JoVE Logo

Accedi

6.14 : Confronto tra il genoma mitocondriale, cloroplastico e procariotico

The present-day mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes have retained some of the characteristics of their ancestral prokaryotes and also have acquired new attributes during their evolution within eukaryotic cells. Like prokaryotic genomes, mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes neither bind with histone-like proteins nor show complex packaging into chromosome-like structures, as observed in eukaryotes. Unlike mitotic cell divisions observed in eukaryotic cells, mitochondria and chloroplasts undergo binary fission and equally separate their DNA into the daughter organelles as observed in prokaryotes. Furthermore, ribosomes in both mitochondria and chloroplasts are sensitive to antibacterial antibiotics.

Prokaryotic genomes have millions of base pairs and thousands of genes; mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes, except in a few plants, are much smaller with numbers of base pairs in the thousands with a few hundred genes. This difference in genome size occurred because, during evolution, significant parts of primitive mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes were exported to the nucleus. This export of genes made them dependent on the nuclear genome for the supply of some of the proteins required for their biogenesis.

The different evolutionary paths taken by animals and plants have resulted in significant differences between genomes of animal mitochondria and plant mitochondria and chloroplasts. Animal mitochondrial genomes are smaller than plant mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes. Also, similar to most prokaryotic genomes, animal mitochondrial genomes do not carry any introns. However, introns are present in the genomes of both plant mitochondria and chloroplasts. Compared to mitochondrial genomes, chloroplast genomes show less variation in size and structure and also contain more genes. For example, the number of genes present in the chloroplast genome of Arabidopsis thaliana is almost double of the genes present in its mitochondrial genome. Furthermore, chloroplast genomes are more similar to their prokaryotic counterparts than the mitochondrial genome as they are similar in their regulatory sequences and arrangement of many gene clusters.

Tags

Mitochondrial GenomeChloroplast GenomeProkaryotic GenomePrimitive Predator CellsEukaryotic CellsCyanobacteriaSymbiotic RelationshipsEscherichia ColiGenesHuman Mitochondrial GenomeArabidopsis ThalianaFlowering PlantCyanobacterial GenomesSynechocystis GenomeTerrestrial PlantsDNA StructureHistone ProteinsCircular And Double stranded DNA

Dal capitolo 6:

article

Now Playing

6.14 : Confronto tra il genoma mitocondriale, cloroplastico e procariotico

DNA Replication

12.0K Visualizzazioni

article

6.1 : Replicazione nei procarioti

DNA Replication

50.8K Visualizzazioni

article

6.2 : Replicazione negli eucarioti

DNA Replication

43.3K Visualizzazioni

article

6.3 : Accoppiamento della base del DNA

DNA Replication

26.8K Visualizzazioni

article

6.4 : La forca di replicazione del DNA

DNA Replication

35.4K Visualizzazioni

article

6.5 : Proofreading

DNA Replication

13.6K Visualizzazioni

article

6.6 : Sintesi del filamento ritardato

DNA Replication

48.8K Visualizzazioni

article

6.7 : DNA elicasi

DNA Replication

21.1K Visualizzazioni

article

6.8 : Il replisoma

DNA Replication

32.8K Visualizzazioni

article

6.9 : Mismatch Repair

DNA Replication

9.3K Visualizzazioni

article

6.10 : DNA topoisomerasi

DNA Replication

30.7K Visualizzazioni

article

6.11 : Telomeri e telomerasi

DNA Replication

22.9K Visualizzazioni

article

6.12 : Eredità non-nucleare

DNA Replication

4.1K Visualizzazioni

article

6.13 : Genetica mitocondriale animale

DNA Replication

7.4K Visualizzazioni

article

6.15 : Esportazione dei geni mitocondriali e cloroplastici

DNA Replication

3.6K Visualizzazioni

See More

JoVE Logo

Riservatezza

Condizioni di utilizzo

Politiche

Ricerca

Didattica

CHI SIAMO

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Tutti i diritti riservati