Aby wyświetlić tę treść, wymagana jest subskrypcja JoVE. Zaloguj się lub rozpocznij bezpłatny okres próbny.
Method Article
Chondrogenesis from stem cells requires fine tuning the culture conditions. Here, we present a magnetic approach for condensing cells, an essential step to initiate chondrogenesis. In addition, we show that dynamic maturation in a bioreactor applies mechanical stimulation to the cellular constructs and enhances cartilaginous extracellular matrix production.
Cartilage engineering remains a challenge due to the difficulties in creating an in vitro functional implant similar to the native tissue. An approach recently explored for the development of autologous replacements involves the differentiation of stem cells into chondrocytes. To initiate this chondrogenesis, a degree of compaction of the stem cells is required; hence, we demonstrated the feasibility of magnetically condensing cells, both within thick scaffolds and scaffold-free, using miniaturized magnetic field sources as cell attractors. This magnetic approach was also used to guide aggregate fusion and to build scaffold-free, organized, three-dimensional (3D) tissues several millimeters in size. In addition to having an enhanced size, the tissue formed by magnetic-driven fusion presented a significant increase in the expression of collagen II, and a similar trend was observed for aggrecan expression. As the native cartilage was subjected to forces that influenced its 3D structure, dynamic maturation was also performed. A bioreactor that provides mechanical stimuli was used to culture the magnetically seeded scaffolds over a 21-day period. Bioreactor maturation largely improved chondrogenesis into the cellularized scaffolds; the extracellular matrix obtained under these conditions was rich in collagen II and aggrecan. This work outlines the innovative potential of magnetic condensation of labeled stem cells and dynamic maturation in a bioreactor for improved chondrogenic differentiation, both scaffold-free and within polysaccharide scaffolds.
Magnetic nanoparticles are already used in the clinic as contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and their therapeutic applications keep expanding. For example, it has recently been shown that labeled cells can be manipulated in vivo using an external magnetic field and can be directed and/or maintained at a defined site of implantation1,2,3. In regenerative medicine, they can be used to engineer organized tissues in vitro4, including vascular tissue5,6,7, bone8, and cartilage9.
Articular cartilage is immersed in an avascular environment, making repairs of the extracellular matrix components very limited when damages occur. For this reason, research is currently focused on the engineering of hyaline cartilage replacements that can be implanted at the defect site. In order to produce an autologous replacement, some research groups are exploring the use of autologous chondrocytes as a cell source10,11, while others emphasize the capacity of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) to differentiate into chondrocytes12,13. In previous studies recapitulated here, we selected MSC, as their bone marrow sampling is fairly simple and does not require the sacrifice of healthy chondrocytes, which risk losing their phenotype14.
An early step essential to initiating the chondrogenic differentiation of stem cells is their condensation. Cell aggregates are commonly formed using either centrifugation or micromass culture15; however, these condensation methods neither present the potential to create cell clusters within thick scaffolds nor the potential to control the fusion of aggregates. In this paper, we describe an innovative approach to condensing stem cells using MSC magnetic labeling and magnetic attraction. This technique has been proven to form scaffold-free 3D constructs via the fusion of aggregates with one another to obtain a millimeter-scale cartilaginous tissue9. Magnetic seeding of thick and large scaffolds has also allowed the possibility of increasing the size of the engineered tissue, designing a shape more readily useful for implantation, and diversifying the potential for clinical applications in cartilage repair. Here, we detail the protocol for the magnetic seeding of MSC into porous scaffolds composed of natural polysaccharides, pullulan, and dextran, scaffolds previously used to confine stem cells16,17. Chondrogenic differentiation was finally performed in a bioreactor to ensure continuous nutrient and gas diffusion into the matrix core of the scaffolds seeded with a high density of cells. Besides providing nutrients, chondrogenic growth factors, and gas to the cells, the bioreactor offered mechanical stimulation. Overall, the magnetic technology used to confine stem cells, combined with dynamic maturation in a bioreactor, can markedly improve chondrogenic differentiation.
1. Construction of the Magnetic Devices
NOTE: The devices used for cell seeding vary depending on the application (Figure 1). To form aggregates, the number of cells is limited to 2.5×105/aggregate, so the magnetic tips must be very thin (750 µm in diameter). To seed the 1.8 cm2/7 mm-thick scaffolds, the magnets must be larger (3 mm in diameter) and will ensure cell migration through the pores of the scaffold.
2. Stem Cell Labeling
NOTE: Stem cells were labeled with 0.1 mM magnetic nanoparticles for 30 min (2.6 ± 0.2 pg iron/cell) to form aggregates, while they were labeled with 0.2 mM magnetic nanoparticles for 30 min (5 ± 0.4 pg iron/cell) to seed scaffolds. These nanoparticle concentrations and incubation times have been used previously and published for MSC and other cells18,19, and it has been determined that nanoparticles impacted neither cell viability nor MSC differentiation capacity. The iron mass incorporated by the stem cells was measured via single-cell magnetophoresis19,20.
3. Magnetic Cell Seeding
4. Differentiation into Chondrocytes
NOTE: After 4 days of incubation, remove the magnets and continue the chondrogenic maturation either in a Petri dish (static conditions) or in a bioreactor (dynamic conditions). Negative control samples are matured in static conditions with chondrogenic medium without TGF-β3.
5. RNA Extraction and Gene Expression Analysis
NOTE: Prior to RNA extraction, digest the scaffolds with an enzymatic solution.
6. Histological Analysis
First, aggregates can be individually formed using micro-magnets by depositing 2.5×105 labeled stem cells (Figure 2A). These single aggregates (~0.8 mm in size) can then be fused into larger structures thanks to sequential, magnetically induced fusion. For instance, on day 8 of chondrogenic maturation, aggregates were placed in contact in pairs to form doublets; quadruplets were assembled on day 11 by merging 2 doublets; and finally, on day 15, the 4 quadr...
First, because the techniques presented here rely on the internalization of magnetic nanoparticles, one important issue is the outcome of the nanoparticles once they localize within the cells. It is true that iron nanoparticles may trigger potential toxicity or impaired differentiation capacity depending on their size, coating, and time of exposure19,22. However, several studies have shown no impact on cellular physiology when encapsulated iron nanoparticles were...
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The authors would like to acknowledge QuinXell Technologies and CellD, particularly Lothar Grannemann and Dominique Ghozlan for their help with the bioreactor. We thank Catherine Le Visage, who provided us with the pullulan/dextran polysaccharide scaffolds. This work was supported by the European Union (ERC-2014-CoG project MaTissE 648779) and by the AgenceNationalede la Recherche (ANR), France (MagStem project ANR-11 SVSE5).
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Iron oxide (maghemite) nanoparticules (γ-Fe2O3) | PHENIX - University Paris 6 | Made and given by C. Ménager | Mean diameter of 8.1 nm and negative surface charge |
Polysaccharide Pullulan/Dextran scaffolds | LIOAD - University Nantes | Made and given by C. Le Visage | Prepared from a 75:25 mixture of pullulan/dextran in alkaline conditions (10 M NaOH). Porosity: 185-205 µm; Thickness: 7 mm; Surface area: 1.8 cm2. |
TisXell Regeneration System | QuinXell Technologies | QX900-002 | Biaxial bioreactor with 500 mL culture chamber |
Cage for scaffolds: Histosette II M492 | VWR | 720-0909 | |
Mesenchymal Stem Cell (MSC) | Lonza | PT-2501 | Three independant batches have been used |
MSCGM BulletKit medium | Lonza | PT-3001 | For the complete medium, add the provided BulletKit (containing serum, glutamine and antibiotics) to the MSCGM medium |
DMEM with Glutamax I | Life Technologies | 31966-021 | No sodium pyruvate, no HEPES |
RPMI medium 1640, no Glutamine | Life Technologies | 31870-025 | No sodium pyruvate, no HEPES |
PBS w/o CaCl2 w/o MgCl2 | Life Technologies | 14190-094 | |
0.05% Trypsin-EDTA (1x) | Life Technologies | 25300-054 | |
Penicillin (10,000 U/mL) / Streptomycin (10,000 µg/mL) | Life Technologies | 15140-122 | |
ITS Premix Universal Culture Supplement (20x) | Corning | 354352 | |
Sodium pyruvate solution 100 mM | Sigma | S8636 | |
L-Ascorbic Acid 2-phosphate | Sigma | A8960 | Prepare the concentrated solution (25 mM) in distilled water extemporaneously |
L-Proline | Sigma | P5607 | Prepare the 175 mM stock solution diluted in distilled water and store at 4 °C |
Dexamethasone | Sigma | D4902 | Prepare the 1 mM stock solution diluted in Ethanol 100% and store at -20 °C |
TGF-beta 3 protein 10 µg | Interchim | 30R-AT028 | |
Tri-sodium citrate | VWR | 33615.268 | Prepare the 1 M stock solution diluted in distilled water and store at 4 °C |
Pullulanase from Bacillus acidopullulyticus | Sigma | P2986 | |
Dextranase from Chaetomium erraticum | Sigma | D0443 | |
NucleoSpin RNA Extraction Kit | Macherey-Nagel | 740955.5 | |
SuperScript II Reverse Transcriptase | Life Technologies | 18064-014 | |
Random Primer - Hexamer | Promega | C1181 | 500 µg/mL: Use diluted 1/2 and put 1 µL per sample |
Recombinant RNAs in ribonuclease inhibitor | Promega | N2511 | 40 U/µL: put 1 µL per sample |
PCR nucleotide dNTP mix (10 mM each) | Roche | 10842321 | |
SyBr Green PCR Master Mix | Life Technologies | 4368708 | |
Step One Plus Real-Time PCR System | Life Technologies | 4381792 | |
Formalin solution 10% neutral buffered | Sigma | HT5012 | |
OCT solution | VWR | 361603E | |
Isopentane | Sigma | M32631 | |
Toluidine blue O | VWR | 1.15930.0025 | |
Ethanol absolute | VWR | 20821.310 | |
Toluene | VWR | 1.08323.1000 | |
Mounting medium Pertex | Histolab | 840 | |
RPLP0 Primer for qPCR | Eurogentec | 5'-TGCATCAGTAC CCCATTCTATCAT-3'; 5'-AAGGTGTAATC CGTCTCCACAGA-3' | |
Aggrecan Primer for qPCR | Eurogentec | 5'-TCTACCGCTGCGAGGTGAT-3'; 3'-TGTAATGGAACACGATGCCTTT-5' | |
Collagen II Primer for qPCR | Eurogentec | 5'-ACTGGATTGACCCCAACCAA-3'; 3'-TCCATGTTGCAGAAAACCTTCA-5' |
Zapytaj o uprawnienia na użycie tekstu lub obrazów z tego artykułu JoVE
Zapytaj o uprawnieniaThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone