표면 화산 3 차원 지진 이미징 데이터 처리 방법: 응용 프로그램 타림 홍수 현무암을

요약

3 차원 (3D) 반영 지진학 표면 화산 이미징에 대 한 강력한 방법입니다. 타림 분 지에서 산업 3D 지진학 데이터를 사용 하 여 우리는 지진 데이터 큐브에서 욕실 및 표면 화산 도관을 추출 하는 방법을 보여 줍니다.

초록

배관 시스템의 구조와 형태 분화 속도 현무암 용암의 스타일에 중요 한 정보를 제공할 수 있습니다. 표면 지 오-시체를 공부 하는 가장 강력한 방법은 산업 3D 반영 지진학 이미지를 사용 하는 것입니다. 그러나, 전략 이미지 표면 화산을 석유와 가스 저수지의 매우 다르다. 이 연구에서 우리는 타림 분 지, 중국 북부, 불투명도 렌더링 기법을 통해 욕실을 시각화 하는 방법과 시간 조각화는 도관의 이미지를 설명 하기에서 지진 데이터 큐브를 처리 합니다. 첫 번째 경우, 우리 고립 프로브 지진 시야 욕실 사이의 연락처를 표시 하 고 지층 인 지진 큐브에서 욕실 추출 불투명도 렌더링 기술을 적용. 결과 자세한 문 턱 형태학 흐름 방향으로 돔 센터에서 테두리를 보여 줍니다. 두 번째 지진 큐브 사용 하 여 시간 조각 도관, 이미지를 해당 표시 된 불연속 encasing 바위에서 하는. 시간 조각에서 다른 깊이의 집합 타림 홍수 basalts 별도 파이프 모양의 도관에 의해 먹이 중앙 화산에서 폭발을 보여줍니다.

서문

퇴적 분 지에서 산업 지진 이미징 프로젝트의 대부분의 목적은 탄화수소 저수지에 대 한 탐구입니다. 최근 몇 년 동안, 탄화수소 탐험 volcanogenic 분 지의 많은 상당한 석유와 가스 저수지 때문에 폭파 바위의 다량을 포함 하는 분 지를 확장 했다. 그러나, volcanogenic 분 지에 폭파 바위의 인터페이스 때문에 지진 데이터 처리는 감소 에너지 전송, 본질적인 감쇠, 간섭 효과, 굴절, 산란¹등 다양 한 침입에 의해 유도 된 과제의 일련을 제공 합니다. 따라서, 유전 회사 맞추고 있습니다 감소 등 "부정적인 영향"에 지진 이미징^2,,34.

퇴적 분 지 내에서 폭파 시체 encasing 바위^1,,56큰 음향 임피던스 대비로 인해 2 차원 또는 3 차원 지진 반사 영상으로 쉽게 식별 됩니다. 이 메서드는 화산 배관 시스템^{7,8,9,10,11,,1213}의 수직 및 수평 구조의 화려한 이미지를 제공할 수 있습니다. 그러나, 표면 유황 이미징의 전략은 석유와 가스 탐사^8,,1415의 매우 다릅니다. 이 연구의 몇 가지 성공 사례^10,,1516외 표면 화산 산업 지진 데이터의 사용을 제한 했다. 이 문서에서 우리는 표면 화산의 해석에 대 한 사용자 지정 지진 데이터 처리, 상세한 절차 보고 합니다. 우리는 두 개의 지진 큐브, TZ47 및 YM2 처리 (그림 1), 타림 홍수 현무암¹⁷에 묻혀 폭파 시체를 시각화 하는 방법을 보여 줍니다.

프로토콜

NOTE: The data processing procedures include: synthetic seismogram calculation, synthetic-real seismic trace correlation, and geo-body extraction. Below are the step-by-step details of each procedure.

1. Calculation of Synthetic Seismogram

1. Calculate the acoustic impedance at each interval of the down-well logging curve.
   NOTE: Acoustic impedance is the product of 'seismic wave velocities' and 'density' (ρ*ν)). The data are often averaged to sampling intervals larger than 1 ft, in order to reduce the computation time and aliasing.
2. Calculate the reflection coefficients (R₀) at each interface by using the acoustic impedance calculation:
   
   where ν₁ and ν₂ are the averaged velocities of the layers below and above the interface, respectively; ρ₁ and ρ₂ are the corresponding averaged densities.
   1. If the well does not intersect the igneous bodies, use nearby wells that have intersected the target rocks to obtain the parameters (velocity, density, etc.).
3. Chose a wavelet that has an amplitude and phase spectrum similar to that of the nearby seismic data.
4. Convolve the synthetic wavelet with the reflection series for the entire well survey and generate a synthetic seismic trace. The final simulated seismic trace T(t) can be described by the convolutional model as below:
   
   where R₀(t) is the reflection coefficient, w(t) is the wavelet and n(t) is the noise.
5. If the frequency of the seismic data has large variations throughout the whole well, re-compute the synthetic seismic trace using a wavelet with a different phase and a dominant frequency at different depth intervals.
   1. Repeat the process if the match between the synthetic trace and the seismic data is not satisfactory.
6. Perform the calculation with the provided software (e.g., Petrel E&P Software Platform).
   1. Start the software. Select File | Open Project | and then select the demo research project tlm (users can select their own desired projects). The project should contain well data, wired log, well tops, seismic cube, and interpretation surface in the research area.
   2. Click on Home | Windows | 2D Windows | 3D Windows to open two display windows to show the data sets according to user's preference.
   3. In the "Wells Tree of Input Pane", right click the desired well. Open the Settings window of the well and select the Time tab to create a new time log. Select Velocity Function, then select DT data in the new time log. Click the OK button to close settings window. A new one-way time log is automatically created and will be shown in the "Wells Tree of Input Pane".
      NOTE: A one-way time log is a time-depth relationship of this well. Wired log domains can be transformed to time domains and be shown in the time domain window.
   4. Activate an existing 3D Window by clicking the displayed window. If there is no 3D Window displayed, create a new 3D Window by clicking Home | Windows | 3D Windows. Select TWT in the toolbar of the 3D Window to show the 3D Window in time domain.
   5. Select representative wired logs (such as 'GR', 'DT', or 'RT') in the Wells Tree to show them in the 3D Window; at the same time, select the seismic profile in the 'seismic' tree of the 'input' pane to show them in the same 3D Window.
   6. Use the Manipulate Plane tool in the toolbar of the 3D Window to adjust the location of the profile to intersect the well; the user will see that the wired log has been transformed to the time domain and displayed with the seismic profile in the same 3D window.
   7. Click Seismic Interpretation | Seismic Well Tie | Seismic Well Tie Process. Choose Integrated Seismic Well Tie in the type of study row, and add desired well in the Well row. Choose calibrated one-way time log as time-depth relationship in the TDR row of the input tab, choose seismic cube in the seismic row. Choose any log in the RC calculation method.
   8. Click Launch Wavelet Toolbox to create a Ricker wavelet to apply in this process. Click OK and a new well section window and synthetic seismogram display will be created.

2. Correlate the Synthetic Traces with the Real Seismic Reflectors

1. Use an automated correlation application, like Seismic Well Tie in the platform, to adapt the resulting synthetic trace to the vertical scale of the seismic section.
2. Adjust the synthetic seismogram to increase the overlapping of high amplitude reflectors of the synthetic trace and real trace.
3. Adjust the synthetic seismogram and the real trace repeatedly. When the overlapping trace reaches the maximum, the interpreter has reached the "best fits" between the obtained synthetic seismogram and real traces.
   1. Repeat the process until the correlations reach the desired level.
4. Perform the correlation with the provided software.
   1. Activate the window created in step 1.6.3, which is the one-way time log automatically created from the acoustic log.
      NOTE: This automatically created 'one-way time log' is not perfectly correlated with the real seismic reflectors. The users should calibrate the correlations between the one-way time log and the real seismic reflectors.
   2. To calibrate their correlations, choose a continual and representative reflector that is intersected by the well. Then manually adjust the depth of the well log. For example, to adjust the depth of the DT log, right click the One-Way Time Log in well tree | select the Calculator tool | then add a small time increment (for example, 10 ms) by typing 'DT=DT+10' in the input dialog of the Calculator tool.
   3. If the '10 ms' increment is too large or too small, change the increment to another time (can be negative value) in the 'calculator' tool. Check the correlation between the well log and the selected seismic horizon repeatedly and then adjust the time increment repeatedly, until the correlation is perfectly calibrated.

3. Extraction of Basaltic Sills

1. Pick 2 high-amplitude reflectors encasing the target sills.
   NOTE: Most intrusions are expressed in seismic data as tuned reflection packages, whereby the reflections from the upper and lower intrusion contacts cannot be distinguished. Tuning occurs when the vertical intrusion thickness is between λ/4 and λ/8 (λ is seismic wavelength)¹⁹. Therefore, sills are shown as a set of strong reflections in the seismic section, and their apparent thickness is false.
2. Extract probes between the horizons corresponding to the two high-amplitude reflectors.
   NOTE: There are different tools based on the rendering technique that can help the interpreters better visualize the targets, such as "box probes", "surfaces probes" and "well probes". However, for identification of contacts between the sills and encasing strata, the best tool is "surface probe". ("Surface probe, etc." are terms in 'Petrel' software. The software users should be familiar with these terms).
3. Remove the areas surrounding the geological objects of interest by changing the Voxel connectivity opacity threshold value. Set the default threshold value to 20%. The visualization method of "opacity rendering" is used here to display the result of the extraction of basaltic sills ( Figure 2C).
   NOTE: There are high amplitude reflections along the surface between igneous rock and sedimentary rock because of their significant difference in acoustic impedance. Make the low amplitude parts transparent to highlight the shape of the igneous bodies.
4. As the value for isolation can be higher than 20 - 30%, change the value with small increments to make sure all important igneous bodies are not lost; the larger the value, the higher the risk of losing the volume of the real igneous bodies.
5. Perform the operation with the provided software.
   1. Click the Seismic Interpretation pane, click Insert a Horizon Probe. A probe will be added in the geobody interpretation probes tree of input pane. Double click the added horizon probe and a pop-up window will appear.
   2. Click the Horizons tab in the pop-up window and choose two seismic surfaces that isolate the zone of sills. Click OK to apply the operation.
   3. Check the newly added probe in the geobody interpretation probes tree shown in the input pane. A seismic cube will then appear in the 3D window.
   4. Double click the probe and choose the Opacity tab. A histogram of seismic amplitude will be shown in the tab. Use the left mouse button to draw a line in the histogram to control the opacity of the seismic cube. The low amplitude parts of the tube should be invisible and the high amplitude parts will be left.
   5. Adjust the histogram repeatedly until the desired shape of the interested geobody is achieved.

4. Extraction of the Feeding Conduits

1. Choose continuous and high energy reflection horizons at different depths beneath the surface lava flow.
2. Do time slicing along the selected horizons, to find out discontinuities corresponding to the vertical conduits.
3. Adjust the Two-Way Time (TWT) repeatedly, to achieve the best imaging of the discontinuities of the conduits.
   NOTE: Seismic data cannot image vertical structures well, so better images from amplitude volumes and variance volumes are chosen by comparing clearness at different travel times.
4. Try different slicing techniques, and then choose which can better image the discontinuities.
   NOTE: Different tools can be used here, such as variance body slicing. Its theoretical basis is the similarity between each seismic section and adjacent seismic traces in the seismic data. Another tool, the variance cube, is a new data body processed by the conventional seismic data, which is helpful for the identification of changes in the structure and lithology, plane combination of the fault, etc.²⁰
5. Plot the slices at different travel times or depths into a 3D space.
6. Perform the operation with the provided software.
   1. Double click Volume Attributes in the geophysics tree of the processes pane. Check Structural Methods in the category column and Variance in the attribute column. Select the seismic cube to input box and adjust the other parameter in the parameter tab. For better reading performance, check the box in the realize column. A variance cube is created in the seismic tree of the input pane.
   2. Right click the variance cube and click Insert Time Slice Intersection to show more horizontal intersections in the 3D window. Use the Manipulate Plane tool in the toolbar of the 3D window to adjust the location of the slices to optimize the display of conduits.
   3. Right click the seismic amplitude cube and click Insert Time Slice Intersection to show more horizontal intersections in 3D window. Do the same operation as step 4.6.2 to adjust the location of the slices to optimize the display of conduits.

결과

폭파, 수평 욕실 몸과 수직 화산 도관의 2 종류를 적용 하 여 위에서 설명한 기술의 유용성을 설명 합니다. 욕실의 추출 불투명 렌더링 기술을 사용 하 여 실시 하 고 해석 화산 도관의 슬 라이 싱 기법을 사용 하 여 수행 됩니다.

욕실의 추출

산업 드릴링 우물에서 북부 타림 분 지

토론

여기 묻혀 있는 현무암 화산; 배관 시스템의 구조와 형태를 보여주는 2 방법 설명 하나는 불투명도 렌더링, 다른 자르는 시간 이다.

불투명도 렌더링 메서드는 연속 및 수평 인터페이스 encasing 지층과 가까운 지리적 시체에 적합 합니다. 이 방법으로, 하나는 마그마 돌출부의 3D 형태를 추출할 수 있습니다. 일반적으로, 흐름 방향 마그마 돌출부의 긴 축을 해야 합니다. 그것은 ?...

자료

Name	Company	Catalog Number	Comments
The Petrel E&P software platform	Schlumberger		software version:2014