In this protocol, methods for synthesizing and characterizing multi-modal phase-change porphyrin droplets are outlined.
Phase-change droplets are a class of ultrasound contrast agents that can convert into echogenic microbubbles in situ with the application of sufficient acoustic energy. Droplets are smaller and more stable than their microbubble counterparts. However, traditional ultrasound contrast agents are not trackable beyond acoustic feedback measurements, which makes quantifying contrast agent bio-distribution or accumulation ex vivo difficult. Researchers may have to rely on fluorescent or optically absorbent companion diagnostic particles to infer bio-distribution. The purpose of this protocol is to detail steps for creating multi-modal phase-change porphyrin droplets using a condensation method. Porphyrins are fluorescent molecules with distinct absorbance bands that can be conjugated onto lipids and incorporated into droplets to extend droplet versatility, enabling more robust bio-distribution while retaining acoustic properties. Seven formulations with varying porphyrin-lipid and base lipid contents were made to investigate microbubble and droplet size distributions. Characterizations suited to porphyrin-containing structures are also described in the protocol to demonstrate their analytic versatility in-solution. Sizing showed that the post-condensed mean diameters were 1.72 to 2.38 times smaller than precursor populations. Absorbance characterization showed intact assemblies had a Q-band peak of 700 nm while disrupted samples had an absorbance peak at 671 nm. Fluorescence characterization showed intact 30% porphyrin-lipid assemblies were fluorescently quenched (>97%), with fluorescence recovery achieved upon disruption. Acoustic vaporization showed that porphyrin droplets were non-echogenic at lower pressures and could be converted into echogenic microbubbles with sufficient pressures. These characterizations show the potential for porphyrin droplets to eliminate the need for absorbance or fluorescence-based companion diagnostic strategies to quantify ultrasound contrast agent bio-distribution for delivery or therapeutic applications in vivo or ex vivo.
Ultrasound imaging is a non-invasive, non-ionizing form of medical imaging that utilizes acoustic waves. While ultrasound scanners are more portable and can provide real-time images, ultrasound imaging can suffer from low contrast, making it difficult for sonographers to reliably distinguish similarly echogenic pathological features. To counteract this limitation, microbubbles can be injected into the host to improve vascular contrast. Microbubbles are micron-sized gas filled contrast agents that are highly echogenic to acoustic waves and can provide enhanced vessel contrast1,2. The shells and gas cores of microbubbles can be tailored for different applications, such as imaging, thrombolysis, cell membrane permeabilization, or transient vascular opening2.
A drawback of microbubbles is their short circulation half-lives. For example, clinically available perflutren lipid microspheres only have a half-life of 1.3 minutes3. For long imaging sessions, multiple injections of microbubbles are needed. Another drawback of microbubbles is their large diameters. While perflutren lipid microspheres are around 1 to 3 µm in diameter, small enough to circulate in vasculature, they are too large to extravasate and passively accumulate into tissues of interest, such as tumors4. One strategy to overcome these limitations is to condense the gas-core microbubbles into smaller, liquid-core droplets5,6. While droplets are not echogenic in their liquid state, they can be vaporized into microbubbles upon exposure to ultrasound with sufficiently high peak negative pressure, regaining their ability to provide contrast. This allows for the droplet to take advantage of the more favorable pharmacokinetics of a small liquid-core, while retaining the ability to provide contrast when insonated and without changing the chemical composition4,7.
Decafluorobutane is an ideal perfluorocarbon compound for phase-shifting between gaseous and liquid states5,6,7. Decafluorobutane allows for condensation of microbubbles into droplets with temperature reduction alone, whereas less dense perfluorocarbons require additional pressurization5. This gentle method minimizes destruction of bubbles during condensation7,8,9. As their cores are liquid, droplets are non-echogenic and invisible to ultrasound. However, with the application of sufficient acoustic or thermal energy, the liquid cores can vaporize back into a gaseous state, generating echogenic microbubbles8. This vaporization allows for control of when and where to generate microbubbles.
While droplets are useful for passive accumulation, in situ vaporization, or improving cell permeability4, droplets (and their fragments) cannot be imaged or quantified ex vivo. Therefore, quantifiable companion diagnostic agent, such as fluorescent4,10,11, magnetic particles12, optically absorbent agents13, are utilized as an analogue to gauge droplet delivery to tissues of interest. For example, Helfield et al. used a co-injection of fluorescent nano-beads for histology image quantification of mouse organs as droplets could not be detected fluorescently4. The disadvantage of companion diagnostic agents is the trackable component may act independently from the droplet depending on its individual pharmacokinetic profile.
Fortunately, the shell of microbubbles and droplets can be customized. For example, Huynh et al. demonstrated ultrasound contrast agents with porphyrin-lipid shells, creating multi-modal microbubbles14. Porphyrins are a class of organic compounds with an aromatic macrocylic structure14,15. They are optically absorbent, fluorescent, and can be chelated to a wide variety of metals for radiotherapy, radionuclide-based imaging, or trace metal-based quantification14. One example of porphyrin is pyropheophorbide (Pyro). By conjugating Pyro onto lipids, incorporating Pyro-lipids in microbubbles or droplets allow them to be imaged and tracked through multiple modalities: acoustically, fluorescently, and through absorbance14. This multi-modal contrast agent could be used to track and quantify accumulation. This could eliminate the need for companion diagnostic agents as the quantifiable component is now conjugated onto the shell, enabling more accurate delivery quantification16.
Herein, a protocol for creating multi-modal phase-change porphyrin droplets is outlined. As ultrasound contrasts agents can be used as a platform for drug delivery to tissues of interest, such as tumors2,4, extending their detectability beyond ultrasound could prove useful for delivery efficacy quantification. The purpose of these droplets is to provide trackable ultrasound contrast agents capable of passive accumulation in vivo, in situ vaporization and acoustics, and with the potential to quantify bio-distribution or accumulation from ex vivo organs without the reliance on secondary sensors. Characterization methods are also outlined to showcase porphyrin droplets' potential as bio-distribution sensors. The effects of Pyro-lipid loading in the shell (0% to 50% by molar ratio) are also discussed.
1. Dehydrated lipid films
2. Lipid Hydration
3. Decafluorobutane vials
4. Droplet formation
5. Morphological and Optical Characterization
6. Vaporization imaging
Pre-condensed, size-selected microbubble samples (n = 3) and post-condensed droplet samples (n = 3) were sized on a Coulter Counter (CC) with a 10 µm aperture. A limitation of the 10 µm aperture is it cannot measure particles smaller than 200 nm, which can bias the mean size and concentration. Figure 4 shows the sizing data for each of the Pyro-lipid content formulations. Table 1 shows statistics based on the sizing data. Using a ratio of pre- and post-condensed mean diameters, the results showed that the 0% Pyro-lipid formulation had the smallest mean diameter shift at 1.72 ± 0.02. The 50% Pyro-lipid formulation had the greatest mean diameter at 2.38 ± 0.08. The 1% Pyro-lipid droplet sample had the highest observed concentration at (2.71 ± 0.13) × 1010 /mL while the 40% Pyro-lipid droplet sample had the lowest observed concentration at (7.36 ± 0.81) × 109 /mL. Sizing data showed the 10% Pyro-lipid droplet sample had the smallest peak dimeter at 261 ± 13 nm while the 50% Pyro-lipid droplet sample had the largest at 390 ± 55 nm. Generally, as the Pyro-lipid content increased, the concentration decreased and the mean diameter increased. As the post-condensed samples are based on the precursor microbubble sample, the trend occurred for both types of ultrasound contrast agents. As the Pyro-lipid content increased, a microbubble subpopulation (with a peak size at approximately 2000 µm) started to form. This secondary peak was not present in the 0% Pyro-lipid microbubble sample and most apparent in the 40% and 50% Pyro-lipid populations.
Figure 5Â shows representative absorbance measurements of the 30% Pyro-lipid droplet sample. The peak of the intact sample in PBS was 700 nm while the disrupted sample in Triton shifted the peak to 671 nm. This showed that the intact assembles have different optical properties compared to the individual, unassembled lipid components.
Figure 6A shows representative fluorescence measurements of the pre-condensed microbubble sample while Figure 6B shows post-condensed droplet sample with 30% Pyro-lipid. The intact sample in PBS had a fluorescence peak at 704 nm while the disrupted form had a peak at 674 nm. Subtracting the disrupted area under the curve with the intact area under the curve, and dividing the difference by the disrupted area under the curve gives the quenching efficiency, which works out to be 98.61% and 98.07% for the 30% Pyro-lipid microbubble sample and droplet sample, respectively.
To demonstrate droplets converting to microbubbles, diluted droplets were imaged and vaporized in a 37 °C flow phantom with an ultrasound system. Figure 7 shows representative ultrasound images of the 30% Pyro-lipid droplet sample imaged at different pressures. At low pressures (Figure 7A), there was very little signal, only background signal from air bubbles stuck from the agar synthesis. This is because droplets are non-echogenic and do not scatter ultrasound. At a slightly high power, a few microbubbles were generated (Figure 7B) as shown by the appearance of bright speckles. As the pressure increased, more microbubbles were generated (Figure 7C and 7D). This also demonstrated that the droplets will not spontaneously vaporize at 37 °C.
Figure 1: Images of the steps to form the 30% Pyro-lipid solution. A) Lipid powder plus Pyro-SPC in chloroform. B) Dissolving solution added. C) Lipid film dried and coated onto interior wall of vial. D) Lipid vial wrapped in aluminum foil (exterior foil taped for reuse). E) Hydrated lipid solution. F) Lipid solution in serum vial. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: The 10-manifold gas exchanger. The valves referenced in the protocol are labelled. See Supplemental File "Other Protocols and Data" for instructions on how to assemble the Gas Exchanger. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: A) The lipid solutions of the 7 formulations (0% to 50% Pyro-SPC) in sample vials. Figures B to D show images of the steps taken to make 30% Pyro-lipid droplets. B) 30% Pyro-lipid solution in a sample vial. C) Post-agitation. D) 15 min size-selected. E) Bottom partition transferred to decafluorobutane vial. D) Post-condensation. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Coulter Counter (CC) sizing data of the size-selected microbubble and droplet samples with different Pyro-lipid shell content (n = 3). The solid green lines represent microbubbles and the dotted cyan lines represent droplets. A) 0% Pyro-SPC. B) 1% Pyro-SPC. C) 10% Pyro-SPC. D) 20% Pyro-SPC. E) 30% Pyro-SPC. F) 40% Pyro-SPC. G) 50% Pyro-SPC. H) The total observed concentrations of microbubble and droplet samples from the CC based on Pyro-SPC content in the shell. All error bars indicate standard deviation. All measurements were performed using a 10 µm aperture which has a size range of 200 nm to 6000 nm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: Representative ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectroscopy absorbance measurements from 300 to 800 nm of the post-condensed 30% Pyro-lipid droplet sample diluted in PBS and in 1% Triton. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 6: Representative fluorescence emission from 600 to 750 nm excited at 410 nm. A) Size-selected, pre-condensed 30% Pyro-lipid microbubble sample in PBS and in 1% Triton. B) Post-condensed 30% Pyro-lipid droplet sample in PBS and in 1% Triton. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 7: Representative ultrasound images of a 37 °C agar flow phantom taken with a pre-clinical 21 MHz linear array transducer in B-mode (see Table of Materials). The left column (Figures A, C, E,& G) shows PBS controls. The right column (Figures B, D, F,& H) shows 20 µL of post-condensed 30% Pyro-lipid droplet sample diluted into 50 mL of 37 °C PBS. Each row represents free-field peak negative pressures, which were estimated from the work done by Sheeran et al.8 The yellow triangles indicate focus depth. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Method | Agent | Pyro Shell % | 0 | 1 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 |
CC | Bubbles | Conc. [/mL] | (2.76 ± 0.28) × 10^10 | (3.04 ± 0.15) × 10^10 | (2.02 ± 0.11) × 10^10 | (1.91 ± 0.22) × 10^10 | (1.47 ± 0.05) × 10^10 | (8.47 ± 0.95) × 10^9 | (9.89 ± 0.15) × 10^9 |
CC | Bubbles | Peak [nm] | 329 ± 6 | 297 ± 15 | 305 ± 21 | 273 ± 14 | 310 ± 40 | 266 ± 33 | 393 ± 89 |
CC | Bubbles | Mean [nm] | 609 ± 2 | 603 ± 15 | 635 ± 6 | 690 ± 8 | 812 ± 1 | 935 ± 22 | 950 ± 55 |
CC | Bubbles | Median [nm] | 450 ± 6 | 421 ± 6 | 414 ± 6 | 432 ± 5 | 490 ± 2 | 596 ± 37 | 695 ± 41 |
CC | Droplets | Conc. [/mL] | (2.18 ± 0.07) × 10^10 | (2.71 ± 0.13) × 10^10 | (1.75 ± 0.18) × 10^10 | (1.72 ± 0.13) × 10^10 | (1.09 ± 0.01) × 10^10 | (7.36 ± 0.81) × 10^9 | (7.38 ± 0.28) × 10^9 |
CC | Droplets | Peak [nm] | 292 ± 0 | 297 ± 17 | 261 ± 13 | 280 ± 9 | 268 ± 17 | 287 ± 38 | 390 ± 55 |
CC | Droplets | Mean [nm] | 353 ± 5 | 350 ± 5 | 347 ± 1 | 347 ± 4 | 397 ± 1 | 399 ± 6 | 400 ± 7 |
CC | Droplets | Median [nm] | 318 ± 4 | 318 ± 4 | 310 ± 1 | 315 ± 2 | 340 ± 0 | 367 ± 5 | 370 ± 9 |
Table 1: Sizing data statistics of the microbubble and droplet samples with different Pyro-SPC content from Coulter Counter (CC) (n = 3). All errors indicate standard deviation.
Supplementary Information - Lipid Formula Sheet: Please click here to download this File.
Supplementary Information - Other Protocols and Data: Please click here to download this File.
After adding all the lipid components together (Steps 1.2 and 1.4.5, Figure 1A), a solution of chloroform and methanol (and water if phosphatidic acid lipids like DSPA are present) was added to ensure the Pyro-lipid and non-Pyro lipid components were fully homogenized (Step 1.5, Figure 1B). To prevent the formation of lipid vesicles with heterogeneous lipid composition, the dissolved lipids were dried and coated onto the interior of the wall of the vial as a thin film (Figure 1C). The coating (Step 1.6) also makes the hydration (Step 2.1 to 2.4) easier as it increases the surface area of the dried film. The drying (Step 1.6, Figure 1C) and vacuuming (Step 1.8, Figure 1D) were done to ensure the chloroform and methanol were fully evaporated as these chemicals can disrupt the formation of microbubbles. While the protocol can be scaled down to make lipid solution volumes as low as 1 mL, larger volumes can reduce vial-to-vial variation. While this may run the risk of degrading the Pyro-SPC while not in use, the storage condition of the lipid solution (Step 2.9 to 2.10) was meant to reduce that risk. The degassing step with the gas exchanger (Step 2.9.2, Figure 1F and Figure 2) serves to eliminate as much oxygen as possible to prevent oxidization. It is not recommended storing lipid solutions containing porphyrin-lipids while atmospheric gases are still dissolved in the solution (Figure 1E).
In step 2.10, the lipid solution is in a serum vial with a pressurized headspace, similar to how the clinically approved ultrasound contrast agent perflutren lipid microspheres are sold (similar to Figure 1F). Internal work has shown stable microbubbles could not be generated via mechanical agitation with the presence of Pyro-lipids if the cap was a soft material like the rubber stopper. Therefore, the lipid solution was transferred to a sample vial with a non-rubber phenolic cap (Steps 4.1 to 4.4, Figure 3A and 3B). When the decafluorobutane gas was flowed into the sample vial (Steps 4.1 to 4.4), the denser decafluorobutane should displace the atmospheric air in the sample vial headspace. Currently, it is unknown why Pyro-lipids are unable to form microbubbles with rubber stoppers. With no Pyro-lipids, stable microbubbles can be made directly in the serum vials with rubber stoppers4,7. Thus, it is recommended using the Gas Exchanger to degas and re-pressurize the serum vial then agitate the serum vial itself for non-Pyro-lipid formulations4,5,6,7 (see "Other Protocols and Data"). The advantage of being able to mechanically agitate in serum vial is the headspace can be pressurized and size-selection can be done by inverting the serum vial upside-down8. In this protocol, the 0% Pyro-lipid formulation was transferred to a sample vial (Steps 4.1 to 4.4) to be consistent with the formulations that did contain Pyro-lipids. Additionally, longer acyl lipid chain lengths result in more stable droplets due to better van der Waals interactions19. The lipid shell composition was chosen based on what was commercially available, 18-acyl chain length for all lipid types. DSPE-PEG5K was incorporated in all the formulation (Step 1.1) as the presence of the polyethylene glycol chains prevents coalescence of structures via repulsive steric forces19. During lipid hydration, the bath sonicator bath was set to 70 °C (Step 2.1) as high enough to fully disperse the 18-acyl chain length lipid film18. For longer acyl chain lengths, higher temperatures will be required.
Higher Pyro-lipid loading would increase the concentration of optically absorbing and fluorescing components, which may be desired for certain applications that benefit from maximized porphyrin loading. However, as the Pyro-lipid content increased, the observable droplet concentration decreased and the diameters increased (Figure 4 and Table 1). This illustrates a trade-off between optical fluorescence and absorbance properties versus droplet concentration and diameter. To researchers that must prioritize small diameters for in vivo accumulation through small leaky vessels or if a high concentration of droplets needs to be injected, increasing Pyro-lipid loading may not be worth the increase in droplet dimeter or decrease in droplet concentration. If high droplet concentrations and/or small droplet diameters are paramount, similarly sized companion diagnostic agents should be considered instead of Pyro-lipids. While 1% Pyro-lipid droplets did not result in a decrease in concentration or increase in size, 1% Pyro-lipid loading may be too low to be reasonably detectable from tissue background fluorescently. However, the flexibility of porphyrin moiety provides multiple options for functionalization which will impart alternative means of quantification more suitable for low-concentration applications. For example, Pyro-lipids can be chelated with copper-64 for positon emission tomography imaging and gamma counting20, or with palladium for trace-metal quantification using mass spectrometry, or with manganese for magnetic resonance imaging14.
While some experiments may only require a small volume of the droplet solution, 1 mL of the lipid solution is needed to fill the 1.85 mL sample vial. Goertz et al. demonstrated that changes to handling, headspace pressure, liquid-to-gas ratio, and even the vial shape can all affect microbubble populations17. Vial temperature during agitation and size-selection can also influence the size distribution. Therefore, for the methods optimized by the end-user, it is critical to be as consistent as possible when making droplets. Unopened droplets may be frozen (-20 °C) and thawed later for future use but this will affect size populations.
The agitation procedure that activates a lipid solution into microbubbles does not produce a morphologically homogeneously population (Step 4.6); rather, the sample is filled with microbubbles, multilamellar vesicles, liposomes, and micelles18,21,22. While microbubble sizes span the micron and nanometer range, the other structures are largely below 800 nm 23. The sizing techniques used do not distinguish between these various structures, and thus the post-agitated microbubble samples (Step 4.6, Figure 3C) and the post-condensed droplet samples (Step 4.14, Figure 3F) must be assumed as mixtures. The ultrasound-insensitive assemblies (multilamellar vesicles, liposomes, and micelles) are likely conserved post-condensation and will not change size as they do not have phase-changeable cores. Since the Coulter Counter cannot distinguish between these different supramolecular assemblies, the shift in population size following condensation should be interpreted with the assumption that some proportion of the nanoscale structures are inconvertible and contribute to the observed population in that size region. Additionally, these structures contribute to the spectroscopic and fluorescent signatures of these samples14. The fluorescence and absorbance signatures of micelles, liposome/vesicles, and droplets are all similar, including their degree of fluorescence quenching14. Thus, it is important to consider that there is a mixture of assemblies in Figures 3C to 3F, Figure 4, the PBS diluted sample in Figure 5, and the PBS diluted sample in Figure 6.
After size-selecting and prior to condensation (Step 4.9), it is possible to eliminate the non-bubble assemblies by centrifuging the microbubble sample to separate the buoyant bubbles from the non-buoyant assemblies as described by Feshitan et al.21 The degree of separation can be controlled by adjusting the spin force and duration. However, experiments of microbubble condensation of such size-isolated samples revealed that using the larger precursor microbubble populations that are selected using size isolation procedures yielded larger droplets (see "Other Protocols and Data" Step S5 for post-spun bubble and droplet sizing). Since an intended application of droplets produced with this protocol is a platform for passive extravasation and accumulation due to their small size compared to microbubbles4,8, droplet populations that are as small as possible were desired. Thus, this protocol used post-agitated microbubble samples that were not size-isolated via centrifugation, even if that meant ultrasound-insensitive micelles, liposomes, and vesicles were present in the final solution. This does imply that quantification procedures for bio-distribution will derive signal for all of the injected structures and are not limited to just the droplets. However, since these similarly-sized structures most likely accumulate via a passive mechanism that is primarily dictated by size, it is not suspected that this should change the main inferences that can be made if this platform is to be utilized in vivo, although all these aspects should be individually considered depending on the context in which the platform may be used. Tests using experimental arms with and without ultrasound can be performed to ensure that it is the ultrasound-sensitive droplets that are responsible for any changes in bio-distribution, as only the perfluorocarbon core assemblies in the solution will respond to ultrasound.
After agitation, the vial was rested for 15 minutes and a partition was observed in the vial (Figure 3C versus 3D). Size-selection via buoyancy is a simple method of eliminating the larger structures/bubbles from an activated microbubble solution8,17. In this case, particles with diameters greater than 5 µm were mostly removed after size-selection (Figure 4). The extent of size-selection can be tuned by controlling the duration of the size-selection17. Sheeran et al. has shown that not size-selecting can result in generated microbubbles that occlude vasculature8.
Perfluorocarbons have the advantage of being biologically inert7. While decafluorobutane's boiling point is -1.7 °C, above body temperature, the droplets do not immediately vaporize when exposed to 37 °C (Figure 7B). As the droplets are meta-stable at 37 °C, additional acoustic energy is needed to vaporize the droplets to microbubbles7,9. Poproski et al. has demonstrated porphyrin droplets condensed via pressurization22. This is a viable and even essential method when using less dense perfluorocarbons but high pressures may destroy some bubbles in the process. Octafluoropropane (C3F8) has a boiling point of -36.7 °C, so both cooling and pressurization is needed for droplet condensation. However, the lighter perfluorocarbon leads to less stable droplets. Dodecafluoropentane (C5F12) can lead to more stable droplets with a boiling point of 28 °C. However, it is a liquid at room temperature and will need stronger acoustic energies to vaporize. Thus, choice of the containing gas of the ultrasound contrast agent should consider the conditions of its intended biological application in addition to the parameters of its fabrication. In this protocol, the isopropanol bath for condensation was set to -15 to -17 °C (Step 4.7.1 and Step 4.13) while other protocols used -10 °C 5,6. Even with a common decafluorobutane core, the condensation temperature may vary depending on excipient composition, total lipid concentration, and lipid shell composition. If using other formulations, optimization may be required to ensure proper droplet condensation without causing the solution to freeze.
As the droplets are smaller and more stable than their microbubble precursor7, they can take better advantage of passive accumulation mechanisms to extravasate into certain tissues of interest, such as the enhanced permeability and retention effect of certain tumor types4,24. With fluorescent, optically absorbent, and acoustic methods of detection14, it is possible to use a single formulation to quantify uptake. Additionally, this platform can be used to investigate whether the acoustic vaporization of droplets can improve delivered agent fraction beyond passive levels16. To quantify agent bio-distribution in tissues and organs of interest after injection, a known amount of Pyro-lipid droplets should be injected into the animal, ultrasound may or may not be applied depending on the control set, the animal should be sacrificed a pre-specified time-point, and the organs should be removed and weighed. The organs should be homogenized, filtered, diluted in surfactant (detergent) to decellularize the tissue, and quantified with fluorescence or UV-Vis spectroscopy to obtain injected dose percentages per organ mass based on the Pyro signals. For Step 5.4.5 (Figure 5) and Step 5.5.5 (Figure 6), Triton X-100 surfactant (detergent) was used to disrupt the samples as it is non-fluorescent at 410 nm and its absorbance wavelengths do not overlap with Pyro's.
Microbubbles were not characterized with UV-Vis absorbance. As the UV-Vis spectroscope's laser source is parallel with the detector, any large bubbles could scatter light away from the detector, making them appear more optically absorbent14. Unlike the UV-Vis spectrophotometer, the fluorescence spectrophotometer's detector is/should be perpendicular to the laser source to prevent the source from interfering with the detector. UV-Vis was used to quantify the absorbance of the intact and disrupted droplet samples (Step 5.4, Figure 5). 300 to 800 nm was chosen as the absorbance wavelengths as the two main absorbance bands of pyro-lipid, the Soret band (340 to 500 nm) and the Q-band (640 to 730 nm), fall within this range14. When assembled into a droplet (or other supramolecular structures), the Q-band peak of Pyro-lipid is red-shifted from 671 nm to 700 nm (Figure 5). When this supramolecular structure is disrupted by a surfactant like Triton, the peak shifts back to 671 nm14,15. Based on this shift, it is possible to tell whether the Pyro-lipids are in an assembled state or in a disrupted state. The ratio of the two peaks can be used to estimate the decay of the assemblies over time.
For the fluorescence measurements (Step 5.5, Figure 6), an excitation wavelength of 410 nm was chosen as it corresponds to the Soret band peak for unassembled Pyro-lipid14. An emission wavelength range from 600 to 800 nm was selected as the peaks of the intact assemblies in PBS and disrupted Pyro-lipids in Triton are contained within this range. The shift and increase in fluorescence (Figure 6) between the intact (704 nm in PBS) and disrupted (674 nm in Triton) samples occurred because of structure-induced quenching. In the assembled form, the Pyro-lipid molecules were packed closely together so generated photons were absorbed by nearby Pyro-lipid molecules. This is evident in the intact versus disrupted quenching efficiency. Thus, it is necessary to dilute samples in surfactant (detergent) like 1% Triton X-100 to relieve quenching and maximize signal for bio-distribution quantification14.
For simplicity, the same linear array ultrasound transducer was used to both vaporize and image (Steps 6.5 and 6.7, Figure 7). This ultrasound transducer (Table of Materials) was capable of reaching the necessary peak negative pressures needed to vaporize droplets8. Filling a tank with deionized water from a tap generates gases that become dissolved in the water (Step 6.1). To minimize interference from the dissolved gases in the water with vaporization and imaging, the water was rested for 24 h in the tank to allow the gases in the water to equilibrate with the atmosphere (Step 6.1). Alternatively, the deionized water can be degassed with a sufficiently sized, sealable container connected to a sufficiently powerful vacuum. The ultrasound images demonstrated the microbubbles were successfully condensed as the droplets were unobservable/non-echogenic at low pressures (Figure 7B). It was only at higher output pressures that the droplets vaporized into observable, echogenic microbubbles (Figure 7D, 7F, 7H). While the post-condensed droplet sample contains micelles and liposomes/vesicles, these assemblies are non-echogenic and only droplets can vaporize into echogenic microbubbles. A PBS control was flowed through the phantom to establish baseline images (Figures 7A, 7C, 7E, 7G). As the pressure increased in the PBS, no contrast was generated. This indicated that the high pressures from the transducer could not produce spontaneous cavitation in a water-based medium alone, and thus all other generated contrast could be attributed to the ultrasound contrast agent employed. If the output pressure is too high, generated microbubbles can be destroyed. By incrementally increasing the pressure and observing the generated contrast, the optimal pressure can be found8. The circulation half-life of the droplets can be determined in a similar way by vaporizing the droplets are certain time intervals and observing the contrast generated over time7.
In summary, multi-modal phase-change droplets with varying Pyro-lipid content were created with the condensation method. Sizing showed that there was a trade-off between Pyro-lipid loading and microbubble/droplet concentration. Characterizations showed that there were differences in intact and disrupted forms in both absorbance and fluorescence. Ultrasound imaging showed droplets were non-echogenic at 37 °C and were vaporizable into echogenic microbubbles at sufficient pressures. Characterizations also showed the potential for Pyro-lipid droplets to replace companion diagnostic agents for droplet bio-distribution or accumulation tests. Future work will investigate in-solution vaporization thresholds, in-solution stability, and in vivo circulation durations in nude mice.
The authors would like to thank Dr. Brandon Helfield for helping build the gas exchanger and Dr. Miffy Hok Yan Cheng for technical discussions. The authors would like to thank the following funding sources: Ontario Graduate Scholarship, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Terry Fox Research Institute, and Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-[methoxy(polyethylene glycol)-5000] (ammonium salt) | Avanti Polar Lipids | 880220 | Also known as "DSPE-PEG5K" |
1-stearoyl-2-hydroxy-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine | Avanti Polar Lipids | 855775 | Also known as "DSPC" |
Aluminum Foil | Any brand | ||
Aluminum Seals, Tear-Off | VWR | 16171-840 | Standard Aluminum, 13 mm outer diameter |
Bath Sonicator | Any brand | Capable of sonicating and heating up to 70 °C, | |
Bio-Stor Screw Cap Vials | National Scientific | BS20NABP | Plastic, 2 mL Skirted, with O-ring |
Borosilicate glass clear serum vials | VWR | 16171-285 | 3 mL, 7 mm inner mouth diameter, 13 mm outer mouth diameter |
Borosilicate Glass Sample Vial with Phenolic Screw Cap | VWR | 66011-020 | 1.85 mL, Short Form Style, 12 mm outer diameter, 35 mm height, 8-425 cap size |
Borosilicate Glass Vial with Screw-On cap | Any brand | Sizes will depend on desired volumes | |
Chloroform | Any brand | ||
Coulter Counter Elctrolyte Diluent | Any brand | Compatible with Coulter Counter | |
Decafluorobutane (C4F10) | FluoroMed | 355-25-9 | |
Deionized Water | Any brand | ||
Dry Ice (Carbon Dioxide) | Any brand | ||
Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) Particle Analyzer | Any brand | Capable of temperature control | |
E-Z Crimper, 13 mm | Wheaton | W225302 | 13 mm Standard Aluminum Seals |
E-Z Decapper, 13 mm | Wheaton | W225352 | 13 mm Standard Aluminum Seals |
Fluorescent Spectrophotometer | Any brand | Capable of 400 to 600 excitation and 300 to 800 nm emission detection, detector perpendicular to laser source | |
Fluorescent Spectrophotometer Compatible Cuvette | Any brand | Can hold at least 2 mL, capable of 300 to 800 nm, all four sides are optical windows | |
Gas Exchanger | Made in-house | Refer to Supplementary Information - "Other Protocols and Data" for assembly instructions. | |
Glass syringes | Any brand | Sizes will depend on desired volumes | |
GLWR Custom Aperture Tube 10 um | Beckman Coulter | B42812 | 10 µm aperture, compatible with Beckman Coulter MultiSizer 4e |
Glycerol | Any brand | ||
Insulated Styrofaom containers with lids | Any brand | ||
Isopropanol | Any brand | ||
Lyophilization-Style Rubber Stoppers | VWR | 71000-060 | 7 mm inner mouth diameter, 13 mm outer mouth diameter, 2-leg, Chlorobutyl |
Membrane Diaphram Vacuum Pump | Sartorius Stedim | 16694-1-60-06 | Adjustable pressure |
Metal Tongs | Any brand | ||
Methanol | Any brand | ||
MS250 21 MHz Linear Array Ultrasound Transducer | VisualSonics | 21 MHz, Capable of B-mode and non-linear imaging. | |
MultiSizer 4e | Beckman Coulter | Capable of sizing from 0.2µm to 6 µm | |
Nalgene Rapid-Flow Sterile Single Use Vacuum Filter Units | Thermo Scientific | 567-0010 | Polyethersulfone (PES) membrane, 0.1μm pore size, 1000 mL volume. As Isoton II is non-sterile, can use Filter units multiple times |
Needles, Conventional | BD | 305176 | 20 gauge, 1.5 inch length |
Nitrogen Gas | Any brand | Make sure there are regulator valves and tubes to direct the flow. Setup will be dependend on brand and source. | |
Parafilm | Any brand | Called "wax film" in the protocol. | |
Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) | Any brand | 1X, 7.4 pH | |
Pipette | Any brand | Sizes will depend on desired volumes | |
Pipette Tips | Any brand | Sizes will depend on desired volumes | |
Plastic Syringes | Any brand | 1 mL, 3 mL, and 30 mL. With Luer Lock connections | |
Polyethersulfone (PES) Membrane Filter | Any brand | 0.2 µm pore size | |
Propylene Glycol | Any brand | ||
Pyropheophorbide conjugated 1-stearoyl-2-hydroxy-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine | Made in-house | Also known as "Pyro-SPC". Refer to "Supplementary Information - Other Protocols and Data" for synthesis. | |
Thermometer | Any brand | (-20 to 100 °C) | |
Triton X-100 | Any brand | Also known as "2-[4-(2,4,4-trimethylpentan-2-yl)phenoxy]ethanol" | |
Ultrapure Water | Any brand | Type 1 Purity | |
Ultraviolet–Visible (UV-Vis) Spectrophotometer | Any brand | Capable of absorbance from 300 to 800 nm, at least 0.5 nm resolution | |
Ultraviolet–Visible (UV-Vis) Spectrophotometer Compatible Cuvette, 1 cm Path Length | Any brand | Can hold at least 2 mL, capable of 300 to 800 nm | |
Vacuum Desiccator | Any brand | ||
Vevo 2100 Ultrasound Imaging Platform | VisualSonics | Pre-clinical ultrasound imaging system | |
Vialmix | Bristol-Myers-Squibb | Called "mechanical agitator" in the protocol. Agitates for 45 s. | |
Vortex Mixer | Any brand |
This article has been published
Video Coming Soon
ABOUT JoVE
Copyright © 2024 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved