JoVE Logo
Faculty Resource Center

Sign In

Summary

Abstract

Introduction

Protocol

Representative Results

Discussion

Acknowledgements

Materials

References

Biology

Recombineering Homologous Recombination Constructs in Drosophila

Published: July 13th, 2013

DOI:

10.3791/50346

1Department of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, 2Department of Physiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, 3Green Center for Systems Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas

Homologous recombination techniques greatly advance Drosophila genetics by enabling the creation of molecularly precise mutations. The recent adoption of recombineering allows one to manipulate large pieces of DNA and transform them into Drosophila6. The methods presented here combine these techniques to rapidly generate large homologous recombination vectors.

The continued development of techniques for fast, large-scale manipulation of endogenous gene loci will broaden the use of Drosophila melanogaster as a genetic model organism for human-disease related research. Recent years have seen technical advancements like homologous recombination and recombineering. However, generating unequivocal null mutations or tagging endogenous proteins remains a substantial effort for most genes. Here, we describe and demonstrate techniques for using recombineering-based cloning methods to generate vectors that can be used to target and manipulate endogenous loci in vivo. Specifically, we have established a combination of three technologies: (1) BAC transgenesis/recombineering, (2) ends-out homologous recombination and (3) Gateway technology to provide a robust, efficient and flexible method for manipulating endogenous genomic loci. In this protocol, we provide step-by-step details about how to (1) design individual vectors, (2) how to clone large fragments of genomic DNA into the homologous recombination vector using gap repair, and (3) how to replace or tag genes of interest within these vectors using a second round of recombineering. Finally, we will also provide a protocol for how to mobilize these cassettes in vivo to generate a knockout, or a tagged gene via knock-in. These methods can easily be adopted for multiple targets in parallel and provide a means for manipulating the Drosophila genome in a timely and efficient manner.

Clean molecularly-defined manipulations of single genes at their endogenous loci offer an invaluable tool to study a myriad of questions relevant to eukaryotic biology. Drosophila reverse genetic techniques for generating loss-of-function alleles had proven to be challenging until Golic and colleagues introduced in vivo gene targeting using homologous recombination to Drosophila 1-3. They demonstrated that specific genomic loci could be targeted using a linear fragment of DNA from an integrated transgenic construct. This linear "donor" DNA is generated in vivo through FRT-mediated recombination (to excise the DNA from the....

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

1. Selection of BAC and Region to Target

  1. To acquire a BAC with the gene of interest (GOI) (here CG32095 is used as an example), search for CG32095 at www.flybase.org. Under the section stocks and reagents, check the section entitled, "Genomic Clones" for BACs containing CG32095. Make sure that the BAC includes at least 10 kb upstream and 5 kb downstream the gene of interest. Alternatively, clones in the P[acman] vector7.......

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

Amplification of the LA and RA homology arms should produce 500 bp products and the PCR-SOE reaction should yield a 1.0 kb product (Sections 2.1-2.4; Figure 2). The BP reaction performed in section 2.5 is typically very efficient and bacterial transformation of the product yields 5-100 colonies on average. Nearly all the colonies tested with PCR check show the expected PCR product.

During the first round of recombineering (Section 3) expect to get 20-40 colonies after transfor.......

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

The power of genetic model organisms in biomedical research is largely based on the tools available for genetic manipulation. The small models C. elegans and Drosophila in particular allow for inexpensive and fast molecular genetic analyses of complete pathways and gene families implicated in multicellular development or function. Recent years have seen significant advances in tool development for manipulating genes in Drosophila 14,15. For example, recombineering, which is widely us.......

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

We would like to thank Hugo Bellen and the Bloomington Stock Center for reagents. We further thank Koen Venken, Hugo Bellen and all members of the Buszczak and Hiesinger labs for helpful discussions. This work was supported by grants from the National Institute of Health to ACR (T32GM083831), PRH (RO1EY018884) and to MB (RO1GM086647), a grant by the Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas to MB and PRH (RP100516), and the Welch Foundation (I-1657) to PRH. MB is an E.E. and Greer Garson Fogelson Scholar in Biomedical Research and PRH is a Eugene McDermott Scholar in Biomedical Research at UT Southwestern Medical Center.

....

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

Name Company Catalog Number Comments
Name of the reagent Company Catalogue number Comments (optional)
SW102 Recombination competent bacteria NCI-Frederick Recombination Bacteria (SW102, SW105 and SW106) http://ncifrederick.cancer.gov/research/brb/logon.aspx
TransforMax EPI300 electrocopmpetent E. coli Epicentre EC300110 Includes CopyControl induction solution
PfuUltra II Fusion HS DNA Polymerase Aligent Technology Inc. 600670  
BamHI-HF New England Biolabs R3136S  
Zymoclean Gel DNA Recovery Kit Zymo Research D4001  
Use Gateway BP ClonaseII Enzyme kit Invitrogen 11789-020  
P[acman]KO1.010 Buszczak and Hiesinger Labs Upon request  
pENTR RFP-Kan11 Buszczak and Hiesinger Labs Upon request  
Flystocks Bloomington stock center Stock numbers: 25680, 25679 y1 w*/Dp(2;Y)G, P{hs-hid}Y; P{70FLP}11 P{70I-SceI}2B snaSco/CyO, P{hs-hid}4
y1 w*/Dp(2;Y)G, P{hs-hid}Y; P{70FLP}23 P{70I-SceI}4A/TM3, P{hs-hid}14, Sb1
Electroporation machine Biorad GenePulser Xcell with PC module 165-2662  
Cuvettes Fisher Brand #FB101  

  1. Rong, Y. S., Golic, K. G. A targeted gene knockout in Drosophila. Genetics. 157, 1307-1312 (2001).
  2. Rong, Y. S., Golic, K. G. Gene targeting by homologous recombination in Drosophila. Science. 288, 2013-2018 (2000).
  3. Gong, W. J., Golic, K. G. Ends-out, or replacement, gene targeting in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 2556-2561 (1073).
  4. Warming, S., Costantino, N., Court, D. L., Jenkins, N. A., Copeland, N. G. Simple and highly efficient BAC recombineering using galK selection. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, e36 (2005).
  5. Copeland, N. G., Jenkins, N. A., Court, D. L. Recombineering: a powerful new tool for mouse functional genomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2, 769-779 (2001).
  6. Venken, K. J., He, Y., Hoskins, R. A., Bellen, H. J. P[acman]: a BAC transgenic platform for targeted insertion of large DNA fragments in D. melanogaster. Science. 314, 1747-1751 (2006).
  7. Venken, K. J., et al. Versatile P[acman] BAC libraries for transgenesis studies in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat. Methods. 6, 431-434 (2009).
  8. Groth, A. C., Fish, M., Nusse, R., Calos, M. P. Construction of transgenic Drosophila by using the site-specific integrase from phage phiC31. Genetics. 166, 1775-1782 (2004).
  9. Bischof, J., Maeda, R. K., Hediger, M., Karch, F., Basler, K. An optimized transgenesis system for Drosophila using germ-line-specific phiC31 integrases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 104, 3312-3317 (2007).
  10. Chan, C. C., et al. Systematic discovery of Rab GTPases with synaptic functions in Drosophila. Current Biology: CB. 21, 1704-1715 (2011).
  11. Chan, C. C., Scoggin, S., Hiesinger, P. R., Buszczak, M. Combining recombineering and ends-out homologous recombination to systematically characterize Drosophila gene families: Rab GTPases as a case study. Commun. Integr. Biol. 5, 179-183 (2012).
  12. Wu, N., Matand, K., Kebede, B., Acquaah, G., Williams, S. Enhancing DNA electrotransformation efficiency in Escherichia coli DH10B electrocompetent cells. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology. 13, (2010).
  13. Wang, S., Zhao, Y., Leiby, M., Zhu, J. A new positive/negative selection scheme for precise BAC recombineering. Mol. Biotechnol. 42, 110-116 (2009).
  14. Venken, K. J., Bellen, H. J. Transgenesis upgrades for Drosophila melanogaster. Development. 134, 3571-3584 (2007).
  15. Dietzl, G., et al. A genome-wide transgenic RNAi library for conditional gene inactivation in Drosophila. Nature. 448, 151-156 (2007).

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2024 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved