A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Method Article
Here, we present an integrated workflow to identify phenotypic and molecular features that characterize circulating tumor cells (CTCs). We combine live immunostaining and robotic micromanipulation of single and clustered CTCs with single cell-based techniques for downstream analysis and assessment of metastasis-seeding ability.
Blood-borne metastasis accounts for most cancer-related deaths and involves circulating tumor cells (CTCs) that are successful in establishing new tumors at distant sites. CTCs are found in the bloodstream of patients as single cells (single CTCs) or as multicellular aggregates (CTC clusters and CTC-white blood cell clusters), with the latter displaying a higher metastatic ability. Beyond enumeration, phenotypic and molecular analysis is extraordinarily important to dissect CTC biology and to identify actionable vulnerabilities. Here, we provide a detailed description of a workflow that includes CTC immunostaining and micromanipulation, ex vivo culture to assess proliferative and survival capabilities of individual cells, and in vivo metastasis-formation assays. Additionally, we provide a protocol to achieve the dissociation of CTC clusters into individual cells and the investigation of intra-cluster heterogeneity. With these approaches, for instance, we precisely quantify survival and proliferative potential of single CTCs and individual cells within CTC clusters, leading us to the observation that cells within clusters display better survival and proliferation in ex vivo cultures compared to single CTCs. Overall, our workflow offers a platform to dissect the characteristics of CTCs at the single cell level, aiming towards the identification of metastasis-relevant pathways and a better understanding of CTC biology.
The clinical manifestation of metastasis in distant organs represents the final stage of cancer progression and accounts for more than 90% of cancer-related deaths1. The transition from localized to metastatic disease is a multi-step process, often mediated by circulating tumor cells (CTCs)2,3,4. These cells are shed from the primary tumor into the blood circulation and are transported to distant organs, where they may extravasate and establish metastatic lesions5,6. Although solid tumors can release a relatively high number of CTCs, most CTCs are destined to die, owing to high shear forces in circulation, anoikis-mediated cell death, immune attack or limited capabilities to adapt to a foreign microenvironment7. Therefore, it is pivotal to establish tools that enable the dissection of the molecular features of those CTCs that are endowed with metastasis-seeding ability. Recent preclinical and clinical studies suggest that the presence and quantity of single CTCs and CTC clusters is associated with a worse outcome in patients with various types of solid tumors8,9,10,11,12,13,14. CTC clusters are groups of two or more CTCs attached to each other during circulation and are more efficient in forming metastasis compared to single CTCs3,15,16. Cells within a cluster maintain strong cell-cell adhesion through desmosomes and adherens junctions, which may help to overcome anoikis17,18. Recently, we observed that clustering of CTCs is linked to hypomethylation of binding sites for stemness- and proliferation-associated transcription factors, leading to an increased ability to successfully initiate metastasis19. CTC cluster dissociation results in remodeling of key binding sites, and consequently, the suppression of their metastatic potential19. Additionally to clusters of cancer cells, CTCs can also associate to white blood cell (most frequently neutrophils) to maintain high proliferation levels in circulation and increase their metastatic capability20. However, the biology of CTCs is understood only in part and several questions remain open, including the underlying molecular features and vulnerabilities of single and clustered cells.
In recent years, several strategies have been established that exploit cell-surface expression patterns as well as physical properties of CTCs for their isolation21,22,23,24,25. Antigen-dependent isolation methods rely mostly on the expression of cell surface Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule (EpCAM)26. The most frequently used and (at present) the only FDA-approved platform for CTC enumeration, is the CellSearch system, which is based on a two-step procedure to isolate CTCs21. In the first step, plasma components are removed by centrifugation, while CTCs are captured with magnetic ferrofluids coupled to anti-EpCAM antibodies. In the second step, the CTC-enriched solution is stained for nucleated (DAPI-positive) cells expressing cytokeratin (CK)8,18,19, while white blood cells (WBCs) are identified using the pan-leukocyte marker CD45. Finally, captured cells are placed on an integrated screening platform and CTCs are identified through the expression of EpCAM, CKs, and DAPI while being negative for CD45. Although this is considered to be the gold standard for CTC enumeration, downstream molecular analysis is challenging with this technology due to inherent constraints in CTC retrieval. Additionally, given its isolation procedure, CellSearch may favor the enrichment of CTCs with higher EpCAM levels compared to CTCs with lower EpCAM expression, due for instance to cancer heterogeneity27 or downregulation of epithelial markers28,29. To overcome these limitations, antigen-independent technologies for the enrichment of CTCs have emerged. For example, the CTC-iChip integrates hydrodynamic separation of nucleated cells, including CTCs and WBCs from remaining blood components, followed by an immunomagnetic depletion of antibody-tagged WBCs, allowing purification of untagged and viable CTCs in solution25. Additionally, the fact that most CTCs are slightly bigger than red blood cells (RBCs) or WBCs led to the development of size-based CTC enrichment technologies23,30 (e.g., the Parsortix system (ANGLE)) which makes use of a microfluidic-based technology, comprising a narrowing channel across the separation cassette, leading cells to a terminal gap of either 10, 8, 6.5 or 4.5 µm (different sizes are available depending upon the expected diameter of target cancer cells). Most of the blood cells pass through the narrow gap, while CTCs get trapped due to their size (but also due to their lower deformability) and are, therefore, retained in the cassette. Reverting the flow direction enables the release of captured CTCs, which are in a viable state and suitable for downstream analysis. Independently of the chosen protocol for CTC isolation, however, typical post-enrichment procedures still yield CTCs that are mixed with a relatively small number of RBCs and WBCs, making the analysis of pure single or bulk CTCs challenging. To address this issue, we established a workflow that allows CTC manipulation without potential bias introduced by blood cell contaminants. The addition of immunostaining beforehand, with variable antibody-combinations, distinguishes CTCs from blood cells and even allows to identify CTC subgroups with distinct surface-marker expression profiles. This highly customizable procedure can be then further combined with specific downstream applications.
Here, we describe a workflow that starts from a CTC-enriched product (obtained with any CTC enrichment technology of choice) and combines several approaches to gain insight into CTC biology at single-cell resolution. In a nutshell, our workflow enables the identification of single CTCs, CTC clusters and CTC-WBC clusters by live immunostaining, followed by single-cell micromanipulation and downstream analysis using ex vivo culturing protocols, single cell sequencing, and in vivo metastasis assays.
All the procedures involving blood samples from patients were performed upon signed informed consent of the participants. Procedures were run according to protocols EKNZ BASEC 2016-00067 and EK 321/10, approved by the ethical and institutional review board (Ethics Committee northwest/central Switzerland [EKNZ]), and in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
All the procedures concerning animals were performed in compliance with institutional and cantonal guidelines (approved mouse protocol #2781, Cantonal Veterinary Office of Basel-City).
1. Patient sample preparation
2. Mouse sample preparation
3. CTCs live immunostaining
4. Micromanipulation of CTCs and single-cell picking
NOTE: Before starting, be aware that the micromanipulator requires up to 45 min for complete set up. Once set up, the procedure for CTC identification and micromanipulation requires up to 2 minutes per cell (or cluster).
5. Single-cell picking and seeding for survival and proliferation analysis
6.CTC cluster breaking and single-cell picking for sequencing
7. CTCs isolation for mouse injection
The presented workflow allows the preparation of individual CTCs, either from single CTCs or separated from CTC clusters. CTCs from patients or tumor-bearing mice are enriched from whole blood with available CTC-enrichment methods and then stained with antibodies against cancer-associated markers (e.g., EpCAM, green) and WBC-specific markers (e.g., CD45, red) (Figure 1A). The stained CTC product is then transferred to the micromanipulation station were i...
The molecular characterization of CTCs holds the promise to improve our understanding of the metastatic process and guide the development of new anti-metastasis therapies. Here we provide a detailed description of those protocols that enable CTC micromanipulation and downstream analysis, including both single cell-based functional assays, gene expression analysis and in vivo transplantation for metastatic potential assessment20.
Among the most critical steps of...
N.A. and B.M.S. are listed as inventors in patent applications that relate to circulating tumor cells and the treatment of cancer. N.A. is a paid consultant for pharmaceutical and insurance companies with an interest in liquid biopsy.
We thank all patients that donated blood for our study, as well as all involved clinicians and study nurses. We thank Jens Eberhardt, Uwe Birke, and Dr. Katharina Uhlig from ALS Automated Lab solutions GmbH for continuous support. We thank all members of the Aceto lab for feedback and discussions. Research in the Aceto lab is supported by the European Research Council, the European Union, the Swiss National Science Foundation, the Swiss Cancer League, the Basel Cancer League, the two Cantons of Basel through the ETH Zürich, and the University of Basel.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Anti-human EpCAM-AF488 | Cell Signaling Technology | CST5198 | clone: VU1D9 |
1X DPBS | Invitrogen | 14190169 | no calcium, no magnisium |
6-wells Ultra-low attachment plate | Corning | 3471 | |
Anti-human CD45-BV605 | Biolegend | 304041 | clone: HI30 |
Anti-human EGFR-FITC | GeneTex | GTX11400 | clone: ICR10 |
Anti-human HER2-AF488 | Biolegend | 324410 | clone: 24D2 |
Anti-mouse CD45-BV605 | Biolegend | 103139 | clone: 30-F11 |
BD Vacutainer K2EDTA | BD | 366643 | for human blood collection |
Cell Celector | ALS | CC1001 | core unit |
CellD software | ALS | version 3.0 | |
Cultrex PathClear Reduced Growth Factor BME, Type 2 | R&D Systems | 3533-005-02 | |
Micro tube 1.3 mL K3EDTA | Sarstedt | 41.3395.005 | for mouse blood collection |
PCR tubes | Corning | PCR-02-L-C | |
RLT Plus | Quiagen | 1053393 | |
SUPERase In RNase Inhibitor | Thermo Fisher | AM2696 | 1 U/µL |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved