Aby wyświetlić tę treść, wymagana jest subskrypcja JoVE. Zaloguj się lub rozpocznij bezpłatny okres próbny.
Method Article
* Wspomniani autorzy wnieśli do projektu równy wkład.
The comparison and optimization of two plant organellar DNA enrichment methods are presented: traditional differential centrifugation and fractionation of the total gDNA based on methylation status. We assess the resulting DNA quantity and quality, demonstrate performance in short-read next-generation sequencing, and discuss the potential for use in long-read single-molecule sequencing.
Plant organellar genomes contain large, repetitive elements that may undergo pairing or recombination to form complex structures and/or sub-genomic fragments. Organellar genomes also exist in admixtures within a given cell or tissue type (heteroplasmy), and an abundance of subtypes may change throughout development or when under stress (sub-stoichiometric shifting). Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies are required to obtain deeper understanding of organellar genome structure and function. Traditional sequencing studies use several methods to obtain organellar DNA: (1) If a large amount of starting tissue is used, it is homogenized and subjected to differential centrifugation and/or gradient purification. (2) If a smaller amount of tissue is used (i.e., if seeds, material, or space is limited), the same process is performed as in (1), followed by whole-genome amplification to obtain sufficient DNA. (3) Bioinformatics analysis can be used to sequence the total genomic DNA and to parse out organellar reads. All these methods have inherent challenges and tradeoffs. In (1), it may be difficult to obtain such a large amount of starting tissue; in (2), whole-genome amplification could introduce a sequencing bias; and in (3), homology between nuclear and organellar genomes could interfere with assembly and analysis. In plants with large nuclear genomes, it is advantageous to enrich for organellar DNA to reduce sequencing costs and sequence complexity for bioinformatics analyses. Here, we compare a traditional differential centrifugation method with a fourth method, an adapted CpG-methyl pulldown approach, to separate the total genomic DNA into nuclear and organellar fractions. Both methods yield sufficient DNA for NGS, DNA that is highly enriched for organellar sequences, albeit at different ratios in mitochondria and chloroplasts. We present the optimization of these methods for wheat leaf tissue and discuss major advantages and disadvantages of each approach in the context of sample input, protocol ease, and downstream application.
Genome sequencing is a powerful tool to dissect the underlying genetic basis of important plant traits. Most genome-sequencing studies focus on the nuclear genome content, as the majority of genes are located in the nucleus. However, organellar genomes, including the mitochondria (across eukaryotes) and plastids (in plants; the specialized form, the chloroplast, works in photosynthesis) contribute significant genetic information essential to organismal development, stress response, and overall fitness1. Organellar genomes are typically included in total DNA extractions intended for nuclear genome sequencing, although methods to reduce organelle numbers prior to DNA extraction are also employed2. Many studies have used sequencing results from total gDNA extractions to assemble organellar genomes3,4,5,6,7. However, when the target of the study is to focus on organellar genomes, using the total gDNA increases the sequencing costs because many reads are "lost" to the nuclear DNA sequences, particularly in plants with large nuclear genomes. Moreover, due to the duplication and transfer of organellar sequences into the nuclear genome and between organelles, resolving the correct mapping position of sequencing reads to the proper genome is bioinformatically challenging2,8. The purification of organellar genomes from the nuclear genome is one strategy to reduce these problems. Further bioinformatics strategies may be used to separate reads that map to regions of homology between the mitochondria and chloroplasts.
While the organellar genomes from many plant species have been sequenced, little is known about the breadth of organellar genome diversity available in wild populations or in cultivated breeding pools. Organellar genomes are also known to be dynamic molecules that undergo significant structural rearrangement due to recombination between repeat sequences9. Moreover, multiple copies of the organellar genome are contained within each organelle, and multiple organelles are contained within each cell. Not all copies of these genomes are identical, which is known as heteroplasmy. In contrast to the canonical picture of "master circles," there is now growing evidence for a more complex picture of organellar genome structures, including sub-genomic circles, linear chromosomes, linear concatamers, and branched structures10. The assembly of plant organellar genomes is further complicated by their relatively large sizes and substantial inverted and direct repeats.
Traditional protocols for organellar isolation, DNA purification, and subsequent genome sequencing are often cumbersome and require large volumes of tissue input, with several grams to upwards of hundreds of grams of young leaf tissue necessary as a starting point11,12,13,14,15,16,17. This makes organellar genome sequencing inaccessible when tissue is limited. In some situations, seed amounts are limited, such as when it is necessary to sequence on a generational basis or in male sterile lines that have to be maintained via crossing. In these situations, organellar DNA can be purified and then subjected to whole-genome amplification. However, whole-genome amplification can introduce significant sequencing bias, which is a particular problem when assessing structural variation, sub-genomic structures, and heteroplasmy levels18. Recent advances in library preparation for short-read sequencing technologies have overcome low-input barriers to avoid whole-genome amplification. For example, the Illumina Nextera XT library preparation kit allows for as little as 1 ng of DNA to be used as input19. However, standard library preparations for long-read sequencing applications, such as PacBio or Oxford Nanopore sequencing technologies, still require a relatively high amount of input DNA, which can pose a challenge for organellar genome sequencing. Recently, new user-made, long-read sequencing protocols have been developed to reduce the input amounts and to help facilitate genome sequencing in samples where obtaining microgram-quantities of DNA is difficult20,21. However, obtaining high-molecular weight, pure organellar fractions to feed into these library preparations remains a challenge.
We sought to compare and optimize organellar DNA enrichment and isolation methods suitable for NGS without the need of whole-genome amplification. Specifically, our goal was to determine best practices to enrich for high-molecular weight organellar DNA from limited starting materials, such as a subsample of a leaf. This work presents a comparative analysis of methods to enrich for organellar DNA: (1) a modified, traditional differential centrifugation protocol versus (2) a DNA fractionation protocol based on the use of a commercially available DNA CpG-methyl-binding domain protein pulldown approach22 applied to plant tissue23. We recommend best practices for the isolation of organellar DNA from wheat leaf tissue, which may be readily extended to other plants and tissue types.
1. Generation of Plant Materials for Organellar Isolation and DNA Extraction
2. Method #1: DNA Extraction Using Differential Centrifugation (DC)
NOTE: The differential centrifugation protocol was modified from two publications that optimized conditions to isolate both organelles but enrich for mitochondria17,24. The resulting protocol is less time-intensive and uses fewer toxic chemicals than the previous methods. Specifically, we made modifications to the buffers and wash steps, including the addition of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) to the STE extraction buffer and the elimination of the final wash step in NETF buffer, which contains sodium fluoride (NaF).
Caution: The preparation and use of STE buffer should be performed under a chemical fume hood with proper personal protection equipment, as this buffer contains 2-mercaptoethanol (BME).
3. Method #2: Methyl-fractionation (MF) Approach to Enrich for Organellar DNA from Total Genomic DNA
NOTE: This protocol was modified from a user-developed Genomic Tip Kit DNA extraction protocol for plants and fungi27 and the commercial Microbiome DNA Enrichment Kit protocol28. In theory, any DNA isolation protocol that yields high-molecular weight DNA may be used for the pulldown. For short-read sequencing, any extraction yielding predominately >15 kb fragments is adequate for use in the pulldown. For long-read sequencing, larger fragments may be desirable. Therefore, we optimized this protocol to yield high molecular weight DNA.
4. Sample Quantification and Quality Control
The protocols presented in this manuscript describe two distinct methods to enrich for organellar DNA from plant tissue. The conditions presented here reflect optimization for wheat tissue. A comparison of key steps in the protocols, required tissue input, and DNA output are described in Figure 1. The steps of the DC protocol we tested follow similar conditions to those described previously (Figure 1A). Harvested tissue must be p...
To date, most organellar sequencing studies center on traditional DC methods to enrich for specific DNA. Methods to isolate organelles from diverse plants have been described, including moss40; monocots such as wheat15 and oats11; and dicots such as arabidopsis11, sunflower17, and rapeseed14. Most protocols focus on leaf tissue13,
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the US Department of Agriculture. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
We would like to acknowledge funding from the United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service and from the National Science Foundation (IOS 1025881 and IOS 1361554). We thank R. Caspers for greenhouse maintenance and plant care. We also thank the University of Minnesota Genomics Center, where the Illumina library preparations and sequencing were performed. We are also grateful for the comments from the journal editors and four anonymous reviewers that further strengthened our manuscript. We also thank OECD for a fellowship to SK to integrate these protocols for collaborative projects with colleagues in Japan.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
2-mercaptoethanol (beta-mercaptoethanol; BME) | Sigma Aldrich | M3148-100ml | |
2-propanol (Isopropyl alcohol/isopropanol), bioreagent | Sigma Aldrich | I9516 | |
agarose, Bio-Rad Cetified Megabase agarose | Bio-Rad | 1613108 | |
analytical balance | Mettler Toledo | AB54-S | |
balance | Mettler Toledo | PB1502-S | |
bovine serum albumin (BSA) | Sigma Aldrich | B4287-25G | |
Ceramic grinding cylinders, 3/8in x 7/8in | SPEX SamplePrep | 2183 | |
Cryogenic Blocks compatible with tissue homogenizer for holding 50 mL tubes | SPEX SamplePrep | 2664 | |
DNaseI | Sigma | DN25 | |
ethanol, absolute | Decon Laboratories | 2716 | |
Ethylenediamine Tetraacetic Acid (EDTA), 0.5 M Solution, pH 8.0 | Fisher | BP2482-500 | |
gel imaging system | |||
gel stain | Such as GelRed or Ethidium Bromide | ||
grinding pestle, wide tip for 2 mL conical tubes | |||
Guanidine-HCl, 8 M solution | ThermoFisher | 24115 | |
LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I Master | Roche | 4707516001 | |
liquid nitrogen | |||
Lysing enzymes from Trichoderma harzianum | Sigma | L1412 | |
Magnesium Chloride | G Bioscience | 24115 | |
magnetic rack | ThermoFisher | A13346 | |
microcentrifuge tubes, LoBind 1.5 mL | Eppendorf | 22431021 | |
microcentrifuge tubes, standard nuclease-free 1.5 mL | Eppendorf | ||
microcentrifuge, refrigerated | Sorvall | Legend X1R | Or equivalent product, must be capable of reaching at least 18,000 x g with rotors for 50 mL tubes, Oak Ridge tubes, and 1.5 mL tubes |
microcentrifuge, room temperature | Eppendorf | 5424 | Or equivalent product, must be capable of reaching at least 18,000 x g with rotor for 1.5 mL and 2 mL microcentrifuge tubes |
Microcon DNA Fast Flow Centrifugal Filter Units | EMD Millipore | MRCFOR100 | |
Miracloth, 1 square per sample cut to fit funnel | EMD Millipore | 475855 | |
NEBNext Microbiome DNA Enrichment Kit | New England Biolabs | E2612L | |
parafilm | Parafilm M | PM992 | |
plastic pots and trays | |||
polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) | Fisher | BP431-100 | |
Proteinase K | Qiagen | 19131 | |
Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis rig (e.g. CHEF DR III) | Bio-Rad | 1703697 | |
purification beads, Agencourt AMpureXP beads | Beckman Coulter | A63881 | |
QIAamp DNA Mini Kit | Qiagen | 51304 | |
Qiagen 20/g Genomic Tip DNA Extraction Kit | Qiagen | 10223 | |
Qiagen Buffer EB (elution buffer) | Qiagen | 19086 | |
Qiagen DNA Extraction Buffer Set | Qiagen | 19060 | |
QiaRack | Qiagen | 19015 | |
qPCR machine (e.g. Roche Light Cycler 480) | Roche | ||
qPCR plate sealing film | Roche | 4729757001 | |
qPCR plate, 96 well plate | Roche | 4729692001 | |
Qubit assay tubes | Life Technologies | Q32856 | |
Qubit Broad Spectrum assay kit | Life Technologies | Q32850 | |
Qubit High Sensitivity assay kit | Life Technologies | Q32851 | |
RNaseA | Qiagen | 19101 | |
Serological pipettes (20 mL) and pipet-aid | Fisher | 13-678-11 | |
Small funnels, 1 per sample | |||
Sodium Chloride | Ambion | AM9759 | |
Soft paintbrush, 2 per sample | |||
SPEX SamplePrep 2010 Geno/Grinder or another type of tissue homogenizer | SPEX SamplePrep | Or another comparable tissue homogenizer. If you do not have access to a tissue homogenizer, then grinding in a pre-chilled mortar and pestle will suffice (see protocol for details). However, a homogenizer will give more consistent results and total homogenization time is reduced. | |
Sucrose | Omnipure | 8550 | |
TBE | |||
thermomixer | |||
Tris | Sigma | T2819-100ml | |
Triton X-100 | Promega | H5142 | |
tube rotater | |||
tubes, 50 mL conical polypropylene | Corning | 352070 | |
tubes, 50 mL high-speed polypropylene | ThermoScientific/Nalgene | 3119-0050 | e.g. Nalgene Oakridge tubes or equivalent |
vermiculite | |||
water bath | |||
water, sterile and certified Nuclease-free | Fisher | 1481 | |
water, sterile milliQ |
Zapytaj o uprawnienia na użycie tekstu lub obrazów z tego artykułu JoVE
Zapytaj o uprawnieniaThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone