Sign In

6.14 : Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes

The present-day mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes have retained some of the characteristics of their ancestral prokaryotes and also have acquired new attributes during their evolution within eukaryotic cells. Like prokaryotic genomes, mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes neither bind with histone-like proteins nor show complex packaging into chromosome-like structures, as observed in eukaryotes. Unlike mitotic cell divisions observed in eukaryotic cells, mitochondria and chloroplasts undergo binary fission and equally separate their DNA into the daughter organelles as observed in prokaryotes. Furthermore, ribosomes in both mitochondria and chloroplasts are sensitive to antibacterial antibiotics.

Prokaryotic genomes have millions of base pairs and thousands of genes; mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes, except in a few plants, are much smaller with numbers of base pairs in the thousands with a few hundred genes. This difference in genome size occurred because, during evolution, significant parts of primitive mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes were exported to the nucleus. This export of genes made them dependent on the nuclear genome for the supply of some of the proteins required for their biogenesis.

The different evolutionary paths taken by animals and plants have resulted in significant differences between genomes of animal mitochondria and plant mitochondria and chloroplasts. Animal mitochondrial genomes are smaller than plant mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes. Also, similar to most prokaryotic genomes, animal mitochondrial genomes do not carry any introns. However, introns are present in the genomes of both plant mitochondria and chloroplasts. Compared to mitochondrial genomes, chloroplast genomes show less variation in size and structure and also contain more genes. For example, the number of genes present in the chloroplast genome of Arabidopsis thaliana is almost double of the genes present in its mitochondrial genome. Furthermore, chloroplast genomes are more similar to their prokaryotic counterparts than the mitochondrial genome as they are similar in their regulatory sequences and arrangement of many gene clusters.

Tags
Mitochondrial GenomeChloroplast GenomeProkaryotic GenomePrimitive Predator CellsEukaryotic CellsCyanobacteriaSymbiotic RelationshipsEscherichia ColiGenesHuman Mitochondrial GenomeArabidopsis ThalianaFlowering PlantCyanobacterial GenomesSynechocystis GenomeTerrestrial PlantsDNA StructureHistone ProteinsCircular And Double stranded DNA

From Chapter 6:

article

Now Playing

6.14 : Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes

DNA Replication

9.5K Views

article

6.1 : Replication in Prokaryotes

DNA Replication

48.1K Views

article

6.2 : Replication in Eukaryotes

DNA Replication

39.6K Views

article

6.3 : DNA Base Pairing

DNA Replication

26.1K Views

article

6.4 : The DNA Replication Fork

DNA Replication

33.4K Views

article

6.5 : Proofreading

DNA Replication

11.7K Views

article

6.6 : Lagging Strand Synthesis

DNA Replication

44.9K Views

article

6.7 : DNA Helicases

DNA Replication

19.8K Views

article

6.8 : The Replisome

DNA Replication

30.5K Views

article

6.9 : Mismatch Repair

DNA Replication

8.6K Views

article

6.10 : DNA Topoisomerases

DNA Replication

28.9K Views

article

6.11 : Telomeres and Telomerase

DNA Replication

21.4K Views

article

6.12 : Non-nuclear Inheritance

DNA Replication

3.9K Views

article

6.13 : Animal Mitochondrial Genetics

DNA Replication

7.0K Views

article

6.15 : Export of Mitochondrial and Chloroplast Genes

DNA Replication

3.5K Views

See More

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved