Name: producing, characterizing and quantifying biochar in the woods using portable flame cap kilns
Uploaded: 2024-01-05T13:40:00.000+00:00
Duration: 7 min 27 s
Description: Watch this Scientific Journal Video about On-Site Biochar Production for Woody Debris Incineration in Forestry at JoVE.com

Many thanks to the US Biochar Initiative and the USDA Forest Service for sponsoring and supporting the Biochar in the Woods network for sharing information amongst a variety of practitioners who are inventing and refining methods to make and use biochar for environmental management and climate mitigation.

NOTE: This methodology uses Ikhala smart phone application (henceforth referred as D-MRV application; Table of Materials) to access carbon removal payments, field measurements and digital monitoring, reporting and verification.
1. Gathering feedstock and confirming the suitability
<ol>
	<li>Select and report the feedstock size.</li>
	<li>Select woody material less than 15 cm in diameter. Ensure that all materials are branchy or non-uniform in shape so that it does not pack tightly and inhibit airflow in the kiln.</li>
	<li>On the D-MRV application, click on the Take a Photo button in the Feedstock section to open the camera. With the camera open, aim at the subject (dry feedstock piles with a measuring stick), and capture the image by pressing the Shutter button on the screen.</li>
	<li>Report feedstock species: Open the D-MRV application and answer the short digital questionnaire reporting the amounts of each species type. Reporting is based on visual estimations.</li>
	<li>Determine and report feedstock moisture.
	<ol>
		<li>Using a standard firewood moisture meter, take a reading by inserting the pins in the middle of the largest piece of each type of feedstock.</li>
		<li>On the D-MRV application, take a photo of each moisture meter reading. Click on the Take a Photo button in the moisture meter section, and type in the value displayed on the moisture meter in the text field. Submit one photo and text entry for each moisture meter reading.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
2. Assembling, loading, and lighting the kiln
<ol>
	<li>On level ground, clear flammable organic material from a circle approximately 3 m in diameter. Assemble the 6 inner kiln panels into a cylinder using the connector brackets,</li>
	<li>Using a shovel or similar tool, seal the bottom edge of the cylinder with a small berm of mineral dirt or clay so that air cannot enter the kiln from the bottom.</li>
	<li>Attach the 6 heat shield panels to the connector brackets, ensuring that an air gap is left at the bottom of the heat shield so that air can flow through the annular gap between the inner and outer cylinders. Attach the kiln ID tag to the heat shield using the heat shield hardware.</li>
	<li>Identify the kilns used in the batch. In the Burn Preparation section, click the Take a Photo button to take pictures of the assembled kiln and the ID tag and submit them for each kiln on site.</li>
	<li>Load the kiln: Use smaller (2-6 cm thick is ideal), drier material for the initial loading of the kiln. Pack the material up to the kiln rim, arranging any non-branchy material, such as poles, so that it does not pack too tightly and restrict airflow. 
	NOTE: The goal is to make sure the material is packed tightly enough to sustain a flame but also allow combustion air to reach to the bottom of the pile.</li>
	<li>Light the kiln: Add small, dry kindling material on top of the loaded kiln. Use an accelerant if needed and light with a match, or use a propane torch. Light the kiln in several places on the top so that a cap of flame quickly develops over the entire kiln.</li>
	<li>Using the D-MRV app, take a 30 s video clip as soon as the flame cap is established. In the Burn Start section, click on the Take Video button and then click on the Submit Video button.</li>
</ol>
3. Feeding and tending the kiln
<ol>
	<li>During the first phase of operation, air is drawn from the top down to the bottom of the kiln, while the initial load mostly burns down to a layer of coals. Ensure that the first load produces a good bed of coals before adding more material. Add a new layer of feedstock when the previous layer begins to show a film of white ash.</li>
	<li>Transition to continuous loading: Load new material in the kiln at a steady rate. Try to keep each layer of wood the same diameter so the charring is even.
	<ol>
		<li>Use the flame as an indicator of loading rate: Let the flame be the guide for adding new material. Ensure that a good strong flame is maintained on top because that is the heat source for making char.</li>
		<li>If the operator loads too much, too fast, the flame will be smothered. If that happens, pause and wait for the flame to come back up. If the operator does not load enough material, the flame will die down, and the char will start to burn to ash. If that starts to happen, add more material to keep the flame going.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Verify the flame presence during the burn as an indicator of clean, hot combustion that will minimize methane emissions and maximize stable char formation.
	<ol>
		<li>Using the D-MRV application, take a 30-s video of the flame approximately 1 h after the kiln is lit. Navigate to the Burn Quality Proof section and click on the Proof of Burn at First Hour button.</li>
		<li>Click on the Take Video button, press Record for a minimum of 30 s, and click the Submit Video button.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Add the biggest material in the middle stages of the burn so it has time to char completely. The kiln will fill with biochar at different rates, depending on feedstock type, size, and moisture.</li>
	<li>Using the D-MRV application, take a 30-s video of the flame at the end of the second hour of the burn. Click the Proof of Burn at Second Hour button and then the Take Video button. Press Record for a minimum of 30 s and click the Submit Video button.</li>
	<li>Using the D-MRV application, take a 30-s video of the flame at the end of the third hour of the burn. Click the Proof of Burn at Third Hour button and then the Take Video button. Press Record for a minimum of 30 s and click the Submit Video button.</li>
	<li>As the kiln fills with red hot glowing coals, make the last few layers of medium-sized material to allow any larger pieces to finish charring.</li>
</ol>
4. Finishing, quenching, and measuring the biochar
<ol>
	<li>End the burn when the accumulated biochar is within 10-20 cm of the top rim of the kiln, when the feedstock is all used, or when the work day ends.</li>
	<li>The charring is complete when there are no longer any flames. Wait for 10-15 min after adding the last piece of feedstock for the flames to die down. There will always be a few bigger pieces that do not char completely, which is not a concern.</li>
	<li>Before quenching, use a steel rake to level the hot, glowing coals in the kiln.
	<ol>
		<li>Place a measuring stick vertically in the kiln, against the kiln wall, so that one end touches the level char. On the D-MRV application, take a picture of the measuring stick that shows the depth of the char in the kiln by navigating to the Measuring the Biochar section and click on the Take a Photo button.</li>
		<li>In the text input field for the question What is the reading from the top of the biochar to the top of kiln, enter the value on the measuring stick.</li>
		<li>Repeat this measurement and photo recording two more times at different locations within the kiln by clicking on the Submit and Add Another Photo button.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Immediately after reporting the char depth measurements, take a photo of the kiln identification tag for verification purposes.</li>
	<li>Measure char bulk density.
	<ol>
		<li>When the biochar batch is complete, but before quenching, fill a metal bucket with hot glowing coals shoveled from the kiln. Weigh the bucket to get the tare weight using a hanging scale. Take a picture to record the weight.</li>
		<li>Fill the bucket with hot coals and weigh it, taking a picture to record the weight.</li>
		<li>Repeat the sampling procedure (4.5.1-4.5.2) two more times, taking samples from different parts of the kiln and recording the value with a photo.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Quench with water.
	<ol>
		<li>Begin to spray water at low pressure into the kiln until the heat shield is cool enough to touch. Remove all the heat shield panels and stack them out of the way.</li>
		<li>While spraying water, remove several kiln panels and rake the char out into a thin layer to cool. Continue to spray and rake until the char is completely cool. The biochar should be cool enough to put a hand in it.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Remove and record unburned pieces. Remove any partially charred pieces and arrange them on one of the kiln panels in a single layer, with the measuring stick laid alongside. Using the D-MRV application, take a picture of the incompletely charred pieces.</li>
</ol>

Carbon Sequestration and Soil Enhancement Through Onsite Biochar Production

<ol>
	<li>Jerrett, M., Jina, A. S., Marlier, M. E. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Up+in+smoke:+California's+greenhouse+gas+reductions+could+be+wiped+out+by+2020+wildfires.">Up in smoke: California's greenhouse gas reductions could be wiped out by 2020 wildfires.</a> Environmental Pollution. 310, 119888 (2022).</li><li>Case, M. J., Johnson, B. G., Bartowitz, K. J., Hudiburg, T. W. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Forests+of+the+future:+Climate+change+impacts+and+implications+for+carbon+storage+in+the+Pacific+Northwest,+USA.">Forests of the future: Climate change impacts and implications for carbon storage in the Pacific Northwest, USA.</a> Forest Ecology and Management. 482, 118886 (2021).</li><li>Korb, J. E., Johnson, N. C., Covington, W. W. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Slash+pile+burning+effects+on+soil+biotic+and+chemical+properties+and+plant+establishment:+Recommendations+for+amelioration.">Slash pile burning effects on soil biotic and chemical properties and plant establishment: Recommendations for amelioration.</a> Restoration Ecology. 12 (1), 52-62 (2004).</li><li>Page-Dumroese, D. S., Busse, M. D., Archuleta, J. G., McAvoy, D., Roussel, E. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Methods+to+reduce+forest+residue+volume+after+timber+harvesting+and+produce+black+carbon.">Methods to reduce forest residue volume after timber harvesting and produce black carbon.</a> Scientifica. 2017, 2745764 (2017).</li><li>Pingree, M. R. A., Homann, P. S., Morrissette, B., Darbyshire, R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Long+and+short-term+effects+of+fire+on+soil+charcoal+of+a+conifer+forest+in+Southwest+Oregon.">Long and short-term effects of fire on soil charcoal of a conifer forest in Southwest Oregon.</a> Forests. 3 (4), 353-369 (2012).</li><li>DeLuca, T. H., Aplet, G. H. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Charcoal+and+carbon+storage+in+forest+soils+of+the+Rocky+Mountain+West.">Charcoal and carbon storage in forest soils of the Rocky Mountain West.</a> Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 6 (1), 18-24 (2008).</li><li>Page-Dumroese, D. S., Coleman, M. D., Thomas, S. C., Uzun, B. B., Apayd?n Varol, E., Liu, J., Bruckman, V. J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Opportunities+and+Uses+of+Biochar+on+Forest+Sites+in+North+America.">Opportunities and Uses of Biochar on Forest Sites in North America.</a> Biochar: A Regional Supply Chain Approach in View of Climate Change Mitigation. , (2016).</li><li>Ogawa, M., Okimori, Y. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Pioneering+works+in+biochar+research,+Japan.">Pioneering works in biochar research, Japan.</a> Soil Research. 48 (7), 489-500 (2010).</li><li>Inoue, Y., Mogi, K., Yoshizawa, S. J. A. K. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=.">.</a> Properties of cinders from red pine, black locust and henon bamboo. , (2019).</li><li>Boateng, A. A., Garcia-Perez, M., Ma&#353;ek, O., Brown, R., del Campo, B. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Biochar+Production+Technology.">Biochar Production Technology.</a> Biochar for Environmental Management. , 63-87 (2015).</li><li>Cornelissen, G., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Emissions+and+char+quality+of+flame-curtain&amp;#34;+Kon+Tiki&amp;#34;+Kilns+for+Farmer-Scale+charcoal/biochar+production.">Emissions and char quality of flame-curtain&amp;#34; Kon Tiki&amp;#34; Kilns for Farmer-Scale charcoal/biochar production.</a> PloS One. 11 (5), e0154617 (2016).</li><li>Lehmann, J., Gaunt, J., Rondon, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Bio-char+sequestration+in+terrestrial+ecosystems-a+review.">Bio-char sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems-a review.</a> Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. 11 (2), 403-427 (2006).</li><li>Babrauskas, V. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Temperatures+in+flames+and+fires.">Temperatures in flames and fires.</a> Fire Science and Technology Inc. 18, 369-374 (2006).</li><li>McDonald-Wharry, J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=2013-2014+survey+of+chars+using+Raman+spectroscopy.">2013-2014 survey of chars using Raman spectroscopy.</a> C. Journal of Carbon Research. 7, 63 (2021).</li><li>Swami, S. N., Steiner, C., Teixeira, W. G., Lehmann, J., Woods, W. I., Teixeira, W. G., Lehmann, J., Steiner, C., WinklerPrins, A., Rebellato, L. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=.">.</a> Charcoal making in the Brazilian Amazon: Economic Aspects of Production and Carbon Conversion Efficiencies of Kilns. Amazonian Dark Earths: Wim Sombroek's Vision. , (2009).</li><li>. Available from: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.fs.usda.gov/research/rmrs">https://www.fs.usda.gov/research/rmrs</a> (2023)</li><li>Etter, H., Vera, A., Aggarwal, C., Delaney, M., Manley, S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Methodology+for+biochar+utilization+in+soil+and+non-soil+applications.">Methodology for biochar utilization in soil and non-soil applications.</a> Verified Carbon Standard. , (2021).</li><li>. Available from: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.carbon-standards.com/docs/7c831c99c4c1f3639703621518a5cd87_artisan-c-sink-guidelines_v1_0.pdf">https://www.carbon-standards.com/docs/7c831c99c4c1f3639703621518a5cd87_artisan-c-sink-guidelines_v1_0.pdf</a> (2022)</li><li>. Available from: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.africandata.tech">https://www.africandata.tech</a> (2023)</li><li>Puettmann, M., Sahoo, K., Wilson, K., Oneil, E. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Life+cycle+assessment+of+biochar+produced+from+forest+residues+using+portable+systems.">Life cycle assessment of biochar produced from forest residues using portable systems.</a> Journal of Cleaner Production. 250, 119564 (2020).</li><li>Robillard, T. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=(2019).+Innovations+in+Biochar+-+new+CSP+enhancement+helps+forest+owners+convert+tree+debris+to+soil-friendly,+carbon-storing+biochar.">(2019). Innovations in Biochar - new CSP enhancement helps forest owners convert tree debris to soil-friendly, carbon-storing biochar.</a> Natural Resources Conservation Service. , (2023).</li><li>Young, G. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=.">.</a> Potter Valley Tribe Biochar Results. , (2023).</li><li>Enders, A., Hanley, K., Whitman, T., Joseph, S., Lehmann, J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Characterization+of+biochars+to+evaluate+recalcitrance+and+agronomic+performance.">Characterization of biochars to evaluate recalcitrance and agronomic performance.</a> Bioresource Technology. 114, 644-653 (2012).</li><li>. Simple lab method for determining carbon content of biochar Available from: <a target="_blank" href="https://biochar-us.org/simple-lab-method-determining-carbon-content-biochar-2022">https://biochar-us.org/simple-lab-method-determining-carbon-content-biochar-2022</a> (2023)</li><li>Brewer, C. E., Levine, J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Weight+or+volume+for+handling+biochar+and+biomass.">Weight or volume for handling biochar and biomass.</a> The Biochar Journal. , (2015).</li><li>Wilson, K. e. l. p. i. e. . J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=A+carbon+conservation+corps+to+restore+forests+with+biochar+using+flame+cap+kilns.">A carbon conservation corps to restore forests with biochar using flame cap kilns.</a> 2021 ASABE Annual International Virtual Meeting. , 2100361 (2021).</li><li>VanderMeer, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Time+and+motion+study+results+using+an+in-woods+flame-cap+kiln.">Time and motion study results using an in-woods flame-cap kiln.</a> US Biochar Initiative, Biochar in the Woods Symposium. , (2023).</li></ol>

Author Kelpie Wilson is the inventor and manufacturer of the Ring of Fire Biochar Kiln. Author Wihan Bekker is part-owner of African Data Technologies (Pty) Ltd., developer of the CM002 Component Methodology and Ikhala D-MRV reporting platform.

Different biomass species will produce biochar with differing fractions of carbon and ash, regardless of production temperature, due to the elemental composition of the biomass24. Because the existing databases of biochar characteristics for different feedstocks are not complete, projects may need to submit samples for lab analysis to verify the organic carbon content of the biochar. To keep project costs down, we recommend a simple lab procedure that can be done at low cost by students in school laboratories at the high school or community college level25. Over time, as more projects are implemented on the ground, the database of biochar carbon content values for different feedstock types will grow and become more usable. 
Many of the D-MRV measurements are intended to verify that the production conditions are optimal for producing biochar with characteristics that closely match database values. These key measurements are the feedstock moisture and the video series documenting the quality of flaming combustion, which determines the temperature of production and the resulting stability of the carbon in the biochar. 
While measuring the volume of biochar produced in the kiln is straightforward, determining the dry mass of the biochar produced is not easy. Working with biochar is challenging because the complex particle density of the material makes bulk density measurements difficult to determine26. Once biochar has been quenched, it is not possible to get a dry weight of a certain volume of biochar in the field. However, the dry bulk density of biochar can be measured in the field by filling a metal bucket of known volume with hot coals and weighing it. This procedure can give us a good approximation of the dry mass of the biochar.
A key drawback to this methodology is the inherent variability of the field operations, including feedstock variability and the skill level of the operator. The operator must determine the feedstock loading rate and work to maintain a strong flame in the kiln. Failure to maintain the flame by over-loading will affect the temperature of char formation and hence, the char stability. This is best addressed by an effective training program for operators. Worker training and safety protocols are crucial to the success of onsite biochar production. Given the labor requirements, training programs will need to be well-organized and made widely available27.
Another limitation of the methodology is the variability in implementing the D-MRV measurements. Feedstock moisture can be quite variable within a given batch, even if all of the feedstock is otherwise uniform. The method of taking three snapshot videos of the flame during the process to verify that proper temperatures are reached is limited by the dynamic nature of the burn. Three snapshot videos may not be representative of the whole process. A viable cross-check to this measurement is simply knowing how long the burn took and how much biochar was produced because non-optimal temperature conditions will result in lower production volumes. The field D-MRV measurements of bulk density and volume are limited in their precision; however, this is compensated for by using security margins to ensure that the final values are conservative and do not overestimate the carbon removal. 
Operational logistics also contribute to the variability of biochar production parameters and the success of projects. Operational logistics must consider factors such as weather, terrain, access, worker safety, training, tools and equipment, and water availability. Most of the tools and supplies needed to make biochar are standard equipment provided to firefighters and forestry crews. Specific tools needed for implementing D-MRV with the Ring of Fire biochar kiln are listed in the Table of Materials file.
Making biochar in the field from waste biomass must compete with the alternative of open burning or incineration, which has the advantage of very low cost. The marginal cost of making biochar versus open burning has mostly to do with increased labor requirements, as the capital cost of the simple flame cap kilns is low27. To date, there are not enough large-scale projects with robust data collection to pinpoint the actual marginal cost of biochar production over incineration. However, one example can show the potential for carbon finance to fill the gap. 
Watershed Consulting in Missoula, MT, treated slash thinned from 21 acres of mixed conifer forest in Western Montana in 2021 using Ring of Fire biochar kilns28. The total project cost was $42,302.00, and the total biochar yield was 112.5 cubic yards. Using our own standard assumptions about biochar characteristics made in flame cap kilns, we estimate that the project sequestered 31.75 metric tonnes of CO2 at $1,332.35 per tonne. The cost of piling and incinerating the material would have been $15,750.00, leaving a marginal cost of $26,552.00 to make biochar instead of incineration, or $836.28 per tonne of biochar produced. That marginal cost could be at least partially compensated by carbon removal payments of $100 to $200 per tonne of CO2, validating the importance of the D-MRV process. To complete the economic picture of the project, it is important for financing authorities to acknowledge the ecosystem benefits of avoiding soil damage from burn pile scars, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, and particulate air pollution, as well as returning char to forest soils for moisture retention, nutrient cycling, and soil health. 
The detailed methods described in this paper will help individuals and groups working in ecosystems impacted by alien invasive species, drought, and wildfire to implement economically feasible biomass-to-biochar projects that can improve and restore soils and native ecosystems while avoiding greenhouse gas emissions and sequestering carbon for climate mitigation. Despite the variability and lack of precision in the measurements and verification points in this practical field methodology, we conclude that it is still a valuable approach to sequestering carbon in field situations where other approaches, like the transport of biomass to an industrial pyrolysis facility, are not practical.

In many world regions, including the western US, climate change, drought, and alien invasive species have created a wildfire crisis that threatens ecosystems and communities. As forests and woodlands burn uncontrollably, large amounts of particulates and greenhouse gasses are emitted into the atmosphere, with devastating consequences for human health and the climate. For instance, wildfires in California in 2020 are estimated to have released around 127 million megatons of greenhouse gas emissions, approximately two times the amount of California's total GHG emission reductions from 2003 to 20191. Increasingly, scientists and land managers are investigating human actions that can help restore these forests and woodlands and their ecosystem services. The manual thinning and removal of excess biomass is one of the most important actions that must be taken2. Removal of biomass includes its disposal, and where the biomass is situated in remote and difficult-to-access locations, there are few options other than incineration onsite in unmanaged slash piles. Unmanaged burn piles do the job of removing fuels from the landscape, but they damage forest soils as the concentrated heat under the piles incinerates the soil's organic horizon, leaving behind bare soil that is vulnerable to erosion and colonization by invasive species. It can take decades to regenerate the organic soil horizon in a burn pile scar3. Unmanaged burn piles are also a source of particulate and greenhouse gas emissions. Smoke from slash pile burning also restricts the burning window in air-quality-limited watersheds, making it more difficult to accomplish the work.
Researchers for the USDA Forest Service have examined the alternative of producing biochar from slash materials, and have identified several promising techniques, including the option of using small, mobile biochar kilns in the forest4. Converting forest slash to biochar onsite has many ecological advantages over the current practice of slash disposal by incineration in burn piles, including reduced soil heating and particulate emissions. Biochar produced onsite can be removed and utilized in agriculture, or it can be left in place where it serves several functions in restoring forest health and improving adaptation to climate change and drought. Because up to 50% of the total carbon in many forest soils is charcoal from historic, natural fires5, leaving biochar on the site where it is made can restore forest soil charcoal that is often missing from recent soil horizons due to fire suppression, with unknown impacts on ecosystem processes6. Biochar left in place on forest soils can mimic the effects of charcoal produced by natural fire and produce similar effects on soil carbon content and soil physical, chemical and biological properties7.
In recent years, an international network of forestry workers, woodland owners, researchers, and biochar consultants has developed a suite of carbonization methods for converting forest slash into biochar onsite as an alternative to slash pile incineration. These methods are based on the principle of flame carbonization, first developed and commercialized in Japan as the "smokeless carbonizing kiln" offered by the Moki company8. This steel ring kiln makes well-carbonized biochar with reported biomass-to-biochar conversion efficiency of 13% to 20%, depending on the feedstock used9.
The process of producing biochar or charcoal is often referred to as pyrolysis, the separation of biomass components by heat in the absence of oxygen. This is usually conceived of as retort pyrolysis, where biomass is physically isolated from air in an externally heated vessel. However, pyrolysis can also take place in the presence of limited air, as in gasification and flame carbonization, because solid fuels like wood burn in stages. When heat is applied to biomass, the first stage of combustion is dehydration, as water is evaporated from the material. This is followed by devolatilization and simultaneous char formation, also known as pyrolysis. Volatile gas containing hydrogen and oxygen is released and burned in a flame, continually adding heat to the process. As the gas is released, the remaining carbon is converted to aromatic carbon, or char. The final stage of combustion is the oxidation of the char to mineral ash10.
Because these are discrete phases that occur in an open combustion process, we have the opportunity to stop the process after char formation by removing air or heat. This is accomplished during the biochar production process by continually adding new material to the burn pile so that the hot char is buried by new material that cuts off the flow of oxygen. Hot charcoal accumulates in the bottom of the pile and is prevented from burning to ash as long as flame is present, because the flame consumes most of the available oxygen. When all of the fuel has been added to the pile, the flame begins to die down. At that point, the hot charcoal can be preserved by removing oxygen and heat, usually by spraying the coals with water and raking them thin to cool11.
The basic principle of operation is that of counter-flow combustion. Counter-flow combustion air keeps the flame low and prevents the emission of embers or sparks. The flame also burns most of the smoke, reducing emissions. In summary, the following principles explain the operation of counter-flow combustion in a flame cap kiln: (1) Gas flows upward while combustion air flows downward, (2) Counter-current flow is established as burning fuel draws air downward, (3) Flames stay low and close to fuel, minimizing ember escape, (4) Smoke burns in the hot zone, (5) Because all the combustion air comes from above, it is consumed by the flames (6) Very little air is able to reach the unburned coals that fall to the bottom of the kiln, (7) The coals are preserved until the end of the process when they are quenched or snuffed.
In addition to its benefits to soil, biochar is also a leading method of carbon removal for climate change mitigation. Up to half the carbon in woody biomass can be converted to stable, aromatic carbon in the form of biochar12. However, not all pyrolysis technologies produce the same amount of recalcitrant carbon that remains stable in soils for 100 years or more (the key metric for determining carbon removal value). Biochar stability is closely correlated with the temperature of production. The adiabatic flame temperature of burning wood is estimated to be close to that of propane, 1,977 °C13. Biochar production in a flame cap kiln is closely coupled with the flame, with no heat transfer losses by conduction through a metal wall, as in retort pyrolysis. Therefore, we would expect that the temperature of production would be high as long as a flame is maintained during the process. A survey of chars using Raman spectroscopy14 reported that a biochar sample from a flame cap kiln (provided by lead author Kelpie Wilson) was among the three samples with the highest apparent temperature of char formation, in the range of 900 °C.
Thermocouples are required to access the interior of the burn and accurately measure the production temperature of biochar in a flame cap kiln or burn pile, and these are expensive and not available to low-tech producers. Therefore, we have used a method described by researchers working in the Brazilian Amazon that uses heat crayons (used by welders to check the temperature of metal parts) that melt at a calibrated temperature15. Bricks are marked with crayons, wrapped in aluminum foil, and placed in various places in the kiln during production. We used this method several times and determined that the kiln temperatures exceeded 650° C, as the crayon marks were completely melted. This will be a useful method to confirm production temperatures where needed; however, the main verification point will be documenting the presence of flame throughout.
There is not much published data on the characteristics of biochar made by low-tech flame carbonizing methods. However, biochar samples made by flame carbonizing methods in several kiln types were analyzed by Cornellissen et al. and found to meet European Biochar Certificate (EBC) standards for biochar, including low PAH content and high biochar stability. Furthermore, the biochar produced from both woody and herbaceous feedstocks had an average carbon content of 76 percent11. The US Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station16 analyzed five biochar samples from flame cap kilns and burn piles made at a field day in California in 2022. The average carbon content of the samples was 85 percent. Given these results, we can conclude that it is likely that biochar made from woody residues in flame cap kilns will meet the basic requirements for verified carbon removal: high carbon content and high biochar stability.
Two carbon removal protocols for low-tech, place-based biochar production have now been released by Verra17 and the European Biochar Consortium Global Artisan C-Sink protocol18. These newly developed protocols are promising; however, they have some limitations when applied to forests, woodland, and other landscapes under threat from drought and wildfire. Accordingly, this paper will describe a new methodology, the Methodology CM002 V1.0, from AD Tech19, that is being developed specifically for flame carbonization of woody debris as part of vegetation management and fuel load reduction activities. Life cycle analysis confirms that biochar carbon sequestration using onsite biochar production from woody biomass in flame cap kilns produces a net carbon removal benefit20. Successful implementation of carbon removal protocols can help support financially the vital fuels reduction work that needs to take place to protect communities and ecosystems from wildfires and ecosystem degradation. In order to access carbon removal payments, field measurements and digital monitoring, reporting and verification (D-MRV) methods are incorporated as routine practices into the biochar production methodology described here. Details of the platform are discussed in the Supplemental Information (Supplementary File 1).
While several open-source designs of flame cap kilns are being manufactured by individuals for their own use21, to our knowledge, at this time, there is only one flame cap kiln with a capacity of greater than one cubic meter that is being mass produced for sale in North America, the Ring of Fire Kiln22, a lightweight, portable flame cap kiln that is designed for easy mobility using hand crews. The kiln consists of an inner ring comprising six sheets of mild steel secured together. An outer ring composed of lighter gauge steel bolts onto the brackets that hold the inner ring together. The outer ring serves as a heat shield that holds in heat for better efficiency. The top of the kiln is open to the air, and this is where the flame cap forms. Air flowing up through the annular gap between the main kiln body and the heat shield provides pre-heated combustion air to the kiln, further increasing combustion efficiency (Figure 1)
<img alt="Biochar production diagram; airflow directs counter-flow flames, retaining heat, producing biochar." class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/65543/65543fig01.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1747911167000" data-alt="Figure 1"> 
Figure 1: Schematic showing air flow, flame characteristics, and char accumulation in the Ring of Fire Kiln. Counter-flow combustion air pulls the smoke into the hot zone, where it burns up. Air flowing up through the annular gap between the main kiln body and the heat shield provides pre-heated combustion air to the kiln, further increasing combustion efficiency. <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/65543/65543fig01large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
The kiln diameter is 2.35 m, forming a cylinder that is one meter tall for a total volume of 4.3 m3. In practice, the kiln is never filled completely to the top, so a typical production batch will fill the kiln from between ½ to ¾ full for a volume of biochar that is between 2 and 3 cubic meters.
Because the Ring of Fire Kiln is a standardized design, it is being adopted as the first certified technology for use in the CM002 Component Methodology that provides standardized procedures for the quantification of greenhouse gas (GHG) benefits. Measurement and data collection steps meeting the requirements of the CM002 are incorporated into the method. Reporting is done through a smartphone application by answering short questionnaires throughout the process and uploading photos and video clips to the mobile app.

<table><tbody><tr><td>Digital hanging scale</td><td>AvaWeigh</td><td>HSD40</td><td>44 pound scale for weighing produce</td></tr><tr><td>Ikhala smart phone app</td><td>AD Tech</td><td>N/A</td><td>download from Android or Apple app store</td></tr><tr><td>Metal ruler</td><td>Azbvek</td><td>ZG0044-New</td><td>Stainless Steel 100 cm Ruler</td></tr><tr><td>Ring of Fire Kiln</td><td>Wilson Biochar</td><td>ROF 1.2</td><td>Panel style flame cap kiln with heatshield</td></tr><tr><td>Smart phone</td><td>any</td><td>N/A</td><td>must use either I-OS or Android operating system</td></tr><tr><td>Steel utility pail - 7 liter</td><td>Behrens</td><td>120GS</td><td>galvanized steel utility bucket</td></tr><tr><td>Wood moisture meter</td><td>General Tools</td><td>MMD4E</td><td>Digital moisture meter, pin type with LCD display</td></tr></tbody></table>

producing, characterizing and quantifying biochar in the woods using portable flame cap kilns

One of the biggest challenges in utilizing non-commercial forest biomass is its widely distributed nature. The best solution to the biomass problem, to avoid expensive and carbon-intensive processing (chipping) and transportation costs, is to process it onsite. However, conventional burn piles have destructive impacts on forest soil and provide no benefits other than fuel reduction. Converting forest slash to biochar onsite has many ecological advantages over the current practice of slash disposal by incineration in burn piles, including reduced soil heating and particulate emissions, along with multiple benefits of the biochar to forest soil health and water holding capacity when left in place. Making biochar onsite in the woods is a way to return a pyrogenic carbon component to forest soils that has been missing due to the recent history of fire suppression. Biochar is also a leading method of carbon removal and sequestration for climate change mitigation. In this study, we document a method for making biochar using a portable biochar kiln. This low-cost method utilizes hand crews equipped with water for quenching kilns before the biochar burns to ash. Simple techniques for quantifying and characterizing the biochar produced are incorporated into the method for the purpose of measuring impact and qualifying for carbon removal certificates to help pay for the cost of the work. We describe the CM002 Component Methodology that provides standardized procedures for the quantification of GHG benefits during three stages of the process: waste biomass sourcing, biochar production, and biochar soil application. The CM002 Methodology is based on international best practices, including the most recent VCS methodology VM0044 Standards and EBC C-Sink Artisan Standards. Reliable quantification methods utilizing appropriate safety factors are the first essential step toward eligibility for carbon removal finance.

A well-organized and implemented biochar batch using the Ring of Fire kiln will produce 2-3 m3 of biochar in 4-5 h of burn time. Using the CM002 Component Methodology and recording burn parameters in the D-MRV application is intended to allow a certified verifier to confirm the batch biochar production volume and biochar quality. More information on the methodology is provided in the Supplemental Information (Supplementary File 1).
The process verification points for a typical batch of biochar made in the Ring of Fire kiln are listed here (Figure 2). Table 1 gives typical values as measured in the field or determined by verification.
1. Report feedstock type. 
2. Feedstock size: picture of feedstock pile with a ruler in place. 
3. Feedstock moisture: one picture showing moisture meter reading from the largest piece of each feedstock species. 
4. Ignition: One 30-s video showing the start of the kiln burn and recording time of start. Video shows a strong flame cap has developed. 
5. Production temperature verification based on flame presence: three 30-s videos show strong flame presence during the burn. 
6. Biochar volume: three pictures of measuring stick in the kiln to show the height of level char in the kiln at three locations. Measured distances from the top of the kiln to the char are averaged to one value for calculations. 
7. Bulk density: One picture of the scale showing the empty weight of the bucket. Three pictures of scale showing the weight of the char and bucket. Char taken from 3 locations in the kiln. The three weight measurements are averaged to one value for calculations
<img alt="Biochar production steps diagram: feedstock type, size, moisture, ignition, flame, volume, density." class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/65543/65543fig02.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1747911167000" data-alt="Figure 2"> 
Figure 2: Infographic showing the process verification points. The process verification points for a typical batch of biochar made in the Ring of Fire kiln. <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/65543/65543fig02large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<table border="1" fo:keep-together.within-page="1" fo:keep-with-next.within-page="always">
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td colspan="4"></td>
			<td>Data point #1</td>
			<td>Data point #2</td>
			<td>Data point #3</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td colspan="4">Feedstock species</td>
			<td>pine 50%</td>
			<td>fir 50%</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td colspan="4">Moisture meter reading</td>
			<td>19%</td>
			<td>23%</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td colspan="4">Volume of empty kiln cylinder</td>
			<td colspan="3">4.3 m3</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td colspan="4">Height of kiln cylinder</td>
			<td colspan="3">1 m</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td colspan="4">Height of char level in kiln</td>
			<td>60 cm</td>
			<td>61 cm</td>
			<td>59 cm</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td colspan="4">Tare weight of 7 liter bucket</td>
			<td colspan="3">0.6 kg</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td colspan="4">Weight of bucket with char</td>
			<td>1.8 kg</td>
			<td>1.9 kg</td>
			<td>2.0 kg</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td colspan="4">Database value of char carbon content</td>
			<td colspan="3">86.8%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td colspan="4">Carbon stability factor</td>
			<td colspan="3">0.74</td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>
Table 1: Representative values used to verify production results and processing parameters for a typical batch of biochar produced in a Ring of Fire biochar kiln.
Using these points of control, the verifier determines that the biochar has been made with appropriate feedstocks and at a temperature above 600 °C to meet the requirements of the CM002 Component methodology for long-term stability. This allows the carbon stability factor of 0.74 for 100-year permanence to be applied to the biochar batch. To determine the volume of the biochar batch, the verifier uses the volume of the empty kiln as verified by the kiln ID tag (4.3 m3) and the height of the char level in the kiln (1 m - 0.4 m = 0.6 m). Since the kiln is 60% full, the volume of char is 0.6 x 4.3 m3 = 2.6 m3. The verifier then calculates the bulk density of the biochar based on bucket measurements. Subtracting the 0.6 kg bucket weight from each measurement gives values of 1.2 kg, 1.3 kg, and 1.4 kg that are averaged to 1.3 kg/7 L. This is equivalent to 185.7 kg/m3. Therefore, the dry weight of the biochar produced is (185.7 kg/m3) x (2.6 m3) = 483 kg.
The verifier can take the carbon content of the biochar from a database, or in this case, from a simple lab test that confirmed a carbon content of 86.8% from a batch of mixed softwoods produced in a Ring of Fire Kiln in Sonoma County, California in 2021. The test was performed by Control Laboratories of Watsonville, CA23. The carbon stability factor of 0.74 is applied. Therefore, the stable organic carbon content on a dry weight basis for biochar is derived from the mass of biochar, its organic carbon content, and the 100-year stability factor for a final value of (483) x (0.868) x (0.74) = 310.2 kg of stable carbon. To arrive at the final value of carbon removal, project leakage is subtracted, and the appropriate security margins are applied along with the conversion factor from solid carbon to carbon dioxide, as described in Supplementary File 1. The certified biochar removal value of the biochar depends on final verification that the biochar has been applied to soil or compost and is not burned or otherwise oxidized.
Supplementary File 1: Detailed information regarding the methodology and calculations. <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/65543/Supplementary%20File%201.docx" target="_blank">Please click here to download this File.</a>

Watch this Scientific Journal Video about On-Site Biochar Production for Woody Debris Incineration in Forestry at JoVE.com

Author Spotlight: On-Site Biochar Production for Woody Debris Incineration in Forestry 

New methods for disposing of forestry slash piles in place produce pyrogenic carbon for restoring forest soil health and for carbon removal and sequestration. Here, we present a biochar production method integrating a new carbon removal accounting methodology and a digital application.

Producing, Characterizing and Quantifying Biochar in the Woods Using Portable Flame Cap Kilns

One of the biggest challenges in utilizing non-commercial forest biomass is its widely distributed nature. The best solution to the biomass problem, to ...

producing-characterizing-quantifying-biochar-woods-using-portable

Research

JoVE Journal

Environment

2.4K Views.  US Biochar Initiative. New methods for disposing of forestry slash piles in place produce pyrogenic carbon for restoring forest soil health and for carbon removal and sequestration. Here, we present a biochar production method integrating a new carbon removal accounting methodology and a digital application. 

Video: Author Spotlight: On-Site Biochar Production for Woody Debris Incineration in Forestry 

Physical, Chemical and Biological Characterization of Six Biochars Produced for the Remediation of Contaminated Sites

The physical and chemical properties of biochar vary based on feedstock sources and production conditions, making it possible to engineer biochars with specific functions (e.g. carbon sequestration, soil quality improvements, or contaminant sorption). In 2013, the International Biochar Initiative (IBI) made publically available their Standardized Product Definition and Product Testing Guidelines (Version 1.1) which set standards for physical and chemical characteristics for biochar. Six biochars made from three different feedstocks and at two temperatures were analyzed for characteristics related to their use as a soil amendment. The protocol describes analyses of the feedstocks and biochars and includes: cation exchange capacity (CEC), specific surface area (SSA), organic carbon (OC) and moisture percentage, pH, particle size distribution, and proximate and ultimate analysis. Also described in the protocol are the analyses of the feedstocks and biochars for contaminants including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), metals and mercury as well as nutrients (phosphorous, nitrite and nitrate and ammonium as nitrogen). The protocol also includes the biological testing procedures, earthworm avoidance and germination assays. Based on the quality assurance / quality control (QA/QC) results of blanks, duplicates, standards and reference materials, all methods were determined adequate for use with biochar and feedstock materials. All biochars and feedstocks were well within the criterion set by the IBI and there were little differences among biochars, except in the case of the biochar produced from construction waste materials. This biochar (referred to as Old biochar) was determined to have elevated levels of arsenic, chromium, copper, and lead, and failed the earthworm avoidance and germination assays. Based on these results, Old biochar would not be appropriate for use as a soil amendment for carbon sequestration, substrate quality improvements or remediation.

Biochar is a carbon-rich material used as a soil amendment with the ability to sustainably sequester carbon, improve substrate quality and sorb contaminants. This protocol describes the 17 analytical methods used for the characterization of biochar, which is required prior to large scale implementation of these amendments in the environment.

The physical and chemical properties of biochar vary based on feedstock sources and production conditions, making it possible to engineer biochars with ...

Experimental Protocol for Biodiesel Production with Isolation of Alkenones as Coproducts from Commercial Isochrysis Algal Biomass

The need to replace petroleum fuels with alternatives from renewable and more environmentally sustainable sources is of growing importance. Biomass-derived biofuels have gained considerable attention in this regard, however first generation biofuels from edible crops like corn ethanol or soybean biodiesel have generally fallen out of favor. There is thus great interest in the development of methods for the production of liquid fuels from domestic and superior non-edible sources. Here we describe a detailed procedure for the production of a purified biodiesel from the marine microalgae Isochrysis. Additionally, a unique suite of lipids known as polyunsaturated long-chain alkenones are isolated in parallel as potentially valuable coproducts to offset the cost of biodiesel production. Multi-kilogram quantities of Isochrysis are purchased from two commercial sources, one as a wet paste (80% water) that is first dried prior to processing, and the other a dry milled powder (95% dry). Lipids are extracted with hexanes in a Soxhlet apparatus to produce an algal oil (&#34;hexane algal oil&#34;) containing both traditional fats (i.e., triglycerides, 46-60% w/w) and alkenones (16-25% w/w). Saponification of the triglycerides in the algal oil allows for separation of the resulting free fatty acids (FFAs) from alkenone-containing neutral lipids. FFAs are then converted to biodiesel (i.e., fatty acid methyl esters, FAMEs) by acid-catalyzed esterification while alkenones are isolated and purified from the neutral lipids by crystallization. We demonstrate that biodiesel from both commercial Isochrysis biomasses have similar but not identical FAME profiles, characterized by elevated polyunsaturated fatty acid contents (approximately 40% w/w). Yields of biodiesel were consistently higher when starting from the Isochrysis wet paste (12% w/w vs. 7% w/w), which can be traced to lower amounts of hexane algal oil obtained from the powdered Isochrysis product.

Experimental Protocol for Biodiesel Production with Isolation of Alkenones as Coproducts from Commercial Isochrysis Algal Biomass

Detailed methods are presented for the production of biodiesel along with the co-isolation of alkenones as valuable coproducts from commercial Isochrysis microalgae.

The need to replace petroleum fuels with alternatives from renewable and more environmentally sustainable sources is of growing importance. ...

Implementation of Portable Emissions Measurement Systems (PEMS) for the Real-driving Emissions (RDE) Regulation in Europe

Vehicles are tested in controlled and relatively narrow laboratory conditions to determine their official emission values and reference fuel consumption. However, on the road, ambient and driving conditions can vary over a wide range, sometimes causing emissions to be higher than those measured in the laboratory. For this reason, the European Commission has developed a complementary Real-Driving Emissions (RDE) test procedure using the Portable Emissions Measurement Systems (PEMS) to verify gaseous pollutant and particle number emissions during a wide range of normal operating conditions on the road. This paper presents the newly-adopted RDE test procedure, differentiating six steps: 1) vehicle selection, 2) vehicle preparation, 3) trip design, 4) trip execution, 5) trip verification, and 6) calculation of emissions. Of these steps, vehicle preparation and trip execution are described in greater detail. Examples of trip verification and the calculations of emissions are given.

Implementation of Portable Emissions Measurement Systems PEMS for the Real-driving Emissions RDE Regulation in Europe

The European Commission has developed a Real-Driving Emissions (RDE) test procedure to verify pollutant emissions during real-world vehicle operation using the Portable Emissions Measurement Systems (PEMS). This paper presents the experimental procedures required by the newly-adopted RDE test.

Vehicles are tested in controlled and relatively narrow laboratory conditions to determine their official emission values and reference fuel consumption. ...

Protocols for Quantifying Transferable Pesticide Residues in Turfgrass Systems

Plant canopies in established turfgrass systems can intercept an appreciable amount of sprayed pesticides, which can be transferred through various routes onto humans. For this reason, transferable pesticide residue experiments are required for registration and re-registration by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Although such experiments are required, limited specificity is required pertaining to experimental approach. Experimental approaches used to assess pesticide transfer to humans including hand wiping with cotton gloves, modified California roller (moving a roller of known mass over cotton cloth) and soccer ball roll (ball wrapped with sorbent strip) over three treated turfgrass species (creeping bentgrass, hybrid bermudagrass and tall fescue maintained at 0.4, 5 and 9 cm, respectively) are presented. The modified California roller is the most extensively utilized approach to date, and is best suited for use at low mowing heights due to its reproducibility and large sampling area. The soccer ball roll is a less aggressive transfer approach; however, it mimics a very common occurrence in the most popular international sport, and has many implications for nondietary pesticide exposure from hand-to-mouth contact. Additionally, this approach may be adjusted for other athletic activities with limited modification. Hand wiping is the best approach to transfer pesticides at higher mowing heights, as roller-based approaches can lay blades over; however, it is more subjective due to more variable sampling pressure. Utility of these methods across turfgrass species is presented, and additional considerations to conduct transferable pesticide residue research in turfgrass systems are discussed.

Transferable pesticide residue experiments in turfgrass systems are integral components of human risk exposure assessments. Experimental approaches to measure transferable residues should be adjusted to the human interaction of interest and turfgrass system dynamics. Three transferable pesticide residue protocols are presented and the suitability across three turfgrass systems is discussed.

Plant canopies in established turfgrass systems can intercept an appreciable amount of sprayed pesticides, which can be transferred through various routes ...

Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools

The use of video camera systems in ecological studies of fish continues to gain traction as a viable, non-extractive method of measuring fish lengths and estimating fish abundance. We developed and implemented a rotating stereo-video camera tool that covers a full 360 degrees of sampling, which maximizes sampling effort compared to stationary camera tools. A variety of studies have detailed the ability of static, stereo-camera systems to obtain highly accurate and precise measurements of fish; the focus here was on the development of methodological approaches to quantify fish density using rotating camera systems. The first approach was to develop a modification of the metric MaxN, which typically is a conservative count of the minimum number of fish observed on a given camera survey. We redefine MaxN to be the maximum number of fish observed in any given rotation of the camera system. When precautions are taken to avoid double counting, this method for MaxN may more accurately reflect true abundance than that obtained from a fixed camera. Secondly, because stereo-video allows fish to be mapped in three-dimensional space, precise estimates of the distance-from-camera can be obtained for each fish. By using the 95% percentile of the observed distance from camera to establish species-specific areas surveyed, we account for differences in detectability among species while avoiding diluting density estimates by using the maximum distance a species was observed. Accounting for this range of detectability is critical to accurately estimate fish abundances. This methodology will facilitate the integration of rotating stereo-video tools in both applied science and management contexts.

We describe a new method for counting fishes, and estimating relative abundance (MaxN) and fish density using rotating stereo-video camera systems. We also demonstrate how to use distance from camera (Z distance) to estimate species-specific detectability.

The use of video camera systems in ecological studies of fish continues to gain traction as a viable, non-extractive method of measuring fish lengths and ...

On-Site Molecular Detection of Soil-Borne Phytopathogens Using a Portable Real-Time PCR System

On-site diagnosis of plant diseases can be a useful tool for growers for timely decisions enabling the earlier implementation of disease management strategies that reduce the impact of the disease. Presently in many diagnostic laboratories, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), particularly real-time PCR, is considered the most sensitive and accurate method for plant pathogen detection. However, laboratory-based PCRs typically require expensive laboratory equipment and skilled personnel. In this study, soil-borne pathogens of potato are used to demonstrate the potential for on-site molecular detection. This was achieved using a rapid and simple protocol comprising of magnetic bead-based nucleic acid extraction, portable real-time PCR (fluorogenic probe-based assay). The portable real-time PCR approach compared favorably with a laboratory-based system, detecting as few as 100 copies of DNA from Spongospora subterranea. The portable real-time PCR method developed here can serve as an alternative to laboratory-based approaches and a useful on-site tool for pathogen diagnosis.

Rapid and accurate detection of plant pathogens on-site, especially soil-borne pathogens, is crucial to prevent further inoculum production and proliferation of plant diseases in the field. The method developed here using a portable real-time PCR detection system enables on-site diagnosis under field conditions.

On-site diagnosis of plant diseases can be a useful tool for growers for timely decisions enabling the earlier implementation of disease management ...

Sampling, Sorting, and Characterizing Microplastics in Aquatic Environments with High Suspended Sediment Loads and Large Floating Debris

The ubiquitous presence of plastic debris in the ocean is widely recognized by the public, scientific communities, and government agencies. However, only recently have microplastics in freshwater systems, such as rivers and lakes, been quantified. Microplastic sampling at the surface usually consists of deploying drift nets behind either a stationary or moving boat, which limits the sampling to environments with low levels of suspended sediments and floating or submerged debris. Previous studies that employed drift nets to collect microplastic debris typically used nets with &#8805;300 &#181;m mesh size, allowing plastic debris (particles and fibers) below this size to pass through the net and elude quantification. The protocol detailed here enables: 1) sample collection in environments with high suspended loads and floating or submerged debris and 2) the capture and quantification of microplastic particles and fibers &lt;300 &#181;m. Water samples were collected using a peristaltic pump in low-density polyethylene (PE) containers to be stored before filtering and analysis in the lab. Filtration was done with a custom-made microplastic filtration device containing detachable union joints that housed nylon mesh sieves and mixed cellulose ester membrane filters. Mesh sieves and membrane filters were examined with a stereomicroscope to quantify and separate microplastic particulates and fibers. These materials were then examined using a micro-attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (micro ATR-FTIR) to determine microplastic polymer type. Recovery was measured by spiking samples using blue PE particulates and green nylon fibers; percent recovery was determined to be 100% for particulates and 92% for fibers. This protocol will guide similar studies on microplastics in high velocity rivers with high concentrations of sediment. With simple modifications to the peristaltic pump and filtration device, users can collect and analyze various sample volumes and particulate sizes.

Most microplastic research to date has occurred in marine systems where suspended solid levels are relatively low. Focus is now shifting to freshwater systems, which may feature high sediment loads and floating debris. This protocol addresses collecting and analyzing microplastic samples from aquatic environments that contain high suspended solid loads.

The ubiquitous presence of plastic debris in the ocean is widely recognized by the public, scientific communities, and government agencies. However, only ...

Protocol for Producing Three-Dimensional Infrared Video of Freezing in Plants

Freezing in plants can be monitored using infrared (IR) thermography, because when water freezes, it gives off heat. However, problems with color contrast make 2-dimensions (2D) infrared images somewhat difficult to interpret. Viewing an IR image or the video of plants freezing in 3 dimensions (3D) would allow a more accurate identification of sites for ice nucleation as well as the progression of freezing. In this paper, we demonstrate a relatively simple means to produce a 3D infrared video of a strawberry plant freezing. Strawberry is an economically important crop that is subjected to unexpected spring freeze events in many areas of the world. An accurate understanding of the freezing in strawberry will provide both breeders and growers with more economical ways to prevent any damage to plants during freezing conditions.
The technique involves a positioning of two IR cameras at slightly different angles to film the strawberry freezing. The two video streams will be precisely synchronized using a screen capture software that records both cameras simultaneously. The recordings will then be imported into the imaging software and processed using an anaglyph technique. Using red-blue glasses, the 3D video will make it easier to determine the precise site of ice nucleation on leaf surfaces.

Here, we present a protocol to image a strawberry plant freezing in 3 dimensions. Two infrared cameras positioned at slightly different angles are used to produce a red-blue anaglyph video to observe the freezing of the plant in 3 dimensions.

Freezing in plants can be monitored using infrared (IR) thermography, because when water freezes, it gives off heat. However, problems with color contrast ...

Operating a Large Biochar Kiln and Implementing Best Practices

Big Box Biochar Kiln Operation and Best Practices

Big Box biochar kilns are an alternative to open pile burning that allows for in-woods biochar production in a simple metal box with no moving parts. This approach is based on technology used by charcoal makers for centuries but with a modern, mechanized approach. A mini-excavator or other piece of machinery is used to load, tend, and empty the kilns. This article will outline Big Box biochar kiln best practices, including the design, transportation, placement, loading, lighting, quenching, and dumping procedures for beginners developing their own Big Box biochar kiln programs. 
Biochar production requires a low oxygen burning environment, and the Big Box kilns use a flame-cap (sometimes referred to as a flame-curtain) method to burn material with limited smoke production. These kilns have been designed to be easily transferred to the site using an adequately rated trailer. A mini-excavator or other piece of machinery is used to load, tend, and empty the kilns. The author is not aware of a more accessible means for people to sequester durable carbon on the farm, ranch, or in the backyard. This article outlines Big Box biochar kiln best practices, including the design, transportation, placement, loading, lighting, quenching, and dumping procedures for beginners developing their own Big Box biochar kiln programs.

Installation of the Big Box Biochar Kiln for Biochar Production

The Utah Biomass Resources Group (UBRG) has scaled-up simple biochar kilns in an innovative approach to hazardous fuel reduction and biochar production using metal boxes, called Big Box kilns, that allow for in-woods biochar production. This article outlines Big Box biochar kiln operation and best practices.

Big Box biochar kilns are an alternative to open pile burning that allows for in-woods biochar production in a simple metal box with no moving parts. This ...

Air Curtain Burners and Biochar &#8211; Advancing Forest Health and Carbon Capture

Continuous In-woods Production of Biochar Using a Trailer-Mounted Air Curtain Burner

Fuel treatments and other forest restoration thinning practices aim to reduce wildfire risk while building forest resilience to drought, insects, and diseases and increasing aboveground carbon (C) sequestration. However, fuel treatments generate large amounts of unmerchantable woody biomass residues that are often burned in open piles, releasing significant quantities of greenhouse gases and particulates, and potentially damaging the soil beneath the pile. Air curtain burners offer a solution to mitigate these issues, helping to reduce smoke and particulates from burning operations, more fully burn biomass residues compared to pile burning, and eliminate the direct and intense fire contact that can harm soil beneath the slash pile. In an air curtain burner, burning takes place in a controlled environment. Smoke is contained and recirculated by the air curtain, and therefore burning can be conducted under a variety of climatic conditions (e.g.,&#160;wind, rain, snow), lengthening the burning season for disposal of slash material. The mobile pyrolysis unit that continuously creates biochar was specifically designed to dispose of residual woody biomass at log landings, green wood at landfills, or salvaged logged materials and create biochar in the process. This high-carbon biochar output can be used to enhance soil resilience by improving its chemical, physical, and biological properties and has potential applications in remediating contaminated soils, including those at abandoned mine sites. Here, we describe the general use of this equipment, appropriate siting, loading methods, quenching requirements, and lessons learned about operating this new technology.

Author Spotlight: Advancing Place-Based Biochar Production for Ecosystem Restoration and Soil Health

We describe the use of a place-based mobile pyrolysis unit equipped with an air curtain to continuously create biochar. The technology reduces the need for open slash pile burning, which results in lower emissions and fewer soil impacts. The protocol includes guidelines for site selection, loading, and quenching.

Fuel treatments and other forest restoration thinning practices aim to reduce wildfire risk while building forest resilience to drought, insects, and ...

Producing, Characterizing and Quantifying Biochar in the Woods Using Portable Flame Cap Kilns

Summary

Explore More Videos

Chapters in this video

Physical, Chemical and Biological Characterization of Six Biochars Produced for the Remediation of Contaminated Sites

Experimental Protocol for Biodiesel Production with Isolation of Alkenones as Coproducts from Commercial Isochrysis Algal Biomass

Implementation of Portable Emissions Measurement Systems (PEMS) for the Real-driving Emissions (RDE) Regulation in Europe

Protocols for Quantifying Transferable Pesticide Residues in Turfgrass Systems

Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools

On-Site Molecular Detection of Soil-Borne Phytopathogens Using a Portable Real-Time PCR System

Sampling, Sorting, and Characterizing Microplastics in Aquatic Environments with High Suspended Sediment Loads and Large Floating Debris

Protocol for Producing Three-Dimensional Infrared Video of Freezing in Plants

Big Box Biochar Kiln Operation and Best Practices

Continuous In-woods Production of Biochar Using a Trailer-Mounted Air Curtain Burner