A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
* These authors contributed equally
This article describes a methodology for the isolation, characterization, and quantification of human plasma-derived extracellular vesicles (EV) and presents a workflow for label-free analysis of the EV proteome using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).
Extracellular vesicles (EV) are cell-derived, lipid bilayer-enclosed, non-replicable nanoparticles. EV currently gain attention in cardiovascular research due to their role in regulating intercellular communication, potentially serving as valuable biomarkers for cardiovascular disease. However, the EV proteome and its potential as a biomarker in cardiovascular diagnostics remain poorly understood. This protocol presents a standardized method for the isolation and quantification of plasma-derived EV and the analysis of their protein cargo using plasma samples from patients presenting to the Chest Pain Unit of a large university hospital. Following routine phlebotomy, EV are isolated from plasma by differential ultracentrifugation. The enrichment of specific EV marker proteins in EV isolates is visualized by immunoblotting, and average size distribution and plasma EV concentrations are quantified by nanoparticle tracking analysis. Finally, ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry is employed for label-free analysis of the EV proteome. This protocol thus provides a comprehensive approach to study and use plasma-derived EV as potential carriers of critical biological information as well as to explore their potential as novel biomarkers.
Extracellular vesicles (EV), by nomenclature not uniformly defined, are nanoparticles surrounded by a lipid bilayer and released by various cell types, lacking the ability to replicate1. This diverse group includes exosomes, a subpopulation of EV of endosomal origin, typically ranging from approximately 40 nm to 160 nm in diameter2. Detectable in numerous body fluids3, EVs facilitate intercellular communication by transferring various active biomolecules such as proteins, mRNA, microRNA, and lipids. Thus, EV provide information about their cell of origin through cell-specific surface markers and biomolecules, with their properties strongly influenced by the condition of the parent cell and its environment4. These characteristics have led to a growing interest in the potential role of EV as biomarkers, particularly in the context of cardiovascular diseases.
Numerous in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated that myocardial hypoxic stress leads to an increased release of EV5,6,7. Contemporary research on EV cargo has largely focused on EV-bound microRNA, which has the potential to serve as a biomarker in the diagnosis of various cardiovascular diseases8,9,10. In contrast, evidence on the circulating EV proteome remains relatively scarce, with even fewer studies investigating plasma EV in cardiovascular patients. In two comprehensive studies on plasma-derived EV from patients suffering myocardial infarction, the authors identified a specific ischemia-induced EV proteome profile with potential diagnostic relevance6,11.
The methodological processing of EV has historically proven challenging, and currently, there is no definitive recommendation for the optimal approach to EV isolation, characterization, and quantification. Commonly used methods for EV isolation include differential ultracentrifugation, density-gradient centrifugation, and filtration methods such as size-exclusion chromatography1. According to current consensus guidelines, the characterization of EV isolates should include evidence of at least three typical EV surface protein markers, such as tetraspanins or annexins, combined with an imaging modality1. To examine EV cargo at the protein level, antibody-based methods such as Western blot or ELISA are most frequently utilized.
Given the methodological challenges associated with the isolation and processing of circulating EV, this protocol presents a comprehensive pathway from patient recruitment and sample collection to subsequent EV isolation, characterization, and quantification of plasma EV isolates. Additionally, this study showcases a workflow for the immediate isolation of plasma-derived EV from patients presenting to the emergency department (Chest Pain Unit) at a tertiary care center in southwestern Germany, followed by the label-free analysis of disease-specific plasma EV proteome using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The aim is to facilitate a high-throughput analysis to identify differentially enriched EV-bound proteins across a large cohort of patients with diverse ischemic, congenital, or (auto-)immune cardiovascular diseases at the initial diagnosis and throughout disease progression and/or resolution. This proteomic screening approach seeks to identify patterns of EV-specific protein enrichment associated with distinct disease pathways, with the ultimate goal of uncovering novel EV-bound protein biomarkers to enhance current diagnostics and therapeutic monitoring in cardiovascular disease.
For this protocol, an exemplary patient cohort was recruited comprising three healthy control patients with no signs of apparent or underlying cardiovascular disease and two patients with non-ST elevated myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Prior approval was granted by the Institutional Review Board of the Medical Faculty of the University of Heidelberg (IRB approval #S-351/2015), and written consent was obtained from all patients prior to recruitment. Patients were recruited from the Chest Pain Unit of the Department of Cardiology at University Hospital Heidelberg based on initial clinical presentation, medical history, and the results of diagnostic testing.
Inclusion criteria for healthy control patients included atypical or nonspecific clinical presentation, cardiac biomarker levels within normal limits, no history of cardiovascular disease, and normal findings on any further diagnostic testing. Exclusion criteria included a history of malignancy or cytostatic therapy within the last five years, hemodialysis, familial hyperlipidemia syndromes, and any history of cardiovascular disease. NSTEMI was diagnosed following current guidelines12, with hemodynamically relevant coronary stenosis confirmed by coronary angiography. For each patient, up to 36 mL of blood was collected from the antecubital vein into citrate-supplemented collection tubes via standard phlebotomy13, and blood samples were immediately transported at 4 °C for further processing. Details of the reagents and equipment used in this study are listed in the Table of Materials.
1. EV isolation using differential centrifugation
NOTE: A differential centrifugation protocol was employed to isolate EV from human plasma samples. Two ultracentrifugation (UC) cycles with increasing centrifugal force were conducted to maximize purity of the resulting EV pellet.
2. Nanoparticle tracking analysis
NOTE: The quantification of average EV size distribution in human plasma samples was conducted using Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA), a laser-based detection method that analyzes the Brownian motion of nanoparticles.
Label-free analysis of EV proteome using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)
NOTE: Label-free EV proteome analysis was conducted using initial protein separation through gel electrophoresis of EV proteins following membrane lysis. After in-gel protein digestion with trypsin, peptides were analyzed using LC-MS/MS, with individual spectra matched against a human proteome database. Notably, if an untargeted analysis of EV lysates is desired, shotgun proteomics without prior selection of a specific molecular weight range is recommended, making steps 3.1.1-3.1.7 of this protocol unnecessary.
EV were isolated from plasma samples (n = 3) of patients without overt cardiovascular disease, as well as from patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI; n = 2), using the established differential ultracentrifugation protocol. Adequate separation of plasma EV was confirmed by immunoblotting of EV-enriched proteins TSG-101, annexin 5 (Anx5), and CD9 in EV isolates compared to EV-depleted plasma from the same patients (Figure 1A). Transferrin, serving as a negative control, ...
This protocol provides a real-world, step-by-step, ready-to-use methodology for the separation and characterization of plasma EV, as well as an introduction to an unlabeled proteome analysis suitable for integration into routine clinical practice. A detailed description and strict adherence to a unified methodology for EV isolation from plasma samples are important to ensure reproducibility of obtained results. Current literature indicates that pre-analytical conditions can significantly impact subsequent measurements an...
EG received honoraria for lecturers from Roche Diagnostics, BRAHMS Thermo Scientific, Bayer Vital GmbH, AstraZeneca, Lilly Deutschland, Boehringer Ingelheim; he received institutional research grants from Roche Diagnostics and Daiichi Sankyo, and serves as a consultant for Roche Diagnostics, BRAHMS Thermo Scientific, Astra Zeneca, Novartis and Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. JBK received project-related funding from the German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) and Roche Diagnostics. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest related to the submitted work.
The authors thank Heidi Deigentasch, Amelie Werner, and Elisabeth Mertz for their organizational support during this project.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
4x Laemmli sample bufffer | Bio-rad | 1610747 | |
10x RIPA-Buffer | Abcam | ab156034 | |
26.3 mL Polycarbonate Bottle with Cap Assembly for Ultracentrifugation | Beckman Coulter | 355654 | |
5810R Benchtop centrifuge | Eppendorf | 5811000015 | |
Acetonitrile (ACN) | Biosolve | 0001204101BS | |
Dithiothreitol (DTT) | Sigma-Aldrich | 43816-10ML | |
Dulbecco's Phosphate buffered saline (PBS) | Sigma-Aldrich | D8537 | |
Formic Acid 99% ULC/MS 100 | Biosolve | 0006914143BS | |
Histopaque - 1077 | Sigma-Aldrich | 10771 | |
Iodoacetamide (IAA) | Sigma-Aldrich | I6125-5G | |
Mass Spectrometer Orbitrap Q Exactive HF | Thermo Fisher Scientific | IQLAAEGAAPFALGMBDK | |
MOPS SDS running buffer | Thermo Fisher | B0001 | |
NanoSight NS300 | Malvern Panalytical | NS300 | |
Nanosight NTA 3.2 Software | Malvern Panalytical | ||
NuPAGE 4 bis 12 %, Bis-Tris protein gels | Invitrogen | NP0323 | |
Optima XPN-80 floor-standing ultracentrifuge | Beckman Coulter | 521-4180 | |
PageRuler Plus Prestained Protein Ladder | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 26619 | |
Protease/Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail (100X) | Cell Signaling Technology | 5872S | |
Protein marker | Thermo Fisher | 26616 | |
Proteome Discoverer 2.5 | Thermo Fisher | ||
Q Exactive Plus Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer | Thermo Fisher Scientific | IQLAAEGAAPFALGMBDK | |
Quick stain coomasssie | Serva | 35081.01 | |
ReproSil-Pur 120 C18-AQ, 1.9 µm 1 g | Dr. Maisch | r119.aq.0001 | |
SDS-PAGE commercial gel | Thermo Fisher | NW00100BOX | |
S-Monovette Citrat 9NC 0.106 mol/l 3,2% | Sarstedt | 02.1067.001 | |
Speed vac concentrator | Savant | ||
Swiss-Prot (Uniprot) Homo sapiens (UP000005640, June 2020) protein database | UniProt | https://www.uniprot.org/proteomes/UP000005640 | |
Triethylammonium bicarbonate buffer (TEAB) | Sigma-Aldrich | T7408 | |
Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) for HPLC >99%, 100 mL | Sigma-Aldrich | 302031-100ML | |
Trypsin MS-Grade | Thermo Fisher | 90058 | |
Type 50.2 Ti Fixed-Angle Rotor | Beckman Coulter | 337901 | |
UHPLC Dionex Ultimate 3000 | Thermo Fisher Scientific | ULTIM3000RSLCNANO | |
Water | Biosolve | 0023214102BS |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved