A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Here, we present a simple and rapid protocol for the detection of protein interaction at DNA damage sites.
The DNA damage response is a genetic information safeguard that protects cells from perpetuating damaged DNA. The characterization of the proteins that cooperate in this process allows the identification of alternative targets for therapeutic intervention in several diseases, such as cancer, aging-related diseases, and chronic inflammation. The Proximity Ligand Assay (PLA) emerged as a tool for estimating interaction between proteins as well as spatial proximity among organelles or cellular structures and allows the temporal localization and co-localization analysis under stress conditions, for instance. The method is simple because it is similar to conventional immunofluorescence and allows the staining of an organelle, cellular structure, or a specific marker such as mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, PML bodies, or DNA double-strand marker, yH2AX simultaneously. The phosphorylation of the S139 at Histone 2A variant, H2AX, then referred to as yH2AX, is widely used as a very sensitive and specific marker of DNA double-strand breaks. Each focus of yH2AX staining corresponds to one break in DNA that occurs a few minutes after the damage. The analysis of changes in yH2AX foci is the most common assay for studying if the protein of interest is implicated in DNA damage response (DDR). Whether a direct role in the DNA damage site is expected, fluorescence microscopy is used to verify the colocalization of the protein of interest with yH2AX foci. However, except for the new super-resolution fluorescence methods, to conclude, the local interaction with DNA damage sites can be a little subjective. Here, we show an assay to evaluate the localization of proteins in the DDR pathway using yH2AX as a marker of the damage site. This assay can be used to characterize the temporal localization under different insults that cause DNA damage.
Cellular DNA damage occurs daily because of the spontaneous chemical reactions and is also increased by exogenous factors such as genotoxic agents (radiation and chemicals such as etoposide) and oxidative stress1,2,3. The cells have a complex machinery that corrects a myriad of different types of DNA damage, from removal of bases to replicative fork torsion or interruption to the most deleterious lesion: the DNA double-strand break4,5.
Several proteins that participate in the DDR have alrea....
1. Cell plating
NOTE: Cells can be seeded in microscopic fluorescence slides, chambers, or plates. The use of small coverslips or 96/ 384 well plates is recommended for testing multiple conditions and spare reagents. The use of coverslips is advisable for cell lines that detach easily, like HEK293 cells. The coverslips can be previously coated with a poly-L-lysine solution to improve the attachment.
We have observed Nek4-Ku70 interaction in the absence of etoposide treatment. However, this interaction can occur outside of the nucleus (Figure 1A). The Nek4-Ku70 interaction increases after DNA damage and is concentrated in the nucleus (Figure 1A). In the case of Nek5-Topoisomerase II β (TOPIIβ) interaction, used in this assay as a positive control based on literature results18, the interaction is greatly increased by etoposid.......
The data show that the use of PLA concomitantly to a DNA-damaged marker can provide the most information in a DNA damage response profiling, showing the spatial and temporal behavior of the interaction after the insult. PLA is a versatile method that has been used for dimerization identification, organelles contact determination, protein-nucleic acid interaction, and mainly protein-protein interaction10,11,19,
We thank Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP, through Grant Temático 2022/15126-9 to JK and fellowship 21/09439-1 to LARM) and the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for funding this research.
....Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Black 384-well plates | Perkin Elmer Cell carrier plates | ||
Donkey anti- Rabbit Alexa Fluor 488 | Invitrogen | A21206 | 1:300 |
Duo link Donkey anti Mouse Minus | Sigma | DUO92004 | |
Duolink antibody diluent | Sigma | DUO82008 | |
Duolink blocking solution 1X | Sigma | DUO82007 | |
Duolink Detection reagent Far red | Sigma | DUO92013 | |
Duolink Donkey anti goat plus | Sigma | DUO92003 | |
Duolink Donkey anti rabbit plus | Sigma | DUO92002 | |
Etoposide | Sigma | E1383 | |
Goat anti Nek4 | Santa Cruz Biotechnology | SC-5517 | goat anti Nek4 was used at 1:50 dilution |
Hoechst 33342 | Thermo | H1399 | 0.6 µg/mL |
Leica DMI microscope | Leica | ||
Mouse anti Ku70 | Thermo | MA5-13110 | mouse anti Ku70 was used at 1:100 dilution |
Mouse anti TOPIIβ | Santa Cruz Biotechnology | SC-365071 | 1:25 |
Rabbit anti Nek5 | Santa Cruz Biotechnology | SC-84527 | 1:25 |
Rabbit anti Y H2AX | Cell Signalling | 9718S | 1:100 dilution |
U2OS cell line | ATCC | HTB-96 |
This article has been published
Video Coming Soon
ABOUT JoVE
Copyright © 2024 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved