electromagnetic-source-imaging-presurgical-evaluation-children-with

Electromagnetic Source Imaging in Presurgical Evaluation of Children with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy

For children with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), seizure freedom relies on the delineation and resection (or ablation/disconnection) of the epileptogenic ...

Cook Children’s Health Care System

University of Texas at Arlington

Children with medically refractory epilepsy (MRE) require resective neurosurgery to achieve seizure freedom, whose success depends on accurate delineation of the epileptogenic zone (EZ). Functional connectivity (FC) can assess the extent of epileptic brain networks since intracranial EEG (icEEG) studies have shown its link to the EZ and predictive value for surgical outcome in these patients. Here, we propose a new noninvasive method based on magnetoencephalography (MEG) and high-density (HD-EEG) data that estimates FC metrics at the source level through an "implantation" of virtual sensors (VSs). We analyzed MEG, HD-EEG, and icEEG data from eight children with MRE who underwent surgery having good outcome and performed source localization (beamformer) on noninvasive data to build VSs at the icEEG electrode locations. We analyzed data with and without Interictal Epileptiform Discharges (IEDs) in different frequency bands, and computed the following FC matrices: Amplitude Envelope Correlation (AEC), Correlation (CORR), and Phase Locking Value (PLV). Each matrix was used to generate a graph using Minimum Spanning Tree (MST), and for each node (i.e., each sensor) we computed four centrality measures: betweenness, closeness, degree, and eigenvector. We tested the reliability of VSs measures with respect to icEEG (regarded as benchmark) via linear correlation, and compared FC values inside vs. outside resection. We observed higher FC inside than outside resection (p<0.05) for AEC [alpha (8-12 Hz), beta (12-30 Hz), and broadband (1-50 Hz)] on data with IEDs and AEC theta (4-8 Hz) on data without IEDs for icEEG, AEC broadband (1-50 Hz) on data without IEDs for MEG-VSs, as well as for all centrality measures of icEEG and MEG/HD-EEG-VSs. Additionally, icEEG and VSs metrics presented high correlation (0.6-0.9, p<0.05). Our data support the notion that the proposed method can potentially replicate the icEEG ability to map the epileptogenic network in children with MRE.Clinical Relevance - The estimation of FC with noninvasive techniques, such as MEG and HD-EEG, via VSs is a promising tool that would help the presurgical evaluation by delineating the EZ without waiting for a seizure to occur, and potentially improve the surgical outcome of patients with MRE undergoing surgery.

Mapping Functional Connectivity of Epileptogenic Networks through Virtual Implantation.

Epilepsy is increasingly considered a disorder of brain networks. Studying these networks with functional connectivity can help identify hubs that facilitate the spread of epileptiform activity. Surgical resection of these hubs may lead patients who suffer from drug-resistant epilepsy to seizure freedom. Here, we aim to map non-invasively epileptogenic networks, through the virtual implantation of sensors estimated with electric and magnetic source imaging, in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. We hypothesize that highly connected hubs identified non-invasively with source imaging can predict the epileptogenic zone and the surgical outcome better than spikes localized with conventional source localization methods (dipoles). We retrospectively analysed simultaneous high-density electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography data recorded from 37 children and young adults with drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent neurosurgery. Using source imaging, we estimated virtual sensors at locations where intracranial EEG contacts were placed. On data with and without spikes, we computed undirected functional connectivity between sensors/contacts using amplitude envelope correlation and phase locking value for physiologically relevant frequency bands. From each functional connectivity matrix, we generated an undirected network containing the strongest connections within sensors/contacts using the minimum spanning tree. For each sensor/contact, we computed graph centrality measures. We compared functional connectivity and their derived graph centrality of sensors/contacts inside resection for good (n = 22, ILAE I) and poor (n = 15, ILAE II-VI) outcome patients, tested their ability to predict the epileptogenic zone in good-outcome patients, examined the association between highly connected hubs removal and surgical outcome and performed leave-one-out cross-validation to support their prognostic value. We also compared the predictive values of functional connectivity with those of dipoles. Finally, we tested the reliability of virtual sensor measures via Spearman's correlation with intracranial EEG at population- and patient-level. We observed higher functional connectivity inside than outside resection (P < 0.05, Wilcoxon signed-rank test) for good-outcome patients, on data with and without spikes across different bands for intracranial EEG and electric/magnetic source imaging and few differences for poor-outcome patients. These functional connectivity measures were predictive of both the epileptogenic zone and outcome (positive and negative predictive values ≥55%, validated using leave-one-out cross-validation) outperforming dipoles on spikes. Significant correlations were found between source imaging and intracranial EEG measures (0.4 ≤ rho ≤ 0.9, P < 0.05). Our findings suggest that virtual implantation of sensors through source imaging can non-invasively identify highly connected hubs in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, even in the absence of frank epileptiform activity. Surgical resection of these hubs predicts outcome better than dipoles.

Non-invasive mapping of epileptogenic networks predicts surgical outcome.

Normal brain functioning emerges from a complex interplay among regions forming networks. In epilepsy, these networks are disrupted causing seizures. Highly connected nodes in these networks are epilepsy surgery targets. Here, we assess whether functional connectivity (FC) using intracranial electroencephalography can quantify brain regions epileptogenicity and predict surgical outcome in children with drug resistant epilepsy (DRE). We computed FC between electrodes on different states (i.e. interictal without spikes, interictal with spikes, pre-ictal, ictal, and post-ictal) and frequency bands. We then estimated the electrodes' nodal strength. We compared nodal strength between states, inside and outside resection for good- (n = 22, Engel I) and poor-outcome (n = 9, Engel II-IV) patients, respectively, and tested their utility to predict the epileptogenic zone and outcome. We observed a hierarchical epileptogenic organization among states for nodal strength: lower FC during interictal and pre-ictal states followed by higher FC during ictal and post-ictal states (p < 0.05). We further observed higher FC inside resection (p < 0.05) for good-outcome patients on different states and bands, and no differences for poor-outcome patients. Resection of nodes with high FC was predictive of outcome (positive and negative predictive values: 47-100%). Our findings suggest that FC can discriminate epileptogenic states and predict outcome in patients with DRE.

Ludovica Corona

Neuroscience Research Center,
Jane and John Justin Institute for Mind Health,
Neuroscience Research Center, Jane and John Justin Institute for Mind Health

Cook Children’s Health Care System

Electromagnetic Source Imaging in Presurgical Evaluation of Children with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy

Ludovica Corona

.css-o250i3{font-size:18px;font-family:Open Sans,sans-serif;line-height:21.6px;}Neuroscience Research Center,Jane and John Justin Institute for Mind Health,Neuroscience Research Center, Jane and John Justin Institute for Mind Health

Cook Children’s Health Care System

Electromagnetic Source Imaging in Presurgical Evaluation of Children with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy

Neuroscience Research Center,
Jane and John Justin Institute for Mind Health,
Neuroscience Research Center, Jane and John Justin Institute for Mind Health