<meta charset="utf8"></head><body>Orman Odun Delicilerinden Entomopatojenik Mantar Kaynaklarının Araştırılması

<table border="1" fo:keep-together.within-page="1" fo:keep-with-next.within-page="always">
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td>1.5 mL, 2 mL centrifuge tubes</td>
			<td>Biosharp</td>
			<td>BS-15-M</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>10 &#181;L pipet tips</td>
			<td>Sangon Biotech</td>
			<td>F601216</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>10 &#181;L, 20 &#181;L, 100 &#181;L, 200 &#181;L, 1,000 &#181;L pipettes</td>
			<td>Rainin</td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>1,000 &#181;L pipet tips</td>
			<td>Sangon Biotech</td>
			<td>F630102</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>2 mL cryogenic vials</td>
			<td>Corning</td>
			<td>430659</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>20x PBS buffer</td>
			<td>Sangon Biotech</td>
			<td>B548117-0500</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>200 &#181;L pipet tips</td>
			<td>Sangon Biotech</td>
			<td>F601227</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>2,000 bp maker</td>
			<td>TaKaRar</td>
			<td>SD0531</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>50 mL tubes</td>
			<td>Nest</td>
			<td>602052</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>50% glutaraldehyde solution</td>
			<td>Sangon Biotech</td>
			<td>G916054</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>50x TAE buffer</td>
			<td>Sangon Biotech</td>
			<td>B548101</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>6x loading buffer</td>
			<td>TaKaRar</td>
			<td>SD0503</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Agarose</td>
			<td>Sangon Biotech</td>
			<td>A610013</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Anhydrous ethanol</td>
			<td>Jkchemical</td>
			<td>LB10V37</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Biochemistry Cultivation Cabinet</td>
			<td>Shanghaiyiheng</td>
			<td>LRH-250F</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Chloroform</td>
			<td>Juhua</td>
			<td>61553</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Commercial beetle traps</td>
			<td>FEIMENGDI</td>
			<td>BF-8</td>
			<td>www.yinyouji.com</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Gel imager</td>
			<td>Bio-Rad</td>
			<td>GelDoc XR+</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Glycerol</td>
			<td>Sangon Biotech</td>
			<td>A600232</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>High speed refrigerated centrifuge</td>
			<td>Sigma</td>
			<td>D-37520</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>High-Pressure Steam Sterilization Pot</td>
			<td>Mettler Toledo</td>
			<td>JA5003</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Isopropyl alcohol</td>
			<td>General-reagent</td>
			<td>G75885B</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Nucleic acid dye</td>
			<td>Sangon Biotech</td>
			<td>A616696</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Optical Microscope, OM</td>
			<td>Leica</td>
			<td>DM2000</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Parafilm</td>
			<td>Parafilm</td>
			<td>PM996</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>PCR meter</td>
			<td>Heal Force</td>
			<td>Trident960</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Penicillin G</td>
			<td>Marklin</td>
			<td>GB15743</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Potato dextrose agar, PDA</td>
			<td>Oxoid</td>
			<td>CM0139</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Potato dextrose broth, PDB</td>
			<td>Solarbio</td>
			<td>P9240</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Primers</td>
			<td>Sangon Biotech</td>
			<td>/</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Primers Taq</td>
			<td>TaKaRar</td>
			<td>RR902A</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Rapid Fungi Genomic DNA Isolation Kit</td>
			<td>Sangon Biotech</td>
			<td>B518229</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Scanning Electron Microscope, SEM</td>
			<td>Hitachi</td>
			<td>S-3400N</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Streptomycin</td>
			<td>Marklin</td>
			<td>S6153</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Tetracycline</td>
			<td>Marklin</td>
			<td>T829835</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Tween-80</td>
			<td>Marklin</td>
			<td>T6336</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Vacuum freeze dryer</td>
			<td>Yamato</td>
			<td>DC801</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Vortex Shaker</td>
			<td>HLD</td>
			<td>WH-861</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>&#946;-Mercaptoethanol</td>
			<td>Marklin</td>
			<td>M6230</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>

isolation, behavioral identification, and pathogenicity assessment of entomopathogenic fungi from a forest wood borer

The devastation caused by insect pests has led to great ecological and economic losses in both forest and agricultural ecosystems. Most agricultural pests expose themselves to natural enemies or artificial control agents while damaging host plants. Instead, forest wood borers (FWB) nearly complete their whole developmental cycles inside host tree trunks1, which raises large challenges to explore efficient biocontrol organisms from FWB in the wild field. What is even worse is that FWBs carry a great number of phytopathogens2 or have an intimate relationship with these pathogens as their potential vectors3,4, dramatically amplifying the negative effects of FWB on forest health. Excessive use of chemical insecticides can alleviate FWB severity, but the emergence of insecticidal resistance5,6 limits their environmental application. In certain cases, insect parasitoids, predatory arthropods as well as entomopathogenic microbes were released as biocontrol agents to the distribution areas of FWB7 and were proven to be efficient and economically acceptable alternatives to chemical control8,9,10.
Entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) are regarded to have the advantage in controlling FWB over most other microbial groups. Their spores can be carried by insect hosts and stably fixed on body surfaces via penetration into the cuticle or integument8,11. EPF also present excellent adaptability to environmental stresses and some species colonize well in the tissue of trees as endophytes12,13, facilitating their growth, survival, and transmission. However, compared to that in agricultural industries, the species diversity of EPF used in natural forest ecosystems is remarkably restricted14,15,16. Beauveria bassiana (strain PPRI 5339) was evidenced as the most promising strain to promote an IPM program to Eucalyptus weevils in South Africa17 and the combination of two promising isolates of B. bassiana provided an opportunity for the practical microbial control of red palm weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus, at different life stages in palm tree fields18. In addition to Beauveria and the well-known Metarhizium, other EPF genera of the order Hypocreales, especially species of Lecanicillium (many of which are now classified into the genus Akanthomyces19,20), showed strong pathogenicity and high potential in management of forest pests, such as the Cypress aphid in Chile21.
The pine sawyer beetle Monochamus alternatus is a notorious pine forest pest in China and neighboring countries, which burrows into branches and trunks of pine trees to impede the transportation of nutrients and water22,23,24. Moreover, M. alternatus also promotes the invasion of the plant-parasitic pine wood nematode (Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, PWN) as its main vector beetle. Another congeneric species of the beetle, M. galloprovincialis, has spread PWN in several countries in Europe in recent years25. Previous research reported several genera of natural EPFs from Monochamus spp., such as Beauveria, Metarhizium, and Lecanicillium (Verticillium, an even former name of Lecanicillium), in Spain, Japan, and the Anhui/Zhejiang Provinces of China26,27,28,29. Nevertheless, these collections of EPFs seem to be commonly restricted in a certain location, compared to the wide occurrence of Monochamus beetles in natural fields. As the M. alternatus beetle has a wide geographical distribution in China, it could be regarded as a representative wood borer to explore more potential EPFs across different populations.
In the present protocol, we introduce a specific procedure exploring EPFs from several geographical populations of M. alternatus in southern China. This protocol uses a model Coleopteran beetle as a substitute to perform entomopathogenicity assays, under the condition that the tested fungal species has a consistent behavioral phenotype on both beetle species. This protocol can also provide insights into EPF exploration for other forest wood borers, in which the diversity of their entomopathogenic fungal species is underestimated or less investigated.

<meta charset="utf8"></head><body>Yazar Gündemi: Yabani Monochamus alternatus Popülasyonlarında Entomopatojenik Mantarların Orman Odun Delicilerinde Biyokontrol Uygulamaları için Değerlend

Bir Orman Ağaç Kurdundan Entomopatojenik Mantarların İzolasyonu, Davranışsal Tanımlama ve Patojenite Değerlendirmesi

Read this Scientific Article Protocol about Isolation, Behavioral Identification, and Pathogenicity Assessment of Entomopathogenic Fungi from a Forest Wood Borer at JoVE.com

Forest wood borers (FWB) cause severe tree damage and economic losses worldwide. The release of entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) during the FWB emergence ...

isolation-behavioral-identification-pathogenicity-assessment

Research

JoVE Journal

Biology

Isolation, Behavioral Identification, and Pathogenicity Assessment of Entomopathogenic Fungi from a Forest Wood Borer

537 Görüntüleme.  Zhejiang A&F University. Yabani Monochamus alternatus popülasyonlarından entomopatojenik mantar kaynaklarını araştırıyoruz. Bu türü örnek alarak, gelecekteki biyo-kontrol uygulamaları için diğer orman odun delicilerinin entomopatojenik mantarlarının çeşitliliğini zenginleştirebiliriz. Yakın zamanda, Monochamus alternatus'un parazitik entomopatojenik mantarları olarak sertifikalandırılmış, ikisi iyi bilinmeyen, ancak böceklerin güçlü patojenleri olduğu ka...

Video: Yazar Gündemi: Yabani Monochamus alternatus Popülasyonlarında Entomopatojenik Mantarların Orman Odun Delicilerinde Biyokontrol Uygulamaları için Değerlend

Forest wood borers (FWB) cause severe tree damage and economic losses worldwide. The release of entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) during the FWB emergence period is considered an acceptable alternative to chemical control. However, EPF resources have been significantly less explored for FWBs, in contrast to agricultural insect pests. This paper presents a protocol for exploring EPF resources from FWBs using wild Monochamus alternatus populations as an example. In this protocol, the assignment of traps baited with M. alternatus attractants to different populations guaranteed the collection of adequate samples with natural infection symptoms, during the emergence periods of the beetle. Following finely dissecting integuments and placing them onto a selective medium, fungal species were isolated from each part of beetle bodies and identified based on both molecular and morphological traits.
Several fungal species were certified as parasitic EPFs via re-infection of healthy M. alternatus with spore suspensions. Their behavioral phenotypes on M. alternatus were observed using scanning electron microscopy and further compared with those on the Coleopteran model insect Tribolium castaneum. For EPFs that present consistent parasitism phenotypes on both beetle species, evaluation of their activities on T. castaneum provided valuable information on lethality for future study on M. alternatus. This protocol helped the discovery of EPF newly reported on M. alternatus populations in China, which could be applied as an efficient approach to explore more EPF resources from other FWBs.

Here we present a protocol for obtaining entomopathogenic fungi from a forest wood borer and a substitutive way to evaluate their entomopathogenic activities using a Coleopteran model insect. This method is efficient and convenient for exploring entomopathogenic fungal resources from wood-boring insect pests in natural forests.