JoVE Logo

Zaloguj się

Aby wyświetlić tę treść, wymagana jest subskrypcja JoVE. Zaloguj się lub rozpocznij bezpłatny okres próbny.

W tym Artykule

  • Podsumowanie
  • Streszczenie
  • Wprowadzenie
  • Protokół
  • Wyniki
  • Dyskusje
  • Ujawnienia
  • Podziękowania
  • Materiały
  • Odniesienia
  • Przedruki i uprawnienia

Podsumowanie

Here we describe a protocol for simultaneous detection of histone modifications by immunofluorescence and DNA sequences by DNA FISH followed by 3D microscopy and analyses (3D immuno-DNA FISH).

Streszczenie

Fluorescent in situ hybridization using DNA probes on 3-dimensionally preserved nuclei followed by 3D confocal microscopy (3D DNA FISH) represents the most direct way to visualize the location of gene loci, chromosomal sub-regions or entire territories in individual cells. This type of analysis provides insight into the global architecture of the nucleus as well as the behavior of specific genomic loci and regions within the nuclear space. Immunofluorescence, on the other hand, permits the detection of nuclear proteins (modified histones, histone variants and modifiers, transcription machinery and factors, nuclear sub-compartments, etc). The major challenge in combining immunofluorescence and 3D DNA FISH is, on the one hand to preserve the epitope detected by the antibody as well as the 3D architecture of the nucleus, and on the other hand, to allow the penetration of the DNA probe to detect gene loci or chromosome territories 1-5. Here we provide a protocol that combines visualization of chromatin modifications with genomic loci in 3D preserved nuclei.

Wprowadzenie

Epigenetic mechanisms trigger establishment and inheritance of developmental and cell-type specific transcriptional profiles. At one level this involves modulation of chromatin packaging that defines active or silent genomic regions. On a larger scale, global 3D organization of the genome and nuclear architecture also play a role in the control of transcriptional patterns. Thus, dissection of these epigenomic features is essential for a full understanding of how genes are regulated 6-11.

Combined immunofluorescence and 3D DNA FISH provide a unique opportunity to complement molecular and biochemical analyses by assessing specific interactions/associations of DNA sequences and/or proteins within the nucleus. Furthermore, while genome-wide high throughput techniques such as chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP-seq) or chromosome capture conformation coupled with deep sequencing (4C-seq, 5C, Hi-C) provide global data on cell populations12, immunofluorescence/DNA FISH techniques enable analyses at the single cell level.

Here we describe a protocol for simultaneous detection of histone modifications by immunofluorescence and DNA sequences by DNA FISH followed by 3D microscopy and analyses (3D immuno-FISH). The advantage of this protocol is the combined visualization of DNA and preservation of protein structures. Our experience in this field has enabled us to improve and simplify existing protocols. Although we have used this protocol to detect DNA double-stranded breaks in lymphocytes undergoing recombination, this method can be applied to other proteins and other cell-types.

Protokół

1. DNA Probe Labeling with Fluorophores: Nick Translation (~ 6 hr)

  1. Clean BAC DNA (prepared by maxi-prep) or plasmids or PCR products, all resuspended in H2O, can be used for labeling. Note that for a robust FISH signal, probes should span at least 10 kb.
  2. Incubate DNA in RNase A for 30 min at 37 °C (All reagents are listed in Table 1).
  3. Incubate the nick translation reaction for 2 hr at 16 °C (see Tables 2 and 3). Alternative methods of direct labeling may be used (Example: FISH Tag, Invitrogen).
  4. Inactivate the reaction for one hr at -80 °C or overnight at -20 °C.
  5. Determine probe size on a 2% agarose gel. The smear should be between 100 and 1,000 bp, with the majority at approximately 300-500 bp (Note that the smear of Cy5-probes is not visible). If the DNA is not digested enough, more DNA Pol I and DNase I can be added to the reaction and incubated for two more hr at 16 °C.
  6. Purify probes on 0.025 mm filters in two liter beakers filled with H20 for two hr in the dark.
  7. Add blocking factors to the probes as follows: 10 μg of Cot-1 DNA, 10 μg of Hybloc DNA and 100 μg of salmon sperm for 10 μg of DNA probes. Store DNA probes at -20 °C.

2. Probe Precipitation/Denaturation/Pre-annealing (3-4 hr)

  1. Between 0.3 μg and 1 μg of DNA probe is used per coverslip. Mix probes with 0.1 volume of 3M NaAc (pH 5.2) and 2.5 volumes of 100% ethanol, incubate for one hr at -80 °C or overnight at -20 °C and spin down at 13,000 rpm at 4 °C for 30 min. Note that the amount of DNA probe may be adjusted depending on the quality of the DNA and the nuclear region of hybridization. Alternative methods of direct labeling may allow the use of reduced amounts of probe. For detection of multiple DNA FISH signals on one slide, the different probes can be precipitated together (except probes that should not be pre-annealed, like repeat sequences). Probes for several experiments performed at the same time can also be precipitated together. Pellets should be lightly colored according to the fluorophores used (if small amounts of probes are precipitated, the pellet may not be visible).
  2. Dry pellets and resuspend them in 15 μl hybridization buffer (see Table 4) per coverslip with shaking (using an Eppendorf thermomixer) in the dark at 37-45 °C (for approximately 20 min).
  3. Denature probes for 5 min at 75-95 °C.
  4. Pre-anneal probes at 37 °C for 30-60 min. Length of pre-annealing may be adjusted depending on the complexity and quality of the probes.
  5. Apply probes to the coverslips for overnight hybridization (see Section 3).

3. 3-dimensional DNA FISH - First Day (~ 3 hr)

  1. Non-adherent cells are concentrated in a small volume of 1x PBS (~ 2x105 cells in 5-10 μl 1x PBS per coverslip) and dropped on the center of a poly-L-lysine coated coverslip. Adherent cells should be cultured on coverslips for at least 24 hr (~ 70% confluence) (coverslips may be coated with 0.1% gelatin). Square 18x18 to 24-24 mm coverslips are placed in 6-well plates, and throughout the protocol, two ml of each solution is used per well (alternatively round 1.5 mm coverslips can be placed in 12/24-well plates).
  2. Fix cells in 2% paraformaldehyde / 1x PBS, pH 7-7.4, for 10 min at RT (4% PFA stocks can be aliquoted, stored at -20 °C). Paraformaldehyde can be purchased in solution (16%), or 4% stock solutions can be prepared from powder/prills. Paraformaldehyde powder is dissolved in 1x PBS at > 60 °C (pH may be increased to 8-9 to facilitate dissolution), cooled-down on ice, adjusted to pH 7-7.4, filtered, aliquoted in falcons and stored for weeks at -20 °C.
  3. After three rinses in 1x PBS, permeabilize cells in iced-cold 0.4% Triton-X-100 / 1x PBS for 5 min on ice. Length of permeabilization may be adjusted depending on the cell-type. N.B.: If DNA FISH is combined with immunofluorescence, the immunostaining should be performed at this stage (see Section 4).
  4. After three rinses in 1x PBS, incubate cells with 0.1 μg/μl RNase A in 1x PBS for one hr at 37 °C. Coverslips are placed cell-side down onto a drop of 100 μl of solution on parafilm or a slide in a humid chamber. Coverslips are then carefully removed with forceps. If any resistance is encountered, coverslips should be flooded with 1x PBS in order to avoid damaging the cells.
  5. After three rinses in 1x PBS, permeabilize cells in iced-cold 0.7% Triton-X-100 / 0.1 M HCl for 10 min on ice.
  6. After three rinses in 1x PBS, denature cells in 1.9 M HCl for 30 min at RT. Alternately, cells can be denatured in 50% formamide / 2x SSC at 75-80 °C for at least 30 min. Note that hybridization length (and temperature) may be optimized depending on the cell-type.
  7. After three rinses in ice-cold 1x PBS, hybridize cells with probes overnight at 37 °C in a dark and humid chamber. Coverslips are placed cell-side down onto a drop of 15 μl of probe on a slide, and sealed with rubber cement.

4. 3-dimensional Immuno-FISH - First Day (~ 6-7 hr)

  1. For combined immunofluorescence /DNA FISH, immuno-staining should be performed after the permeabilization in 0.4% Triton-X-100 (Step 3.3).
  2. Incubate cells in blocking solution for 30 min at RT (2.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA), 10% Normal Goat Serum, 0.1% Tween-20). The blocking solution is filtered, aliquoted in 1.5 ml Eppendorfs and stored for months at -20 °C.
  3. Incubate cells with the primary antibody raised against the protein or the histone modification of interest diluted in blocking solution, for one hr at RT in a humid chamber. Here we show the example of an antibody against phosphorylated serine-139 of H2AX (γ-H2AX, Millipore; See Table 5 for details). Coverslips are placed cell-side down onto a drop of 100 μl of solution on parafilm or a slide in a humid chamber. Coverslips are then carefully removed with forceps (flooded with 1x PBS if necessary).Note that dilution and incubation length may be adjusted depending on the quality of the antibody and cell-types.
  4. Wash cells in 0.2% BSA / 0.1% Tween-20 / 1x PBS, three times 5 min at RT with shaking.
  5. Incubate cells with the appropriate fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibody diluted in blocking solution for one hr at RT in a dark and humid chamber. Here we show an example of detection with a secondary goat anti-mouse antibody (Alexa Fluor 488 or 555, Invitrogen; See Table 5 for details). Hapten-conjugated secondary antibodies (biotin, digoxigenin, etc) could also be used. In this case, an extra step for appropriate detection (streptavidin, anti-dig, etc) can be performed either before or after over-night DNA-FISH hybridization.
  6. Rinse cells in 0.1% Tween-20 / 1x PBS, three times 5 min at RT with shaking in the dark.
  7. Post-fix cells in 2% paraformaldehyde / 1x PBS for 10 min at RT in the dark.
  8. Continue DNA FISH as above from incubation in RNase A (Step 3.4).

5. 3-dimensional DNA FISH / Immuno-FISH - Second Day (~ 2 hr)

  1. Carefully remove rubber cement, flood coverslips with 2x SSC, carefully remove with forceps and place them in wells containing washing solution.
  2. Wash cells in 2x SSC for 30 min at 37 °C in the dark with shaking.
  3. Wash cells in 2x SSC for 30 min at RT in the dark with shaking.
  4. Wash cells in 1x SSC for 30 min at RT in the dark with shaking. Note that in case of denaturation with formamide, washes should be replaced by the following: 3 washes in 50% formamide / 2x SSC and 3 washes in 2x SSC, 5 min each, at 37 °C.
  5. Mount cells in ProLong Gold mounting medium containing 1.5 μg/ml DAPI (4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) for counterstaining of total DNA. Coverslips are placed cell-side down onto a drop of 10-15 μl of mounting medium on a slide and sealed with nail polish. Slides are kept for months at -20 °C.

6. 3D Microscopy and Analysis

  1. 3D images can be acquired with different microscope systems. In our experiments, optical sections separated by 0.3 μm are collected on a Leica SP5 AOBS confocal system (Acousto-Optical Beam Splitter). Note that the separation between optical planes may be adjusted depending on the type of analysis.
  2. 3D image stacks can be analyzed using different software and tools. We use the Image J software to assess distance measurements between loci of interest and to analyze different types of association of the loci of interest with sub-nuclear compartments or proteins.
  3. All statistical analyses are performed to compare two (or more) different biological conditions with pairwise assessment(s) of significance: comparison between different cell types or stages, comparison between different loci of interest. In all statistical tests, P-values ≤ 5.00E-2 (a = 0.05) are taken to be significant (1.00E-2 ≤ P ≤ 5.00E-2 * significant; 1.00E-3 ≤ P ≤ 1.00E-2 ** very significant; P < 1.00E-3 *** highly significant).

Statistical analysis of the entire distributions of distances between two alleles. We first construct cumulative distribution frequency curves over the entire range of measured distances between the two alleles.To assess the significance of differences in the distributions of empirical inter-allelic distances we use the nonparametric two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test 13,14 .

Statistical analysis of close association (i.e. pairing) of two alleles using an optimal distance cut-off. To identify the range of most robust differences in distances between two alleles or loci, we use a series of two-tail Fisher exact test 15 s. Namely, at each measured distance we test whether one condition is significantly over-represented at shorter distances between the two samples. The minimum in the distribution of P-Values indicates the range of distances that should be considered as a cut-off for close association (i.e. pairing) of the two alleles. Subsequently the two-tail Fisher exact test is used to assess the significance of pairing of two alleles at the identified cut-off value15. Multiple testing corrections are applied to account for the total number of Fisher tests performed 16.

Statistical analysis of association of the locus of interest with sub-nuclear compartments or proteins. The two-tail Fisher-exact test is used to analyze the significance of association of the locus of interest with different compartments or proteins 15.

Wyniki

DNA and immuno-FISH are used in the Skok lab to study the changes in nuclear organization associated with the process of V(D)J recombination of antigen receptor loci during B and T lymphocyte development. The techniques detailed above enable us to i) measure distances between the two ends of a locus (contraction) ii) measure distances between alleles or loci (pairing), iii) analyze the DNA damage occurring within loci, iv) assess the location of alleles and loci relative to nuclear sub-compartments (repressive per...

Dyskusje

The techniques detailed above were used in our lab to analyze the regulation of V(D)J recombination of the Immunoglobulin and Tcra/d loci in developing lymphocytes 30,31 . We are confident that this technique can be adapted for detection of various nuclear proteins, nuclear compartments and loci, in different cell-types. Modifications of the protocol may be necessary, and in this case the major steps to focus on are the following. First, the length of permeabilization can be adjusted de...

Ujawnienia

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Podziękowania

We would like to thank the members of the Skok lab, especially Susannah Hewitt, for discussions and comments. This work is supported by the National Institute of Health grants R01GM086852, RC1CA145746 (J.A.S.). J.A.S. is a Leukemia & Lymphoma Society scholar. J.C. is an Irvington Institute Fellow of the Cancer Research Institute. M.M. is supported by a National Science Foundation Grant Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship (NSF IGERT 0333389).

Materiały

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
H2OFisher# BP2470
RNase ASigma# R4642
dNTPSigma# DNTP100
Alexa dUTPInvitrogen# C11397 to C-11401
Cy3 or Cy5 dUTPFisher# 45-001-xxx
DNase IRoche# 04536282001
DNA Pol IBiolabs# M0209
0.025 μm filtersMillipore# VSWP02500
Cot-1 DNA 1 mg/mlInvitrogen# 18440
Hybloc DNA 1 mg/mlApplied Genetics# MHB
Salmon spermSigma# D1626powder to be resuspended at 10 mg/ml in H2O
NaAc (Sodium Acetate, pH 5.2, buffer solution)Sigma# S7899
Ficoll 400 (Mol Biol grade)Fisher# 525
Polyvinylpyrrolidone (Mol Biol grade)Fisher# BP431
Dextran sulfate powderSigma# D8906
SSPE (Saline-Sodium Phosphate-EDTA) 20x solutionFisher# BP1328
FormamideFisher# BP227
CoverslipsFisher# 12-548-B
SlidesFisher# 12-550
6-well platesFisher# 0720080
PBS, 10xFisher# MT-46-013-CM
Poly-L-lysine solutionSigma# P8920
Paraformaldehyde, prills, 95%Sigma# 441244
Triton-X-100, Mol Biol gradeSigma# T8787
BSA (Bovine Serum Albumin) Fraction VFisher# BP 1600
Normal goat serumVector Labs# S-1000
Tween-20, Mol Biol gradeSigma# P9416
SSC (Saline Sodium Citrate) 20x solutionFisher# BP1325
ProLong Gold antifade reagentInvitrogen# P36930
DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole)Sigma# D9542
Best test one coat rubber cementArt or office supply stores
Table 1. Specific reagents and small equipment.

Odniesienia

  1. Chaumeil, J., Okamoto, I., Heard, E. X-chromosome inactivation in mouse embryonic stem cells: analysis of histone modifications and transcriptional activity using immunofluorescence and FISH. Methods in enzymology. , 376-405 (2004).
  2. Cremer, M., et al. Multicolor 3D fluorescence in situ hybridization for imaging interphase chromosomes. Methods Mol. Biol. 463, 205-239 (2008).
  3. Chaumeil, J., Augui, S., Chow, J. C., Heard, E. Combined immunofluorescence, RNA fluorescent in situ hybridization, and DNA fluorescent in situ hybridization to study chromatin changes, transcriptional activity, nuclear organization, and X-chromosome inactivation. Methods Mol. Biol. 463, 297-308 (2008).
  4. Solovei, I., Cremer, M. 3D-FISH on cultured cells combined with immunostaining. Methods Mol. Biol. 659, 117-126 (2010).
  5. Markaki, Y. The potential of 3D-FISH and super-resolution structured illumination microscopy for studies of 3D nuclear architecture: 3D structured illumination microscopy of defined chromosomal structures visualized by 3D (immuno)-FISH opens new perspectives for studies of nuclear architecture. BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology. 34, 412-426 (2012).
  6. Heard, E., Bickmore, W. The ins and outs of gene regulation and chromosome territory organisation. Current opinion in cell biology. 19, 311-316 (2007).
  7. Misteli, T. Beyond the sequence: cellular organization of genome function. Cell. 128, 787-800 (1016).
  8. Fraser, P., Bickmore, W. Nuclear organization of the genome and the potential for gene regulation. Nature. 447, 413-417 (2007).
  9. Cremer, T., et al. Chromosome territories--a functional nuclear landscape. Current opinion in cell biology. 18, 307-316 (2006).
  10. Mao, Y. S., Zhang, B., Spector, D. L. Biogenesis and function of nuclear bodies. Trends in genetics : TIG. 27, 295-306 (2011).
  11. Dostie, J., Bickmore, W. A. Chromosome organization in the nucleus - charting new territory across the Hi-Cs. Current opinion in genetics & development. 22, 125-131 (2012).
  12. van Steensel, B., Dekker, J. Genomics tools for unraveling chromosome architecture. Nature. 28, 1089-1095 (2010).
  13. Massey, F. J. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Goodness of Fit. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 253, 1951 (1951).
  14. Collins, A., et al. RUNX transcription factor-mediated association of Cd4 and Cd8 enables coordinate gene regulation. Immunity. 34, 303-314 (2011).
  15. Fisher, R. A. On the interpretation of χ2 from contingency tables, and the calculation of P. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 85, 87-94 (1922).
  16. Benjamini, Y. H., Yosef, Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological). 57, 125-133 (1995).
  17. Fitzsimmons, S. P., Bernstein, R. M., Max, E. E., Skok, J. A., Shapiro, M. A. Dynamic changes in accessibility, nuclear positioning, recombination, and transcription at the Igkappa locus. J. Immunol. 179, 5264-5273 (2007).
  18. Fuxa, M., et al. Pax5 induces V-to-DJ rearrangements and locus contraction of the immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene. Genes Dev. 18, 411-422 (2004).
  19. Goldmit, M. Epigenetic ontogeny of the Igk locus during B cell development. Nature. 6, 198-203 (2005).
  20. Hewitt, S. L. Association between the Igk and Igh immunoglobulin loci mediated by the 3' Igk enhancer induces 'decontraction' of the Igh locus in pre-B cells. Nature. 9, 396-404 (2008).
  21. Johnson, K. IL-7 Functionally Segregates the Pro-B Cell Stage by Regulating Transcription of Recombination Mediators across Cell Cycle. Journal of Immunology. , (2012).
  22. Karnowski, A., et al. Silencing and nuclear repositioning of the lambda5 gene locus at the pre-b cell stage requires Aiolos and OBF-1. PLoS ONE. 3, e3568 (2008).
  23. Kosak, S. T. Subnuclear compartmentalization of immunoglobulin loci during lymphocyte development. Science. 296, 158-162 (2002).
  24. Liu, H., et al. Yin Yang 1 is a critical regulator of B-cell development. Genes Dev. 21, 1179-1189 (2007).
  25. Parker, M. J. The pre-B-cell receptor induces silencing of VpreB and lambda5 transcription. Embo J. 24, 3895-3905 (2005).
  26. Roldan, E., et al. Locus 'decontraction' and centromeric recruitment contribute to allelic exclusion of the immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene. Nature immunology. 6, 31-41 (2005).
  27. Skok, J. A. Nonequivalent nuclear location of immunoglobulin alleles in B lymphocytes. Nature. 2, 848-854 (2001).
  28. Skok, J. A. Reversible contraction by looping of the Tcra and Tcrb loci in rearranging thymocytes. Nature immunology. 8, 378-387 (2007).
  29. Xiang, Y., Zhou, X., Hewitt, S. L., Skok, J. A., Garrard, W. T. A multifunctional element in the mouse Igkappa locus that specifies repertoire and Ig loci subnuclear location. Journal of Immunology. 186, 5356-5366 (2011).
  30. Hewitt, S. L. RAG-1 and ATM coordinate monoallelic recombination and nuclear positioning of immunoglobulin loci. Nature immunology. 10, 655-664 (2009).
  31. Deriano, L., et al. The RAG2 C terminus suppresses genomic instability and lymphomagenesis. Nature. 471, 119-123 (2011).
  32. Brown, K. E., Baxter, J., Graf, D., Merkenschlager, M., Fisher, A. G. Dynamic repositioning of genes in the nucleus of lymphocytes preparing for cell division. Molecular cell. 3, 207-217 (1999).
  33. Fernandez-Capetillo, O., Lee, A., Nussenzweig, M., Nussenzweig, A. H2AX: the histone guardian of the genome. DNA repair. 3, 959-967 (2004).
  34. Croft, J. A., et al. Differences in the localization and morphology of chromosomes in the human nucleus. The Journal of cell biology. 145, 1119-1131 (1999).
  35. Chaumeil, J., Le Baccon, P., Wutz, A., Heard, E. A novel role for Xist RNA in the formation of a repressive nuclear compartment into which genes are recruited when silenced. Genes Dev. 20, 2223-2237 (2006).
  36. Walter, J., et al. Towards many colors in FISH on 3D-preserved interphase nuclei. Cytogenetic and genome research. 114, 367-378 (2006).
  37. Toomre, D., Bewersdorf, J. A new wave of cellular imaging. Annual review of cell and developmental biology. 26, 285-314 (2010).
  38. Schermelleh, L., Heintzmann, R., Leonhardt, H. A guide to super-resolution fluorescence microscopy. The Journal of cell biology. 190, 165-175 (2010).
  39. Dobbie, I. M. OMX: a new platform for multimodal, multichannel wide-field imaging. Cold Spring Harbor protocols. , 899-909 (2011).
  40. Boyle, S., Rodesch, M. J., Halvensleben, H. A., Jeddeloh, J. A., Bickmore, W. A. Fluorescence in situ hybridization with high-complexity repeat-free oligonucleotide probes generated by massively parallel synthesis. Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology. 19, 901-909 (2011).

Przedruki i uprawnienia

Zapytaj o uprawnienia na użycie tekstu lub obrazów z tego artykułu JoVE

Zapytaj o uprawnienia

Przeglądaj więcej artyków

Keywords 3D DNA FISH3D Nuclear Organization3D Confocal MicroscopyImmunofluorescenceChromatin ModificationsGene LociChromosome TerritoriesNuclear ArchitectureNuclear ProteinsHistone VariantsTranscription MachineryNuclear Sub compartments

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Prywatność

Warunki Korzystania

Zasady

Badania

Edukacja

O JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone