JoVE Logo

Sign In

A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

This study assesses the fracture toughness of bovine cortical bone at the sub-meso levels using microscopic scratch tests. This is an original, objective, rigorous, and reproducible method proposed to probe fracture toughness below the macroscopic scale. Potential applications are studying changes in bone fragility due to diseases like osteoporosis.

Abstract

Bone is a complex hierarchical material with five distinct levels of organization. Factors like aging and diseases like osteoporosis increase the fragility of bone, making it fracture-prone. Owing to the large socio-economic impact of bone fracture in our society, there is a need for novel ways to assess the mechanical performance of each hierarchical level of bone. Although stiffness and strength can be probed at all scales – nano-, micro-, meso-, and macroscopic – fracture assessment has so far been confined to macroscopic testing. This limitation restricts our understanding of bone fracture and constrains the scope of laboratory and clinical studies. In this research, we investigate the fracture resistance of bone from the microscopic to the mesoscopic length scales using micro scratch tests combined with nonlinear fracture mechanics. The tests are performed in the short longitudinal orientation on bovine cortical bone specimens. A meticulous experimental protocol is developed and a large number (102) of tests are conducted to assess the fracture toughness of cortical bone specimens while accounting for the heterogeneity associated with bone microstructure.

Introduction

In this study, we measure the fracture toughness of bovine compact bone from the mesoscale (osteons) to the microscale (lamellar level) using a novel micro scratch technique1,2,3,4,5. Fracture processes including crack initiation and crack propagation in bone are directly influenced by length scales owing to the different structural constituents and organization at different levels of hierarchy. Therefore, assessing bone fracture at smaller length scales is essential to yielding a fundamental understanding of bone fragility. On the one hand, conventional tests such as three-point bending, compact tension, and flexure tests are commonly conducted on bovine femur and tibia for fracture characterization at the macroscopic scale6,7,8. On the other hand, to measure the fracture toughness at the microscopic scale, Vicker's indentation fracture was proposed9. Micro indentation was performed using the Vicker's indenter to generate radial cracks. Furthermore, the Oliver Pharr nanoindentation fracture toughness method was performed using a sharp cube corner indenter10.

In the above nanoindentation based fracture toughness studies, the lengths of the cracks thus generated were measured by the observer and a semi-empirical model was used to calculate the fracture toughness. However, these methods are irreproducible, subjective, and the results are highly dependent on the observer's skill due to the need to measure the crack lengths using optical microscopy or scanning electron microscopy. Moreover, scratch tests were conducted at the nano-scale, but the underlying mathematical model is not physics-based as it does not account for the reduction in strength due to cracks and defects11. Thus, a gap of knowledge exists: a method for fracture assessment at the microscopic level based on a physics-based mechanistic model. This gap of knowledge motivated the application of micro scratch tests to compact bone by focusing first on porcine specimens5. The study has now been further extended to understand bovine cortical bone.

Two different orientations of the specimens are possible: longitudinal transverse and short longitudinal. Longitudinal transverse corresponds to fracture properties perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the femur. Whereas, short longitudinal corresponds to the fracture properties along the longitudinal axis of femur5. In this study, we apply scratch testing to bovine cortical bones to characterize the bone's fracture resistance in the short longitudinal direction.

Protocol

NOTE: The protocol described here, follows the animal care guidelines of the Illinois Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

1. Specimen Procurement

  1. Collect freshly harvested bovine femurs from a United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)-certified slaughterhouse and transport them in plastic air tight bags in a cooler.
    NOTE: For the study conducted here, femurs were collected from animals that were 24 - 30 months old, corn-fed, and weighed about 1,000 - 1,100 pounds.
  2. Freeze the femurs at -20 °C until the start of the specimen preparation procedure. This temperature keeps the femurs fresh12,13,14.

2. Cutting, Cleaning, and Embedding the Specimens

  1. Thaw the frozen femurs in a container with water for about 2 h at room temperature.
  2. Cut multiple discs about 10 - 15 mm thick from the mid-diaphysis region using a table top diamond band saw to produce specimens with uniform cross-sectional area of the cortical bone.
  3. Use a dissection kit to remove any soft tissue or flesh attached to the cortical bone.
  4. Cut the cross sections of the femurs obtained in step 2.2 using a diamond-wafering blade on a low speed saw under wet conditions along the longitudinal axis of the bone to obtain multiple roughly cuboidal sections.
    NOTE: Here, only specimen preparation and scratch tests performed on the short – longitudinal specimens are discussed. However, except for the direction of cutting, the preparation procedure remains the same for the transverse orientation.
  5. Clean the specimens in a solution prepared using 1.5% anionic cleaner and 5% bleach for a duration of 20 min in an ultrasonic cleaner.
  6. Embed the cortical bone specimens in acrylic resin (herein polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)) for ease of handling and stability.
    1. To embed the specimens, first coat the walls of the mold with a release agent. Then mix the acrylic resin and hardener in a beaker, as per instructions given by the PMMA manufacturer.
    2. Place one of the cut cortical bone specimens into each mold with the surface to be scratched facing downwards. Pour the acrylic resin mix into these prepared specimen holders. Let the specimens cure for a duration of up to 4 - 5 h.
  7. Cut the embedded specimens into 5-mm thick discs, exposing the surface to be scratched, using the low speed saw and mount the specimens on to metal (aluminum) discs of diameter 34 mm and height 5 mm using cyanoacrylate adhesive.
  8. Wrap the specimens in a gauge soaked in Hanks Balanced Saline Solution (HBSS) and refrigerate at 4 °C until further use15,16.

3. Grinding and Polishing Protocols

NOTE: A pre-requisite to high-precision testing at small-length scales is a smooth and levelled surface of specimens. Previous polishing protocols13,17 result in a large surface roughness, leading to substantial inaccuracy in measurement. The challenge lies in achieving low average surface roughness, less than 100 nm, over a large area 3 x 8 mm2 surface.

  1. Grind the bovine cortical bone specimens at room temperature using 400 grit and 600 grit Silicon Carbide papers for 1 min and 5 min, respectively. Maintain the grinder-polisher at base speeds of 100 rpm and 150 rpm, respectively.
  2. Machine grind the bovine cortical bone specimens at room temperature on the 800 and 1,200 grit papers for a duration of 15 min for each step. Maintain the grinder-polisher at a base speed of 150 rpm, head speed of 60 rpm, and operating load of 1 lb.
  3. Polish the specimens using 3 µm, 1 µm, and 0.25 µm diamond suspension solutions in the same order on a hard, perforated, non-woven cloth for a duration of 90 min each at room temperature. Maintain the operating load for each step at 1 lb with the base and head speeds of the polisher at 300 rpm and 60 rpm, respectively.
  4. Polish the specimen using 0.05 µm alumina suspension solution on a soft, synthetic rayon cloth for a duration of 90 min at 1 lb with base and head speed of 100 rpm and 60 rpm, respectively, also at room temperature.
  5. Put the specimens in a beaker with de-ionized water and put the beaker in an ultrasonic bath for 2 min in between each consecutive step of grinding and polishing to clean the residue and avoid cross contamination.
  6. View the surface features using optical microscopy and SEM imaging.
    NOTE: As shown in Figure 1, osteons, Haversian canals, cement lines, interstitial regions, and lacunae were observed on the bovine cortical bone specimens. These imaging methods reveal the porous, heterogeneous, and anisotropic nature of cortical bone specimens. Additionally, advanced surface examination of the specimens was performed to assess the quality of the polished surface. A representative polished surface is shown in Figure 2.

4. Micro Scratch Test

NOTE: Micro scratch tests are performed on the polished bovine cortical bone specimens using a micro scratch tester (Figure 3). A diamond Rockwell indenter with a tip radius of 200 µm and apex angle of 120° is used for the study. The instrument allows the application of a linear progressive load up to 30 N. Furthermore, the instrument is equipped with high-accuracy sensors to measure the horizontal load, penetration depth, and acoustic emissions generated due to scratching. The instrument can capture the panoramas of scratch grooves.

  1. Prior to the testing of cortical bone specimens, calibrate the Rockwell indenter tip using polycarbonate as reference material3.
  2. Place the cortical bone specimen on the stage and choose the site of scratch test using the optical microscope set up integrated to the micro scratch tester module.
  3. Apply a linear progressive load with a start load of 30 mN and end load of 30 N. The loading rate should be set to 60 N/min and the scratch length to 3 mm.
  4. Perform series of scratch tests on the short longitudinal (Figure 3b) bovine cortical bone specimens as illustrated in Figure 3.
  5. Wet the specimen surface with HBSS after a set of every three to four scratch tests to keep them hydrated.
  6. Analyze the scratch test data based on non-linear fracture mechanics modelling2.

Results

Atomic force microscopy was used to measure the roughness of the polished surface. As a rule of thumb, the specimen qualifies as a well-polished one if the surface roughness is an order of magnitude smaller than the surface features of interest. In this case, the measured surface roughness of 60 nm over a 40 µm x 40 µm area clearly falls within this criterion.

Figure 4 shows the force vers...

Discussion

Micro scratch tests induce a mixed-mode fracture3. Furthermore, in the short longitudinal bovine cortical bone specimens, fracture processes are activated as the probe digs deeper. For a 3-mm long scratch, the prismatic volume probed is around 3,600 µm long, 600 µm wide, and 480 µm deep. This large volume helped in predicting a homogenized response. A non-linear fracture mechanics model enabled us to extract the fracture resistance based on the J-integral calculation

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and the College of Engineering at University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign. We acknowledge the Ravindra Kinra and Kavita Kinra Fellowship for supporting the graduate studies of Kavya Mendu. Scanning Electron Microscopy investigation was carried out at the facilities of the Frederick Seitz Material Research Laboratory and Beckman Institute at the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign.

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Table Top Diamond Band SawMcMaster Carr, Elmhurst, ILModel  C-40Blade speed of 40 mph; Blade dimensions: 37 inch in diameter, 0.02 inch wide and 0.14 inch deep
Buehler Isomet 5000 Precision CutterBuehler,41 Waukegan Rd, Lake Bluff, IL 60044112780Blade speed in the range of 200-5000 rpm in 50 rpm incrments; 8 inch diamond wafering blade
Branson 5800 Ultrasonic Cleanser(Through) Grainger, Peoria, Illinois39J365Bransonic CPXH ultrasonic bath has a tank capacity of 2.5 gal
Buehler Ecomet 250 Grinder - PolisherBuehler,41 Waukegan Rd, Lake Bluff, IL 600444972508 inch base plate with a speed range from 10-500 rpm
Anton Paar, CSM Instruments Micro scratch testerAnton Paar Switzerland AG163251Compact Platform, Acoutstic Emission Sensor
JEOL 6060LV general purpose scanning electron microscopeJEOL USA, Inc., Peabody, MAEnvironmental scanning electron microscope which enables imaging at low vacuum levels.
Philips XL30 ESEM FEG FEI CompanyWet mode working of the instrument enables imaging of non conductive samples without altering them 
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Consumables
Bovine FemurL&M Slaughter house, Georgetown, ILCorn fed, 24-30 month old mature bovine specimens.
Alconox Powdered Precision CleanerAlconox, Inc., 30 Glenn St., Ste. 309, White Plains, NY, 106031104-1Biodegradable, Non caustic, Interfering-residue free
Acrylic Plastic CastingElectron Microscopy Sciences24210-02Polymethyl Methacrylate
CarbiMet SiC Abrasive Paper 400 grit, 8 inch, PSA backedBuehler,41 Waukegan Rd, Lake Bluff, IL 6004436080400Grinding - Abrasive Papers
CarbiMet SiC Abrasive Paper 600 grit, 8 inch, PSA backedBuehler,41 Waukegan Rd, Lake Bluff, IL 6004436080600Grinding - Abrasive Papers
MicroCut Discs 800 grit, 8 inch, PSA backedBuehler,41 Waukegan Rd, Lake Bluff, IL 6004436080800Grinding - Abrasive Papers
MicroCut Discs 800 grit, 8 inch, PSA backedBuehler,41 Waukegan Rd, Lake Bluff, IL 6004416081200Grinding - Abrasive Papers
Texmet P For 8'' Wheel PSABuehler,41 Waukegan Rd, Lake Bluff, IL 60044407638Polishing Cloth
8'' Microcloth PSABuehler,41 Waukegan Rd, Lake Bluff, IL 60044407518Polishing Cloth
Meta Di Supreme Polycrystalline Diamond Suspension, 3 µmBuehler,41 Waukegan Rd, Lake Bluff, IL 60044406631Polishing suspension
Meta Di Supreme Polycrystalline Diamond Suspension, 1 µmBuehler,41 Waukegan Rd, Lake Bluff, IL 60044406630Polishing suspension
Meta Di Supreme Polycrystalline Diamond Suspension, 0.25 µmBuehler,41 Waukegan Rd, Lake Bluff, IL 60044406629Polishing suspension
MasterPrep Polishing Suspension, 0.05µmBuehler,41 Waukegan Rd, Lake Bluff, IL 6004440-6377-032Polishing suspension
HBSS, calcium, magnesium, no phenol redThermo Fisher Scientific14025126Buffer Solution

References

  1. Akono, A., Reis, P., Ulm, F. Scratching as a fracture process: From butter to steel. Phys Rev Lett. 106 (20), 204302-204304 (2011).
  2. Akono, A. T., Randall, N. X., Ulm, F. J. Experimental determination of the fracture toughness via microscratch tests: application to polymers, ceramics, and metals. J of Mat Res. 27 (02), 485-493 (2012).
  3. Akono, A. T., Ulm, F. J. An improved technique for characterizing the fracture toughness via scratch test experiments. Wear. 313 (1-2), (2014).
  4. Akono, A. T. Energetic size effect law at the microscopic scale: Application to progressive-load scratch testing. J of Nanomech and Micromech. 6 (2), (2016).
  5. Kataruka, A., Mendu, K., Okeoghene, O., Puthuvelil, J., Akono, A. -. T. Microscopic assessment of bone toughness using scratch tests. Bone Reports. 6, 17-25 (2017).
  6. Melvin, J. W., Evans, F. G. Crack propagation in bone. ASME Biomech Symp. , (1973).
  7. Norman, T. L., Vashishth, D., Burr, D. B. Effect of groove on bone fracture toughness. J of Biomech. 25 (12), 1489-1492 (1992).
  8. Behiri, J. C., Bonfield, W. Crack velocity dependence of longitudinal fracture in bone. J of Mat Sc. 15 (7), 1841-1849 (1980).
  9. Mullins, L. P., Bruzzi, M. S., McHugh, P. E. Measurement of the microstructural fracture toughness of cortical bone using indentation fracture. J of Biomech. 40 (14), 3285-3288 (2007).
  10. Harding, D. S., Oliver, W. C., Pharr, G. M. Cracking during nanoindentation and its use in the measurement of fracture toughness. MRS Proceedings. 356, 663-668 (1994).
  11. Islam, A., Dong, X. N., Wang, X. Mechanistic modeling of a nanoscratch test for determination of in situ toughness of bone. J of the Mech Bhvr of Biomed Mat. 5 (1), 156-164 (2012).
  12. McAlden, R. W., McGeogh, J. A., Barker, M. B., Court-Brown, C. M. Age-related changes in the tensile properties of cortical bone: the relative importance of changes in porosity, mineralization and microstructure. J. Bone Joint Surg. 75, 1193-1205 (1993).
  13. Zioupos, P., Gresle, M., Winwood, K. Fatigue strength of human cortical bone: age, physical, and material heterogeneity effects. J of Biomed Mat Res Part A. 86 (3), 627-636 (2008).
  14. Linde, F., Sørensen, H. C. F. The effect of different storage methods on the mechanical properties of trabecular bone. J of Biomech. 26 (10), 1249-1252 (1993).
  15. Zioupos, P. Accumulation of in-vivo fatigue microdamage and its relation to biomechanical properties in ageing human cortical bone. J of Microscopy. 201 (2), 270-278 (2001).
  16. Yan, J., Clifton, K. B., Mecholsky, J. J., Reep, R. L. Fracture toughness of manatee rib and bovine femur using a chevron-notched beam test. J of Biomech. 39 (6), 1066-1074 (2006).
  17. Xu, J., Rho, J. Y., Mishra, S. R., Fan, Z. Atomic force microscopy and nanoindentation characterization of human lamellar bone prepared by microtome sectioning and mechanical polishing technique. J of Biomed Mat ResPart A. 67 (3), 719-726 (2003).
  18. Yan, J., Mecholsky, J. J., Clifton, K. B. How tough is bone? Application of elastic–plastic fracture mechanics to bone. Bone. 40 (2), 479-484 (2007).
  19. Ritchie, R. O. The conflicts between strength and toughness. Nat Mater. 10 (11), 817-822 (2011).
  20. Kim, K. T., Bažant, Z. P., Yu, Q. Non-uniqueness of cohesive-crack stress-separation law of human and bovine bones and remedy by size effect tests. Intrnl J of Frac. 181 (1), 67-81 (2013).
  21. Bazant, Z. P., Planas, J. . Fracture and size effect in concrete and other quasibrittle materials. 16, (1997).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

Cortical BoneScratch TestFragility AssessmentBiomechanicsFracture MechanicsMesoscaleSpecimen PreparationEmbeddingGrindingPolishingHBSSCryopreservation

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved