Aby wyświetlić tę treść, wymagana jest subskrypcja JoVE. Zaloguj się lub rozpocznij bezpłatny okres próbny.
Method Article
Here we describe a robust method for the fractionation of plant plasma membranes into detergent resistant and detergent soluble membranes based on a mixture of unlabeled and in vivo fully 15N labeled Arabidopsis thaliana cell cultures. The procedure is applied for comparative proteomic studies to understand signaling processes.
Plasma membrane microdomains are features based on the physical properties of the lipid and sterol environment and have particular roles in signaling processes. Extracting sterol-enriched membrane microdomains from plant cells for proteomic analysis is a difficult task mainly due to multiple preparation steps and sources for contaminations from other cellular compartments. The plasma membrane constitutes only about 5-20% of all the membranes in a plant cell, and therefore isolation of highly purified plasma membrane fraction is challenging. A frequently used method involves aqueous two-phase partitioning in polyethylene glycol and dextran, which yields plasma membrane vesicles with a purity of 95% 1. Sterol-rich membrane microdomains within the plasma membrane are insoluble upon treatment with cold nonionic detergents at alkaline pH. This detergent-resistant membrane fraction can be separated from the bulk plasma membrane by ultracentrifugation in a sucrose gradient 2. Subsequently, proteins can be extracted from the low density band of the sucrose gradient by methanol/chloroform precipitation. Extracted protein will then be trypsin digested, desalted and finally analyzed by LC-MS/MS. Our extraction protocol for sterol-rich microdomains is optimized for the preparation of clean detergent-resistant membrane fractions from Arabidopsis thaliana cell cultures.
We use full metabolic labeling of Arabidopsis thaliana suspension cell cultures with K15NO3 as the only nitrogen source for quantitative comparative proteomic studies following biological treatment of interest 3. By mixing equal ratios of labeled and unlabeled cell cultures for joint protein extraction the influence of preparation steps on final quantitative result is kept at a minimum. Also loss of material during extraction will affect both control and treatment samples in the same way, and therefore the ratio of light and heave peptide will remain constant. In the proposed method either labeled or unlabeled cell culture undergoes a biological treatment, while the other serves as control 4.
In 1972, Jonathan Singer and Garth Nicolson proposed the fluid mosaic model a structure model of cellular membranes, replacing the protein-lipid-protein sandwich model that was generally accepted in the early 1960s. Singer and Nicolson postulated that the biological membrane can be considered as a two-dimensional liquid where all lipid and protein molecules diffuse freely and easily 5. Since that time, structure model of the plasma membrane and knowledge of the membrane composition became even more complex. Particularly, within the plasma membrane, structures such as protein complexes and lipid/sterol based structurally disordered microdomains can be observed. In artificial model membranes 6,7, sterols and sphingolipids can laterally segregate from other lipid species to form regions with altered physical features. This segregation within the cellular membrane is mainly caused by the self-associating properties between sterols and highly saturated hydrocarbon chains of phopsho- and sphingolipids 8. Particularly, the rigid sterol rings favor interactions with stiffer and straighter saturated lipid species and these interactions force neighboring hydrocarbon chains into more extended conformations, increasing membrane thickness and hardness.
One of the commonly observed features of sterol enriched membrane microdomains was their insolubility upon treatment with non-ionic detergents such a Triton X-100 or Brij 35. These fractions were thought to be identical with membrane microdomains and were called detergent resistant membranes (DRM) based on their biochemical preparation method 2. The use of nonionic detergents during DRM extraction received some criticism as the biochemical DRM preparation may not directly correspond to any specific membrane compartment within the living cell 9. Particularly, the detergent to protein ratio seems crucial in such preparations, as different detergents, as well as different detergent amounts can yield different composition of the detergent resistant membrane fraction 10. However, there is evidence that particular protein species specifically associate with these cellular sterol-rich membrane domains, and that these proteins are well enriched in biochemical preparations of detergent-resistant membrane fractions 11. The core of proteins that were found in plant DRM fraction, and for which the presence in DRMs was sterol dependent, were particularly GPI-anchored proteins, such as fasciclin-like arabinogalactan proteins (FLAs) and members of the SKU protein family. Also some signaling proteins, such as receptor-like kinases or phospholipases were found 11. These results are consistent with many proteomic studies on mammalian membrane microdomains 12,13. Also in plants there is increasing evidence for the role of membrane microdomains in context of stress response 14-16.
The protocol described here provides a robust method for fractionation of plasma membrane microdomains and particularly uses a protein to detergent concentration that allows us to depict stress induced alterations of the sterol-rich membrane compartment 4,11,14.
PROCEDURE
Common reagents and buffers used in the extraction protocol:
NOTE: pH of the JPL medium should be adjusted to 5.7 with KOH. The medium must be sterilized by filtration or autoclaving prior to use.
PROTOCOLS
1. Metabolic Labeling of Arabidopsis thaliana Cell Suspension Cultures
NOTE: For 15N metabolically labeled cell cultures use the K15NO3 as the only source of nitrogen for at least two passages over two weeks 19. In experiments for comparative proteomics, use a 15N labeled cell culture and also maintain an unlabeled culture in normal medium. Biological treatment will then be applied to either labeled or unlabeled culture, while the other serves as control (Figure 1). For protein preparation, both cultures will be combined 20. When planning the experimental setup, we recommend considering a reciprocal labeling setup 4 in which the same treatment is applied once to the 15N-labeled cells and once to the unlabeled cells and the respective unlabeled or 15N-labeled cells serve as controls. In this case, the double amounts of cell cultures are needed.
2. Plasma Membrane Purification
NOTE: All further steps are carried out in the cold room and/or on ice unless it is noted otherwise.
NOTE: The Supernatant contains soluble proteins. A small amount of this fraction can be saved for further protein precipitation and subsequent analysis also of soluble proteins.
NOTE: The final volume of buffer R depends on the size of the two phase system that is going to be used (~1.6 ml of buffer R is needed when using 6 g system). It is recommended to use less buffer for resuspension so pure buffer can be added onto two-phase system to obtain the demanded weight, rather than using too much buffer for solubilization and not be able to load the whole sample onto the two phase system.
NOTE: Do not vigorously shake the two-phase system. It can cause a lack of separation of the phases in the ultracentrifugation step.
NOTE: The final upper phase may have to be divided into separate ultracentrifuge tubes before it can be diluted five times.
NOTE: A small amount of this fraction can be saved for the analysis of unfractionated plasma membrane.
NOTE: The plasma membrane fraction can be stored at 4 °C overnight before fractionation into detergent resistant membranes and detergent soluble fractions.
3. Detergent Resistant Membrane Preparation
4. Extraction of Proteins from the Detergent Resistant Fraction by Methanol/Chloroform
NOTE: All steps are carried out in the room temperature.
5. In-solution Trypsin Digestion
NOTE: In this procedure all steps are done at room temperature to reduce unwanted derivatization of amino acid side-chains by the denaturants.
NOTE: Only a rough estimate of protein content is necessary. When sample amount is limited it is better to sacrifice accuracy rather than wasting sample on a protein assay.
NOTE: This step is absolutely necessary to dilute the urea concentration as trypsin is very sensitive to high salt.
NOTE: Samples can be stored at - 20 °C until used further, but it is better to store them on StageTips at 4 °C if it is for a short time (one week) or store them after StageTips desalting.
6. Manufacturing of C18-StageTips
NOTE: StageTips can be stored dry at room temperature 21.
7. Use of C18-StageTips for Peptide Desalting and Concentration
NOTE: Use adapters to spin StageTips in an Eppendorf centrifuge, liquid will be collected in a 2 ml reaction tube. For larger-scale preparations, stage tips can also be placed into a tip rack with 96 of the 200 μl tips and liquid can be collected in a microtiter plate.
NOTE: Never use higher speeds than 3,000 x g in a benchtop centrifuge (e.g. Eppendorf 5417R) due to the risk of spinning out the C18 disk from the tip.
NOTE: One disc can bind approx. 100 μg of protein.
NOTE: The washed and loaded StageTips can be stored at 4 °C for up to a week.
NOTE: Dried samples can be stored in the -80 °C for years.
NOTE: The final volume of the used resuspension buffer is dependent on the needs of experimenter and the sensitivity of the mass spectrometer used.
8. Alternative Protocol for Phosphopeptide Enrichment
NOTE: For phosphopeptide enrichment, protein extraction in step 2 must be done in the presence of phosphatase inhibitors.
NOTE: Exact protein concentration does not need to be determined for the following steps. It is enough to have a rough estimate of protein content to avoid unnecessary sample loss
NOTE: Save the TiO2 tips and retrieve the powder. It can be washed with solution B and used again for one or two more rounds.
9. LC-MS/MS Analysis of Peptide Mixtures
NOTE: For optimal fragmentation, either neutral-loss scanning should be applied 22, or if available the multistage activation 23. If ETD is available it will allow peptide backbone fragmentation without loss of phosphoric acid 24.
NOTE: Peak lists from raw data need to be extracted and submitted to database identification as well as for quantitation. Here, we describe settings for using Mascot and MSQuant, which works for raw data files from LTQ, LTQ-Orbitrap and LTQ-FT instruments (Thermo Scientific).
With the presented protocol using metabolically labeled Arabidopsis cell cultures it is possible to isolate plasma membranes from plant tissue (step2, Figures 2 and 4), and enrich for detergent resistant membrane fractions within the plasma membrane (step 3, Figures 3 and 5). Subsequently, the protocol allows extraction of proteins from these detergent resistant membrane fractions (step 4) and digestion of the protein for comparative proteomic analysis (step 5). Finally, the opt...
The protocol presented in this paper contains many steps and all of them are crucial to obtain pure and representative fractionation of the plant plasma membrane into detergent resistant membranes and detergent soluble fractions. Therefore, it is important to follow each step as instructed.
Treatment of the plasma membrane fraction with non-ionic detergent (step 3.2) has the strongest influence on the quality of membrane microdomain fractionation. To obtain reproducible results between differe...
The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.
The author, Witold Szymanski, is an employee of the Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology. The author, Waltraud Schulze is an employee at the University of Hohenheim, Germany.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
REAGENTS | |||
Chemicals were ordered from Sigma-Aldrich unless noted otherwise | |||
Ammonia (stock 25 % solution) | WAKO | 010-03166 | |
TiO2 10 μm | GL-Science | 5020-75010 | |
Empore Disk C18 | Varian | 12145004 | |
Polyethylene glycol(PEG 3350) | Sigma | 88276 | |
Dextran T500 | Roth | 9219.2 | |
Trypsin | Promega | V5113 | |
Protease inhibitor cocktail (PIC) | Sigma | P9599 | |
K15NO3 | Cambridge Isotope Laboratories | NLM-765-PK | |
EQUIPMENT | |||
Optima L-80 XP Ultracentrifuge | Beckman | ||
Plate reader | BioTek | ||
EASY-nLC II nano-Liquid Chromatograph | Thermo Scientific | ||
LTQ-Orbitrap mass spectrometer | Thermo Scientific | ||
Centrifuge 5810R | Eppendorf | ||
Centrifuge 5417R | Eppendorf | ||
Thermomixer | Eppendorf | ||
Speed Vac RVC 2-25 | Christ | ||
Shaker Unimax 2010 | Heidolph |
Zapytaj o uprawnienia na użycie tekstu lub obrazów z tego artykułu JoVE
Zapytaj o uprawnieniaThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone