critical review.</a> Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug. 24 (5), 393-443 (2007).</li><li>Bott, T. R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Biofouling+control+with+ultrasound.">Biofouling control with ultrasound.</a> Heat Transfer Eng. 21 (3), 43-49 (2000).</li><li>Meyer, B. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Approaches+to+prevention,+removal+and+killing+of+biofilms.">Approaches to prevention, removal and killing of biofilms.</a> Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation. 51 (4), 249-253 (2003).</li><li>Hong, S. H., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Effect+of+electric+currents+on+bacterial+detachment+and+inactivation.">Effect of electric currents on bacterial detachment and inactivation.</a> Biotechnol. Bioeng. 100 (2), 379-386 (2008).</li><li>Nandakumar, K., Obika, H., Utsumi, A., Ooie, T., Yano, T. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=In+vitro+laser+ablation+of+laboratory+developed+biofilms+using+an+Nd:YAG+laser+of+532+nm+wavelength.">In vitro laser ablation of laboratory developed biofilms using an Nd:YAG laser of 532 nm wavelength.</a> Biotechnol. Bioeng. 86 (7), 729-736 (2004).</li><li>Gibson, H., Taylor, J. H., Hall, K. E., Holah, J. T. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Effectiveness+of+cleaning+techniques+used+in+the+food+industry+in+terms+of+the+removal+of+bacterial+biofilms.">Effectiveness of cleaning techniques used in the food industry in terms of the removal of bacterial biofilms.</a> J. Appl. Microbiol. 87 (1), 41-48 (1999).</li><li>Kang, M. Y., Jeong, H. W., Kim, J., Lee, J. W., Jang, J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Removal+of+biofilms+using+carbon+dioxide+aerosols.">Removal of biofilms using carbon dioxide aerosols.</a> J. Aerosol Sci. 41 (11), 1044-1051 (2010).</li><li>Cha, M., Hong, S., Kang, M. Y., Lee, J. W., Jang, J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Gas-phase+removal+of+biofilms+from+various+surfaces+using+carbon+dioxide+aerosols.">Gas-phase removal of biofilms from various surfaces using carbon dioxide aerosols.</a> Biofouling. 28 (7), 681-686 (2012).</li><li>Dwidar, M., Hong, S., Cha, M., Jang, J., Mitchell, R. J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Combined+application+of+bacterial+predation+and+carbon+dioxide+aerosols+to+effectively+remove+biofilms.">Combined application of bacterial predation and carbon dioxide aerosols to effectively remove biofilms.</a> Biofouling. 28 (7), 671-680 (2012).</li><li>Cha, M., Hong, S., Lee, S. Y., Jang, J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Removal+of+different-age+biofilms+using+carbon+dioxide+aerosols.">Removal of different-age biofilms using carbon dioxide aerosols.</a> Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 19 (3), 503-509 (2014).</li><li>Singh, R., Monnappa, A. K., Hong, S., Mitchell, R. J., Jang, J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Effects+of+Carbon+Dioxide+Aerosols+on+the+Viability+of+Escherichia+coli+during+Biofilm+Dispersal.">Effects of Carbon Dioxide Aerosols on the Viability of Escherichia coli during Biofilm Dispersal.</a> Sci. Rep. 5, 13766 (2015).</li><li>Sherman, R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Carbon+Dioxide+Snow+Cleaning.">Carbon Dioxide Snow Cleaning.</a> Particul. Sci.Technol. 25 (1), 37-57 (2007).</li></ol>

Previously, we conducted optimization studies on CO2 gas pressure, jet angle, and distance to the solid surface in CO2 aerosol cleaning7. Unlike our previous studies, in the present study, a nitrogen purge was not included in the aerosol (Figure 1). Moreover, 304 stainless steel was used in this protocol, since it is one of the most common stainless steels and is widely used in the food industry. The polished surface is beneficial for fluorescence analysis because of a un...

Biofilms are complex bacterial community structures in which bacterial cells are embedded within self-produced matrices of extracellular polymeric substances, held together, and protected from the external environment. Biofilms can present a public health risk and cause economic losses because they can form on various surfaces, including medical implant materials and devices, food processing equipment, and heat exchangers. In fact, biofilms have been found to be associated with 65% of all bacterial infectious diseases in humans, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention1.
Autoclaves and disinfectants such as chlorine have generally been used for the inactivation of biofilms. However, the use of an autoclave is limited for surfaces that can neither withstand high temperature steam nor be placed into the autoclave. Disinfectants are not suitable for surfaces sensitive to chemical treatment or prone to collecting toxic oxidation products2. In addition, the biofilm should not only be inactivated, but also removed in order to prevent the attachment of new cells onto the surface, thereby forming a new biofilm3. However, it is difficult to remove biofilms using methods based on viscous fluid shear because the flow velocity near the surface is almost zero and the shear force usually cannot overcome the adhesive forces of micron- and submicron-sized substances. Moreover, the biofilm matrix is known to act as a physical and chemical barrier1.
Many physical and mechanical techniques have been developed to remove biofilms from surfaces, including ultrasonic vibration1, electric currents4, laser irradiation5, and high-pressure water sprays6. Each technique has its own pros and cons. Ultrasonic vibration and electric current can be used to control biofilm formation; however, they require a particular configuration and conductive surfaces, respectively, requiring additional shear stress1, 4. Laser irradiation can be applied to a limited area and to hard surfaces; however, some live and dead cells remain on the surface5. High-pressure water sprays effectively remove biofilms; however, their high momentum can cause damage to soft substrates6.
Biofilm removal using CO2 aerosols has been previously proposed. It has shown promising results, with high removal efficiencies within a short time7-11. CO2 aerosols are generated by adiabatic expansion of a high-pressure CO2 gas through a nozzle, and they are applied to the surfaces contaminated with a biofilm. This cleaning technique utilizes the momentum transfer of solid CO2 particles and the solvent action of the melted CO2 liquids, followed by the aerodynamic shear force of the CO2 gas12. Compared with high-pressure N2 gas jets, CO2 aerosol jets at the same stagnation pressure are much more effective in removing E. coli biofilms7. Moreover, although the momentum of the solid CO2 that is delivered to the bacteria is considerably high, the momentum of the total aerosol jet applied to the solid surface is substantially lower than that of water jets. Therefore, damage-free cleaning is possible using this CO2 aerosol technique.
In this protocol, periodic jets of CO2 aerosols without nitrogen purges were used to remove Pseudomonas putida biofilms from a polished stainless steel surface. In fact, nitrogen purges have been used in many CO2 aerosol studies to increase the removal efficiency by reducing the moisture condensation generated during the cleaning, even though heating with a hot plate or infrared lamps and employing dry boxes have also been adopted12. The surface biofilm formation and the optimized cleaning procedures are described below. The removal efficiency was evaluated by measuring the fluorescence intensity of the biofilm on the surface.

<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="573">
	<tbody>
		<tr height="63">
			<td height="63" style="height:63px;width:216px;">304 stainless steel</td>
			<td style="width:71px;">Steelni 
			(South Korea)</td>
			<td style="width:119px;"></td>
			<td style="width:167px;">Polished and diced ones</td>
		</tr>
		<tr height="42">
			<td height="42" style="height:42px;width:216px;">Ultrasonic cleaner</td>
			<td style="width:71px;">Branson 
			(USA)</td>
			<td style="width:119px;">5510E-DTH</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr height="105">
			<td height="105" style="height:105px;width:216px;">Luria-Bertani (LB)</td>
			<td style="width:71px;">Becton, Dickinson and Company 
			(USA)</td>
			<td style="width:119px;">244620</td>
			<td>500 g</td>
		</tr>
		<tr height="105">
			<td height="105" style="height:105px;width:216px;">Agar</td>
			<td style="width:71px;">Becton, Dickinson and Company 
			(USA)</td>
			<td style="width:119px;">214010</td>
			<td>500 g</td>
		</tr>
		<tr height="84">
			<td height="84" style="height:84px;width:216px;">6-well culture plate</td>
			<td style="width:71px;">SPL Life Sciences 
			(South Korea)</td>
			<td style="width:119px;">32006</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr height="63">
			<td height="63" style="height:63px;width:216px;">Ammonium acetate buffer</td>
			<td style="width:71px;">Sigma-Aldrich 
			(USA)</td>
			<td style="width:119px;">667404</td>
			<td>10 mM</td>
		</tr>
		<tr height="105">
			<td height="105" style="height:105px;width:216px;">Dual gas unit</td>
			<td style="width:71px;">Applied Surface Technologies 
			(USA)</td>
			<td style="width:119px;">K6-10DG</td>
			<td style="width:167px;">One nozzle for CO2 gas 
			&#38; 8 nozzles for N2 gas</td>
		</tr>
		<tr height="84">
			<td height="84" style="height:84px;width:216px;">SYTO9</td>
			<td style="width:71px;">Thermo Fissher Scientific 
			(USA)</td>
			<td style="width:119px;">Invitrogen</td>
			<td style="width:167px;">Excitaion: 480 nm 
			Emission: 500 nm</td>
		</tr>
		<tr height="42">
			<td height="42" style="height:42px;width:216px;">Epifluorescence microscope&#160;</td>
			<td style="width:71px;">Nikon (Japan)</td>
			<td style="width:119px;">Eclipse 80i</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr height="42">
			<td height="42" style="height:42px;width:216px;">40&#215; objective lens</td>
			<td style="width:71px;">Nikon 
			(Japan)</td>
			<td style="width:119px;">Plan Fluor</td>
			<td>NA: 0.75</td>
		</tr>
		<tr height="63">
			<td height="63" style="height:63px;width:216px;">CCD camera&#160;</td>
			<td style="width:71px;">Photometrics 
			(USA)</td>
			<td style="width:119px;">Cool SNAP HQ2</td>
			<td>Monochrome</td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>

biofilm removal using carbon dioxide aerosols without nitrogen purge

Biofilms can cause serious concerns in many applications. Not only can they cause economic losses, but they can also present a public health hazard. Therefore, it is highly desirable to remove biofilms from surfaces. Many studies on CO2 aerosol cleaning have employed nitrogen purges to increase biofilm removal efficiency by reducing the moisture condensation generated during the cleaning. However, in this study, periodic jets of CO2 aerosols without nitrogen purges were used to remove Pseudomonas putida biofilms from polished stainless steel surfaces. CO2 aerosols are mixtures of solid and gaseous CO2 and are generated when high-pressure CO2 gas is adiabatically expanded through a nozzle. These high-speed aerosols were applied to a biofilm that had been grown for 24 hr. The removal efficiency ranged from 90.36% to 98.29% and was evaluated by measuring the fluorescence intensity of the biofilm as the treatment time was varied from 16 sec to 88 sec. We also performed experiments to compare the removal efficiencies with and without nitrogen purges; the measured biofilm removal efficiencies were not significantly different from each other (t-test, p &gt; 0.55). Therefore, this technique can be used to clean various bio-contaminated surfaces within one minute.

CO2 aerosols were used to remove the P. putida biofilms from SUS304 surfaces (Figure 1). Most of the surfaces were covered with the biofilm after 24 hr of growth. Most of the biofilm was removed using the CO2 aerosols (Figure 2). As expected, Figure 3 shows an increase in biofilm removal efficiency as the CO2 aerosol treatment time increased. For the treatment time of 88 sec, the removal efficiency was determined to be as high as...

Watch this Scientific Journal Video about Biofilm Removal Using Carbon Dioxide Aerosols without Nitrogen Purge at JoVE.com

Biofilm Removal Using Carbon Dioxide Aerosols without Nitrogen Purge

Biofilms on surfaces can be effectively and rapidly removed by using a periodic jet of carbon dioxide aerosols without a nitrogen purge.

Biofilms can cause serious concerns in many applications. Not only can they cause economic losses, but they can also present a public health hazard. ...

The overall goal of this experiment is to evaluate the effectiveness of biofilm removal using carbon dioxide aerosols without a nitrogen purge. Carbon dioxide aerosols can be used to remove biofilms utilizing momentum transfer and surfactant action over the aerosols. This is an effective and reliable method to remove biofilms in a short period of time, and is also a biofilm gas-phase cleaning technique.To begin the experiment, use mechanically cut 1-millimeter thick three zero four stainless steel chips, 10 x 10 square millimeters inside. Next, ultrasonically clean the chips in acetone, methanol, and deionized or DI water sequentially. Rinse the chips with flowing DI water for four seconds, then dry the chips using nitrogen gas flow for four seconds.Retrieve a Pseudomonas putida KT2440 stock stored at 80 degrees Celsius. Thaw the culture at room temperature for one minute, when the top layer of the frozen stock solution turns to slush. Submerge a loop into the melted layer of the stock solution, and streak the bacteria onto a Luria Broth, or LB plate containing 1.5%agar.Incubate the plate overnight at 30 degrees Celsius. The next day, add 10 milliliters of LB in a 50 mL conical tube. Use a fresh loop to pick a single colony from the plate and inoculate the LB.Incubate the broth in a shaking incubator.Pick up each of the prepared chips with tweezers and dip them in 70%ethanol five times for 1-2 seconds each to sterilize the surface of each chip. Next, rinse each chip in autoclaved deionized or DI water. Then, in LB sequentially to remove the remaining ethanol.Place the chips into six well culture plates with two chips in five millileters of LB broth per well. Then, dilute the bacterial culture until the concentration in the LB broth reaches 8 x 10 to the eighth cells per milliliter. Inoculate each well with 50 microliters of the diluted bacterial culture.Then, incubate the plates. Dip the biofilmed form chips in 10 millimolar ammonium acetate buffer five times to remove loosely attached and planktonic bacteria. Then, dry the chips in a biosafety cabinet where air flows mildly.Immediately after drying, place a chip on the loading place, 20 millileters from the carbon dioxide nozzle along the axis of the jet. Tilt the jet axis to a 40 degree angle. Next, set the stagnation pressures of carbon dioxide and nitrogen gas using gas pressure regulators.Apply the aerosol jet onto the central part of the chip. Turn on the solenoid valve for carbon dioxide for five seconds, and then turn it off for three seconds periodically using a manually controlled switch. If a nitrogen purge needs to be used, turn on the solenoid valve for a continuous supply of nitrogen.Once the setup is complete, treat the chips with carbon dioxide aerosols with and without nitrogen purges and compare chips with different aerosol treatment times. Retain the chips without treatment as negative controls. Prepare one micromolar of green fluorescence nucleic acid stain in DI water to stain bacterial cells on the control and aerosol treated chips.Put the staining solution into the wells with the chips, and incubate them. Following the incubation, gently rinse the chips with flowing DI water to remove excessive fluorescent dye. Then, dry the chips with nitrogen gas flow.Take fluorescence microscopic images of five random fields of view for each chip using an epifluorescence microscope. Finally, move on to calculations. Fluorescence microscopic images for 24 hour grown Pseudomonas putida biofilms were treated with carbon dioxide aerosols for zero, 16, 40, and 88 seconds without nitrogen purges.Removal efficiencies calculated based on the fluorescence intensities of the biofilms without nitrogen purges were higher than removal efficiencies with nitrogen purges. As you have seen in this video, the tri-phase cleaning technique effectively removes biofilm in a short period of time. It can be applied to a wide variety of bio-contaminated surfaces.

Research

Education

JoVE Core

JoVE Journal

Physics

Environment

Unit 1

The First Law of Thermodynamics

SCIENTISTS IN ACTION

The Use of an Automated System (GreenFeed) to Monitor Enteric Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Ruminant Animals

The Use of an Automated System GreenFeed to Monitor Enteric Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Ruminant Animals

Ruminant animals (domesticated or wild) emit methane (CH4) through enteric fermentation in their digestive tract and from decomposition of manure during ...

Measuring Carbon-based Contaminant Mineralization Using Combined CO2 Flux and Radiocarbon Analyses

Measuring Carbon-based Contaminant Mineralization Using Combined CO2 Flux and Radiocarbon Analyses

A method is described which uses the absence of radiocarbon in industrial chemicals and fuels made from petroleum feedstocks which frequently contaminate ...

Assessment of Labile Organic Carbon in Soil Using Sequential Fumigation Incubation Procedures

Management practices and environmental changes can alter soil nutrient and carbon cycling. Soil labile organic carbon, a readily decomposable C pool, is ...

Automated, High-resolution Mobile Collection System for the Nitrogen Isotopic Analysis of NOx

Automated, High-resolution Mobile Collection System for the Nitrogen Isotopic Analysis of NOx

Nitrogen oxides (NOx = NO + NO2) are a family of atmospheric trace gases that have great impact on the environment. NOx concentrations directly influence ...

Functionalization and Dispersion of Carbon Nanomaterials Using an Environmentally Friendly Ultrasonicated Ozonolysis Process

Functionalization of carbon nanomaterials is often a critical step that facilitates their integration into larger material systems and devices. In the ...

Extraction and Characterization of Surfactants from Atmospheric Aerosols

Surface-active compounds, or surfactants, present in atmospheric aerosols are expected to play important roles in the formation of liquid water clouds in ...

Measurement of the Rheology of Crude Oil in Equilibrium with CO2 at Reservoir Conditions

Measurement of the Rheology of Crude Oil in Equilibrium with CO2 at Reservoir Conditions

A rheometer system to measure the rheology of crude oil in equilibrium with carbon dioxide (CO2) at high temperatures and pressures is described. The ...

Assessing the Particulate Matter Removal Abilities of Tree Leaves

Based on the conventional cleaning methods (water cleaning (WC) + brush cleaning (BC)), this study evaluated the influence of ultrasonic cleaning (UC) on ...

Preparation of Biomass-based Mesoporous Carbon with Higher Nitrogen-/Oxygen-chelating Adsorption for Cu(II) Through Microwave Pre-Pyrolysis

Preparation of Biomass-based Mesoporous Carbon with Higher Nitrogen-/Oxygen-chelating Adsorption for CuII Through Microwave Pre-Pyrolysis

An environment-friendly technique for synthesizing biomass-based mesoporous activated carbon with high nitrogen-/oxygen-chelating adsorption for Cu(II) is ...

Measurement of Aerosols Optical Thickness of the Atmosphere using the GLOBE Handheld Sun Photometer

Here, we describe the measurement of aerosol optical thickness using the GLOBE handheld sun photometer. Aerosol optical thickness (AOT) was measured at ...