JoVE Logo
Faculty Resource Center

Sign In

Summary

Abstract

Protocol

Discussion

Materials

References

Bioengineering

Three-dimensional Cell Culture Model for Measuring the Effects of Interstitial Fluid Flow on Tumor Cell Invasion

Published: July 25th, 2012

DOI:

10.3791/4159

1School of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Health Systems, Drexel University

Interstitial fluid flow is elevated in solid tumors and can modulate tumor cell invasion. Here we describe a technique to apply interstitial fluid flow to cells embedded in a matrix and then measure its effects on cell invasion. This technique can be easily adapted to study other systems.

The growth and progression of most solid tumors depend on the initial transformation of the cancer cells and their response to stroma-associated signaling in the tumor microenvironment 1. Previously, research on the tumor microenvironment has focused primarily on tumor-stromal interactions 1-2. However, the tumor microenvironment also includes a variety of biophysical forces, whose effects remain poorly understood. These forces are biomechanical consequences of tumor growth that lead to changes in gene expression, cell division, differentiation and invasion3. Matrix density 4, stiffness 5-6, and structure 6-7, interstitial fluid pressure 8, and interstitial fluid flow 8 are all altered during cancer progression.

Interstitial fluid flow in particular is higher in tumors compared to normal tissues 8-10. The estimated interstitial fluid flow velocities were measured and found to be in the range of 0.1-3 μm s-1, depending on tumor size and differentiation 9, 11. This is due to elevated interstitial fluid pressure caused by tumor-induced angiogenesis and increased vascular permeability 12. Interstitial fluid flow has been shown to increase invasion of cancer cells 13-14, vascular fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells 15. This invasion may be due to autologous chemotactic gradients created around cells in 3-D 16 or increased matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) expression 15, chemokine secretion and cell adhesion molecule expression 17. However, the mechanism by which cells sense fluid flow is not well understood. In addition to altering tumor cell behavior, interstitial fluid flow modulates the activity of other cells in the tumor microenvironment. It is associated with (a) driving differentiation of fibroblasts into tumor-promoting myofibroblasts 18, (b) transporting of antigens and other soluble factors to lymph nodes 19, and (c) modulating lymphatic endothelial cell morphogenesis 20.

The technique presented here imposes interstitial fluid flow on cells in vitro and quantifies its effects on invasion (Figure 1). This method has been published in multiple studies to measure the effects of fluid flow on stromal and cancer cell invasion 13-15, 17. By changing the matrix composition, cell type, and cell concentration, this method can be applied to other diseases and physiological systems to study the effects of interstitial flow on cellular processes such as invasion, differentiation, proliferation, and gene expression.

1. Assay Set-up

  1. Thaw a small aliquot (<500 μl) of Matrigel on ice at 4 °C (approximately 2 hr).
  2. Prepare gel recipe (see example volumes in table below): 10x PBS (1x in total volume), 1N sodium hydroxide (equivalent to 0.023 volumes of added collagen, or per the collagen manufacturer's recommendations, as appropriate), Matrigel and collagen type I to final concentrations of 1 mg/ml and 1.3 mg/ml respectively (other matrix formulations may be used depending on cell type and experiment).
  3. .......

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

Here we have described a methodology for quantifying the effect of interstitial flow on tumor cell invasion, using cells embedded in a 3-D matrix within a cell culture insert. This and similar methods have been used to study the effect of interstitial flow on a variety of cell types 13-15, 17. Our approach partially mimics the matrix microenvironment of the tumor by using type I collagen and Matrigel which contain proteins found in the basement membrane of epithelial tissue and the surrounding stroma 21-2.......

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Name of the reagentCompanyCatalogue numberComments
Collagen (Rat Tail)BD354236Keep sterile
Millicell cell culture insertMilliporePI8P012508 μm pore diameter, polycarbonate membrane
MatrigelBD354234Keep sterile
PBSSigma Aldrich100M-820210x for preparing gel solution, 1x for washing steps
Sodium Hydroxide, 1.0N SolutionSigma AldrichS2770Keep sterile
DMEM 1XCellGro10-013-CVKeep sterile
Fetal Bovine SerumAtlanta Biologicals511150Keep sterile
Penicillin StreptomycinCellGro30002CIKeep sterile
Triton X-100Sigma AldrichX100-500 ml0.5% in PBS
ParaformaldehydeFisher Scientific04042-5004% in PBS
Deionized Water  Keep sterile
4',6-diaminido-2-phenylindole (DAPI)MP Biomedicals02157574011 mg/ml stock solution
Mounting SolutionThermo ScientificTA-030-FM 
Trypsin-EDTACellGro25-052-CIKeep sterile

  1. Cichon, M. A. Microenvironmental influences that drive progression from benign breast disease to invasive breast cancer. J. Mammary Gland. Biol. Neoplasia. 15, 389-3897 (2010).
  2. Proia, D. A., Kuperwasser, C. Stroma: tumor agonist or antagonist. Cell Cycle. 4, 1022-1025 (2005).
  3. Dvorak, H. F. Tumor microenvironment and progression. J .Surg. Oncol. 103, 468-474 (2011).
  4. Provenzano, P. P. Collagen density promotes mammary tumor initiation and progression. BMC Med. 6, 11 (2008).
  5. Engler, A. J. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell. 126, 677-689 (2006).
  6. Paszek, M. J. Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. Cancer Cell. 8, 241-254 (2005).
  7. Levental, K. R. Matrix crosslinking forces tumor progression by enhancing integrin signaling. Cell. 139, 891-906 (2009).
  8. Butler, T. P., Grantham, F. H., Gullino, P. M. Bulk transfer of fluid in the interstitial compartment of mammary tumors. Cancer Res. 35, 3084-3088 (1975).
  9. Dafni, H. Overexpression of vascular endothelial growth factor 165 drives peritumor interstitial convection and induces lymphatic drain: magnetic resonance imaging, confocal microscopy, and histological tracking of triple-labeled albumin. Cancer Res. 62, 6731-6739 (2002).
  10. Chary, S. R., Jain, R. K. Direct measurement of interstitial convection and diffusion of albumin in normal and neoplastic tissues by fluorescence photobleaching. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86, 5385-5389 (1989).
  11. Heldin, C. H. High interstitial fluid pressure - an obstacle in cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 4, 806-813 (2004).
  12. Fukumura, D. Tumor microvasculature and microenvironment: novel insights through intravital imaging in pre-clinical models. Microcirculation. 17, 206-225 (2010).
  13. Shields, J. D. Autologous chemotaxis as a mechanism of tumor cell homing to lymphatics via interstitial flow and autocrine CCR7 signaling. Cancer Cell. 11, 526-538 (2007).
  14. Shieh, A. C. Tumor cell invasion is promoted by interstitial flow-induced matrix priming by stromal fibroblasts. Cancer Res. 71, 790-800 (2011).
  15. Shi, Z. D., Wang, H., Tarbell, J. M. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans mediate interstitial flow mechanotransduction regulating MMP-13 expression and cell motility via FAK-ERK in 3D collagen. PLoS One. 6, e15956 (2011).
  16. Fleury, M. E., Boardman, K. C., Swartz, M. A. Autologous morphogen gradients by subtle interstitial flow and matrix interactions. Biophys J. 91, 113-121 (2006).
  17. Miteva, D. O. Transmural flow modulates cell and fluid transport functions of lymphatic endothelium. Circ. Res. 106, 920-931 (2010).
  18. Ng, C. P., Hinz, B., Swartz, M. A. Interstitial fluid flow induces myofibroblast differentiation and collagen alignment in vitro. J. Cell. Sci. 118, 4731-4739 (2005).
  19. Kunder, C. A. Mast cell-derived particles deliver peripheral signals to remote lymph nodes. J. Exp. Med. 206, 2455-2467 (2009).
  20. Helm, C. L. Synergy between interstitial flow and VEGF directs capillary morphogenesis in vitro through a gradient amplification mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 15779-15784 (2005).
  21. McGuire, P. G., Seeds, N. W. The interaction of plasminogen activator with a reconstituted basement membrane matrix and extracellular macromolecules produced by cultured epithelial cells. J Cell Biochem. 40, 215-227 (1989).
  22. Kleinman, H. K. Isolation and characterization of type IV procollagen, laminin, and heparan sulfate proteoglycan from the EHS sarcoma. Biochemistry. 21, 6188-6193 (1982).
  23. Haessler, U. Migration dynamics of breast cancer cells in a tunable 3D interstitial flow chamber. Integr. Biol. (Camb). , (2011).
  24. Polacheck, W. J., Charest, J. L., Kamm, R. D. Interstitial flow influences direction of tumor cell migration through competing mechanisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 11115-11120 (2011).

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2024 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved