The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community&#39;s Research Fund for Coal and Steel (RFCS) under grant agreement n&#176; RFCR-CT-2014-00007. This work was funded by the UK Carbon Capture and Storage Research Centre (UKCCSRC) as part of Call 2 projects. UKCCSRC is supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) as part of the Research Council&#39;s UK Energy Programme, with additional funding from the Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS - formerly DECC). The authors would also like to thank Mr. Martin Roskilly for his enormous help throughout the course of this work.

1. Material Preparation
<ol>
	<li>Sieve the limestone (~50 kg of raw material) to the desired particle size distribution (300-400 &#181;m or another distribution depending on the experiment) using a mechanical shaker. Put the sieved material in pots next to the calciner for feeding during the test.</li>
	<li>Prepare the material in batches to be introduced into the reactor. The batches are generally 0.5 L or 1 L (1 L of limestone is roughly 1.5 kg), but this can vary depending on the operating parameters.</li>
</ol>
<p...

<ol>
	<li>Bernstein, L., Lee, A., Crookshank, S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Carbon+dioxide+capture+and+storage:+a+status+report.">Carbon dioxide capture and storage: a status report.</a> Climate Policy. 6 (2), 241-246 (2011).</li><li>Boot-Handford, M. E., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Carbon+capture+and+storage+update.">Carbon capture and storage update.</a> Energy Environmental Science. 7 (1), 130-189 (2014).</li><li>Herzog, H. J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Scaling+up+carbon+dioxide+capture+and+storage:+from+megatons+to+gigatons.">Scaling up carbon dioxide capture and storage: from megatons to gigatons.</a> Energy Economics. 33 (4), 597-604 (2011).</li><li>Shimizu, T., Hirama, T., Hosoda, H., Kitano, K., Inagaki, M., Tejima, K. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=A+twin+fluid-bed+reactor+for+removal+of+CO2+from+combustion+processes.">A twin fluid-bed reactor for removal of CO2 from combustion processes.</a> Chemical Engineering Research and Design. 77 (1), 62-68 (1999).</li><li>Blamey, J., Anthony, E. J., Wang, J., Fennell, P. S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=The+calcium+looping+cycle+for+large-scale+CO2+capture.">The calcium looping cycle for large-scale CO2 capture.</a> Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. 36 (2), 260-279 (2010).</li><li>Masnadi, M. S., Grace, J. R., Bi, X. T., Ellis, N., Lim, C. J., Butler, J. W. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Biomass/coal+steam+co-gasification+integrated+with+in-situ+CO2+capture.">Biomass/coal steam co-gasification integrated with in-situ CO2 capture.</a> Energy. 83, 326-336 (2015).</li><li>Abanades, J. C., Anthony, E. J., Lu, D. Y., Salvador, C., Alvarez, D. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Capture+of+CO2+from+combustion+gases+in+a+fluidized+bed+of+CaO.">Capture of CO2 from combustion gases in a fluidized bed of CaO.</a> AIChE Journal. 50 (7), 1614-1622 (2004).</li><li>Hughes, R. W., Lu, D. Y., Anthony, E. J., Macchi, A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Design,+process+simulation+and+construction+of+an+atmospheric+dual+fluidized+bed+combustion+system+for+in+situ+CO2+capture+using+high-temperature+sorbents.">Design, process simulation and construction of an atmospheric dual fluidized bed combustion system for in situ CO2 capture using high-temperature sorbents.</a> Fuel Processing Technology. 86 (14), 1523-1531 (2005).</li><li>Lu, D. Y., Hughes, R. W., Anthony, E. J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Ca-based+sorbent+looping+combustion+for+CO2+capture+in+pilot-scale+dual+fluidized+beds.">Ca-based sorbent looping combustion for CO2 capture in pilot-scale dual fluidized beds.</a> Fuel Processing Technology. 89 (12), 1386-1395 (2008).</li><li>Hawthorne, C., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=CO2+capture+with+CaO+in+a+200+kWth+dual+fluidized+bed+pilot+plant.">CO2 capture with CaO in a 200 kWth dual fluidized bed pilot plant.</a> Energy Procedia. 4, 441-448 (2011).</li><li>S&#225;nchez-Biezma, A., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Postcombustion+CO2+capture+with+CaO.+Status+of+the+technology+and+next+steps+towards+large+scale+demonstration.">Postcombustion CO2 capture with CaO. Status of the technology and next steps towards large scale demonstration.</a> Energy Procedia. 4, 852-859 (2011).</li><li>Dieter, H., Hawthorne, C., Zieba, M., Scheffknecht, G. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Progress+in+calcium+looping+post+combustion+CO2+capture:+successful+pilot+scale+demonstration.">Progress in calcium looping post combustion CO2 capture: successful pilot scale demonstration.</a> Energy Procedia. 37, 48-56 (2013).</li><li>Arias, B., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Demonstration+of+steady+state+CO2+capture+in+a+1.7+MWth+calcium+looping+pilot.">Demonstration of steady state CO2 capture in a 1.7 MWth calcium looping pilot.</a> International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 18, 237-245 (2013).</li><li>Str&#246;hle, J., Junk, M., Kremer, J., Galloy, A., Epple, B. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Carbonate+looping+experiments+in+a+1MWth+pilot+plant+and+model+validation.">Carbonate looping experiments in a 1MWth pilot plant and model validation.</a> Fuel. 127, 13-22 (2014).</li><li>Bidwe, A. R., Hawthorne, C., Dieter, H., Dominguez, M. A., Zieba, M., Scheffknecht, G. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Cold+model+hydrodynamic+studies+of+a+200kWth+dual+fluidized+bed+pilot+plant+of+calcium+looping+process+for+CO2+Capture.">Cold model hydrodynamic studies of a 200kWth dual fluidized bed pilot plant of calcium looping process for CO2 Capture.</a> Powder Technology. 253, 116-128 (2014).</li><li>Chang, M. H., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Design+and+experimental+testing+of+a+1.9+MWth+calcium+looping+pilot+plant.">Design and experimental testing of a 1.9 MWth calcium looping pilot plant.</a> Energy Procedia. 63, 2100-2108 (2014).</li><li>Reitz, M., Junk, M., Str&#246;hle, J., Epple, B. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Design+and+operation+of+a+300kWth+indirectly+heated+carbonate+looping+pilot+plant.">Design and operation of a 300kWth indirectly heated carbonate looping pilot plant.</a> International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 54, 272-281 (2016).</li><li>Mart&#237;nez, A., Lara, Y., Lisbona, P., Romeo, L. M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Energy+penalty+reduction+in+the+calcium+looping+cycle.">Energy penalty reduction in the calcium looping cycle.</a> International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 7, 74-81 (2012).</li><li>Perej&#243;n, A., Romeo, L. M., Lara, Y., Lisbona, P., Mart&#237;nez, A., Valverde, J. M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=The+calcium-looping+technology+for+CO2+capture:+on+the+important+roles+of+energy+integration+and+sorbent+behavior.">The calcium-looping technology for CO2 capture: on the important roles of energy integration and sorbent behavior.</a> Appl Energy. 162, 787-807 (2016).</li><li>Mantripragada, H. C., Rubin, E. S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Calcium+looping+cycle+for+CO2+capture:+Performance,+cost+and+feasibility+analysis.">Calcium looping cycle for CO2 capture: Performance, cost and feasibility analysis.</a> Energy Procedia. 63, 2199-2206 (2014).</li><li>. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=.">.</a> ASTM C1271-99(2012), Standard Test Method for X-ray Spectrometric Analysis of Lime and Limestone. (2012), C1271-C1299 (2012).</li><li>. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=.">.</a> ASTM C25-11e2, Standard Test Methods for Chemical Analysis of Limestone, Quicklime, and Hydrated Lime. , C25-C11 (2011).</li><li>Alonso, M., Rodr&#237;guez, N., Grasa, G., Abanades, J. C. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Modelling+of+a+fluidized+bed+carbonator+reactor+to+capture+CO2+from+a+combustion+flue+gas.">Modelling of a fluidized bed carbonator reactor to capture CO2 from a combustion flue gas.</a> Chem Eng Sci. 64 (5), 883-891 (2009).</li><li>Manovic, V., Anthony, E. J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Parametric+study+on+the+CO2+capture+capacity+of+CaO-based+sorbents+in+looping+cycles.">Parametric study on the CO2 capture capacity of CaO-based sorbents in looping cycles.</a> Energy Fuels. 22 (3), 1851-1857 (2008).</li><li>Duhoux, B., Mehrani, P., Lu, D. Y., Symonds, R. T., Anthony, E. J., Macchi, A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Combined+Calcium+Looping+and+Chemical+Looping+Combustion+for+Post-Combustion+Carbon+Dioxide+Capture:+Process+Simulation+and+Sensitivity+Analysis.">Combined Calcium Looping and Chemical Looping Combustion for Post-Combustion Carbon Dioxide Capture: Process Simulation and Sensitivity Analysis.</a> Energy Technol. 4 (10), 1158-1170 (2016).</li><li>Erans, M., Manovic, V., Anthony, E. J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Calcium+looping+sorbents+for+CO2+capture.">Calcium looping sorbents for CO2 capture.</a> Appl Energy. 180, 722-742 (2016).</li><li>Basu, P. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=A+study+of+agglomeration+of+coal-ash+in+fluidized+beds.">A study of agglomeration of coal-ash in fluidized beds.</a> The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering. 60 (6), 791-795 (1982).</li></ol>

The authors have nothing to disclose.

The operation of the calciner with an inlet of 100% vol oxygen is achievable, based on exploiting the endothermic nature of the calcination reaction, as well as the fact that the solids circulate between the two reactors at different temperatures. This operating mode aims to make the CaL process more economically promising by reducing capital and operating costs. As the recycle of flue gas (mainly CO2, water vapor and unreacted O2) is reduced or even eliminated, the heat consumed to preheat this str...

CO2 emissions and the resulting global warming are critical environmental issues that have attracted a large amount of research in the past years. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) has been acknowledged as a potential technology for reducing CO2 emissions to the atmosphere1,2. The most challenging part of the CCS chain is the capture of CO2, which is also the most costly stage3. In consequence, there has been a focus on developing new technologies for CO2 capture from power plants and other industrial facilities.
CaL as a post-combustion CO2 capture technology, was first proposed by Shimizu et al.4 CO2 is captured by a CaO-based sorbent at 600-700 &#176;C in a reactor called a carbonator, and released by subsequent calcination at 850-950 &#176;C (in a calciner) according to Eq. (1), to produce a high-purity CO2 stream suitable for sequestration5,6. The CaL cycle utilises fluidized beds, which represent an optimal configuration for this process, since they allow for large amounts of solids to be circulated easily from one reactor to the other4,5,6,7,8.
CaO (s) + CO2 (g) &#8660; CaCO3 (s)&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160; &#916;H25 &#176;C = -178.2 kJ/mol&#160; (1)
This concept has been demonstrated at pilot scale by various groups and with different configurations and scales, such as the 0.2 MWth pilot in Stuttgart, the 1 MWth pilot in Darmstadt, the 1.7 MWth pilot in La Pereda and the 1.9 MWth unit in Taiwan9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16. Although this process has been proven, there are still possibilities for increasing its thermal efficiency, such as by modifying the standard operating conditions and changes in the design of the reactor configuration.
The use of heat pipes between the combustor and calciner has been studied instead of oxy-combusting fuel in the calciner. The results for the CO2 capture performance are comparable with those of a conventional CaL pilot-plant, however, this process has higher plant efficiencies and lower CO2 avoidance costs17. Mart&#237;nez et al.18 investigated the heat integration possibilities in order to preheat the solid material entering the calciner and to reduce the heat needed in the calciner. The results showed 9% reduction in the coal consumption when compared with that of the standard case. Other studied possibilities for heat integration have also considered internal and external integration options19.
One of the main problems of the CaL cycle from the economic point of view is to supply the energy needed in the calciner by means of fuel combustion20. Increasing the oxygen concentration in the calciner&#39;s inlet is proposed in order to reduce or even avoid the need of CO2 recycle to the calciner. This alternative reduces the capital costs (reduced size of calciner and air separation units (ASU)), which can significantly improve the competitiveness of this process. The drastic change in the combustion conditions can be attained by exploiting the endothermic calcination reaction and the large CaO/CaCO3 flow circulating from the carbonator operating at lower temperatures (neither advantage is available with the oxy-combustion technology).
This work aims to develop a standard operating procedure for running a CaL pilot plant with a Circulating Fluidized Bed (CFB) carbonator and a Bubbling Fluidized Bed (BFB) calciner with 100% O2 concentration in the calciner&#39;s inlet. Several experimental campaigns have been run during the commissioning of the pilot plant to ensure proper operation as the oxygen concentration increased. Also, three limestone particle size distributions (100-200 &#181;m; 200-300 &#181;m; 300-400 &#181;m) were studied to investigate how this parameter affects the elutriation of particles and capture efficiency in this operating mode.

<table>
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td>Longcal limestone</td>
			<td>Loncliffe</td>
			<td>Longcal SP52</td>
			<td>n/a</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Mechanical Shacker</td>
			<td>SWECO</td>
			<td>LS24S544+C</td>
			<td>Mechanical siever to separate particles</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Oxygen</td>
			<td>BOC</td>
			<td>n/a</td>
			<td>BOC cylinders</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Nitrogen</td>
			<td>BOC</td>
			<td>n/a</td>
			<td>BOC tank</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Carbon dioxide</td>
			<td>BOC</td>
			<td>n/a</td>
			<td>BOC tank</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Natural gas</td>
			<td>n/a</td>
			<td>n/a</td>
			<td>Taken from the line</td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>

operation of a 25 kwth calcium looping pilot-plant with high oxygen concentrations in the calciner

Calcium looping (CaL) is a post-combustion CO2 capture technology that is suitable for retrofitting existing power plants. The CaL process uses limestone as a cheap and readily available CO2 sorbent. While the technology has been widely studied, there are a few available options that could be applied to make it more economically viable. One of these is to increase the oxygen concentration in the calciner to reduce or eliminate the amount of recycled gas (CO2, H2O and impurities); therefore, decreasing or removing the energy necessary to heat the recycled gas stream. Moreover, there is a resulting increase in the energy input due to the change in the combustion intensity; this energy is used to enable the endothermic calcination reaction to occur in the absence of recycled flue gases. This paper presents the operation and first results of a CaL pilot plant with 100% oxygen combustion of natural gas in the calciner. The gas coming into the carbonator was a simulated flue gas from a coal-fired power plant or cement industry. Several limestone particle size distributions are also tested to further explore the effect of this parameter on the overall performance of this operating mode. The configuration of the reactor system, the operating procedures, and the results are described in detail in this paper. The reactor showed good hydrodynamic stability and stable CO2 capture, with capture efficiencies of up to 70% with a gas mixture simulating the flue gas of a coal-fired power plant.

The experimental set-up is shown in Figure 3. The plant comprises two interconnected fluidized-beds. Namely, the carbonator is a CFB with 4.3 m height and 0.1 m internal diameter (ID); while the calciner is a BFB with 1.2 m height and 0.165 m ID. The solid transport from one reactor to the other is controlled by two loop-seals fluidized with nitrogen. Both reactors are fed a mixture of gas through a preheating line, and both are electrically heated; moreover,...

Watch this Scientific Journal Video about Operation of a 25 KWth Calcium Looping Pilot-plant with High Oxygen Concentrations in the Calciner at JoVE.com

Operation of a 25 KWth Calcium Looping Pilot-plant with High Oxygen Concentrations in the Calciner

This manuscript describes a procedure for operating a calcium looping pilot-plant for post-combustion carbon capture with high oxygen concentrations in the calciner in order to reduce or eliminate the flue gas recycle.

Operation of a 25 KWth Calcium Looping Pilot-plant with High Oxygen Concentrations in the Calciner

Calcium looping (CaL) is a post-combustion CO2 capture technology that is suitable for retrofitting existing power plants. The CaL process uses limestone ...

The overall goal of this procedure is to determine an operational mode that reduces or even eliminates the recirculation of off-gas into the calciner in a calcium looping pilot plant. This method can help answer key questions in the calcium looping field, such as how to increase the energy needed in the calciner. The main advantage of this operational mode is that it reduces the size of the calciner as well as the amount of fuel and oxygen used.To begin this procedure, use a mechanical shaker to sieve approximately 50 kilograms of limestone to the desired particle size distribution. Place the sieved materials in pots next to the calciner for feeding during the procedure. Next, start a low flow of nitrogen gas in the carbonator, calciner and the loop seals in the rotameters.Turn on the carbonator transformers, manually. Set the temperatures of all carbonator electrical pre-heaters to 600 degrees Celsius. Begin acquiring data for temperature, pressure and gas composition in both reactors.Then, turn on the calciner, gas pre-heaters. Set the heater around the calciner to 600 degrees Celsius, measuring inside the bubbling, fluidized bed, via a thermocouple. Open to calciner's top valve.Add three liters of the sieved limestone into the downpipe and then close the top valve. After this, open the bottom valve so that the material flows into the reactor. Heat the material as outlined in the text protocol.To begin, increase the flow of oxygen to increase the concentration in the calciner from zero to 40%volume. Make sure that the concentration is stable before starting the combustion. Next, use a rotameter to manually start the stoichiometric flow of natural gas.Adjust the rotameter for the natural gas flow to increase the oxygen concentration in the calciner in 20%increments, until 100%oxygen concentration, natural gas combustion is achieved. After this, add seven liters of limestone to the fluidized bed in 0.5 liters increments. Then, increase the flow of nitrogen gas in the carbonator to start the circulation.Calcine all of the material, as outlined in the text protocol before starting carbon dioxide capture. To begin, use the rotatmeter to manually, switch the carbonation gas from nitrogen to 15%volume carbon dioxide. Using the rotameters, manually adjust the flow of natural gas and oxygen to the calciner, until a stable temperature of between 930 and 950 degrees Celsius is achieved.When the material's activity begins to decline, add more limestone. To begin the shut-down procedure, use the rotameter to manually turn off the natural gas flow. Slowly, decrease the flow of oxygen, until it is shut off, then switch the gases in both reactions to nitrogen.Turn off all heaters and let the rig cool overnight. The reactors have to cool overnight to reach room temperature. In this study, a plant comprised of two interconnected, fluidized beds is used to test the process of running from 20%oxygen to 100%oxygen at the calciner inlet.The rig is first tested with 30%oxygen and the limestone fraction between 200 and 300 micrometers circulating between the two reactors. The inferior capture efficiency of 45%is mainly due to there being insufficient heat to calcine all of the limestone in the bubbling fluidized bed. This causes a decrease in the ratio of calcium oxide to calcium carbonate in the carbonator feed.The rig is then tested with 100%oxygen and a limestone fraction of 100 to 200 micrometers. Most of the limestone material ended up in the calciner cyclone. This is likely the cause of the low capture efficiency and suggests that smaller limestone particles do not provide a beneficial effect on system performance.Lastly, the rig is tested with 100%oxygen, a limestone fraction between 300 and 400 micrometers and careful control over the heat and limestone content. As can be seen, a stable capture efficiency of approximately 70%is achieved for over three hours. Thus, it can be determined that a stable run can be achieved with optimized conditions.After it's development, this technique paved the way for researchers in the field of carbon capture to test the calcium looping cycle with high oxygen concentrations in the calciner. After watching this video, you should have a good understanding of how to perform an experiment, running with high oxygen concentrations in the calciner. Don't forget that working with high oxygen concentrations can be extremely hazardous and precautions, such as turning off the gas if combustion is not occurring properly should always be taken while performing this procedure.

operation-25-kwth-calcium-looping-pilot-plant-with-high-oxygen

Research

JoVE Journal

Environment

7.8K 조회수.  Cranfield University. The overall goal of this procedure is to determine an operational mode that reduces or even eliminates the recirculation of off-gas into the calciner in a calcium looping pilot plant. This method can help answer key questions in the calcium looping field, such as how to increase the energy needed in the calciner. The main advantage of this operational mode is that it reduces the size of the calciner as well as the amount of fuel and oxygen used.To begin this procedure, use a mechanical...