A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

An innovative method for fabricating microfluidic devices using polyethylene terephthalate (PET) lamination significantly reduces the cost and complexity of entrapping and imaging multiple live zebrafish embryos.

Abstract

Zebrafish embryos are transparent and thus uniquely suited for noninvasive intravital imaging of fundamental processes, such as wound healing and immune cell migration. Microfluidic devices are used for entrapment to support long-term imaging of multicellular organisms, including zebrafish. However, the fabrication of these devices using soft lithography requires specialized facilities and competency in 3D printing, which may not be accessible to every lab. Our adaptation of a previously developed low-cost polyethylene terephthalate lamination method for constructing microfluidic devices increases accessibility by enabling design fabrication and iteration for a fraction of the technical investment of conventional techniques. We use a device made with this method, the Rotational Assistant for Danio Imaging of Subsequent Healing (RADISH), to accommodate drug treatment, manual wounding, and long-term imaging of up to four embryos in the same field of view. With this new design, we successfully capture gross morphological characteristics of the calcium signal around laser ablation and manual transection wounds for multiple embryos in the 2 h immediately following injury, as well as neutrophil recruitment to the wound edge for 24 h.

Introduction

The ability to respond adequately to injury is critical to the survival of every organism at every scale, from a single cell to multiple tissues. Wounding and its associated responses, such as phagocyte recruitment to damaged areas1 are, therefore, significant topics in cell and tissue biology. Wounds are sensed immediately after the tissue barrier is breached, causing a tissue gradient response involving wound contraction2,3 that coordinates wound healing and subsequent regrowth4. Due to the mechanical nature of this contraction, tools used during experimentation must not physically impede the movement of cells near the injury site.

Zebrafish embryos are an excellent model for studying development and disease, including the vertebrate wound response, due to their ease of care, genetic tractability, and optical transparency5,6. However, immobilizing the whole organism for an extended period is needed to study the longer-term behavior of cells near an injury site. Embedding embryos in low-melt agarose is sufficient for short-term imaging of unwounded tissue. However, the surrounding gel matrix restricts the contraction and relaxation of wounds and impedes the growth of the developing embryos over time7,8,9.

Microfluidics devices can immobilize zebrafish embryos at different developmental stages10,11,12,13,14,15,16, and some, such as the zWEDGI7, accommodate manual wounding. However, there are several drawbacks to available device designs. For example, many devices printed directly on plastic are incompatible with imaging on inverted microscope systems due to poor optical transparency. Furthermore, parallel channels allow multipositional imaging10,11, but the physical movement of the microscope stage introduces lag in image acquisition. Repeated iteration and optimization to solve these issues are difficult when considering the financial and technical investment required for every new design, especially for current gold-standard methods of device fabrication using polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) soft lithography. The very first step, the creation of a master mold, often requires knowledge of 3D modeling software, access to specialized fabrication equipment, and (depending on the material used) an additional antiadhesion treatment such as silanization before the mold is ever used. Curing the PDMS once poured takes at least one hour at high temperatures, and generally, must be done under a vacuum or with a clamp for best results, often in a clean room7,17,18. As in developmental biology, these costs can rapidly prove prohibitive for experiments requiring many unique microfluidic environments across multiple models.

Of available alternative construction materials, polyethylene terephthalate (PET) is durable, nontoxic, and easy to manipulate. PET sheets are widely available plastic lamination pouches carried at most office supply stores, with pre-applied thermally-activated adhesive (generally ethylene vinyl acetate). By shaping these PET sheets using commercially available craft cutters (i.e., computer-controlled cutting plotters designed for home crafters) and adhering the layers to one another using standard thermal lamination equipment, a wide range of potential designs can be quickly generated and iterated. We have therefore adapted a previously described method of design and construction involving stacked PET18 to create the Rotational Assistant for Danio Imaging of Subsequent Healing (RADISH) (Figure 1A,B). A rotational arrangement of several approximately wedge-shaped restraining channels optimizes proximity while allowing room for manual tail fin transection, accommodating imaging immediately after wounding and simultaneous long-term imaging of multiple wounded zebrafish embryos within the same field of view. Additionally, this construciton method drastically reduces the upfront capital costs and the time required for device construction while maintaining reusability.

Protocol

This study used 3 days post fertilization (dpf) embryos but can be designed to use 2-14 dpf embryos. The zebrafish experiment was conducted by internationally accepted standards. The Animal Care and Use Protocol was approved by The Purdue Animal Care and Use Committee (PACUC), adhering to the Guidelines for using Zebrafish in the NIH Intramural Research Program (protocol number: 1401001018).

1. Assembly of the PET microfluidics device

NOTE: Any part of this protocol may be paused at any time except for steps 1.8 and 1.9, which are sensitive to the drying time of cyanoacrylate.

  1. Design the pattern for the device in the software of choice (e.g., Adobe Illustrator, Figure 1A). Depending on the age and size of the embryo, adjust the width of the channel and the size of the central imaging chamber for best fit.
    1. Save each layer as an individual image file with identical dimensions. Name each file so that the thickness of the sheet to be used and the order of assembly are evident.
  2. Initialize the cutting machine according to the manufacturer's instructions.
  3. Upload each designed pattern to the design software for cutting.
    1. In the design workspace, select the newly uploaded designs. Group patterns intended for the same thickness of PET sheet together in the same cut (Figure 2A). If necessary, readjust the size of the patterns in the design software to the correct dimensions.
    2. Confirm the number and type of patterns in the cut, then select the cut material.
      NOTE: PET sheets may not be a material choice in the design software, including under names such as "plastic laminating pouch." Any material of similar thickness and texture (e.g., transparency sheets or non-adhesive vinyl) can be selected instead.
    3. Attach the PET sheets to the cutting mat, pressing firmly to remove air bubbles, and load the mat into the cutting machine. Follow onscreen instructions to prompt the cutting machine to begin the cut.
    4. Remove finished cuts from the cutting mat. If necessary, adjust cut patterns using a craft knife or scalpel blade.
      NOTE: The image files used to create the RADISH design (Figure 1A) are available for download as vector and PNG file formats (Supplemental File 1). If the cutting machine is lifting, tearing, or failing to cut cleanly through the PET sheet, consider replacing the cutting mat.
  4. Align the layers on coverslip glass, unassisted or with precut registration marks. If multiple layers can be fastened in place together before lamination, align them simultaneously. 
  5. Secure the layers with office tape to avoid shifting during lamination (Figure 2B). Depending on the device size and laminator capacity, mount small designs to a larger backing with more tape to avoid jamming or clogging the laminator feed (Figure 2C).
    NOTE: The backing used in lamination is NOT the same as the cutting mat, and serves primarily to provide traction for the laminator. Any heat-resistant material of negligible thickness will work as a backing (including, but not limited to, cardstock, folded office paper, or a larger PET sheet).
  6. Turn on the laminator and laminate according to the manufacturer's instructions. Remove office tape before aligning the next layer (Figure 2D).
  7. Repeat steps 1.4 through 1.6 until all layers have been adhered to.
  8. Secure the device to a 35 mm dish drilled with a ¾" hole using cyanoacrylate glue (Figure 2E,F). Adjust the shape and type of the dish according to experimental needs (e.g., any container large enough to accommodate the device-one well in a 24-well plate or a larger Petri dish). Use enough glue to seal the device fully to the dish without flooding it.
    NOTE: Securing the device to a holding dish is not required for device function. CAUTION: Cyanoacrylate bonds skin and eyes in seconds and irritates the respiratory system, eyes, and skin. Wear hand and eye protection and work in a well-ventilated area.
  9. Waterproof the PET laminate by thoroughly coating the outer device edges with cyanoacrylate glue (Figure 2F). Use enough glue to fully cover the outer edges. Allow the glue to cure for at least 2 h before use.
    NOTE: Ensure adequate room for cyanoacrylate fumes to vent. The buildup of fumes may cause cyanoacrylate to deposit on the device, obscuring optically transparent material.

2. Positioning of the embryos within the RADISH and preparation for imaging

  1. Raise zebrafish embryos in the standard embryo-rearing medium E319. If necessary, dechorionate embryos at least 1 h before imaging to allow them to flatten. This experiment used embryos at 3 dpf, but embryos can be up to 14 dpf (Figure 1E).
  2. Stain or treat the embryos according to experimental needs.
    NOTE: In these experiments, cell membranes of the outer epithelial layer were stained where relevant by incubating with 100 nM MemGlow 560.
  3. Anesthetize embryos using 164 mg/L MS-22220.
    NOTE: The exact concentration and anesthetic used may be adjusted according to the experimenter's preference. Anesthetic concentration can be reduced to allow successful development during long-term images (see step 4.1).
  4. Fill the holding dish containing the mounted device with 5 mL of E3 containing 164 mg/L MS-222.
  5. Using a transfer pipette, deposit one anesthetized embryo into each holding chamber of the device. Ensure that the embryos remain submerged in liquid for the duration of imaging.
    NOTE: The RADISH design can immobilize 1-4 embryos.
  6. Using a hair loop, orient the embryos such that the tail of the embryo protrudes into the central imaging chamber and the yolk is securely immobilized in the wedge-shaped channel (Figure 1C).
    NOTE: Orienting embryos may be performed under a stereomicroscope for ease of manipulation.
  7. If desired, secure the head of the embryo by adding 1.5% low-melt agarose into the holding chamber using a micropipette.
  8. Move the device with embryos to the imaging system of choice to commence imaging.

3. Imaging of calcium transients after wounding

NOTE: This section and Section 4 are optional and provided as potential sample experiments.

  1. Select the appropriate system and objective for imaging.
    NOTE: Here, an inverted laser scanning confocal was equipped with a 20x objective.
  2. Adjust the sample focus and imaging parameters (e.g., laser power: 5, gain: 90, pinhole size : 2 AU, exposure time [scan speed: 1 frame/s]) for optimal signal-to-noise ratio and acquisition speed.
    NOTE: It is recommended that samples be prefocused and parameters for each channel on the imaging system of choice be adjusted before wounding to reduce the lag between wound formation and image acquisition.
  3. Wound a Tg(krt4:Gal4, UAS:GCaMP6f) x (cdh1-dTomato)xt1821,22 embryo.
    1. To wound the embryo via manual transection, apply pressure with a scalpel blade across the tail fin tissue at the tip of the notochord under a stereomicroscope (Video 1), then return the device to the stage.
      CAUTION: Applying excessive pressure with the scalpel blade can crack the underlying glass. If the glass cracks, discard the device and restart from Step 1.2.
    2. To wound the embryo via laser stimulation, define a region of interest (ROI) near the edge of the tail fin fold and stimulate according to the available laser power.
      NOTE: Here, a laser power of 2.4 W for 30 s at 800 nm was sufficient to induce a full-thickness wound.
  4. Image at room temperature using GFP (excitation 488 nm, emission 510 nm) and RFP (excitation 561 nm, emission 610 nm) channels using a frame interval of 1 min for a total of 1 h.
  5. (Optional): If necessary, release the embryos for retrieval after imaging via gentle suction near the head using a transfer pipette or swirling the dish.

4. Imaging of neutrophil recruitment after wounding

  1. At least 1 h before imaging, transfer the embryos to E3 containing half the standard concentration of anesthetic, in this case, 82 mg/L MS-222.
  2. Select the appropriate objective for imaging (here, an inverted laser scanning confocal equipped with a 10x objective).
  3. Adjust the sample focus and imaging parameters (e.g., laser power: 5, gain: 90, pinhole size: 2 AU, exposure time [scan speed: 0.5 frame/s])) for optimal signal-to-noise ratio and acquisition speed.
    NOTE: It is recommended that samples be prefocused and parameters for each channel on the imaging system of choice be adjusted before wounding to reduce the lag between wound formation and image acquisition.
  4. Wound four Tol2(mpx:Dendra2)23 embryos via manual transection by applying pressure with a scalpel blade across the tail fin tissue under a stereomicroscope, then return the device to the stage.
  5. Capture the image on the GFP (excitation 488 nm, emission 510 nm) channel at room temperature using a 5 min frame interval for 24 h.
  6. If necessary, release the embryos for retrieval after imaging via gentle suction near the head using a transfer pipette or swirling the dish.

Results

For comparison of image quality produced by a laser scanning confocal with and without the aid of the RADISH, embryos expressing the intensiometric calcium biosensor GCaMP6f22,24 in the outer epithelial layer were stained using MemGlow 560 and imaged with an inverted laser scanning confocal covering the entire thickness of the tail fin fold at a time interval of 1 min per frame (Video 2). Without the device (Figure ...

Discussion

The core premise of the PET lamination method involves cost reduction and minimization of technical barriers to entry compared to traditional means of creating microfluidic devices, such as soft lithography or PDMS molding. As such, the only critical steps in this protocol are the accurate alignment of PET layers during lamination and waterproofing of the device edges after construction. All other parts of the method may be modified according to experimental needs (e.g., if immobilization of younger or older embryos is r...

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by research funding from the National Institutes of Health (R35GM119787 to QD). This work is based upon efforts supported by EMBRIO Institute, NSF contract #2120200, a National Science Foundation (NSF) Biology Integration Institute. Confocal imaging was performed at the Purdue Imaging Facility. We thank Dr. Guangjun Zhang (Purdue University) for providing the Tg(UAS:GCaMP6f) line. We thank Dr. David Tobin (Duke University) for providing the (cdh1-tdtomato)xt18 line.

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
25 mm diameter round coverglass #1 thicknessChemglass Life SciencesCLS-1760-025Base mounting material. Thickness was chosen based on the specifications of the microscope lens.
Adobe Illustrator v28.5AdobeN/AVector editor for designing the device pattern.
Calcium Chloride DihydrateFisherC79For making E3 medium.
Design PNG Files (Online Mirror)N/AN/Ahttps://i.ibb.co/QPYj7BL/multipositionalv7-1.png
https://i.ibb.co/FDpQYXc/multipositionalv7-2.png
https://i.ibb.co/5TG4SB6/multipositionalv7-3.png
Design Space for Desktop v8.39CricutN/AProprietary software to drive the craft cutter.
Fusion Plus 7000LGBC1703098Thermal laminator. This specific model was selected for quality of life features, such as maximum sheet stack size.
German Carbide Premium BladeCricut10396595Replacement blade for craft cutter.
Gray Basic Tool SetCricut10307854Tool set for weeding cuts, cleaning mats, and mounting PET sheets. Optional. 
Magnesium Chloride HexahydrateAcros Organic223211000For making E3 medium.
Maker 3Cricut10669040Craft cutter. The Cricut Maker 3 was selected over the Silhouette Cameo 4 for software user friendliness, but any craft cutter capable of reading black and white images will work.
MemGlow 560CytoskeletonMG02-10Red live cell dye for cell membranes. No washing needed. Used in Figure 3. 
No. 22 Carbon Scalpel BladeSurgical Design

22-079-697
Scalpel blade for manual cut adjustments. Any similar craft knife (e.g., X-acto #2 knife) will also work.
Potassium ChlorideFisherBP366For making E3 medium.
Sodium ChlorideFisherBP358For making E3 medium.
StandardGrip Adhesive Cutting MatCricut10138842Mounting mat for craft cutter. The LightGrip cutting mat will also work, but avoid the StrongGrip and FabricGrip cutting mats as the strength of the adhesive may warp the final cut during weeding and removal. Adhesive on mats will eventually wear out with continued use; replace mats as needed.
Stationery Tape 12 mmDeli30014Office tape. Deli brand was chosen via testing for ease of removal after lamination.
Super glue, liquidLoctite1364076Cyanoacrylate glue. Glue used must be liquid. Gel formulations will not sufficiently seal or waterproof device edges.
PET Thermal Laminating Pouches, 3 milScotchTP3854PET sheets with thermal adhesive. Sheets arrive as sandwiched pairs and should be separated before use. Cut with adhesive side facing down.
PET Thermal Laminating Pouches, 5 milScotchTP5854PET sheets with thermal adhesive. Sheets arrive as sandwiched pairs and should be separated before use. Cut with adhesive side facing down.
Tricaine (MS-222)SyndelIC10310680Fish anaesthetic.

References

  1. De Oliveira, S., Rosowski, E. E., Huttenlocher, A. Neutrophil migration in infection and wound repair: going forward in reverse. Nat Rev Immunol. 16 (6), 378-391 (2016).
  2. Xu, S., Hsiao, T. I., Chisholm, A. D. The wounded worm. Worm. 1 (2), 134-138 (2012).
  3. Belacortu, Y., Paricio, N. Drosophila as a model of wound healing and tissue regeneration in vertebrates. Dev Dyn. 240 (11), 2379-2404 (2011).
  4. Yoo, S. K., Freisinger, C. M., LeBert, D. C., Huttenlocher, A. Early redox, Src family kinase, and calcium signaling integrate wound responses and tissue regeneration in zebrafish. J Cell Biol. 199 (2), 225-234 (2012).
  5. Kawakami, A., Fukazawa, T., Takeda, H. Early fin primordia of zebrafish larvae regenerate by a similar growth control mechanism with adult regeneration. Dev Dyn. 231 (4), 693-699 (2004).
  6. Gault, W. J., Enyedi, B., Niethammer, P. Osmotic surveillance mediates rapid wound closure through nucleotide release. J Cell Biol. 207 (6), 767-782 (2014).
  7. Huemer, K., et al. zWEDGI: Wounding and entrapment device for imaging live zebrafish larvae. Zebrafish. 14 (1), 42-50 (2017).
  8. Kaufmann, A., Mickoleit, M., Weber, M., Huisken, J. Multilayer mounting enables long-term imaging of zebrafish development in a light sheet microscope. Development. 139 (17), 3242-3247 (2012).
  9. Hirsinger, E., Steventon, B. A versatile mounting method for long term imaging of zebrafish development. J Vis Exp. (119), e55210 (2017).
  10. Wielhouwer, E. M., et al. Zebrafish embryo development in a microfluidic flow-through system. Lab Chip. 11 (10), 1815-1824 (2011).
  11. Khalili, A., Rezai, P. Microfluidic devices for embryonic and larval zebrafish studies. Brief Funct Genomics. 18 (6), 419-432 (2019).
  12. Choudhury, D., et al. Fish and Chips: a microfluidic perfusion platform for monitoring zebrafish development. Lab Chip. 12 (5), 892-900 (2012).
  13. Zhang, G., et al. An integrated microfluidic system for zebrafish larva organs injection. , 8563-8566 (2017).
  14. Erickstad, M., Hale, L. A., Chalasani, S. H., Groisman, A. A microfluidic system for studying the behavior of zebrafish larvae under acute hypoxia. Lab Chip. 15 (3), 857-866 (2015).
  15. Mani, K., Hsieh, Y. C., Panigrahi, B., Chen, C. Y. A noninvasive light driven technique integrated microfluidics for zebrafish larvae transportation. Biomicrofluidics. 12 (2), 021101 (2018).
  16. Lee, Y., Seo, H. W., Lee, K. J., Jang, J. W., Kim, S. A microfluidic system for stable and continuous EEG monitoring from multiple larval zebrafish. Sensors (Basel). 20 (20), 5903 (2020).
  17. Sonnen, K. F., Merten, C. A. Microfluidics as an emerging precision tool in developmental biology. Dev Cell. 48 (3), 293-311 (2019).
  18. Levis, M., et al. Microfluidics on the fly: Inexpensive rapid fabrication of thermally laminated microfluidic devices for live imaging and multimodal perturbations of multicellular systems. Biomicrofluidics. 13 (2), 024111 (2019).
  19. . E3 medium (for zebrafish embryos). Cold Spring Harbor Protocols. 2011 (10), (2011).
  20. Matthews, M., Varga, Z. M. Anesthesia and euthanasia in zebrafish. ILAR J. 53 (2), 192-204 (2012).
  21. Cronan, M. R., Tobin, D. M. Endogenous tagging at the cdh1 locus for live visualization of E-cadherin dynamics. Zebrafish. 16 (3), 324 (2019).
  22. Thiele, T. R., Donovan, J. C., Baier, H. Descending control of swim posture by a midbrain nucleus in zebrafish. Neuron. 83 (3), 679-691 (2014).
  23. Yoo, S. K., Huttenlocher, A. Spatiotemporal photolabeling of neutrophil trafficking during inflammation in live zebrafish. J Leukoc Biol. 89 (5), 661-667 (2011).
  24. Chen, T. W., et al. Ultrasensitive fluorescent proteins for imaging neuronal activity. Nature. 499 (7458), 295-300 (2013).
  25. Li, L., Yan, B., Shi, Y. -. Q., Zhang, W. -. Q., Wen, Z. -. L. Live imaging reveals differing roles of macrophages and neutrophils during zebrafish tail fin regeneration. J Biol Chem. 287 (30), 25353-25360 (2012).
  26. Mathias, J. R., et al. Resolution of inflammation by retrograde chemotaxis of neutrophils in transgenic zebrafish. J Leukoc Biol. 80, 1281-1288 (2006).
  27. Levis, M., Ontiveros, F., Juan, J., Kavanagh, A., Zartman, J. J. Rapid fabrication of custom microfluidic devices for research and educational applications. J Vis Exp. 2019, (2019).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

Polyethylene TerephthalateLaminationMicrofluidicsZebrafish ImagingIntravital ImagingWound HealingImmune Cell MigrationSoft Lithography3D PrintingRADISH DeviceDrug TreatmentMorphological CharacteristicsCalcium SignalNeutrophil Recruitment

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved