A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Method Article
* These authors contributed equally
The protocol employs a non-invasive stool sampling combined with a quantitative polymerase chain reaction to offer a convenient and rapid diagnostic method for Helicobacter pylori infection and its resistance to clarithromycin and quinolones.
Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is widely prevalent worldwide, with approximately 50% of the global population having a history of H. pylori infection. In China, the infection rate ranges from 40% to 70%. H. pylori is primarily associated with gastrointestinal diseases such as chronic gastritis, gastric ulcers, and duodenal ulcers. Currently, the clinical treatment for H. pylori infection involves either triple or quadruple therapy. However, the extensive use of antibiotics has led to the development of antibiotic resistance in H. pylori. Therefore, detecting both H. pylori and its antibiotic resistance is crucial for guiding clinical treatment.
Diagnostic methods for H. pylori include urea breath test (UBT), antigen test, serological antibody test, endoscopy, rapid urease test (RUT), and bacterial culture. While the first three methods are non-invasive, they do not allow for bacterial recovery and, thus, cannot be used for resistance testing. The latter three methods are invasive, expensive, require high technical expertise, and may cause harm to patients.
Therefore, a non-invasive, rapid method for simultaneous detection of H. pylori infection and antibiotic resistance is of utmost clinical importance for the effective eradication of H. pylori. This paper aims to introduce a specific protocol that combines quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) with TaqMan fluorescent probe technology to rapidly detect H. pylori infection and antibiotic resistance. This method provides a convenient, rapid, and non-invasive way to diagnose H. pylori infection and resistance, unlike traditional bacterial culture and other techniques. qPCR is used to identify the infection and detect mutations in the 23S rRNA and gyrA genes, which are linked to resistance to clarithromycin and quinolones, respectively. Compared to conventional culture techniques, this approach offers a non-invasive, cost-effective, and time-efficient method for detecting Helicobacter pylori infection and determining its antibiotic resistance.
Helicobacter pylori is a gram-negative, spiral-shaped bacterium that can persistently infect the human gastric epithelium1. In 1994, the World Health Organization classified H. pylori as a Group 1 carcinogen for gastric cancer, with ~3% of infected individuals ultimately developing the disease2. A recently published systematic review has indicated that a general trend of increased antibiotic resistance rate of H. pylori was observed in the last decade, which has reached alarming levels worldwide, especially clarithromycin resistance3. In China, the latest survey data showed that the aggregate prevalence of H. pylori among urban Chinese people is 27.08%; the resistance rates for clarithromycin and levofloxacin were 50.83% and 47.17%4, which are higher than the United States (levofloxacin 37.6%, clarithromycin 31.5%)5and Europe (levofloxacin 15.8% and clarithromycin 21.4%)6. Consequently, early and accurate diagnosis and treatment are crucial. However, the increasing antibiotic resistance of H. pylori considerably reduces treatment efficacy, highlighting the urgent need for ongoing research into its diagnosis and treatment.
H. pylori diagnostic methods are categorized into invasive and non-invasive techniques7. Invasive methods include histopathological examination, rapid urease test (RUT), and bacterial culture8. Histopathological examination relies on the processing and microscopic observation of biopsy samples, with accuracy limited by histological preparation and pathology expertise9. RUT detects H. pylori through the activity of urease, which hydrolyzes urea to produce ammonia, resulting in an alkaline shift in the reagent, thus indicating the presence of the bacterium9. It is simple and cost-effective. Bacterial culture, considered the "gold standard," often has a success rate below 50% due to the unique physiological characteristics of H. pylori10.
Non-invasive methods include the 13C/14C urea breath test (UBT), serological diagnosis, and stool antigen testing (SAT)11. The breath test operates on a principle similar to that of RUT, detecting isotopically labeled CO2 in exhaled air to confirm infection12. Serological diagnosis detects antibodies, which may persist after bacterial eradication, making it difficult to assess treatment effectiveness13. Stool antigen testing detects H. pylori-specific antigens in fecal samples, providing a reliable non-invasive method with a lower rate of false positives and good accuracy for diagnosing active infections14.
Each diagnostic method has its advantages and limitations15. Apart from bacterial culture, other methods struggle with detecting antibiotic resistance, while culture is hampered by low success rates16. Recently, molecular diagnostic methods such as real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) have been widely applied to microbial detection17. qPCR can accurately detect H. pylori and analyze resistance gene mutations, offering a more comprehensive view of the infection18.
Fluorescent probes are designed to bind specifically to a target sequence in the DNA during the qPCR process. These probes are typically labeled with a fluorescent dye, which emits a signal when the probe binds to its target and is cleaved by the polymerase during amplification. This provides a real-time measurement of the PCR process. Fluorescent probes are known for their high specificity due to the unique design of the probe, which ensures that only the target DNA sequence is detected, reducing the chances of non-specific binding and improving assay specificity. This makes fluorescent probe technology especially useful for detecting low-abundance targets, such as Helicobacter pylori DNA in stool samples. While SYBR Green is a commonly used DNA-binding dye in PCR, it can bind to any double-stranded DNA, which may result in non-specific amplification and false positives.
Culturing Helicobacter pylori from clinical samples does not provide antibiotic resistance data directly. In contrast, fluorescent probe-based qPCR is faster, more convenient, and can be adapted for simultaneous detection of H. pylori and antibiotic resistance markers. This method not only delivers faster results than traditional culturing methods but also allows for the simultaneous detection of antibiotic resistance genes, greatly enhancing detection efficiency and convenience. This method provides a convenient, rapid, and non-invasive way to diagnose H. pylori infection and resistance, unlike traditional bacterial culture and other techniques.
There are two crucial issues that need to be considered for H. pylori antibiotic-resistance: i) the consistency of genotype and phenotype, ii) the multidrug-resistance. A large-scale multi-center study in China found that the dual-resistance patterns for clarithromycin/levofloxacin were 26.1%. Clarithromycin- and levofloxacin-resistant H pylori phenotypes and genotypes showed satisfactory agreement (kappa coefficient = 0.810 and 0.782, respectively)19. Therefore, it is feasible to use qPCR method to detect H. pylori infection and drug resistance. Stool antigen test (SAT) and qPCR methods are increasingly used due to the convenience of sampling. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the methods for H. pylori detection are as follows: qPCR > UBT > SAT > RUT> CagA IgG > culture20. All non-invasive methods are suitable for primary screening. Since qPCR can additionally detect drug resistance genes, qPCR and culture will be more suitable for guiding treatment.
Other innovative approaches, such as artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms combined with endoscopic images21, digital microfluidics22, and RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a23, theoretically show good diagnostic efficiency and promising application prospects. However, qPCR is currently the most sophisticated molecular biology technique with the potential to provide a superior solution for the diagnosis and treatment of H. pylori infections.
This study adheres to the ethical guidelines established by the Ethics Committee of Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China (Approval No: KY2024-445-01). Detailed information regarding the materials used in this research (reagents, chemicals, equipment, and software) can be found in the Table of Materials.
1. Participant selection
2. Collection of fecal samples
NOTE: Provide section 2 as instructions to the participants.
3. Nucleic acid extraction
NOTE: Complete all procedures within a biosafety cabinet to avoid contamination.
4. qPCR Detection of Helicobacter pylori nucleic acids and resistance mutations to clarithromycin and quinolones
Application of qPCR for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection and antibiotic resistance in fecal samples
We designed primers and probes based on point mutations in the conserved genes of Helicobacter pylori, as well as in the 23S rRNA gene and the gyrA gene. These primers and probes were labeled with different fluorescent dyes and then used for qPCR detection. The quality control results for the qPCR ...
In recent years, molecular detection methods have been extensively applied in the field of microbiology, significantly altering the clinical management of several infectious diseases. These methods operate at the genetic level, allowing for not only the confirmation of bacterial presence but also gene typing and antibiotic resistance testing. Real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR (qPCR) is increasingly favored due to its short processing time, high sensitivity and accuracy, and low risk of cross-contamination. It has b...
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
This study was funded by the Research Foundation for Advanced Talents of Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital [Grant No. KY012023293]. This work was supported by Jiangsu Mole Bioscience Co. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, the decision to publish, or the preparation of the manuscript.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
BSC-1500IIA2-X | BIOBASE | SEDA 20143222263 | Biosafety cabinet |
Disposable fecal collection and storage tube | Mole | Collect fecal specimens | |
E-Centrifuge | WEALTEC | Centrifuge the residual liquid off the wall of the tube | |
Helicobacter pylori nucleic acid, clarithromycin, and quinolone resistance mutation detection kit | Mole | Detection of Helicobacter pylori infection and antibiotic resistance; freeze-dried H. pylori reagent (containing primers, probes, Taq polymerase, UNG enzyme, dNTPs, etc.), a positive control for H. pylori (containing Helicobacter pylori and human β-actin target genes), and a negative control for H. pylori (containing human β-actin target genes) | |
Mole 96M automated nucleic acid extractor | Mole | For DNA extraction | |
Nucleic acid extraction kit | Mole | To extract nucleic acid; contains lysis buffer (guanidine salt, tris hydroxymethyl aminomethane, Tween-20, sodium chloride), Wash Buffer 1 (sodium chloride), Wash Buffer 2 (tris hydroxymethyl aminomethane, Tween-20), Wash Buffer 3 (magnetic beads, Tween-20), Wash Buffer 4 (nuclease-free water), and Elution Buffer (tris hydroxymethyl aminomethane), along with a magnetic rack | |
SLAN Fully automatic medical PCR analysis system | HONGSHI | Data Analysis | |
SLAN-96S Real-Time PCR machine | HONGSHI | Fluorescent quantitative PCR amplification | |
Ultra-low temperature freezers (DW-YL450) | MELING | SEDA 20172220091 | -20 °C for storing reagents |
Vortex-5 | Kylin-bell | For mixing reagent |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved