JoVE Logo

Accedi

14.14 : Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:

  1. Biological Gradient: Also known as the dose-response relationship, this criterion indicates that as exposure increases, so should the risk of the effect. For example, higher levels of cigarette smoke inhalation correspond to a higher risk of lung cancer, demonstrating a clear biological gradient.
  2. Plausibility: This requires that the association aligns with current biological knowledge. For instance, the carcinogenic effects of tobacco smoke are biologically plausible, given the known toxic constituents in tobacco and their effects on cells.
  3. Coherence: The proposed cause-and-effect relationship should not contradict established knowledge about the disease's biology and progression. For example, the link between HPV (Human Papillomavirus) and cervical cancer aligns coherently with the known progression from HPV infection to cancerous lesions.
  4. Experiment: Experimental evidence can support causality. Controlled trials, such as those showing decreased lung cancer rates following smoking cessation, illustrate how intervention studies can clarify causal links.
  5. Analogy: When a similar factor is known to cause a particular effect, it may be reasonable to investigate whether a new factor could cause a similar outcome. For instance, once certain chemicals were known to disrupt the endocrine system, scientists were prompted to explore other substances with similar effects.

While not definitive or exhaustive, these criteria provide a robust framework for evaluating causation across various types of studies, guiding researchers through the complexities of epidemiological and public health investigations.

Tags

Bradford Hill CriteriaCausalityEpidemiological ResearchBiological GradientPlausibilityCoherenceExperimentAnalogyDose response RelationshipCarcinogenic EffectsTobacco SmokeHPVCervical CancerControlled TrialsSmoking Cessation

Dal capitolo 14:

article

Now Playing

14.14 : Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

Biostatistics

164 Visualizzazioni

article

14.1 : Overview of Biostatistics in Health Sciences

Biostatistics

293 Visualizzazioni

article

14.2 : Introduction to Epidemiology

Biostatistics

568 Visualizzazioni

article

14.3 : Prevalence and Incidence

Biostatistics

270 Visualizzazioni

article

14.4 : Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

Biostatistics

149 Visualizzazioni

article

14.5 : Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot

Biostatistics

67 Visualizzazioni

article

14.6 : Study Designs in Epidemiology

Biostatistics

146 Visualizzazioni

article

14.7 : Response Surface Methodology

Biostatistics

75 Visualizzazioni

article

14.8 : Relative Risk

Biostatistics

98 Visualizzazioni

article

14.9 : Odds Ratio

Biostatistics

86 Visualizzazioni

article

14.10 : Causality in Epidemiology

Biostatistics

190 Visualizzazioni

article

14.11 : Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Biostatistics

114 Visualizzazioni

article

14.12 : Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Biostatistics

72 Visualizzazioni

article

14.13 : Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

Biostatistics

161 Visualizzazioni

article

14.15 : Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biostatistics

105 Visualizzazioni

See More

JoVE Logo

Riservatezza

Condizioni di utilizzo

Politiche

Ricerca

Didattica

CHI SIAMO

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Tutti i diritti riservati