A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Method Article
We present protocols herein for high-yield isolation of physiologically active thylakoids and protein transport assays for the chloroplast twin arginine translocation (cpTat), secretory (cpSec1), and signal recognition particle (cpSRP) pathways.
Chloroplasts are the organelles in green plants responsible for carrying out numerous essential metabolic pathways, most notably photosynthesis. Within the chloroplasts, the thylakoid membrane system houses all the photosynthetic pigments, reaction center complexes, and most of the electron carriers, and is responsible for light-dependent ATP synthesis. Over 90% of chloroplast proteins are encoded in the nucleus, translated in the cytosol, and subsequently imported into the chloroplast. Further protein transport into or across the thylakoid membrane utilizes one of four translocation pathways. Here, we describe a high-yield method for isolation of transport-competent thylakoids from peas (Pisum sativum), along with transport assays through the three energy-dependent cpTat, cpSec1, and cpSRP-mediated pathways. These methods enable experiments relating to thylakoid protein localization, transport energetics, and the mechanisms of protein translocation across biological membranes.
Nearly all of the proteinaceous machinery responsible for proper chloroplast function must be translocated from the cytosol1. At the chloroplast envelopes, protein substrates are imported through the translocon of the outer membrane (TOC) and the translocon of the inner membrane (TIC)2. Further targeting to the thylakoid membrane and lumen occurs through the twin arginine translocation (cpTat)3, the secretory (cpSec1)4, the signal recognition particle (cpSRP)5, and the spontaneous insertion pathways6. A method for the high-yield isolation of physiologically active chloroplasts and thylakoid membranes is necessary to measure the energetics and kinetics of a translocation event, to understand the diverse transport mechanisms in each pathway, and to localize a particular protein substrate of interest to any of the six distinct compartments of the chloroplast.
The isolation of membranes from the chloroplast offers better experimental control over environmental factors (such as salt and substrate concentrations, the presence of ATP/GTP, and pH conditions) that affect the measurement of transport energetics and kinetics. This in vitro environment lends itself to the exploration of mechanistic details of translocation for the same reasons. In addition, while predictive software for localization of chloroplast proteins has improved7,8, in vitro transport assays provide a quicker method for confirmation over microscopy-based fluorescent assays that require a genetically encoded fluorescent tag, plant transformation and/or specific antibodies. Here, we present protocols for chloroplast and thylakoid isolations from peas (Pisum sativum), as well as for transport assays optimized for each of the energy-dependent thylakoid translocation pathways.
1. Initial Materials
2. Chloroplast Isolation and Quantification
Note: The first step in preparation of thylakoids is the isolation of intact chloroplasts10. All materials should be kept cold during preparation. Resuspension of chloroplasts should be handled gently, as breakage at this step can severely limit subsequent thylakoid yield.
3. Isolation of Thylakoids
Note: Thylakoids are prepared by hypotonic lysis of intact chloroplasts. This is achieved by exposing the chloroplasts to a hypotonic buffer lacking sorbitol. Isolated thylakoids can be used for assaying any of the translocation pathways, but stromal extract (SE) must also be isolated during this preparation if either cpSec1 or cpSRP pathways are to be investigated.
4. Stromal Extract Recovery and Concentration
5. Transport through the cpTat Pathway
Note: Unlike the cpSec1 or cpSRP, the cpTat pathway does not require soluble components or exogenously added energy sources; only the light-driven proton motive force is necessary3. Therefore, only isolated thylakoids and substrate protein are required for the assay. Typical substrates are intermediate forms of the 17 kDa (as seen in Figure 1) and 23 kDa subunits of the oxygen evolving complex, iOE17 and iOE23, respectively, but precursor forms, prOE17 and prOE23, can also be successfully transported. Precursor forms have the entire bipartite N-terminal targeting sequence, while intermediate forms have only the thylakoid targeting sequence.
6. Transport through the cpSec1 Pathway
Note: Transport through the cpSec1 translocon requires the stromal protein cpSecA112,13, which can be procured via overexpression in E. coli14,15 or recovered by concentrating stroma during thylakoid isolation. A typical substrate is the 33 kDa subunit of the oxygen evolving complex (prOE33), as seen in Figure 2.
7. Insertion through the cpSRP Pathway
Note: The cpSRP-mediated integration of light harvesting complex proteins (LHCP) seen in Figure 3 requires cpSRP54, cpSRP43, and cpFtsY16. These components are supplied to the transport reaction through concentrated stromal extract, as described for the cpSec1 transport protocol.
To gauge amount of substrate successfully transported, it is useful to include one or more "percent input" lanes. For the data presented below, 10% of the final transport reaction without thylakoids was used. This "percent input" also helps to visualize the size of the precursor substrate. The percentage represents a known, defined amount of substrate with which to compare transported substrate against and can be scaled up or down as necessary using initially prepared prot...
Chloroplast and Thylakoid isolation
Excessive breakage can result in poor chloroplast isolation and thus poor thylakoid yield after separation in the gradient. It is best to homogenize the harvested tissue gently by ensuring that all material is submerged before blending and pulsing in 15 s cycles until fully homogenized. If necessary, use multiple shorter rounds of blending with less tissue in each round.
Refrigerating all materials that come into contact with harvest...
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This manuscript was prepared with funding by the Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences, 408 Office of Basic Energy Sciences of the US Department of Energy through Grant DE-SC0017035
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Pisum sativum seeds | Seedway LLC, Hall, NY | 8686 - Little Marvel | |
Miracloth | Calbiochem, Gibbstown, NJ | 475855-1 | |
80% Acetone | Sigma, Saint Louis, MO | 67-64-1 | |
Blender with sharpened blades | Waring Commercial | BB155S | |
Polytron 10-35 | Fischer Sci | 13-874-617 | |
Percoll | Sigma, Saint Louis, MO | GE17-0891-01 | |
Beckman J2-MC with JA 20 rotor | Beckman-Coulter | 8043-30-1180 | |
Sorvall RC-5B with HB-4 rotor | Sorvall | 8327-30-1016 | |
100 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) in 1xIB | Sigma, Saint Louis, MO | 12/3/83 | Can be frozen in aliquots for future use |
200 mM MgATP in 1xIB | Sigma, Saint Louis, MO | 74804-12-9 | Can be frozen in aliquots for future use |
Thermolysin in 1xIB (2mg/mL) | Sigma, Saint Louis, MO | 9073-78-3 | Can be frozen in aliquots for future use |
HEPES | Sigma, Saint Louis, MO | H3375 | |
K-Tricine | Sigma, Saint Louis, MO | T0377 | |
Sorbitol | Sigma, Saint Louis, MO | 50-70-4 | |
Magnesium Chloride | Sigma, Saint Louis, MO | 7791-18-6 | |
Manganese Chloride | Sigma, Saint Louis, MO | 13446-34-9 | |
EDTA | Sigma, Saint Louis, MO | 60-00-4 | |
BSA | Sigma, Saint Louis, MO | 9048-46-8 | |
Tris | Sigma, Saint Louis, MO | 77-86-1 | |
SDS | Sigma, Saint Louis, MO | 151-21-3 | |
Glycerol | Sigma, Saint Louis, MO | 56-81-5 | |
Bromophenol Blue | Sigma, Saint Louis, MO | 115-39-9 | |
B-Mercaptoethanol | Sigma, Saint Louis, MO | 60-24-2 |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved