A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Method Article
In this article, a detailed protocol for quantifying telomere length using a modified terminal restriction fragment analysis is discussed that provides fast and efficient direct measurement of telomere length. This technique can be applied to a variety of cell sources of DNA for quantifying telomere length.
There are several different techniques for measuring telomere length, each with their own advantages and disadvantages. The traditional approach, Telomere Restriction Fragment (TRF) analysis, utilizes a DNA hybridization technique whereby genomic DNA samples are digested with restriction enzymes, leaving behind telomere DNA repeats and some sub-telomeric DNA. These are separated by agarose gel electrophoresis, transferred to a filter membrane and hybridized to oligonucleotide probes tagged with either chemiluminescence or radioactivity to visualize telomere restriction fragments. This approach, while requiring a larger quantity of DNA than other techniques such as PCR, can measure the telomere length distribution of a population of cells and allows measurement expressed in absolute kilobases. This manuscript demonstrates a modified DNA hybridization procedure for determining telomere length. Genomic DNA is first digested with restriction enzymes (that do not cut telomeres) and separated by agarose gel electrophoresis. The gel is then dried and the DNA is denatured and hybridized in situ to a radiolabeled oligonucleotide probe. This in situ hybridization avoids loss of telomere DNA and improves signal intensity. Following hybridization, the gels are imaged utilizing phosphor screens and the telomere length is quantified using a graphing program. This procedure was developed by the laboratories of Drs. Woodring Wright and Jerry Shay at the University of Texas Southwestern1,2. Here, we present a detailed description of this procedure, with some modifications.
Telomeres, situated at the ends of chromosomes, are nucleotide repeats of the sequence TTAGGG (on human chromosomes) that play a critical role in protecting cellular genetic information3,4,5. Telomeres are several thousand base pairs in length and serve to protect the integrity of the rest of the chromosome during DNA replication. Replication of chromosomes is not perfect resulting in the ends of the chromosome not being completely copied. This inefficiency in replication is termed the "end-replication problem" and results in loss of some of the telomere repeats during each round of replication6,7. Telomere length can be restored after cell division by telomerase, an enzyme that replaces the lost telomere sequences8,9. Telomerase, however, is not activated in most human somatic cells and as a result, over time, telomeres will shorten, eventually resulting in cellular senescence10. Due to telomere shortening, telomeres are regarded as a biomarker of aging and risk of age-related diseases11,12. Additionally, telomere length can be affected by genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors and other stimuli such as oxidative stress, indicating that telomere length can play a role as a biomarker in toxicological, epidemiological and behavioral studies13,14,15.
This article demonstrates a technique for measuring telomere length using a modified terminal restriction fragment (TRF) analysis adapted from Mender and Shay2 and Kimura et al.16, and similar to Herbert, Shay and Wright1 and Haussmann and Mauck17. Traditionally, TRF analysis involves a Southern blot procedure. Southern blots are considered the "gold-standard" for studying telomere length and are actively used for examining leukocyte telomere length in epidemiology studies18. This TRF analysis uses digested genomic DNA leaving behind the telomere repeats. The DNA fragments are then separated by gel electrophoresis, denatured and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. The telomere sequences are hybridized to a telomere oligonucleotide probe. Rather than transferring the separated telomeres to a membrane, other TRF techniques use in-gel hybridization techniques with and without denaturation of the DNA. The inclusion of denaturation is important when considering the detection of interstitial telomeres, which have been reported in some species19. Procedures that lack denaturing steps only detect the single stranded DNA overhangs at terminal telomeres and will not bind to interstitial telomere sequences18.
Besides TRF analysis, there are several other techniques for measuring telomere length that each have their own advantages and disadvantages. The Flow-FISH technique can measure mean telomere length of individual cells of a distinct cell type using flow cytometry16,20. While it can accurately tag telomeres with highly specific probes and reduce human error through automation, Flow-FISH is expensive, less efficient and requires fresh samples and a highly-skilled technician, limiting its ability for epidemiology studies16. In addition, this method does not account for potential changes in the number of chromosomes in the cell population. Another technique, qPCR, is widely accepted as a means of measuring telomere length for epidemiology studies16 due to its high-throughput, low-cost and requirement for small amounts of DNA compared to other methods. However, qPCR can only measure average telomeric DNA content relative to a single copy gene and is, thus, an indirect estimate of average telomere length. It also yields a high coefficient of variance in comparison studies, compared to southern blots, leading to questionable accuracy21.
The TRF procedure has its own deficiencies that limit its use for some studies. TRF techniques require a large amount of DNA compared to other methods (between 2 and 3 µg per sample). This limits the technique's applications to examining telomere length of clinical samples for which sufficient genomic DNA can be collected, and cannot be used on degraded DNA samples. Additionally, the TRF analysis is costly and labor intensive, requiring 4-5 days to yield results. However, the TRF yields a low coefficient of variance granting its reproducibility. While this protocol is different than the traditional Southern blot (utilizing in situ gel hybridization), the two techniques are fundamentally the same.
The technique presented here is a combination of a Southern blot and in-gel hybridization; associating the DNA denaturing step from Southern blots with the in-gel hybridization. This combination has the added benefit of improved probe signal strength compared to the Southern blot and has consistently yielded quantifiable results within our lab. Additionally, the use of radioactive probes rather than chemiluminescent probes yields higher signal intensity and allows for visualization and quantification with a phosphorimager, making the analyses of the TRF user-friendly.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
1. Genomic DNA Extraction
2. DNA Integrity Assessment
NOTE: This portion of the protocol outlines a DNA integrity assessment using a gel electrophoresis system with a 11 cm x 14 cm gel. Other systems and gel sizes can also be used, but the voltage and DNA migration time may vary.
3. Genomic DNA Digestion
4. Genomic DNA Gel Electrophoresis
NOTE: This portion of the protocol outlines a procedure for using a 20 cm x 25 cm gel electrophoresis system. Different gel electrophoresis systems can be used, but several variables may need to be modified including voltage, time of migration and amount of electrophoresis buffer added to the system in order to yield optimal results.
5. Gel Fluorescent Imaging and Hybridization
6. Hybridization
7. Gel Washing, Phosphor Screen Exposure, and Radio Imaging
8. Telomere Length Quantification
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Three concentrations of DNA (1, 2 and 3 µg) isolated from the cell line BJ-hTERT (telomerase immortalized human foreskin fibroblasts)22 and human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were analyzed for telomere length. Table 1 shows the lane assignments for each DNA sample. Figure 1 shows a nucleic acid fluorescent stain of the gel. The molecular weight standards are clearly visible. The distance from the top...
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Following electrophoresis, the genomic DNA smear is higher than 800 bp. This can occur if the restriction enzymes are faulty or if additional enzymes (as described above) are needed. A second possible explanation is that the protein is still attached to the DNA. When determining the DNA concentration by spectrophotometer, the 260/280 ratio should be around 1.8. If this ratio is <1.5, there is protein contamination which can interfere with restriction enzyme digestion. Either the DNA sample would need to be re-isolate...
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The authors acknowledge the support of the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute Biobehavioral Oncology shared facility that is supported in part by award P30CA047904.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Biologics | |||
Rsa1, restriction enzyme | New England Biolabs, Inc | R0167S | 10,000 U/mL, DNA digestion. Comes with Cutsmart Buffer (digestion buffer) |
Hinf1, restriction enzyme | New England Biolabs, Inc | R0155S | 10,000 U/mL, DNA digestion. Comes with Cutsmart Buffer (digestion buffer) |
Seakem GTG Agarose | Lonza | 50071 | electrophoresis grade agarose |
Optikinase | affymetrix | 78334X 500 UN | T4 Polynucleotide Kinase |
SYBR Green Nucleic Acid Stain I | ThermoFisher Scientific | S7567 | Syber Green |
exactGene DNA Ladder 24- kB | Fisher Scientific | BP2580100 | |
C-Strand Probe (3'-(G3AT2)4-'5) | Integrated DNA Technologies | Custom ordered DNA oligonucleotide | |
Gamma-ATP-P32 | Perkin Elmer | BLU502Z | Radioisotope |
Qiagen Blood and Cell Culture DNA Mini Kit | Qiagen | 13323 | DNA extraction kit |
GE Illustra Microspin G-25 column | GE Healthcare Life Sciences | 27-5325-01 | For purification of readioactive oligo probe |
Ficoll 400 | non-ionic synthetic polymer | ||
Equipment/Software | |||
Owl A5 Gel electrophoresis system (20 cm x 25 cm) | ThermoFisher Scientific | A5 | Gel electrophoresis |
Horizon 11.4 Gel electrophoresis system (11 cm x 14 cm) | Corel Life Sciences | 11068020 | Gel electrophoresis |
Nylon mesh, 50, 12" x 12" | Ted Pellam, Inc | 41-12105 | |
GE Storage Phosphor Screens | GE Healthcare Life Sciences | 28-9564-75 | |
Phosphor Screen Exposure Cassette | GE Healthcare Life Sciences | 63-0035-44 | |
Isotemp Hybridzation Incubator | Fisher Scientific | 13-247-20Q | |
Cylindrical hybridization tubes | Fisher Scientific | 13-247-300 | |
The Belly Dancer orbital shaker | Sigma-aldrich | Z768499-1EA | Orbital shaker |
Typhoon 9400 | ABI | For imaging of gels and phosphor screens | |
GraphPad Prism 6 | GraphPad | Version 6.05 | Graphing Program |
Microsoft Excel | Microsoft | Office 365 | Spreadsheet program |
Nanodrop | Thermo Scientific | Nanodrp 2000 | Spectrophotometer |
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved