Name: microbubble fabrication of concave-porosity pdms beads
Uploaded: 2015-12-15T14:00:00.000+00:00
Duration: 11 min 52 s
Description: Watch this Scientific Journal Video about Microbubble Fabrication of Concave-porosity PDMS Beads at JoVE.com

This work has been supported by Western Kentucky University&#8217;s Ogden College of Science and Engineering, including internal support from the Department of Chemistry and from the Office of Research (RCAP 13-8032). The assistance of Dr. John Andersland at the WKU Microscopy Facility (SEM images) and Associate Professor Yan Cao of the WKU Institute for Combustion Science and Engineering (BET analysis) has been central to conducting this work.

1. Preparation of Emulsion
<ol>
	<li>Emulsion Contents
	<ol>
		<li>Mass an appropriate amount of salt to produce 10 ml of 0.03-M solution. For platinum(IV) chloride measure 0.101 g, for zinc(II) chloride (ZnCl2) measure 0.032 g, and sodium chloride (NaCl) measure 0.018 g.</li>
		<li>In individual test tubes, dissolve each salt into 10 ml of DI water. Set aside for later use.</li>
		<li>Use a 20-ml, sealable glass vial for the contents throughout this procedure. Tare a balance to the glass vial.</li>
		<li>Weigh vinyl-terminated polydimethylsiloxane by slowly pouring it over a stir rod and into the glass vial resting on the zeroed scale. Weigh out 1.02 g (equivalent to 1.080 ml). 
		NOTE: The high viscosity of this polymer makes pipetting impractical.</li>
		<li>Pipette 1.02 ml of n-Heptane to the vial. Add 2 drops of non-ionic surfactant (sorbitan monoleate) to the vial. Pipette 0.3 ml of salt solution and 0.45 ml of DI-water to the vial.</li>
		<li>Seal the glass vial by screwing the lid on tightly. Shake vigorously for 60 sec to initiate the emulsion before beginning sonication.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Construction of Water-bath Sonicator Apparatus
	<ol>
		<li>Fill sonicator with water up to the minimum fill line. Add 250 ml of tap water to a 400-ml beaker. Fill the 400-ml beaker with ice so that the water level is just at the rim.</li>
		<li>Place this beaker inside the water-bath sonicator. Check the fill-line on the sonicator, adjusting if needed. Place a ring stand directly beside the water-bath sonicator.</li>
		<li>Using two ring stand clamps, position them so that an arm is extended out, perpendicular to the ring stand and another one is extended towards the water bath so that it is pointing downwards into the beaker filled with ice water. Attach another clamp to the ring stand with a thermometer down in the 400-ml beaker so that the temperature can be monitored throughout sonication.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Emulsification Procedure
	<ol>
		<li>Place the emulsion-containing vial so that it is fully submerged in the 400-ml beaker by securing it into the clamp protruding down into the beaker.</li>
		<li>Ensure that the glass vial containing the PDMS mixture is not touching the sides of the beaker to eliminate heat caused by friction.</li>
		<li>Turn on the sonicator and set sonication time for 7 min. Because the emulsion is very heat sensitive, ensure that the temperature inside the beaker is between 0 and 5 &#176;C throughout sonication. Start sonication once the temperature inside the beaker is desirable.</li>
		<li>After 7 min of sonication, remove the vial and gently shake/swirl for 1 min, holding the top of the vial to eliminate any clumps that might form in the emulsion.</li>
		<li>Dispose of the contents of the beaker. Refill with 250 ml of water and add ice to the fill to within 1 cm the top of the beaker.</li>
		<li>Place the vial back in the clamp. Submerge it under the ice water to resume sonication for 7 min.</li>
		<li>Repeat steps 1.3.3 to 1.3.6 for a total of eight, 7-min sonication periods, or until the sonication appears to be homogenous and no clumps are present. Store at RT. 
		NOTE: The emulsification should be stable for several days, but can be recovered by sonication as above in 7-min intervals until it appears homogenous. Store at RT.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
2. Cross-linking
<ol>
	<li>Setup for Addition of Triethoxysilane/Surfactant Solution
	<ol>
		<li>Pipette 5.4 ml triethoxysilane into a test tube. Place in a test tube rack under the hood for later use.</li>
		<li>Fill a 400-ml beaker with ice water and place it under the hood. Next to the 400-ml beaker place a ring stand with a clamp attached, extended directly over the opening of the beaker. This will be the ice-bath for the addition of triethoxysilane.</li>
		<li>Place a hot plate on the other side of the ring stand. Fill an 800-ml beaker with approximately 700 ml of tap water. Place it on the hot plate.</li>
		<li>Turn on the hot plate and maintain a temperature of 75 to 85 &#176;C inside the 800-ml beaker. Attach a clamp with a thermometer to the ring stand so the temperature of the water inside the 800-ml beaker can be monitored.</li>
		<li>Produce the surfactant solution by dissolving 0.5 g of sodium dodecyl sulfate to 375 ml of water (4.62 mM). Add approximately 10 ml of surfactant solution to a clean, empty test tube.</li>
		<li>Attach another clamp to the ring stand under the hood with the surfactant test tube secured such that its liquid level is below the surface of the water inside the 800-ml beaker. Allow 10 min for thermal equilibration.</li>
		<li>Wet a piece of filter paper and place it in the top of a small funnel. Place the stem of the funnel inside a 250-ml Erlenmeyer flask and place the flask under the hood.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Addition of Triethoxysilane
	<ol>
		<li>Place the emulsion vial in the clamp over the ice-water beaker inside the hood. Position the PDMS mixture in the clamp so that the vial contents are below the surface of the water. The addition of triethoxysilane causes an exothermic reaction, so the emulsion must be kept cold in order to maintain its structure.</li>
		<li>Remove the lid from the glass vial to avoid gaseous build up.</li>
		<li>Slowly pour the test tube containing triethoxysilane into the glass vial in a continuous stream over a period of approximately 10 sec (roughly 0.5 ml/sec). 
		CAUTION: The addition of triethoxysilane initiates an exothermic reaction and the release of caustic hydrogen chloride (HCl) gas. The vial will become extremely hot and a toxic gas will evolve from the mixture. DO NOT STIR the contents while adding the triethoxysilane.</li>
		<li>After adding triethoxysilane completely, gently stir the contents with a glass stir rod while wearing a heat protective glove. Wait for 2 min or until gas stops evolving from the vial.</li>
		<li>Following cross-linking, there is no phase separation visible in the sample. If clumps are present, seal the vial and shake rigorously for 20 sec while holding the vial by the lid.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Bead production
	<ol>
		<li>Use a clean, glass Pasteur pipette to draw the cross-linked emulsion from the glass vial. Add the cross-linked emulsion drop-wise to the surfactant solution (which should be maintained between 75 and 85 &#176;C) into the test tube taking as little time as possible in between drops.</li>
		<li>30 sec to 1 min after the addition of the emulsion, the surfactant solution will slowly begin to evolve gas as solids begin to form inside the test tube.</li>
		<li>While wearing heat protective gloves, take the test tube out of the clamp and pour its entire contents into the filtration apparatus under the hood. Filter for 5 min. Remove the filter paper from the filter.</li>
		<li>Transfer the filtered solids onto a watch glass and separate beads for O/N drying under the hood. Cleaning of the beads can be postponed indefinitely. Store dried beads at RT in a sealed glass vial until needed, and clean immediately prior to use.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Bead Cleaning
	<ol>
		<li>Create another filtration apparatus under the hood and place the dried beads inside the funnel on top of the filter paper.</li>
		<li>Use a plastic wash bottle filled with DI-water to rinse the beads gently, moving them around slightly to ensure all the beads are rinsed.</li>
		<li>Let the beads dry for 1 hr by placing them on a watch glass under the hood. Use a wash bottle filled with hexanes to rinse the beads using the same method for rinsing with water.</li>
		<li>Place the beads on a watch glass. Place the watch glass and the beads under the hood to dry.</li>
		<li>After the beads are completely dry, place them in a small sealable glass vial and store at RT for future use.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Mounting the Beads for SEM Analysis and SEM Settings
	<ol>
		<li>Place a strip of double-sided carbon conductive tape on top of the stub onto which the beads will be mounted. Using scissors, trim around the stub to ensure no tape hangs over the edges.</li>
		<li>Place a piece of filter paper under the stub on a flat surface. Remove the top layer from the tape so that the adhesive underside is exposed.</li>
		<li>Gently pour the beads over the stub. Some beads will stick to the tape, but most will bounce off and land on the filter paper. Pour these back into the vial if they stayed on the filter paper. Repeat if necessary, washing any beads (according to 2.4.2 to 2.4.5) that become contaminated.</li>
		<li>To ensure the beads are secure on the stub, use a bulb syringe and lightly blow very closely to the stub surface. Pour more beads over the stub if only a few adhered to the tape. Ensure that all beads are secure before placing the stub into the SEM chamber and evacuating it.</li>
		<li>Once the samples have been mounted properly they are now ready to undergo SEM analysis15. Collect images in LOW VAC mode at 15 keV to optimize the resolution of the bead&#8217;s surface features.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>

<ol>
	<li>Pedraza, E., Brady, A. C., Fraker, C. A., Stabler, C. L. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Synthesis+of+macroporous+poly(dimethylsiloxane)+scaffolds+for+tissue+engineering+applications.">Synthesis of macroporous poly(dimethylsiloxane) scaffolds for tissue engineering applications.</a> J. Biomater. Sci., Polym. Ed. 24 (9), 1041-1056 (2013).</li><li>Ratner, B. D., Bryant, S. J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Biomaterials:+Where+we+have+been+and+where+we+are+going.">Biomaterials: Where we have been and where we are going.</a> Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 6, 41-75 (2004).</li><li>B&#233;langer, M. C., Marois, Y. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Hemocompatibility,+biocompatibility,+inflammatory+and+in+vivo+studies+of+primary+reference+materials+low-density+polyethylene+and+polydimethylsiloxane:+A+review.">Hemocompatibility, biocompatibility, inflammatory and in vivo studies of primary reference materials low-density polyethylene and polydimethylsiloxane: A review.</a> J. Biomed. Mater. 58 (5), 467-477 (2001).</li><li>Kobayashi, T., Saitoh, H., Fujii, N., Hoshino, Y., Takanashi, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Porous+membrane+of+polydimethylsiloxane+by+hydrosilylation+cure:+characteristics+of+membranes+having+pores+formed+by+hydrogen+foams.">Porous membrane of polydimethylsiloxane by hydrosilylation cure: characteristics of membranes having pores formed by hydrogen foams.</a> J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 50 (6), 971-979 (1993).</li><li>Yager, P., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Microfluidic+diagnostic+technologies+for+global+public+health.">Microfluidic diagnostic technologies for global public health.</a> Nature. 442 (7101), 412-418 (2006).</li><li>Yu, P., Lu, C. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=PDMS+used+in+microfluidic+devices:+principles,+devices+and+technologies.">PDMS used in microfluidic devices: principles, devices and technologies.</a> Adv. Mater. Sci. Res. 11, 443-450 (2011).</li><li>Zhou, J., Khodakov, D. A., Ellis, A. V., Voelcker, N. H. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Surface+modification+for+PDMS-based+microfluidic+devices.">Surface modification for PDMS-based microfluidic devices.</a> Electrophoresis. 33 (1), 89-104 (2012).</li><li>Spietelun, A., Pilarczyk, M., Kloskowski, A., Namie&#347;nik, J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Polyethylene+glycol-coated+solid-phase+microextraction+fibres+for+the+extraction+of+polar+analytes&#8212;A+review.">Polyethylene glycol-coated solid-phase microextraction fibres for the extraction of polar analytes&#8212;A review.</a> Talanta. 87, 1-7 (2011).</li><li>Vas, G., V&#233;key, K. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Solid-phase+microextraction:+a+powerful+sample+preparation+tool+prior+to+mass+spectrometric+analysis.">Solid-phase microextraction: a powerful sample preparation tool prior to mass spectrometric analysis.</a> J. Mass Spectrom. 39 (3), 233-254 (2004).</li><li>Odziemkowski, M., Koziel, J. A., Irish, D. E., Pawliszyn, J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Sampling+and+Raman+confocal+microspectroscopic+analysis+of+airborne+particulate+matter+using+poly(dimethylsiloxane)+solid+phase+microextraction+fibers.">Sampling and Raman confocal microspectroscopic analysis of airborne particulate matter using poly(dimethylsiloxane) solid phase microextraction fibers.</a> Anal. Chem. 73 (13), 3131-3139 (2001).</li><li>Grosse, M. T., Lamotte, M., Birot, M., Deleuze, H. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Preparation+of+microcellular+polysiloxane+monoliths.">Preparation of microcellular polysiloxane monoliths.</a> J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 46 (1), 21-32 (2007).</li><li>Sun, W., Yan, X., Zhu, X. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Synthesis,+porous+structure,+and+underwater+acoustic+properties+of+macroporous+cross-linked+copolymer+beads.">Synthesis, porous structure, and underwater acoustic properties of macroporous cross-linked copolymer beads.</a> Colloid Polym. Sci. 290 (1), 73-80 (2012).</li><li>Dufaud, O., Favre, E., Sadtler, V. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Porous+elastomeric+beads+from+crosslinked+emulsions.">Porous elastomeric beads from crosslinked emulsions.</a> J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 83 (5), 967-971 (2002).</li><li>Farmer, B. C., Mason, M., Nee, M. J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Concave+porosity+non-polar+beads+by+a+modified+microbubble+fabrication.">Concave porosity non-polar beads by a modified microbubble fabrication.</a> Mater. Lett. 98, 105-107 (2013).</li><li>Flegler, S. L., Heckman, J. W., Klomparens, K. J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=.">.</a> Scanning and Transmission Electron Microscopy: An Introduction. , 151-155 (1995).</li><li>Brunauer, S., Emmett, P. H., Teller, E. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Adsorption+of+Gases+in+Multimolecular+Layers.">Adsorption of Gases in Multimolecular Layers.</a> J. Am. Chem. Soc. 60 (2), 309-319 (1938).</li><li>Sing, K. S. W. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Characterization+of+porous+materials:+past,+present+and+future.">Characterization of porous materials: past, present and future.</a> Colloids Surf. A. 241 (1), 3-7 (2004).</li></ol>

The authors have nothing to disclose.

The beads produced using this protocol (and by adjusting the electrolyte concentration and identity) are fundamentally different from those produced with a low-ionic strength emulsion, as seen by comparison of Figure 1A to the other SEM images in Figure 1. Our initial report used PtCl4 with the intention of further catalyzing the polymerization cross-linking at the aqueous-aliphatic interface14. In that report, large concave indentations were seen. Since that report...

Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) is one of the most widely used silicone compounds. Its biocompatibility has led to widespread use in implant and other biomedical engineering structures1,2. It is trivially cross-linked into elastic structures using an organosilyl compound (such as triethoxysilane), a simple and reliable procedure which has made it useful for cast polymer applications where some flexibility is required3. Once cross-linked, PDMS is largely inert, particularly in biological conditions, and is therefore useful for a variety of food and medical applications4,5. Ease of casting, chemical inertness, and hydrophobicity have made it a natural choice for microfluidic devices6,7. Its affinity for non-halogenated, non-polar organic compounds has made it a popular stationary phase in separations chemistry8-10. 
Recently, microbubble fabrications have been used to generate porous beads for use as catalyst structural substrates or in chemical separations11,12. In both applications, ideal materials will have a maximized surface-area-to-volume (SAV) ratio for best efficiency. In a microbubble fabrication process, microstructuring of materials is typically accomplished by isolating the polymer in aliphatic &#8220;microbubbles&#8221; by emulsification in an aqueous continuous phase. The initial report of microporous PDMS beads produced them by mechanical emulsification of two phases (aliphatic and aqueous)13. The stock PDMS liquid (and its cross-linking agent) is dissolved into the aliphatic phase, which is structured into microscopic beads by being forced to cavitate within the (continuous) aqueous phase. The emulsification is stabilized by the addition of a non-ionic surfactant. When the emulsion is added dropwise to a heated bath, solid beads form by agglomeration of the microbubbles into clusters of tiny spheres of cross-linked PDMS. Our goal in this protocol is to modify this procedure to develop beads with an inverted porosity to improve the SAV ratio of the material.
As reported previously, control of the beads can be directed to some extent by the aliphatic:aqueous ratios in the emulsion. However, we have reported recently that addition of platinum(IV) chloride (PtCl4) inverts the porosity: materials are formed in which the PDMS is riddled with concave pores14. This indicates that the aqueous layer cavitates inside the aliphatic one, despite having similar aliphatic:aqueous ratios to those published in the original work13. The primary advantage of our method is that this concave porosity should naturally result in an increased SAV ratio, and thus, improved efficiency for analytical chemistry applications. While we are continuing to explore the specific effects of the addition of the platinum compound, we show here that the same effect can be accomplished using any aqueously soluble ionic compound, though perhaps to a reduced extent. Because our techniques also differ in some key aspects from what has been previously reported, we present our protocols here as a video to encourage others to extend our methods. Most notably, we use a common bath sonicator of the type used to clean glassware or other equipment, rather than the (considerably more expensive) probe sonicator often used in microbubble fabrication. This adjusted approach to the microbubble fabrication procedure could potentially be extended for the production of large quantities of bulk materials as well, creating porous sheets or slabs which could have applications for biomedical devices, aerospace and automotive industry, or substrates for chemical catalysis. Users seeking to generate high-SAV-ratio, microstructured materials using other similar polymers for such analyses may find that our protocols can be extended to any polymer for which the microbubble emulsion technique can be applied.

<table><tbody><tr><td>Poly(dimethylsiloxane), vinyl terminated</td><td>Sigma-Aldrich</td><td>68083-19-2</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>n-Heptane</td><td>Sigma-Aldrich</td><td>142-82-5</td><td>Flammable</td></tr><tr><td>Triethoxysilane</td><td>Sigma-Aldrich</td><td>998-30-1</td><td>Flammable, Accutely Toxic</td></tr><tr><td>Sorbitan Monoleate (Span-80)</td><td>Fluker</td><td>1338-43-8</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Platinum(IV) Chloride</td><td>Sigma-Aldrich</td><td>13454-96-1</td><td>Accutely Toxic</td></tr><tr><td>Zinc(II) Chloride</td><td>Sigma-Aldrich</td><td>7646-85-7</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Sodium Chloride</td><td>Sigma-Aldrich</td><td>7647-14-5</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2.8 L Water Bath Sonicator</td><td>VWR</td><td>97043-964</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

microbubble fabrication of concave-porosity pdms beads

Microbubble fabrication (by use of a fine emulsion) provides a means of increasing the surface-area-to-volume (SAV) ratio of polymer materials, which is particularly useful for separations applications. Porous polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) beads can be produced by heat-curing such an emulsion, allowing the interface between the aqueous and aliphatic phases to mold the morphology of the polymer. In the procedures described here, both polymer and crosslinker (triethoxysilane) are sonicated together in a cold-bath sonicator. Following a period of cross-linking, emulsions are added dropwise to a hot surfactant solution, allowing the aqueous phase of the emulsion to separate, and forming porous polymer beads. We demonstrate that this method can be tuned, and the SAV ratio optimized, by adjusting the electrolyte content of the aqueous phase in the emulsion. Beads produced in this way are imaged with scanning electron microscopy, and representative SAV ratios are determined using Brunauer&#8211;Emmett&#8211;Teller (BET) analysis. Considerable variability with the electrolyte identity is observed, but the general trend is consistent: there is a maximum in SAV obtained at a specific concentration, after which porosity decreases markedly.

Representative SEM images of beads arising from emulsions with different electrolyte conditions are shown in Figure 1. Figure 1A shows a bead similar to those obtained by DuFaud, et al.13, produced using our procedures, without the addition of any electrolyte. Beads shown in Figure 1B-D, resulting in different morphologies for each metal ion. For all images shown, 300 &#956;l of 0.03-M electrolyte solutions were used in place of 300 &#956;l of the DI ...

Watch this Scientific Journal Video about Microbubble Fabrication of Concave-porosity PDMS Beads at JoVE.com

Microbubble Fabrication of Concave-porosity PDMS Beads

Procedures used to generate microstructured concave-porosity polydimethylsiloxane beads are presented. Effects of electrolyte concentration and identity within the aqueous phase are particularly emphasized.

Microbubble fabrication (by use of a fine emulsion) provides a means of increasing the surface-area-to-volume (SAV) ratio of polymer materials, which is ...

microbubble-fabrication-of-concave-porosity-pdms-beads

Research

JoVE Journal

Chemistry

8.3K Views.  Western Kentucky University. Procedures used to generate microstructured concave-porosity polydimethylsiloxane beads are presented. Effects of electrolyte concentration and identity within the aqueous phase are particularly emphasized. 

Video: Microbubble Fabrication of Concave-porosity PDMS Beads

Micropunching Lithography for Generating Micro- and Submicron-patterns on Polymer Substrates

Conducting polymers have attracted great attention since the discovery of high conductivity in doped polyacetylene in 19771. They offer the advantages of low weight, easy tailoring of properties and a wide spectrum of applications2,3. Due to sensitivity of conducting polymers to environmental conditions (e.g., air, oxygen, moisture, high temperature and chemical solutions), lithographic techniques present significant technical challenges when working with these materials4. For example, current photolithographic methods, such as ultra-violet (UV), are unsuitable for patterning the conducting polymers due to the involvement of wet and/or dry etching processes in these methods. In addition, current micro/nanosystems mainly have a planar form5,6. One layer of structures is built on the top surfaces of another layer of fabricated features. Multiple layers of these structures are stacked together to form numerous devices on a common substrate. The sidewall surfaces of the microstructures have not been used in constructing devices. On the other hand, sidewall patterns could be used, for example, to build 3-D circuits, modify fluidic channels and direct horizontal growth of nanowires and nanotubes.
A macropunching method has been applied in the manufacturing industry to create macropatterns in a sheet metal for over a hundred years. Motivated by this approach, we have developed a micropunching lithography method (MPL) to overcome the obstacles of patterning conducting polymers and generating sidewall patterns. Like the macropunching method, the MPL also includes two operations (Fig. 1): (i) cutting; and (ii) drawing. The "cutting" operation was applied to pattern three conducting polymers4, polypyrrole (PPy), Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophen)-poly(4-styrenesulphonate) (PEDOT) and polyaniline (PANI). It was also employed to create Al microstructures7. The fabricated microstructures of conducting polymers have been used as humidity8, chemical8, and glucose sensors9. Combined microstructures of Al and conducting polymers have been employed to fabricate capacitors and various heterojunctions9,10,11. The "cutting" operation was also applied to generate submicron-patterns, such as 100- and 500-nm-wide PPy lines as well as 100-nm-wide Au wires. The "drawing" operation was employed for two applications: (i) produce Au sidewall patterns on high density polyethylene (HDPE) channels which could be used for building 3D microsystems12,13,14, and (ii) fabricate polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) micropillars on HDPE substrates to increase the contact angle of the channel15.

A micropunching lithography approach is developed to generate micro- and submicron-patterns on top, sidewall and bottom surfaces of polymer substrates. It overcomes the obstacles of patterning conducting polymers and generating sidewall patterns. This method allows rapid fabrication of multiple features and is free of aggressive chemistry.

Conducting polymers have attracted great attention since the discovery of high conductivity in doped polyacetylene in 19771. They offer the advantages of ...

Engineering

Fabrication of a Microfluidic Device for the Compartmentalization of Neuron Soma and Axons

In this video, we demonstrate the technique of soft lithography with polydimethyl siloxane (PDMS) which we use to fabricate a microfluidic device for culturing neurons. Previously, a silicon wafer was patterned with the design for the neuron microfluidic device using SU-8 and photolithography to create a master mold, or what we simply refer to as a "master". Next, we pour the silicon polymer PDMS on top of the master which is then cured by heating the PDMS to 80&deg;C for 1 hour. The PDMS forms a negative mold of the device. The PDMS is then carefully cut and lifted away from the master. Holes are punched where the reservoirs will be and the excess PDMS trimmed away from the device. Nitrogen is used to blow away any excess debris from the device. At this point the devices are now ready for use and can either bonded to corning No. 1 cover glass with a plasma sterilizer/cleaner or can be reversibly bound to the cover glass by simply placing the device on top of the cover glass. The reversible bonding of the device to glass is covered in a separate video and requires first that the device be sterilized either with 70% ethanol or by autoclaving. Plasma treating sterilizes the devices so no further treatment is necessary. It is, however, important, when plasma-treating the devices, to add liquid to the devices within 10 minutes of the plasma treatment while the surfaces are still hydrophilic. Waiting longer than 10 minutes to add liquid to the device makes it difficult for the liquid to enter the device. The neuron devices are typically plasma-bound to cover glass and 0.5 mg/ml poly-L-lysine (PLL) in pH 8.5 borate buffer is immediately added to the device. After a minimum of 3 hours incubating with PLL, the devices are washed with dH2O water a minimum of 3 times with at least 15 minutes between each wash. Next, the water is removed and fresh media is added to the device. At this point the device is ready for use. It is important to remember at this point to never remove all the media from the device. Always leave media in the main channel.

In this video we demonstrate the technique of soft lithography with polydimethyl siloxane (PDMS) which we use to farbricate a microfluidic device for culturing neurons.

In this video, we demonstrate the technique of soft lithography with polydimethyl siloxane (PDMS) which we use to fabricate a microfluidic device for ...

Biology

Microfluidic Chips Controlled with Elastomeric Microvalve Arrays

Miniaturized microfluidic systems provide simple and effective solutions for low-cost point-of-care diagnostics and high-throughput biomedical assays. Robust flow control and precise fluidic volumes are two critical requirements for these applications. We have developed microfluidic chips featuring elastomeric polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microvalve arrays that: 1) need no extra energy source to close the fluidic path, hence the loaded device is highly portable; and 2) allow for microfabricating deep (up to 1 mm) channels with vertical sidewalls and resulting in very precise features.

The PDMS microvalves-based devices consist of three layers: a fluidic layer containing fluidic paths and microchambers of various sizes, a control layer containing the microchannels necessary to actuate the fluidic path with microvalves, and a middle thin PDMS membrane that is bound to the control layer. Fluidic layer and control layers are made by replica molding of PDMS from SU-8 photoresist masters, and the thin PDMS membrane is made by spinning PDMS at specified heights. The control layer is bonded to the thin PDMS membrane after oxygen activation of both, and then assembled with the fluidic layer. The microvalves are closed at rest and can be opened by applying negative pressure (e.g., house vacuum). Microvalve closure and opening are automated via solenoid valves controlled by computer software.

Here, we demonstrate two microvalve-based microfluidic chips for two different applications. The first chip allows for storing and mixing precise sub-nanoliter volumes of aqueous solutions at various mixing ratios. The second chip allows for computer-controlled perfusion of microfluidic cell cultures.

The devices are easy to fabricate and simple to control. Due to the biocompatibility of PDMS, these microchips could have broad applications in miniaturized diagnostic assays as well as basic cell biology studies.

We demonstrate protocols for manufacturing and automating elastomeric polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)-based microvalve arrays that need no extra energy to close and feature photolithographically defined precise volumes. A parallel subnanoliter-volume mixer and an integrated microfluidic perfusion system are presented.

Miniaturized microfluidic systems provide simple and effective solutions for low-cost point-of-care diagnostics and high-throughput biomedical assays.  ...

High Throughput Single-cell and Multiple-cell Micro-encapsulation

Microfluidic encapsulation methods have been previously utilized to capture cells in picoliter-scale aqueous, monodisperse drops, providing confinement from a bulk fluid environment with applications in high throughput screening, cytometry, and mass spectrometry. We describe a method to not only encapsulate single cells, but to repeatedly capture a set number of cells (here we demonstrate one- and two-cell encapsulation) to study both isolation and the interactions between cells in groups of controlled sizes. By combining drop generation techniques with cell and particle ordering, we demonstrate controlled encapsulation of cell-sized particles for efficient, continuous encapsulation. Using an aqueous particle suspension and immiscible fluorocarbon oil, we generate aqueous drops in oil with a flow focusing nozzle. The aqueous flow rate is sufficiently high to create ordering of particles which reach the nozzle at integer multiple frequencies of the drop generation frequency, encapsulating a controlled number of cells in each drop. For representative results, 9.9 &mu;m polystyrene particles are used as cell surrogates. This study shows a single-particle encapsulation efficiency Pk=1 of 83.7% and a double-particle encapsulation efficiency Pk=2 of 79.5% as compared to their respective Poisson efficiencies of 39.3% and 33.3%, respectively. The effect of consistent cell and particle concentration is demonstrated to be of major importance for efficient encapsulation, and dripping to jetting transitions are also addressed. 
Introduction 
Continuous media aqueous cell suspensions share a common fluid environment which allows cells to interact in parallel and also homogenizes the effects of specific cells in measurements from the media. High-throughput encapsulation of cells into picoliter-scale drops confines the samples to protect drops from cross-contamination, enable a measure of cellular diversity within samples, prevent dilution of reagents and expressed biomarkers, and amplify signals from bioreactor products. Drops also provide the ability to re-merge drops into larger aqueous samples or with other drops for intercellular signaling studies.1,2 The reduction in dilution implies stronger detection signals for higher accuracy measurements as well as the ability to reduce potentially costly sample and reagent volumes.3 Encapsulation of cells in drops has been utilized to improve detection of protein expression,4 antibodies,5,6 enzymes,7 and metabolic activity8 for high throughput screening, and could be used to improve high throughput cytometry.9 Additional studies present applications in bio-electrospraying of cell containing drops for mass spectrometry10 and targeted surface cell coatings.11 Some applications, however, have been limited by the lack of ability to control the number of cells encapsulated in drops. Here we present a method of ordered encapsulation12 which increases the demonstrated encapsulation efficiencies for one and two cells and may be extrapolated for encapsulation of a larger number of cells.
To achieve monodisperse drop generation, microfluidic "flow focusing" enables the creation of controllable-size drops of one fluid (an aqueous cell mixture) within another (a continuous oil phase) by using a nozzle at which the streams converge.13 For a given nozzle geometry, the drop generation frequency f and drop size can be altered by adjusting oil and aqueous flow rates Qoil and Qaq. As the flow rates increase, the flows may transition from drop generation to unstable jetting of aqueous fluid from the nozzle.14 
When the aqueous solution contains suspended particles, particles become encapsulated and isolated from one another at the nozzle. For drop generation using a randomly distributed aqueous cell suspension, the average fraction of drops Dk containing k cells is dictated by Poisson statistics, where Dk = &lambda;k exp(-&lambda;)/(k!) and &lambda; is the average number of cells per drop. The fraction of cells which end up in the "correctly" encapsulated drops is calculated using Pk = (k x Dk)/&Sigma;(k' x Dk'). The subtle difference between the two metrics is that Dk relates to the utilization of aqueous fluid and the amount of drop sorting that must be completed following encapsulation, and Pk relates to the utilization of the cell sample. As an example, one could use a dilute cell suspension (low &lambda;) to encapsulate drops where most drops containing cells would contain just one cell. While the efficiency metric Pk would be high, the majority of drops would be empty (low Dk), thus requiring a sorting mechanism to remove empty drops, also reducing throughput.15
Combining drop generation with inertial ordering provides the ability to encapsulate drops with more predictable numbers of cells per drop and higher throughputs than random encapsulation. Inertial focusing was first discovered by Segre and Silberberg16 and refers to the tendency of finite-sized particles to migrate to lateral equilibrium positions in channel flow. Inertial ordering refers to the tendency of the particles and cells to passively organize into equally spaced, staggered, constant velocity trains. Both focusing and ordering require sufficiently high flow rates (high Reynolds number) and particle sizes (high Particle Reynolds number).17,18 Here, the Reynolds number Re =uDh/&nu; and particle Reynolds number Rep =Re(a/Dh)2, where u is a characteristic flow velocity, Dh [=2wh/(w+h)] is the hydraulic diameter, &nu; is the kinematic viscosity, a is the particle diameter, w is the channel width, and h is the channel height. Empirically, the length required to achieve fully ordered trains decreases as Re and Rep increase. Note that the high Re and Rep requirements (for this study on the order of 5 and 0.5, respectively) may conflict with the need to keep aqueous flow rates low to avoid jetting at the drop generation nozzle. Additionally, high flow rates lead to higher shear stresses on cells, which are not addressed in this protocol. The previous ordered encapsulation study demonstrated that over 90% of singly encapsulated HL60 cells under similar flow conditions to those in this study maintained cell membrane integrity.12 However, the effect of the magnitude and time scales of shear stresses will need to be carefully considered when extrapolating to different cell types and flow parameters. The overlapping of the cell ordering, drop generation, and cell viability aqueous flow rate constraints provides an ideal operational regime for controlled encapsulation of single and multiple cells.
Because very few studies address inter-particle train spacing,19,20 determining the spacing is most easily done empirically and will depend on channel geometry, flow rate, particle size, and particle concentration. Nonetheless, the equal lateral spacing between trains implies that cells arrive at predictable, consistent time intervals. When drop generation occurs at the same rate at which ordered cells arrive at the nozzle, the cells become encapsulated within the drop in a controlled manner. This technique has been utilized to encapsulate single cells with throughputs on the order of 15 kHz,12 a significant improvement over previous studies reporting encapsulation rates on the order of 60-160 Hz.4,15 In the controlled encapsulation work, over 80% of drops contained one and only one cell, a significant efficiency improvement over Poisson (random) statistics, which predicts less than 40% efficiency on average.12
In previous controlled encapsulation work,12 the average number of particles per drop &lambda; was tuned to provide single-cell encapsulation. We hypothesize that through tuning of flow rates, we can efficiently encapsulate any number of cells per drop when &lambda; is equal or close to the number of desired cells per drop. While single-cell encapsulation is valuable in determining individual cell responses from stimuli, multiple-cell encapsulation provides information relating to the interaction of controlled numbers and types of cells. Here we present a protocol, representative results using polystyrene microspheres, and discussion for controlled encapsulation of multiple cells using a passive inertial ordering channel and drop generation nozzle.

Combining monodisperse drop generation with inertial ordering of cells and particles, we describe a method to encapsulate a desired number of cells or particles in a single drop at kHz rates. We demonstrate efficiencies twice exceeding those of unordered encapsulation for single- and double-particle drops.

Microfluidic encapsulation methods have been previously utilized to capture cells in picoliter-scale aqueous, monodisperse drops, providing confinement ...

Bioengineering

Creating Sub-50 Nm Nanofluidic Junctions in PDMS Microfluidic Chip via Self-Assembly Process of Colloidal Particles

Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) is the prevailing building material to make microfluidic devices due to its ease of molding and bonding as well as its transparency. Due to the softness of the PDMS material, however, it is challenging to use PDMS for building nanochannels. The channels tend to collapse easily during plasma bonding. In this paper, we present an evaporation-driven self-assembly method of silica colloidal nanoparticles to create nanofluidic junctions with sub-50 nm pores between two microchannels. The pore size as well as the surface charge of the nanofluidic junction is tunable simply by changing the colloidal silica bead size and surface functionalization outside of the assembled microfluidic device in a vial before the self-assembly process. Using the self-assembly of nanoparticles with a bead size of 300 nm, 500 nm, and 900 nm, it was possible to fabricate a porous membrane with a pore size of ~45 nm, ~75 nm and ~135 nm, respectively. Under electrical potential, this nanoporous membrane initiated ion concentration polarization (ICP) acting as a cation-selective membrane to concentrate DNA by ~1,700 times within 15 min. This non-lithographic nanofabrication process opens up a new opportunity to build a tunable nanofluidic junction for the study of nanoscale transport processes of ions and molecules inside a PDMS microfluidic chip.

We propose a simple self-assembly technique of silica colloidal nanoparticles to create a nanofluidic junction between two microchannels in polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). Using this technique, a nanoporous bead membrane with a pore size down to ~45 nm was built inside a microchannel and applied to electrokinetic preconcentration of DNA samples.

Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) is the prevailing building material to make microfluidic devices due to its ease of molding and bonding as well as its ...

A Microfluidic Technique to Probe Cell Deformability

Here we detail the design, fabrication, and use of a microfluidic device to evaluate the deformability of a large number of individual cells in an efficient manner. Typically, data for ~102 cells can be acquired within a 1 hr experiment. An automated image analysis program enables efficient post-experiment analysis of image data, enabling processing to be complete within a few hours. Our device geometry is unique in that cells must deform through a series of micron-scale constrictions, thereby enabling the initial deformation and time-dependent relaxation of individual cells to be assayed. The applicability of this method to human promyelocytic leukemia (HL-60) cells is demonstrated. Driving cells to deform through micron-scale constrictions using pressure-driven flow, we observe that human promyelocytic (HL-60) cells momentarily occlude the first constriction for a median time of 9.3 msec before passaging more quickly through the subsequent constrictions with a median transit time of 4.0 msec per constriction. By contrast, all-trans retinoic acid-treated (neutrophil-type) HL-60 cells occlude the first constriction for only 4.3 msec before passaging through the subsequent constrictions with a median transit time of 3.3 msec. This method can provide insight into the viscoelastic nature of cells, and ultimately reveal the molecular origins of this behavior.

We demonstrate a microfluidics-based assay to measure the timescale for cells to transit through a sequence of micron-scale constrictions.

Here we detail the design, fabrication, and use of a microfluidic device to evaluate the deformability of a large number of individual cells in an ...

Fabrication of Refractive-index-matched Devices for Biomedical Microfluidics

The use of microfluidic devices has emerged as a defining tool for biomedical applications. When combined with modern microscopy techniques, these devices can be implemented as part of a robust platform capable of making simultaneous complementary measurements. The primary challenge created by the combination of these two techniques is the mismatch in refractive index between the materials traditionally used to make microfluidic devices and the aqueous solutions typically used in biomedicine. This mismatch can create optical artifacts near the channel or device edges. One solution is to reduce the refractive index of the material used to fabricate the device by using a fluorinated polymer such as MY133-V2000 whose refractive index is similar to that of water (n = 1.33). Here, the construction of a microfluidic device made out of MY133-V2000 using soft lithography techniques is demonstrated, using O2 plasma in conjunction with an acrylic holder to increase the adhesion between the MY133-V2000 fabricated device and the polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) substrate. The device is then tested by incubating it filled with cell culture media for 24 h to demonstrate the ability of the device to maintain cell culture conditions during the course of a typical imaging experiment. Finally, quantitative phase microscopy (QPM) is used to measure the distribution of mass within the live adherent cells in the microchannel. This way, the increased precision, enabled by fabricating the device from a low index of refraction polymer such as MY133-V2000 in lieu of traditional soft lithography materials such as PDMS, is demonstrated. Overall, this approach for fabricating microfluidic devices can be readily integrated into existing soft lithography workflows in order to reduce optical artifacts and increase measurement precision.

This protocol describes the fabrication of microfluidic devices from MY133-V2000 to eliminate artifacts that often arise in microchannels due to the mismatching refractive indices between microchannel structures and an aqueous solution. This protocol uses an acrylic holder to compress the encapsulated device, improving adhesion both chemically and mechanically.

The use of microfluidic devices has emerged as a defining tool for biomedical applications. When combined with modern microscopy techniques, these devices ...

Double Emulsion Generation Using a Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) Co-axial Flow Focus Device

Double emulsions are useful in a number of biological and industrial applications in which it is important to have an aqueous carrier fluid. This paper presents a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microfluidic device capable of generating water/oil/water double emulsions using a coaxial flow focusing geometry that can be fabricated entirely using soft lithography. Similar to emulsion devices using glass capillaries, double emulsions can be formed in channels with uniform wettability and with dimensions much smaller than the channel sizes. Three dimensional flow focusing geometry is achieved by casting a pair of PDMS slabs using two layer soft lithography, then mating the slabs together in a clamshell configuration. Complementary locking features molded into the PDMS slabs enable the accurate registration of features on each of the slab surfaces. Device testing demonstrates formation of double emulsions from 14 &#181;m to 50 &#181;m in diameter while using large channels that are robust against fouling and clogging.

Double Emulsion Generation Using a Polydimethylsiloxane PDMS Co-axial Flow Focus Device

Microfluidic double emulsions generation typically involves devices with patterned wettability or custom-fabricated glass components. Here we describe the fabrication and testing of an all polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) double emulsion generator that does not require surface treatment or complicated fabrication processes, and is capable of producing double emulsions down to 14 &#181;m.

Double emulsions are useful in a number of biological and industrial applications in which it is important to have an aqueous carrier fluid. This paper ...

Window on a Microworld: Simple Microfluidic Systems for Studying Microbial Transport in Porous Media

Microbial growth and transport in porous media have important implications for the quality of groundwater and surface water, the recycling of nutrients in the environment, as well as directly for the transmission of pathogens to drinking water supplies. Natural porous media is composed of an intricate physical topology, varied surface chemistries, dynamic gradients of nutrients and electron acceptors, and a patchy distribution of microbes. These features vary substantially over a length scale of microns, making the results of macro-scale investigations of microbial transport difficult to interpret, and the validation of mechanistic models challenging. Here we demonstrate how simple microfluidic devices can be used to visualize microbial interactions with micro-structured habitats, to identify key processes influencing the observed phenomena, and to systematically validate predictive models. Simple, easy-to-use flow cells were constructed out of the transparent, biocompatible and oxygen-permeable material poly(dimethyl siloxane). Standard methods of photolithography were used to make micro-structured masters, and replica molding was used to cast micro-structured flow cells from the masters. The physical design of the flow cell chamber is adaptable to the experimental requirements: microchannels can vary from simple linear connections to complex topologies with feature sizes as small as 2 &mu;m. Our modular EcoChip flow cell array features dozens of identical chambers and flow control by a gravity-driven flow module. We demonstrate that through use of EcoChip devices, physical structures and pressure heads can be held constant or varied systematically while the influence of surface chemistry, fluid properties, or the characteristics of the microbial population is investigated. Through transport experiments using a non-pathogenic, green fluorescent protein-expressing Vibrio bacterial strain, we illustrate the importance of habitat structure, flow conditions, and inoculums size on fundamental transport phenomena, and with real-time particle-scale observations, demonstrate that microfluidics offer a compelling view of a hidden world.

Microfluidic devices can be used to visualize complex natural processes in real time and at the appropriate physical scales. We have developed a simple microfluidic device that mimics key features of natural porous media for studying growth and transport of bacteria in the subsurface.

Microbial growth and transport in porous media have important implications for the quality of groundwater and surface water, the recycling of nutrients in ...

A Paired Bead and Magnet Array for Molding Microwells with Variable Concave Geometries

A spheroid culture is a useful tool for understanding cellular behavior in that it provides an in vivo-like three-dimensional environment. Various spheroid production methods such as non-adhesive surfaces, spinner flasks, hanging drops, and microwells have been used in studies of cell-to-cell interaction, immune-activation, drug screening, stem cell differentiation, and organoid generation. Among these methods, microwells with a three-dimensional concave geometry have gained the attention of scientists and engineers, given their advantages of uniform-sized spheroid generation and the ease with which the responses of individual spheroids can be monitored. Even though cost-effective methods such as the use of flexible membranes and ice lithography have been proposed, these techniques incur serious drawbacks such as difficulty in controlling the pattern sizes, achievement of high aspect ratios, and production of larger areas of microwells. To overcome these problems, we propose a robust method for fabricating concave microwells without the need for complex high-cost facilities. This method utilizes a 30 x 30 through-hole array, several hundred micrometer-order steel beads, and magnetic force to fabricate 900 microwells in a 3 cm x 3 cm polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) substrate. To demonstrate the applicability of our method to cell biological applications, we cultured adipose stem cells for 3 days and successfully produced spheroids using our microwell platform. In addition, we performed a magnetostatic simulation to investigate the mechanism, whereby magnetic force was used to trap the steel beads in the through-holes. We believe that the proposed microwell fabrication method could be applied to many spheroid-based cellular studies such as drug screening, tissue regeneration, stem cell differentiation, and cancer metastasis.

This manuscript introduces a robust method of fabricating concave microwells without the need for complex high-cost facilities. Using magnetic force, steel beads, and a through-hole array, several hundred microwells were formed in a 3 cm x 3 cm polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) substrate.