로그인

JoVE 비디오를 활용하시려면 도서관을 통한 기관 구독이 필요합니다. 전체 비디오를 보시려면 로그인하거나 무료 트라이얼을 시작하세요.

기사 소개

  • 요약
  • 초록
  • 서문
  • 프로토콜
  • 결과
  • 토론
  • 공개
  • 감사의 말
  • 자료
  • 참고문헌
  • 재인쇄 및 허가

요약

Microvesicles shed from the plasma membrane act as cellular effectors. Spleen microvesicles (SMVs) are surrogate markers of pathophysiological conditions. In rats and mice, SMV content and properties characterize aging or inflammation and are altered by cytoprotective treatments, making them a valuable yet abundant monitoring tool for preclinical research.

초록

Microvesicles (MVs) are submicron fragments released from the plasma membrane of activated cells that act as proinflammatory and procoagulant cellular effectors. In rats, spleen MVs (SMVs) are surrogate markers of pathophysiological conditions. Previous in vitro studies demonstrated that Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis), a major periodontal pathogen, enables the endothelial shedding and apoptosis while lipopolysaccharide (LPS) favors the shedding of splenocyte-derived microvesicles (SMVs). In vivo studies showed the feasibility of pharmacological control of SMV shedding. The present protocol establishes a standardized procedure for isolating splenic SMVs from the P. gingivalis acute murine infection model. P. gingivalis infection was induced in young C57BL/6 mice by intraperitoneal injection (three injections of 5 x 107 bacteria/week). After two weeks, the spleens were collected, weighed, and the splenocytes were counted. SMVs were isolated and quantified by protein, RNA, and prothrombinase assays. Cell viability was assessed by either propidium iodide or trypan blue exclusion dyes. Following splenocyte extraction, neutrophil counts were obtained by flow cytometry after 24 h of splenocyte culture. In P. gingivalis-injected mice, a 2.5-fold increase in spleen weight and a 2.3-fold rise in the splenocyte count were observed, while the neutrophils count was enhanced by 40-folds. The cell viability of splenocytes from P. gingivalis-injected mice ranged from 75%-96% and was decreased by 50% after 24 h of culture without any significant difference compared to unexposed controls. However, splenocytes from injected mice shed higher amounts of MVs by prothrombinase assay or protein measurements. The data demonstrate that the procoagulant SMVs are reliable tools to assess an early spleen response to intraperitoneal P. gingivalis infection.

서문

Microvesicles (MVs), also termed microparticles or ectosomes, are plasma membrane fragments with a diameter of 0.1-1.0 µm released in body fluids and the extracellular space in response to various cell stimuli. First identified as platelet dust exposing procoagulant phospholipids, mostly phosphatidylserine (PSer), MVs constitute an additional surface for the assembly of the blood coagulation complexes1,2. The key role of circulating MVs as procoagulant effectors has been demonstrated in patients with Scott syndrome2, a rare genetic disease that leads to dysfunctional PSer exposure and bleeding (Supplementary Figure 1). MVs have been extensively studied as circulating biomarkers of thrombotic risk in chronic diseases associated with cardiovascular disorders such as diabetes, chronic kidney disease, preeclampsia, and hypertension3,4. They are currently recognized as true cellular effectors in fluids or organ tissues like the myocardium1. Because they convey active proteins, lipids, and miRNA, they remotely modulate vascular responses such as hemostasis, inflammation, vascular angiogenesis, and vascular growth or tissue remodeling5.

While clinical studies examine the prognosis value of MVs concerning risk factors, MVs isolated from the patient's fluids or tissue enable the ex vivo assessment of their effector properties6. The deciphering of the mechanisms governing MV biogenesis and cross-talk abilities is generally achieved in cell culture models to identify active molecules exposed by or encapsulated within the MVs and their downstream signaling. The MV interactions with target cells will depend on membrane protein/protein binding, when appropriate counter-ligands are available, and/or lipid fusion7.

Under physiological conditions, MVs circulating in the plasma mostly originate from vascular cells, as identified by the lineage cluster differentiation markers (CD)8,9. However, in pathology, notably in cancer10 and graft rejection11,12, MVs are shed from the damaged tissue and bear noxious procoagulant and proinflammatory features. These are detected in the systemic circulation, making them useful probes for monitoring protective or rejuvenation therapies, and possible pharmacological targets13. Because MVs circulate as a dynamic storage pool reflecting vascular and tissue cell homeostasis in health and disease, a better understanding of their remote action also needs to be investigated in vivo, after IV injection or nasal instillation in small animals14,15. Indeed, MVs have been considered major contributors to the intricate pathways coupling exaggerated inflammation and thrombosis16.

Periodontitis is an inflammatory disease of infectious origin affecting tooth-supporting tissues17,18 and is associated with thrombotic risk. It is characterized by gingival bleeding, alveolar bone destruction, tooth mobility and can ultimately lead to tooth loss. Periodontitis is highly prevalent worldwide and affects more than 50% of the population, with 11% presenting a severe form19. Periodontitis is induced by bacterial dysbiosis of the subgingival biofilms, which sustain an exacerbated inflammatory response that triggers tissue destruction20. Over the last decade, periodontitis has been linked to systemic diseases such as cardiovascular disorders, diabetes, and rheumatoid arthritis. The possible explanations are the action of the periodontal pathogens at a distance and/or the increased systemic inflammation mediated by proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL-1, IL-6) and TNF-α21,22.

Among pathogens associated with the periodontitis onset and development, Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis)23 is found in most severe lesions that harvest several virulence factors, including lipopolysaccharide (LPS)24 inducing Toll-like-receptor (TLR)-mediated inflammatory responses25 and the recruitment of neutrophils and polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) at the site of the initial infection26. The LPS from P. gingivalis activates TLR-4 or TLR-2, facilitating immune detection and bacterial survival evasion27. At the vascular level, activation of TLR2 by LPS is associated with immunothrombosis. The unique ability of P. gingivalis to prompt TLR-2 signaling while TLR-4-dependent recognition is significantly impaired favors persistent low-grade infection28,29.

In vivo procedures to study the MV responses to low-grade pathogen chronic and sustained infection are scarce. Methodological approaches for tissular MVs extraction are poorly described in the literature and generally concern the harvest of MVs from pathological tissues like solid tumors, liver steatosis, atherothrombotic plaques, or grafts11,29,30, while the spleen senses bacteria and viruses in the bloodstream. It also stores erythrocytes, platelets, lymphocytes, monocytes, basophils, and eosinophils involved in the immune response. Granulocytes like neutrophils from the red pulp also generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) and proteases that destroy pathogens and prevent infection from spreading31,32. Amazingly, and to the best of our knowledge, spleen MVs are not investigated in the context of pathogen-induced tissue insults. There is a global unmet need to study the variations of tissular MVs in physiopathology.

In vitro data from our laboratory showed that LPS induces the shedding of procoagulant MVs from rat splenocytes, which in turn prompt the senescence of cultured coronary endothelial cells and a consecutive proinflammatory and proinflammatory procoagulant endothelial phenotype11. The feasibility of the pharmacological control of the spleen MVs was further demonstrated after treating the animal with an optimized omega-3 formula. The oral gavage of middle-aged and aged rats was found to be protective against both the shedding of procoagulant MVs from splenocytes and their prosenescent noxious properties towards the coronary endothelium33.

Compared to blood, the spleen offers the advantage of being an important source of leukocytes in one individual. In addition, a splenic-cardiac axis has recently been proposed3,34, making the spleen a possible contributor to the infection-related cardiovascular risk of beneficial interest for pharmacological control. The assessment of the SMVs properties or release is key in understanding pathogen-induced or inflammatory responses. Interestingly, it can be achieved in treated animals and in different physiopathological models (age, hypertension, diabetes). Indeed, by comparing middle-aged and aged rats33, the differences in spleen MVs properties and release can be evidenced following a simple 24 h splenocyte culture.

Given the above evidences of the alteration of the effector properties of spleen MVs with the physiopathological condition and the feasibility of their pharmacological control in rats, a standardized protocol is described herein for the isolation of murine spleen MVs. The procedure would better fit in-depth investigations of the in vivo mechanisms supporting SMVs-mediated effects, eventually in engineered mice. The procedure was established in C57BL/6 mice using a local intraperitoneal infection by P. gingivalis, to establish proof of a remote action of the pathogen on spleen MV (SMV) effector properties.

프로토콜

All experimental protocols were approved by and followed the relevant guidelines of the local Ethics Committee (APAFIS#28745-2020121815051557) and animal care of the home University and of the INSERM. Male Young C57BL/6 mice, 6-8 weeks of age, were used for the experiments. Mice were regularly examined to evaluate pain and stress, and their weights were monitored daily. Unless otherwise stated, all extracting buffers and solutions must be sterile and at room temperature.

1. Animal preparation

  1. Administer the mice with six intraperitoneal injections of P. gingivalis (PG) every 2 days for 2 weeks (three injections of 5 x 107 bacteria/week, Supplementary File 1).
  2. Anesthetize the mice using a combination of 100 mg/kg of ketamine and 10 mg/kg of xylazine.
  3. Sacrifice the anesthetized mice and harvest the spleen after laparotomy.
    ​NOTE: The specific conditions for P. gingivalis infection and the sacrifice of the animals for spleen harvest are detailed in the "animal experiment" section of Supplementary File 1. The schematic representation of the protocol steps is shown in Figure 1.

2. Extraction of splenocytes

  1. Using a scalpel, mince the spleen tissue into ~1 mm slices in a Petri dish already filled with 3 mL of RPMI containing antibiotics (Streptomycin (100 U/mL)/Penicillin (100 U/mL), Fungizone (250 mg/mL), L-glutamine (2 mM)), and supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) (see Table of Materials).
  2. Transfer the slices to a sieve (see Table of Materials), which is from beforehand attached to a 50 mL polystyrene tube.
  3. Use the plunger of a syringe as a pestle to crush the tissues on the sieve.
  4. Rinse the sieve with the RPMI medium (3 mL).
  5. Centrifuge the cell suspension eluate at 450 x g for 5 min at room temperature and discard the supernatant with caution by backflow.

3. Removal of erythrocytes via an osmotic shock

  1. Add 1 mL of ACK buffer (see Table of Materials), mix well, incubate for 3 min at room temperature and shake gently by hand rotation.
  2. Dilute by adding 9 mL of RPMI and mix well using aspiration and backflow.
  3. Centrifuge at 450 x g for 5 min at room temperature.
  4. Discard the supernatant by aspiration and backflow, and resuspend the pellet in 5 mL of RPMI medium.
  5. Mix gently (aspiration/backflow) and eventually remove any lipidic debris by pipetting or using a sieve.

4. Adjustment of isolated splenocyte concentration

  1. Fill a 1.5 mL microtube containing 900 µL of RPMI.
  2. Using a micropipette, take 100 µL of the cellular suspension, add to the 1.5 mL microtube containing 900 µL of RPMI medium, and mix well.
  3. Transfer 10 µL of the diluted cells into a microtube, add 10 µL of the trypan blue exclusion dye, and mix well.
  4. Place 10 µL of the solution (step 3.3) into the counting slide of the automatic cell counter (see Table of Materials) and determine the cell count.
    NOTE: The device software gives two values: the total cell number and the living cell number and percentage.
  5. Adjust the concentration of living cells to 3 or 5 x 106 cells/mL (Vmax = 20 mL; max total capacity is 100 x 106 cells/mL).
  6. Seed the cells in a 75 mL flask containing RPMI.
  7. Incubate the flask vertically in a humidified incubator at 37 °C for 24 h.
    CAUTION: Trypan blue is a mutagenic and carcinogenic agent35,36. Ensure to wear gloves while counting, even outside of the hood. Immediately discard tips and fluids into containers and wash the bench surface.
    ​NOTE: If the collected cells are less than 50 x 106, use a 25 mL culture flask. The cell number should not vary much from one individual to the other. The percentage of living cells is generally superior to 80% at this step.

5. Isolation of splenocyte microvesicles

  1. After 24 h, pour the flask content into a 50 mL polypropylene or polystyrene tube.
  2. Centrifuge at 450 x g for 15 min at room temperature to remove cells and debris.
  3. After centrifugation, keep 100 µL of the 1st supernatant (SN1) for an eventual measurement of the initial MV concentration to calculate the isolation yield. Note the SN1 volume.
  4. Centrifuge the SN1 at 450 x g for 15 min at room temperature.
  5. Discard pellet and centrifuge again at 450 x g for 15 min at room temperature. Rapidly withdraw and collect SN2 (note the volume).
  6. Transfer SN2 into 1.8 mL microtubes with conical shape bottoms. Keep 100 µL of SN2 for an eventual measurement of the initial MV concentration to calculate the isolation yield in case too much debris eventually impairs MV measurement in SN1.
  7. Add 5 mL of RPMI medium to the pellet (cells) and count the splenocytes.
    NOTE: The cell suspension can also be fixed for flow cytometry characterization in 0.1% paraformaldehyde (final concentration)37.
  8. Centrifuge SN2 at 14,000 x g for 1 h at 4 °C and eventually refrigerate the rotor in advance by running the empty rotor at 4 °C. This step generates SN3.
  9. Immediately withdraw SN3 from each microtube by inverting over a single sterile 50 mL tube (under the hood). Note the SN3 volume.
  10. Gently mix SN3 using a pipette under the hood. Keep aliquots for eventual measurements in the suspension.
    NOTE: The solution is now depleted of MVs but contains the soluble mediators and exosomes.
  11. Scrape each microtube (closed) on a spiked rack to mechanically favor the resuspension of the MVs in the pellet.
  12. Add 200 µL of Hank's balanced saline solution without Ca2+ and Mg2+ (HBSS) in the first microtube (see Table of Materials).
  13. Resuspend the MV pellet of the first tube by gentle aspiration/backflow cycles (~10 times) using a 1 mL micropipette. Take great care to avoid foaming as this will promote the oxidation of the vesicles and other moieties in the suspension.
  14. Harvest the first 200 µL of resuspended MVs and pour them into the second tube over the pellet. Gently mix as above, and then pour again into the third tube and mix gently. The suspension becomes more and more turbid from tube to tube. Close the third tube.
  15. Initiate the collection of the next three microtubes as above (step 4.14).
  16. Collect all the resuspended MVs in a single (or two) collector microtube (2 mL with conical shape bottom). Keep 50 µL for the eventual calculation of the yield of this step. Note the suspension volume.
  17. Centrifuge the collector tube at 14,000 x g for 1 h at 4 °C. This step generates SN4.
  18. Immediately discard the SN4 (pour over a supernatant collecting tube). Keep an aliquot of SN4 to calculate the yield of the purification step and gently resuspend the pellet in 500 µL of HBBS (without Ca2+ and Mg2+). Keep a 50 µL aliquot of the resuspended pellet to calculate the purification yield and note its volume.
  19. Store the resuspended pellet at 4 °C for up to one month for functional assays under sterile conditions or at -20 °C for structural assays.
  20. Calculate the purification yield (see NOTE below) of each step or the whole procedure by measuring the concentration of MVs in supernatants and/or pellet suspensions.
    NOTE: Purification Yield (%): ([MV1] x SN1 volume) / ([MV4] x final suspension volume) x 100.
    This yield needs to be rationalized to the number of splenocytes isolated from the culture flask and counted in step 4.4. The present experiment's purification yield is ~70% starting from 111 x 106 cells and 60 mL of supernatant.
    1. Evaluate the loss of SMVs caused by the procedure by measuring the SMVs remaining in the supernatants depleted of SMVs and mainly containing exosomes (SN2 and SN4).
    2. Measure the MV concentration by TRPS or prothrombinase assay38 for high sensitivity and specificity.
      CAUTION: Harvest the MVs after centrifugation by the rapid upside-down pouring of the supernatant. Waiting or using U-shape microtubes will prompt MV loss on the microtube wall. Never use a micropipette to discard the supernatant; the pellet can be aspirated instead. Never delay the process after the centrifuge is stopped. Overspeed centrifugation will result in contamination of the MV pellet by exosomes.
      NOTE: The centrifugation speeds and duration are optimized for an MV enrichment with minimal contamination by exosomes. This protocol is not reliable to study spleen monocyte/macrophage MVs because these cells can phagocyte and rapidly recapture their own MVs39. The protocol cannot be paused and restarted later because of loss of cells due to cell viability.

결과

The data provided give a full representation of the whole procedure, using two main animal conditions: control untreated young C57BL/6 mice and their littermates subjected to six intraperitoneal (IP) PG injections every 2 days, for 2 weeks. They also show the remote action of an intraperitoneal PG injection on the spleen response after 2 weeks. Splenocyte microvesicles were quantified by either prothrombinase enzymatic assay or by measuring their proteins and RNA concentration by spectrophotometric, and the proportion of...

토론

The present study confirms that the spleen is a major and reliable source of MVs with physiopathological relevance compared to other sources like blood, of limited volume in mice. Provided precautions are taken, the method is easy to set up and does not require expensive equipment. Since no alternate way other than in vivo assessment is available, the current model appears to be a valuable method to study the impact of pro-drugs on MV shedding. Importantly, the standardized protocol for harvesting murine splenic...

공개

The authors have nothing to disclose.

감사의 말

Authors are indebted to Claudine Ebel from the Service commun de cytométrie en flux (Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Strasbourg) for expert assistance and formation to complex flow cytometry analysis of the spleen and Ali El Habhab for initial training on rat spleen cells labelling. Deniz Karagyoz helped in digging gathering literature. This work was partly supported by two ANR grants COCERP (N°A17R417B), ENDOPAROMP(N°ANR-17-CE17-0024-01).

자료

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
2 mL tubes type EppendorfDutscher54816Conical bottom stériel microtubes
Allegra 64 R CentrifugeBeckman Coulter
Automatic cell counterBiorad
Bovine serum albuminEuromedex04-100-812-EPrepared, filtered with 0.22 µm sieve and stored at 4 °C under sterile conditions by using the following formulas: 2 mM EDTA, 0,5% BSA and sterile PBS
CD11 (Mac-1)e-Biosciences45-00112-80Conjugated to eFluor 450; λmax excitation 405 nm λmax emission 445 nm
CD16/32BD Biosciences553142unconjugated
EDTACalbiochemCalbiochemS 6381-92-6
Falcon tubeCell star22726150 mL
Fetal Bovine serumDutscherS1810-500Batch number = S14028S1810
Fortessa AriaBD Biosciencesfor cell sorting
Fortessa flow cytometerBecton-Dickinson.
FungizonePAN biotechP06-01050
HBSSGibco14175-053Without phenol red, without Ca+2 and Mg+2
ICAM-1abcamab171123
LYG-6 (Gr-1)BD Biosciences566218Conjugated to BUV395; λmax excitation 348 nm, λmax emission 395 nm
Lysis buffer erythrocytes (ACK)SigmaPrepared, filtered with 0.22 µm sieve and stored at 4°C under sterile conditions by using the following formulas: NH4Cl, 0.15 M (molarity), 53.491 (mw) 4 g
KHCO3 1 mM (molarity) 100.115 (mw), 50 mg
EDTA  0.1 mM (molarity), 292.24 (mw), 14.6 g
pH: 7.2–7.4
NanoDrop 1000 spectrophotometerThermoscientific
PBSLonza17-516FWithout Ca+2  and Mg+2
Plastic petri dish100 mm
Polystyren tubeFalcon352070
q-Nano GoldiZON science
RPMI 1640 culture medium: 2 g/L glucosePAN biotechp04-18047Supplemented withsupplemented with Streptomycin (100 U/mL) /Penicillin (100 U/mL), Fungizone (250 mg/mL), L-glutamine (2 mM) and FBS 10%.
Scalpels
Sieve NylonFalcon USA352360100 µm
Streptomycin/PenicillinPAN biotechP06-07100
Syringe2 mL
Trypan BlueBiorad1450013
VCAM1abcamab215380

참고문헌

  1. Loyer, X., et al. Intra-cardiac release of extracellular vesicles shapes inflammation following myocardial infarction. Circulation Research. 123 (1), 100-106 (2018).
  2. Aupeix, K., Toti, F., Satta, N., Bischoff, P., Freyssinet, J. M. Oyxsterols induce membrane procoagulant activity in monocytic THP-1 cells. Biochemical Journal. 314 (3), 1027-1033 (1996).
  3. Emami, S., et al. Antibiotic resistance pattern and distribution of pslA gene among biofilm producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from waste water of a burn center. Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology. 8 (11), 23669 (2015).
  4. Burger, D., et al. Microparticles: biomarkers and beyond. Clinical Science. 124 (7), 423-441 (2013).
  5. Braeckmans, K., et al. Sizing nanomatter in biological fluids by fluorescence single particle tracking. Nano Letters. 10 (11), 4435-4442 (2010).
  6. Chironi, G. N., et al. Endothelial microparticles in diseases. Cell and Tissue Research. 335 (1), 143-151 (2009).
  7. Meldolesi, J. Exosomes and ectosomes in intercellular communication. Current Biology. 28 (8), 435-444 (2018).
  8. Chen, T. S., et al. Mesenchymal stem cell secretes microparticles enriched in pre-microRNAs. Nucleic Acids Research. 38 (1), 215-224 (2010).
  9. Pirro, M., et al. Microparticles derived from endothelial progenitor cells in patients at different cardiovascular risk. Atherosclerosis. 197 (2), 757-767 (2008).
  10. Zahra, S., Anderson, J. A., Stirling, D., Ludlam, C. A. Microparticles, malignancy and thrombosis. British Journal of Haematology. 152 (6), 688-700 (2011).
  11. Amoura, L., et al. Assessment of plasma microvesicles to monitor pancreatic islet graft dysfunction: Beta cell- and leukocyte-derived microvesicles as specific features in a pilot longitudinal study. American Journal of Transplantation. 20 (1), 40-51 (2020).
  12. De Rop, C., et al. Evaluation of tissue factor bearing microparticles as biomarkers in allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. Transplantation. 92 (3), 351-358 (2011).
  13. de Abreu, R. C., et al. Native and bioengineered extracellular vesicles for cardiovascular therapeutics. Nature Reviews Cardiology. 17 (11), 685-697 (2020).
  14. Beitler, J. R., et al. Advancing precision medicine for acute respiratory distress syndrome. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. 10 (1), 107-120 (2022).
  15. Porro, C., et al. Proinflammatory effect of cystic fibrosis sputum microparticles in the murine lung. Journal of Cystic Fibrosis. 12 (6), 721-728 (2013).
  16. Boisrame-Helms, J., et al. Lipid emulsions differentially affect LPS-induced acute monocytes inflammation: in vitro effects on membrane remodeling and cell viability. Lipids. 49 (11), 1091-1099 (2014).
  17. Kinane, D. F., Stathopoulou, P. G., Papapanou, P. N. Authors' reply: Predictive diagnostic tests in periodontal diseases. Nature Reviews Disease Primers. 3 (1), (2017).
  18. Kinane, D. F., Stathopoulou, P. G., Papapanou, P. N. Periodontal diseases. Nature Reviews Disease Primers. 3 (1), 1-14 (2017).
  19. Kassebaum, D. K., Tedesco, L. A. The 21(st)-century dental curriculum: a framework for understanding current models. Journal of Dental Education. 81 (8), 13-21 (2017).
  20. Hajishengallis, G., Chavakis, T., Hajishengallis, E., Lambris, J. D. Neutrophil homeostasis and inflammation: novel paradigms from studying periodontitis. Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 98 (4), 539-548 (2015).
  21. Suh, J. S., et al. Periodontitis-induced systemic inflammation exacerbates atherosclerosis partly via endothelial-mesenchymal transition in mice. International Journal of Oral Science. 11 (3), 21 (2019).
  22. Bugueno, I. M., et al. Porphyromonas gingivalis triggers the shedding of inflammatory endothelial microvesicles that act as autocrine effectors of endothelial dysfunction. Scientific Reports. 10 (1), 1778 (2020).
  23. Hajishengallis, G., Lamont, R. J. Breaking bad: manipulation of the host response by Porphyromonas gingivalis. European Journal of Immunology. 44 (2), 328-338 (2014).
  24. Lamont, T., Worthington, H. V., Clarkson, J. E., Beirne, P. V. Routine scale and polish for periodontal health in adults. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 12, (2018).
  25. Huck, O., et al. Reduction of articular and systemic inflammation by Kava-241 in a Porphyromonas gingivalis-induced arthritis murine model. Infection and Immunity. 86 (9), 00356 (2018).
  26. Sochalska, M., Potempa, J. Manipulation of neutrophils by Porphyromonas gingivalis in the development of periodontitis. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 7, 197 (2017).
  27. Kocgozlu, L., Elkaim, R., Tenenbaum, H., Werner, S. Variable cell responses to P. gingivalis lipopolysaccharide. Journal of Dental Research. 88 (8), 741-745 (2009).
  28. Slocum, C., et al. Distinct lipid a moieties contribute to pathogen-induced site-specific vascular inflammation. PLOS Pathogens. 10 (7), 1004215 (2014).
  29. Thietart, S., Rautou, P. E. Extracellular vesicles as biomarkers in liver diseases: A clinician's point of view. Journal of Hepatology. 73 (6), 1507-1525 (2020).
  30. Witek, R. P., et al. Liver cell-derived microparticles activate hedgehog signaling and alter gene expression in hepatic endothelial cells. Gastroenterology. 136 (1), 320-330 (2009).
  31. Tahir, F., Ahmed, J., Malik, F. Post-splenectomy sepsis: a review of the literature. Cureus. 12 (2), 6898 (2020).
  32. Hussain, M., Stover, C. M., Dupont, A. P. gingivalis in periodontal disease and atherosclerosis - scenes of action for antimicrobial peptides and complement. Frontiers in Immunology. 6, 45 (2015).
  33. Qureshi, A. W., et al. Ageing enhances the shedding of splenocyte microvesicles with endothelial pro-senescent effect that is prevented by a short-term intake of omega-3 PUFA EPA:DHA 6:1. Biochemical Pharmacology. 173, 113734 (2020).
  34. Dunford, A., Keramida, G., Anagnostopoulos, C. D., Michael Peters, A. The cardiosplenic axis: another obscure pathophysiological function of the spleen and its investigation using molecular imaging. Nuclear Medicine Communications. 38 (3), 205-208 (2017).
  35. Ford, R. J., Becker, F. F. The characterization of trypan blue-induced tumors in Wistar rats. The American Journal of Pathology. 106 (3), 326-331 (1982).
  36. Field, F. E., et al. Trypan blue: identification and teratogenic and oncogenic activities of its coloured constituents. Chemico-Biological Interactions. 16 (1), 69-88 (1977).
  37. Covarrubias, R., et al. Optimized protocols for isolation, fixation, and flow cytometric characterization of leukocytes in ischemic hearts. American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 317 (3), 658-666 (2019).
  38. El Habhab, A., et al. Significance of neutrophil microparticles in ischaemia-reperfusion: Proinflammatory effectors of endothelial senescence and vascular dysfunction. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 24 (13), 7266-7281 (2020).
  39. Freyssinet, J. M. Cellular microparticles: what are they bad or good for. The Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasist. 1 (7), 1655-1662 (2003).

재인쇄 및 허가

JoVE'article의 텍스트 или 그림을 다시 사용하시려면 허가 살펴보기

허가 살펴보기

더 많은 기사 탐색

Splenic MicrovesiclesP GingivalisMurine ModelBacterial InfectionProinflammatoryProcoagulantSplenocyte SheddingFlow CytometryCell ViabilityNeutrophil CountsProtein AssaysRNA AssaysLipopolysaccharideStandardized ProtocolImmune Response

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

개인 정보 보호

이용 약관

정책

연구

교육

JoVE 소개

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. 판권 소유