JoVE Logo

Accedi

È necessario avere un abbonamento a JoVE per visualizzare questo. Accedi o inizia la tua prova gratuita.

In questo articolo

  • Riepilogo
  • Abstract
  • Introduzione
  • Protocollo
  • Risultati
  • Discussione
  • Divulgazioni
  • Riconoscimenti
  • Materiali
  • Riferimenti
  • Ristampe e Autorizzazioni

Riepilogo

Una valutazione funzionale della giunzione neuromuscolare (NMJ) può fornire informazioni essenziali sulla comunicazione tra nervo e del muscolo. Qui descriviamo un protocollo per valutare globalmente la giunzione neuromuscolare e il muscolo funzionalità utilizzando due preparazioni diverse del nervo-muscolo, cioè Soleo-sciatic e diaframma-frenico.

Abstract

Funzionalità della giunzione neuromuscolare (NMJ) svolge un ruolo fondamentale nello studio di malattie in cui la comunicazione tra il motoneurone e il muscolo è alterata, come invecchiamento e sclerosi laterale amiotrofica (ALS). Qui descriviamo un protocollo sperimentale che può essere utilizzato per misurare la funzionalità NMJ combinando due tipi di stimolazione elettrica: diretta stimolazione della membrana muscolare e la stimolazione attraverso il nervo. Il confronto della risposta muscolare a queste due diverse stimolazioni può aiutare a definire, a livello funzionale, potenziali alterazioni nella giunzione neuromuscolare che portano al declino funzionale nel muscolo.

Preparazioni dix vivo E sono adatti a studi ben controllati. Qui descriviamo un protocollo intensivo per misurare diversi parametri del muscolo e funzionalità NMJ per la preparazione del nervo sciatico soleo e per la preparazione del nervo frenico a membrana. Il protocollo dura circa 60 min e viene condotta ininterrottamente per mezzo di un su misura software che misura le proprietà di cinetica di contrazione, il rapporto di forza-frequenza per stimolazioni del nervo e del muscolo e due parametri specifici per funzionalità NMJ, cioè la neurotrasmissione guasto e la fatica intratetanic. Questa metodologia è stata utilizzata per rilevare danni nelle preparazioni di nervo del muscolo soleo e diaframma utilizzando mouse transgenico SOD1G93A , un modello sperimentale di ALS che overexpresses ubiquistmente il mutante antiossidante degli enzimi superossido dismutasi 1 (SOD1).

Introduzione

La giunzione neuromuscolare (NMJ) è un prodotto chimico sinapsi formato dalla connessione tra il terminale del motoneurone della fibra muscolare e l'assone del neurone di motore terminal. NMJ ha dimostrato di giocare un ruolo cruciale quando la comunicazione tra il nervo e del muscolo è alterata, come si verifica nell'invecchiamento o sclerosi laterale amiotrofica (ALS). Come nervo e del muscolo di comunicare in modo bidirezionale1,2, potendo misurare NMJ difetti separatamente da difetti muscolari può fornire nuove intuizioni loro interazione fisiopatologici. Infatti, questa valutazione funzionale può aiutare a valutare se le alterazioni morfologiche o biochimiche riducono neurotrasmissione funzionalità di segnalazione.

Il confronto della risposta contrattile del muscolo suscitato da stimolazione del nervo e la risposta del muscolo stesso evocata dalla stimolazione diretta della sua membrana è stata proposta come una misura indiretta di funzionalità NMJ. Infatti, dal neurotrasmissione di by-pass di stimolazione della membrana di segnalazione, eventuali differenze nelle due risposte contrattili possono essere attribuite ai cambiamenti nella giunzione neuromuscolare. Questo approccio è stato ampiamente proposto per ratti3,4,5,6,7e utilizzato anche per raccogliere informazioni su mouse modelli8,9,10,11,12.

Qui, descriviamo in dettaglio una procedura per asportare e testare due preparati di nervo del muscolo, cioè i preparativi Soleo-sciatic e diaframma-frenico. Utilizzando un su misura software, abbiamo progettato un protocollo di test continuo che combina la misurazione di diversi parametri che caratterizzano la funzionalità del muscolo e NMJ, quindi ottenendo una valutazione completa del danno NMJ separatamente da quella del muscolo. In particolare, il protocollo di misura la forza di contrazione, la cinetica di muscolo, la curva di forza-frequenza per diretta e stimolazioni nervose, la neurotrasmissione guasto13 per un infornamento e le frequenze tetaniche e la fatica di intratetanic7.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocollo

All the animal experiments were approved by the ethics committee of Sapienza University of Rome-Unit of Histology and Medical Embryology and were performed in accordance with the current version of the Italian Law on the Protection of Animals.

1. Experimental set-up

  1. Set-up the experimental system composed of 1 actuator/transducer, 2 stimulators, 1 in-vitro muscle apparatus, 1 preparatory tissue bath, 1 suction electrode, 1 digital oscilloscope, 1 stereomicroscope, 1 cold light illuminator, 1 acquisition board, 1 connector block and a personal computer.
    NOTE: Here the command software was programmed in LabView and was designed to guarantee high flexibility, accuracy, and repeatability of the stimulations. For each stimulation, the user can select the pulse width, frequency, duration, and decide whether it is delivered to the membrane or through the nerve. The user can also select the length of the rest period before each stimulation.

2. Evaluations of the NMJ contractile properties of soleus and diaphragm muscles

  1. System warm-up
    1. Prepare the Krebs Ringer buffer14 and place it in a bath of the mounting apparatus and the preparatory tissue bath. Place a 60 mm dish prepared with 4 ml of silicon in the preparatory tissue bath.
    2. Turn on the circulating water bath and set the temperature to 30 °C for the soleus muscle and to 27 °C for the diaphragm muscle.
    3. Allow 95% O2 - 5% CO2 mixture to flow into both the baths.
    4. Turn on the actuator/transducer and the two pulse stimulators and set the current values to 300 mA for membrane stimulation and to 5 mA for nerve stimulation.
      NOTE: The 300 mA current value has previously been shown not to induce any significant contraction on the nerve branches when D-tubocurarine is added to the solution15. The 5 mA current value corresponds to the amount of current required to stimulate the muscle through the nerve without creating an overlap with the membrane stimulation induced by means of the solution. Since the distance between the suction electrode and the muscle is dependent on the nerve length, this current value must be carefully adjusted before each experiment, as described below.
  2. Soleus and diaphragm dissection
    1. Sacrifice the mouse by cervical dislocation to minimize suffering, and immediately excise the muscles for testing as follows.
    2. Soleus-sciatic preparation, dissection, and set-up
      1. Spray 70% ethanol on the mouse leg and remove the skin covering the leg. Make an incision in the upper part of the leg with a pair of scissors and then pull the skin firmly. Isolate the Achilles' tendon from the tibia and then cut the Achilles' tendon with a pair of scissors.
      2. Tightly clamp the tendon with a pair of forceps and gently pull the gastrocnemius muscle together with the soleus. Once the proximal tendon of the soleus is exposed, cut the entire calf with a pair of scissors while still holding the Achilles' tendon. Immediately place the tissue sample in the preparatory tissue bath.
      3. Place the preparatory bath under the stereomicroscope and fix the calf to the silicon dish using 0.20 mm diameter stainless steel pins. Using a pair of forceps clamp the proximal tendon of the soleus and gently pull it to expose the sciatic innervation.
      4. Once the innervation is exposed (Figure 1), carefully remove the surrounding tissue to expose about 5 mm of the nerve. Use a fine pair of scissors to cut the nerve. While tightly clamping the soleus on the proximal tendon with a pair of forceps, pull it again and excise it by cutting the Achilles' tendon with a pair of scissors.
      5. Pass a nylon wire through the hole of the lever arm of the actuator/transducer. Create a noose at the end of the wire and grasp the Achilles' tendon before pulling the wire back until the muscle reaches the bath of the mounting apparatus. Clamp the proximal tendon within the fixed clamp and tie the nylon wire around the lever arm. Allow the muscle to equilibrate in the solution.
      6. Determine the initial optimal length (L0).
        1. First, stretch the muscle to preload it at 10 mN (this value guarantees the maximum twitch force (based on experience)). Then, gently stretch the muscle to change the preload and stimulate it with a series of single pulses. The optimal length is achieved when the maximum twitch force is measured.
    3. Diaphragm-phrenic preparation, dissection, and set-up
      1. Spray 70% ethanol on the mouse skin. Remove the skin covering the diaphragm muscle by making an incision over the sternum with a pair of scissors and by pulling the skin firmly.
      2. With a pair of scissors, cut the abdomen horizontally below the sternum and gently remove the intestine and the organs with a pair of forceps. Use a pair of thick scissors to cut the spine.
      3. Cut the ribs about 1 cm over the sternum and proceed horizontally. Gently remove the outer organs with a pair of forceps and cut the spine to obtain a circular ring of ribs containing the diaphragm.
      4. Wash the preparation in a dish containing the Krebs Ringer buffer and then place it in the silicon dish inside the preparatory tissue bath, with the upper side facing up and the sternum facing forward.
      5. Using the stereomicroscope, carefully remove the lungs and the remaining organs; the phrenic nerve will be visible on the right side (Figure 2A).
      6. Trim the ribs to leave a ring of about 2 mm all along the diaphragm.
      7. Using forceps, fix one 0.20 mm diameter stainless steel pin on the diaphragm central tendon at the point corresponding to the phrenic nerve innervation, and another pin on the ribs on the same axis to identify the diaphragm strip of interest.
      8. Fix two additional pins on the central tendon and another two pins on the ribs on either side of the selected strip to lay out the diaphragm. If necessary, clean the phrenic nerve from the surrounding connective tissue using forceps.
      9. Using a curved blade, cut the diaphragm on either sides of the innervation to identify a tendon-muscle-rib strip as shown in Figure 2B.
      10. Pass a nylon wire through the hole of the lever arm of the actuator/transducer. Create a noose at the end of the wire and grasp the tendon before pulling the wire back until the muscle reaches the bath of the mounting apparatus.
      11. Clamp the ribs within the fixed clamp and tie the nylon wire around the lever arm.
      12. Allow the muscle to equilibrate in the solution and determine the initial optimal length (L0).
        1. Stretch the muscle to preload it at 5 mN. Gently stretch the muscle to change the preload and stimulate it with a series of single pulses. The optimal length is achieved when the maximum twitch force is measured.

figure-protocol-7442
Figure 1 - Soleus-sciatic nerve preparation. Soleus-sciatic nerve during surgical operation for the functional tests. The sciatic is exposed using a pair of forceps. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

figure-protocol-7941
Figure 2 - Diaphragm-phrenic nerve preparation. Picture shows a phase of the diaphram-phrenic nerve preparation excision (A) and the strip to be mounted for functional tests (B). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

  1. Measuring NMJ properties separately from muscle contractility
    1. Set the best current intensity for the stimulation trough the nerve and verify that the current pulses delivered through the suction electrode do not elicit muscle contraction by the spread of current in the bath.
      1. Place the suction electrode near the muscle and pull the nerve in. While gently increasing the current intensity (starting from 5 mA), stimulate the muscle with a series of single pulses. The optimal current value is determined when the twitch force is maximum.
      2. Push the nerve out of the electrode and deliver a few single pulses. Ensure that the muscle does not contract due to overlap with the membrane stimulation by means of the solution. Pull the nerve in again.
    2. Launch the program and select the input file to run the desired testing protocol.
      NOTE: The input file includes all the stimulation parameters needed to run the entire protocol. Although the same protocol structure is used for the two muscles the stimulation parameters differ depending on the protocol refers to the soleus or diaphragm muscles.
      1. Soleus-sciatic nerve stimulation (see Table 1)
        1. Use the following pulse widths for all the electrical stimulations: 1.4 ms for sciatic nerve stimulation and 0.1 ms for direct soleus stimulation. The full protocol lasts approximately 65 min.
      2. Diaphragm-phrenic nerve stimulation (see Table 2)
        1. Use the following pulse widths for all the electrical stimulations: 1.8 ms for phrenic nerve stimulation and 0.2 ms for direct diaphragm stimulation. The full protocol lasts approximately 55 min.
      3. At the end of the experimental protocol, measure the length and the wet weight of the muscle using an analog caliper with an 0.05 mm accuracy and a precision scale with an 0.1 mg accuracy, respectively.
        1. Compute the cross sectional area (CSA) by dividing the muscle mass by the product of optimal fiber length (Lf) and the density of mammalian skeletal muscle (1.06 mg/mm3)16.
          NOTE: Lf is obtained by multiplying L0 by the fiber length/muscle length ratio (0.71 for soleus muscle16 and 1 for the diaphragm muscle17).
Type of experimentFrequencyDurationRepetitionsMuscle or Nerve stimulationPurpose
(Hz)(s)
TwitchSingle pulse1MuscleTwitch force and kinetics
Rest30
TwitchSingle pulse1Nerve
Rest30
TwitchSingle pulse1Muscle
Rest30
TwitchSingle pulse1Nerve
Rest120
Unfused tetanus400.81NerveForce/frequency curves for nerve and muscle stimulations
Rest180
Unfused tetanus600.81Muscle
Rest180
Fused tetanus800.81Nerve
Rest180
Unfused tetanus200.81Muscle
Rest180
Unfused tetanus600.81Nerve
Rest180
Fused tetanus800.81Muscle
Rest180
Unfused tetanus200.81Nerve
Rest180
Unfused tetanus400.81Muscle
Rest300
Fatigue paradigm350.81 muscle stimulation followed by 14 nerve stimulations with a rest time of 1.2 s each, repeated 20 timesNeurotransmission failure (NF)
Rest900
Fatigue paradigm800.81 muscle stimulation followed by 14 nerve stimulations with a rest time of 1.2 s each, repeated 20 timesNeurotransmission failure (NF) and Intratetanic fatigue (IF)

Table 1 - Soleus-sciatic nerve stimulation protocol. The table lists the sequence of tests that form the complete protocol for testing soleus-sciatic nerve preparations.

Type of experimentFrequencyDurationRepetitionsMuscle or Nerve stimulationPurpose
(Hz)(s)
TwitchSingle pulse1MuscleTwitch force and kinetics
Rest30
TwitchSingle pulse1Nerve
Rest30
TwitchSingle pulse1Muscle
Rest30
TwitchSingle pulse1Nerve
Rest120
Unfused tetanus600.51NerveForce/frequency curves for nerve and muscle stimulations
Rest120
Fused tetanus1000.51Muscle
Rest180
Unfused tetanus400.51Nerve
Rest120
Unfused tetanus200.51Muscle
Rest120
Unfused tetanus800.51Nerve
Rest150
Unfused tetanus800.51Muscle
Rest150
Unfused tetanus200.51Nerve
Rest120
Fused tetanus1000.51Muscle
Rest150
Fused tetanus1000.51Nerve
Rest180
Unfused tetanus600.51Muscle
Rest300
Fatigue paradigm350.331 muscle stimulation followed by 14 nerve stimulations with a rest time of 0.67 s each, repeated 20 timesNeurotransmission failure (NF)
Rest900
Fatigue paradigm800.331 muscle stimulation followed by 14 nerve stimulations with a rest time of 0.67 s each, repeated 20 timesNeurotransmission failure (NF) and Intratetanic fatigue (IF)

Table 2 - Diaphragm-phrenic nerve stimulation protocol. The table lists the sequence of tests that form the complete protocol for testing diaphragm-phrenic nerve preparations.

3. Data analysis

NOTE: At the end of the protocol compute all the desired parameters as follow.

  1. From single pulse stimulation
    1. Compute twitch force (mN; maximum active force generated during twitch) and specific twitch force (mN/mm2). Compute it by subtracting the initial preload value to the maximum force generated by the muscle. Compute the specific twitch force as twitch force divided by the muscle CSA.
    2. Compute time to peak tension (TTP) (ms) as the time from pulse release to twitch force.
    3. Compute half relaxation time (1/2RT) (ms) as the time from twitch force to 50% of twitch force.
    4. Compute dF/dt (mN/ms) as the maximum value of force derivative during the contractile phase.
    5. Compute -dF/dt (mN/ms) as the maximum value of force derivative during the relaxing phase.
  2. From pulse train stimulations
    1. Compute unfused force (mN) and specific unfused force (mN/mm2). Compute it by subtracting the initial preload value to the maximum force generated by the muscle. Compute the specific unfused force as the unfused force divided by the muscle CSA.
      NOTE: The unfused force is the maximum active force generated during a pulse train with a frequency lower than the tetanic frequency.
    2. Compute tetanic force (mN) and specific tetanic force (mN/mm2); the maximum force is the maximum active force generated during a pulse train delivered at tetanic frequency. Compute it by subtracting the initial preload value to the maximum force generated by the muscle. Compute the specific tetanic force as the tetanic force divided by the muscle CSA.
    3. Compute force-frequency curve. Plot the value of force (or specific force) obtained for each stimulation versus the increasing frequency of stimulation. Typically, it begins with the single pulse stimulation and ends up with the tetanic frequency.
  3. From fatigue paradigms
    1. Calculate neurotransmission failure (NF) as:
      figure-protocol-20879
      where MF is the force decrease following muscle stimulation and F is the force decrease following nerve stimulation, measured on the first pulse train after muscle stimulation.
    2. Calculate intratetanic fatigue (IF) as:
      figure-protocol-21191
      where Flp is the force generated by the muscle at the last pulse of stimulation, and Fm is the maximum force generated by the muscle during the same pulse train. Regarding to the nerve stimulation, compute the intratetanic fatigue on the first pulse train immediately after the direct stimulation.

4. Statistical analysis

NOTE: The statistical analysis models must be chosen according to whether muscle response to both nerve and membrane stimulations is compared within the same animal model or between 2 different animal models18,19.

  1. Use the Student's t test for TTP, 1/2RT, dF/dt, -dF/dt if comparing only muscle responses to direct and indirect stimulations. If comparing muscle preparations obtained from 2 different mouse strains, use 2-way ANOVA with stimulation type and mouse strain as fixed factors. When the 2-way ANOVA returns a significant outcome, use multiple comparison tests to search for statistical differences.
  2. For force-frequency curve (if comparing only muscle responses to direct and indirect stimulations), use 2-way ANOVA with stimulation type and frequency of stimulation as fixed factors. Use multiple comparison tests if required.
    1. If comparing muscle preparations obtained from 2 different mouse strains, use 3-way ANOVA with stimulation type, frequency of stimulation and mouse strain as fixed factors.
      1. When the 3-way ANOVA yields a significant effect of the factors animal strain and stimulation type, use 2-way ANOVA to identify significant differences between 2 groups at a time. For example, differences between the muscle response of the 2 groups to membrane stimulation, or between muscle response to direct and indirect stimulations within one group can be assessed.
  3. Intratetanic fatigue
    NOTE: Since the protocol was designed to induce fatigue in response to nerve stimulation even in control mice, this parameter can only be used to investigate differences between 2 mouse strains, and a statistical analysis within a single group would always yield significant differences.
    1. To compare two groups, use 3-way ANOVA with stimulation type, time, and mouse strain as fixed factors. When the 3-way ANOVA yields a significant effect of the factors animal strain and stimulation type, use 2-way ANOVA to identify significant differences between 2 groups at a time, as for the force-frequency curve.
  4. For neurotransmission failure, use 2-way ANOVA with animal strain and time as fixed factors. If it returns significant outcomes, use multiple comparison tests to search for statistical differences.
    NOTE: Since this parameter only returns one value for each mouse strain, it allows different mouse models to be compared.
  5. For muscle weight, length, and CSA, use Student's t test to investigate differences when comparing muscle-nerve preparations from different animal models.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Risultati

Il protocollo che abbiamo descritto fornisce informazioni su denervazione funzionale in diverse malattie neuromuscolari o invecchiamento-sarcopenia. Questo protocollo può essere utilizzato per determinare se (e, in caso affermativo, a quale livello) le alterazioni muscolari sono dovuti a cambiamenti selettivi che si verificano nel muscolo stesso o nella trasmissione neuromuscolare. I dati riportati qui sotto sono i risultati di un precedente lavoro di nostro gruppo18

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussione

Il protocollo sperimentale descritto sopra fornisce un modo ideale di misurazione e discriminare eventuali alterazioni funzionali che si sono verificati direttamente nel muscolo o indirettamente a livello della giunzione neuromuscolare. Poiché questa tecnica è basata su una misura indiretta di funzionalità NMJ, non può essere utilizzato per stabilire se qualsiasi difetto è correlato a cambiamenti morfologici o cambiamenti biochimici. Al contrario, fornisce un modo efficace di determinare se eventuali alterazioni mor...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Divulgazioni

Gli autori non hanno nulla a rivelare.

Riconoscimenti

Lavoro in laboratorio degli autori è stato sostenuto dalla Fondazione Roma e Telethon (grant no. GGP14066).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materiali

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Dual-Mode Lever System Aurora Scientific Inc.300Bactuator/transducer
High-Power Bi-Phase Stimulator Aurora Scientific Inc.701Bpulse stimulator (nerve)
High-Power Bi-Phase Stimulator Aurora Scientific Inc.701Cpulse stimulator (muscle)
In vitro Muscle Apparatus Aurora Scientific Inc.800A
Preparatory tissue bathRadnoti158400
Monopolar Suction ElectrodeA-M Systems573000with a home-made reference 
Oscilloscope TektronixTDS2014
StereomicroscopeNikonSMZ 800
Cold light illuminator Photonic OpticsPL 3000
Acquisition boardNational InstrumentsNI PCIe-6353
Connector blockNational InstrumentsNI 2110
Personal computerAMD Phenom II x4 970Processor 3.50 Ghz with Windows 7
LabView 2012 softwareNational Instruments
Krebs-Ringer Bicarbonate Buffer Sigma-AldrichK4002 physiological buffer
Sodium bicarbonateSigma-AldrichS5761 
Calcium chloride CaCl2Sigma-AldrichC4901anhydrous, powder, ≥97%
Buffer HEPESSigma-AldrichH3375≥99.5% (titration)
Dishes 60mm x 15mmFalcon353004Polystyrene
SiliconeSylgard 184 Silicone Elastomer Kit  0.5Kg.
ThermostatDennerleDigitalDuomat 1200
PumpNewa MiniMN 606for aquarium
Heat resistance ThermocableLucky Reptile61403-150/60Hz 50W
Bucketany 10 litersPolypropylene
O2 + 5%CO2siadMix gas
#5 Forceps Fine Science Tools11252-202 items
Spring Scissors - 8 mm BladesFine Science Tools15024-10nerve excision
Sharp Scissors Fine Science Tools 14059-11muscle removal
Delicate ScissorsWagner02.06.32external of the animal
Student Scalpel Handle #3Fine Science Tools 91003-12 
Scalpel Blades #10Fine Science Tools 10010-00
Scalpel Blades #11Fine Science Tools 10011-00
nylon wire Ø0.16 mmany

Riferimenti

  1. Dadon-Nachum, M., Melamed, E., Offen, D. The "dying-back" phenomenon of motor neurons in ALS. J Mol Neurosci. 43 (3), 470-477 (2011).
  2. Dobrowolny, G., et al. Skeletal Muscle Is a Primary Target of SOD1G93A-Mediated Toxicity. Cell Metab. 8 (5), 425-436 (2008).
  3. Mantilla, C. B., Zhan, W. Z., Sieck, G. C. Neurotrophins improve neuromuscular transmission in the adult rat diaphragm. Muscle Nerve. 29 (3), 381-386 (2004).
  4. Prakash, Y. S., Miyata, H., Zhan, W. Z., Sieck, G. C. Inactivity-induced remodeling of neuromuscular junctions in rat diaphragmatic muscle. Muscle Nerve. 22 (3), 307-319 (1999).
  5. Sieck, D. C., Zhan, W. Z., Fang, Y. H., Ermilov, L. G., Sieck, G. C., Mantilla, C. B. Structure-activity relationships in rodent diaphragm muscle fibers vs. neuromuscular junctions. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 180 (1), 88-96 (2012).
  6. Van Lunteren, E., Moyer, M. Effects of DAP on diaphragm force and fatigue, including fatigue due to neurotransmission failure. J Appl Physiol. 81 (5), 2214-2220 (1996).
  7. Van Lunteren, E., Moyer, M., Kaminski, H. J. Adverse effects of myasthenia gravis on rat phrenic diaphragm contractile performance. J Appl Physiol. 97 (3), 895-901 (2004).
  8. Lee, Y., Mikesh, M., Smith, I., Rimer, M., Thompson, W. Muscles in a mouse model of spinal muscular atrophy show profound defects in neuromuscular development even in the absence of failure in neuromuscular transmission or loss of motor neurons. Dev Biol. 356 (2), 432-444 (2011).
  9. Personius, K. E., Sawyer, R. P. Variability and failure of neurotransmission in the diaphragm of mdx mice. Neuromuscular Disord. 16 (3), 168-177 (2006).
  10. Röder, I. V., Petersen, Y., Choi, K. R., Witzemann, V., Hammer, J. A., Rudolf, R. Role of myosin Va in the plasticity of the vertebrate neuromuscular junction in vivo. PLoS ONE. 3 (12), e3871(2008).
  11. Chevessier, F., et al. A mouse model for congenital myasthenic syndrome due to MuSK mutations reveals defects in structure and function of neuromuscular junctions. Hum Mol Genet. 17 (22), 3577-3595 (2008).
  12. Farchi, N., Soreq, H., Hochner, B. Chronic acetylcholinesterase overexpression induces multilevelled aberrations in mouse neuromuscular physiology. J Physiol. 546 (1), 165-173 (2002).
  13. Kuei, J. H., Shadmehr, R., Sieck, G. C. Relative contribution of neurotransmission failure to diaphragm fatigue. J Appl Physiol (Bethesda, Md: 1985). 68 (1), 174-180 (1990).
  14. Del Prete, Z., Musarò, A., Rizzuto, E. Measuring mechanical properties, including isotonic fatigue, of fast and slow MLC/mIgf-1 transgenic skeletal muscle. Ann Biomed Eng. 36 (7), 1281-1290 (2008).
  15. Lynch, G. S., Hinkle, R. T., Chamberlain, J. S., Brooks, S. V., Faulkner, J. A. Force and power output of fast and slow skeletal muscles from mdx mice 6-28 months old. J Physiol. 535 (2), 591-600 (2001).
  16. Brooks, S. V., Faulkner, J. A. Contractile properties of skeletal muscles from young, adult and aged mice. J Physiol. 404, 71-82 (1988).
  17. Lynch, G. S., Hinkle, R. T., Faulkner, J. A. Force and power output of diaphragm muscle strips from mdx and control mice after clenbuterol treatment. Neuromuscul Disord. 11 (2), 192-196 (2001).
  18. Rizzuto, E., Pisu, S., Musar, A., Del Prete, Z. Measuring Neuromuscular Junction Functionality in the SOD1 G93A Animal Model of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Ann Biomed Eng . 43, (2015).
  19. Soliani, L. Manuale di statistica per la ricerca e la professione statistica univariata e bivariata parametrica e non-parametrica per le discipline ambientali e biologiche. , (2004).
  20. Gurney, M. E., Pu, H., et al. Motor neuron degeneration in mice that express a human Cu,Zn superoxide dismutase mutation. Science (New York, N.Y). 264 (5166), 1772-1775 (1994).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Ristampe e Autorizzazioni

Richiedi autorizzazione per utilizzare il testo o le figure di questo articolo JoVE

Richiedi Autorizzazione

Esplora altri articoli

Neuroscienzeproblema 126giunzione neuromuscolarefunzionalit muscolaremisure ex vivobiomeccanicaneuroscienzeSoleodiaframmapropriet contrattilimodelli murini

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Riservatezza

Condizioni di utilizzo

Politiche

Ricerca

Didattica

CHI SIAMO

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Tutti i diritti riservati