Aby wyświetlić tę treść, wymagana jest subskrypcja JoVE. Zaloguj się lub rozpocznij bezpłatny okres próbny.
Here, a protocol to manufacture glass-based microfluidic devices used for generating highly monodisperse emulsions with controlled drop size is presented.
In this manuscript, three different step-by-step protocols to generate highly monodisperse emulsion drops using glass-based microfluidics are described. The first device is built for the generation of simple drops driven by gravity. The second device is designed to generate emulsion drops in a coflowing scheme. The third device is an extension of the coflowing device with the addition of a third liquid that acts as an electric ground, allowing the formation of electrified drops that subsequently discharge. In this setup, two of the three liquids have an appreciable electrical conductivity. The third liquid mediates between these two and is a dielectric. A voltage difference applied between the two conducting liquids creates an electric field that couples with hydrodynamic stresses of the coflowing liquids, affecting the jet and drop formation process. The addition of the electric field provides a path to generate smaller drops than in simple coflow devices and for generating particles and fibers with a wide range of sizes.
Controlled generation of drops in the micron and nanoscale with a narrow size distribution is a challenging task. These drops are of interest for the engineering of soft materials with many applications in science and technology1,2,3,4,5,6.
The most common devices for the high production rate of drops are mixers7 and ultrasound emulsificators8. These methods are simple and low cost, but they typically result in polydisperse drops with a wide range of sizes. Hence, additional steps are required to produce monodisperse samples. Microfluidic devices can be designed differently to provide an efficient way to drop formation. Additionally, the usually low flow rates involved (i.e., low Reynolds number) allow for great control over the fluid flow.
While microfluidic devices are commonly made using lithographic techniques with poly(dimethyl) siloxane (PDMS), this manuscript focuses on glass-based capillary devices. PDMS devices are usually chosen for their ability to design complex channel patterns and because of their scalability. Glass devices, on the contrary, are rigid and have greater solvent resistance than their PDMS counterparts. Additionally, glass can be modified to change its wettability, which allows controlling the generation of complex emulsions. Being able to independently treat the nozzle and channel walls enables the formation of drops in a controlled and reproducible manner, while assuring the stability of the resultant emulsions if the drops were to touch the walls9; otherwise the drops may coalesce and accumulate at the wall. Another difference between these two types of devices is that in glass-based devices, the flow is three-dimensional, while it is planar in conventional PDMS devices. This fact minimizes the drop contact with the channel walls so that the influence of contact lines can be neglected10, thereby protecting the stability of multiple emulsion drops.
Figure 1: Different microfluidic device configurations. Sketches of (A) a T-junction, (B) a coflowing device, and (C) a flow-focusing device. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
There are three main geometries used, namely T-junction11, flow focusing12,13, and coflow14. In the T-junction geometry, the dispersed phase contained in the channel perpendicularly intersects the main channel which houses the continuous phase. The shear stress exerted by the continuous phase breaks the incoming dispersed liquid resulting in drops. The generated drops are limited in lower size by the dimensions of the main channel11. In the flow-focusing geometry, the two fluids are forced through a small orifice that is located in front of the injection tube. The result is the formation of a jet, which is much smaller than the injection tube12,13. Finally, the coflow geometry has a configuration characterized by the coaxial flow of two immiscible fluids14. In general, dripping and jetting can be observed depending on the operating conditions. The dripping regime occurs at low flow rates and the resulting droplets are very monodisperse and have a diameter proportional to the tip size. The drawback is its low production frequency. The jetting regime occurs at higher flow rates as compared to the dripping regime. In this case, the drop diameter is directly proportional to the diameter of the jet which can be much smaller than the diameter of the tip under the right conditions.
An alternative to these hydrodynamic approaches relies on the additional use of electric forces. Electrospray is a well-known and widely used technique for generating droplets. It is based on the principle that a liquid with a finite electrical conductivity will deform in the presence of a strong electric field. The liquid will eventually adopt a conical shape resulting from the balance between electric and surface tension stresses15. The process starts with the electric field inducing an electric current in the liquid that causes charges to accumulate at the surface. The presence of the electric field results in an electric force on these charges, which drags the liquid along, elongating the meniscus in the direction of the field. Under different conditions, the meniscus can either shed the charged drops or may emit one or several jets which then break into drops15. Although these electrically assisted microfluidic methods naturally allow the generation of small drops, they suffer from a lack of a steady-state operation that compromises the emulsion monodispersity. The resultant charged drops tend to discharge on the confining walls and/or anywhere in the device where the electric potential is lower than the imposed external voltage. Thus, the electrified meniscus becomes unstable, ultimately emitting drops in a chaotic way and causing their uncontrolled production and loss of monodispersity.
In electro-coflow, the electrical and hydrodynamic stresses are coupled in a coflow microfluidic device16 similar to the one used for generating double emulsions12. Two main features allow electro-coflow to be successful in reaching a steady-state emission regime: (i) the dispersed phase is ejected into another coflowing viscous liquid, and (ii) the use of a liquid counter-electrode or ground. Having a flowing outer liquid has proven to change the geometric properties of the drop emission process17. The liquid counter-electrode allows the discharge and extraction of the resultant drops, assuring the steady-state generation of drops. In addition, by exploiting the balance of electrical and hydrodynamic forces, the resultant drop sizes can potentially vary within a wider range than the sizes that can be covered by any of the previously mentioned techniques.
This detailed video protocol is intended to help new practitioners in the use and fabrication of glass-based microfluidics.
1. Making simple drops
Figure 2: Carved needle. Needle with a hole carved in its base to fit a round capillary. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Device for generating simple drops. Schematic of a device for generating simple drops. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Collecting simple drops. (A) Sketch of how to collect drops in a beaker. (B) Top view of a beaker where 10cSt silicone oil drops were collected in 16 mM SDS in water solution, produced with a 580 µm tip. The drop size is (3.29 ± 0.08) mm. (C) Top view of a beaker where 10cSt Silicone oil drops were collected in 16 mM SDS in water solution , produced with an 86 µm tip. The drop size is (1.75 ± 0.04) mm Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
2. Making emulsion drops using a coflowing scheme
NOTE: The device is built similar to the device described in step 1.
Figure 5: Effects of the hydrophobic treatment. (A) and (C) Capillary without any liquid inside. The red line indicates the end of the capillary. (B) Untreated capillary. The liquid is wetting the capillary as it has climbed above the red line. (D) Treated capillary with water. Water does not wet the capillary in this case. Liquid stays below the red line. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 6: Coflowing device. (A) Position the square capillary on the microscope slide. (B) Position the round capillary inside the square one. (C) The complete device with the syringe needles. (D) Photograph of the complete device. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
3. Making an electro-coflow device
Figure 7: How to position the capillaries on an electro-coflow device step by step. (A) Building the glass base for the device joining two microscope slides. The colored parts are the cut pieces of glass that after being glued, hold together the two microscope slides. (B) The optimal position of the square capillary on two assembled microscope slides. (C) Positioning of the round capillaries for electro-coflow experiments. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 8: Electro-coflow device. (A) Photograph of an electro-coflow device. (B) Sketch of an electro-coflow device. The numbers indicate the input for (1) the inner liquid, (2) the outer liquid, (3) the exit of the device, and (4) the liquid collector/ground. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 9: Picture of the tip and liquid counter-electrode during an electro-coflow experiment. The tip-collector distance, L, is marked. The scale bar corresponds to 100 µm. Microscope magnification is 4x. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
4. Cleaning procedures
In this manuscript, three different devices have been designed to generate drops. We have generated drops with a size of (3.29 ± 0.08) mm (Figure 4B) and (1.75 ± 0.04) mm (Figure 4C) using the device described in step 1. The emulsion drops can be generated using the coflow and the electro-coflow devices. For the latter, we show dripping in Figure 9, while cone-jet and whipping modes are shown in
The protocol to fabricate three different glass-based devices has been described above. In the case of the device to generate simple drops, the flow rate and liquid properties are crucial to generate drops in a controlled manner. Drops will form at the tip in the dripping regime, or at the end of the jet in the jetting regime. The transition from dripping to jetting is parametrized by the dimensionless Weber number, We23. This number represents the ratio between inertial and surface tension forces...
The authors have nothing to disclose.
We are thankful to the ACS PRF (grant 60302-UR9), Agrobio S.L. (contract #311325), and MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033/FEDER, UE (grant No. PID2021-122369NB-I00).
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
2-[methoxy(polyethyleneoxy)6-9propyl] trimethoxysilane. | Gelest | SIM6492.7 | |
Ceramic tile | Sutter | CTS | |
Ethylene glycol | Fisher | BP230 | These can be found at other companies like Sigma-Aldrich |
Hexane | Sigma- Aldrich | 34859 | Available in other vendors |
ITW Polymers Adhesives Devcon 5 Minute Epoxy Adhesive 25 mL Dev-Tube | Ellsworth adhesives | 470740 | |
Microforge | Narishige | MF 830 | |
Micropipette puller | Sutter | P97 | |
Microscope slides | Fisher | 12-544-1 | Available in other vendors |
Needle 20 Gauge, .0255" ID, .0355" OD, 1/2" Long | McMaster | 75165A677 | |
SDS | Sigma-aldrich | 428015 | Surfactant |
Silicone oil | Clearco | PSF-10cSt | The catalog number correspond to the 10cSt viscosity oil. Different viscosity oils can be found at this company |
Span 80 | Fisher | S0060500G | non-ionic surfactant |
Square glass capillary 2mm ID (borosillicate 300 or 600 mm long) | VitroCom | S 102 | |
Standard Glass Capillaries, 6 in., 2 / 1.12 OD/ID | World Precision instruments | 1B200-6 | These can be found at other companies like Sutter or Vitrocom |
Syringe pump | Chemyx | FUSION 100-X | This model has a good quality/price ratio |
Syringes (it will depend on the compatibility with the liquids) | Fisher | Catalog number will depend on the size | |
Trimethoxy(octyl)silane | Sigma- Aldrich | 376221 | Available in other vendors |
Tubing ( it will depend on the compatibility with the liquids) | Scientific commodities | BB3165-PE/5 | This reference is for polyethylene micro tubing. The size fits the needle size listed here |
Zapytaj o uprawnienia na użycie tekstu lub obrazów z tego artykułu JoVE
Zapytaj o uprawnieniaThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone