Sign In

A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

We present a microfluidic cancer-on-chip model, the "Evolution Accelerator" technology, which provides a controllable platform for long-term real-time quantitative studies of cancer dynamics within well-defined environmental conditions at the single-cell level. This technology is expected to work as an in vitro model for fundamental research or pre-clinical drug development.

Abstract

Conventional cell culture remains the most frequently used preclinical model, despite its proven limited ability to predict clinical results in cancer. Microfluidic cancer-on-chip models have been proposed to bridge the gap between the oversimplified conventional 2D cultures and more complicated animal models, which have limited ability to produce reliable and reproducible quantitative results. Here, we present a microfluidic cancer-on-chip model that reproduces key components of a complex tumor microenvironment in a comprehensive manner, yet is simple enough to provide robust quantitative descriptions of cancer dynamics. This microfluidic cancer-on-chip model, the "Evolution Accelerator," breaks down a large population of cancer cells into an interconnected array of tumor microenvironments while generating a heterogeneous chemotherapeutic stress landscape. The progression and the evolutionary dynamics of cancer in response to drug gradient can be monitored for weeks in real time, and numerous downstream experiments can be performed complementary to the time-lapse images taken through the course of the experiments.

Introduction

Cancer has been increasingly recognized as a complex ecosystem that depends not only on the continued dysregulation of mutated cell populations but also on vital interactions between cancer cells and the host microenvironment. In this sense, cancer evolves on an adaptive landscape manifested by a combination of factors, including a heterogeneous tumor microenvironment and crosstalk with a variety of host cells, all of which contribute selective pressures for further genetic or epigenetic changes1,2,3. In the context of solid tumors, uneven distribution of chemotherapeutics and other resource gradients contributes to their molecular heterogeneity and may play a role in the development of drug resistance, increased angiogenesis to particular tumor subpopulations, and even metastasis4,5,6. Conventional in vitro 2D cell culture studies, while possessing large-scale, convenient experimental capacity, provides mean-field, uniform, and fixed conditions, often lacking the precise spatial and temporal environmental control necessary to truly emulate in vivo tumor dynamics. Thus, there is a need for more representative ex vivo models to reproduce the tumor microenvironment prior to animal models in the drug development pipeline in order for a better prediction of cancer progression as well as responses to drugs within dynamical stress landscapes. Microfluidics have been proposed to bridge the gap between 2D cell culture studies and more complex in vivo animal studies that may not be able to support controllable quantitative studies7,8,9.

An ideal in vitro system to characterize cancer cell dynamics should possess the ability to generate a heterogeneous microenvironment to mimic the adaptive cellular responses that may take place in a tumor, as well as allow for the observation of these dynamics at a single-cell resolution. In this article, we describe a microfluidic cell culture platform, a PDMS-based device called the "Evolution Accelerator" (EA), that allows for parallel in vitro studies of cancer cell dynamics at cellular resolution with real-time data acquisition over the course of weeks, while stably maintaining gradients of stress across the culture landscape. The design of this platform is based on our previous work, in which the evolutionary dynamics of organisms in a metapopulation can be accelerated10,11. Specifically, in a group of spatially separated populations that interact at some level, when exposed to a heterogeneous stress landscape, the most fit species can dominate in a local population faster compared with that of a large uniform population. The advantageous species then migrate to neighboring microhabitats in search of resources and space, and eventually dominate the entire population. As shown in Figure 1, the pattern of the microfluidic EA chip is composed of (i) a pair of serpentine channels that provide fresh media circulation and construct fixed boundary conditions for chemical diffusion, and (ii) the hexagonal cell culture region which consists 109 interconnected hexagonal and 24 half-hexagonal chambers in the center, resembling a honeycomb structure. The chip is 100 µm in depth. Media channels and cell culture region are connected with small slits (about 15 µm wide), which prevent direct media flow and the resulting shear stress across the cell culture area, yet still allow chemicals to diffuse through small slits and exchange nutrients, metabolic waste, etc. The generation of chemical gradients is demonstrated in Figure 1B, where one media channel contains 0.1 mM of fluorescein while the other channel is free of fluorescein. Cells are cultured on a gas permeable membrane, encapsulated by the microstructures through the positive back pressure on the membrane against the chip. The components of the device holder are illustrated in Figure 2, and the experimental setup is illustrated in Figure 3, where the culture is maintained on an inverted microscope at 37 °C, with above 85% relative humidity, and conditioned under normoxia gas composition.

This system provides detailed observation of localized cellular interactions via brightfield and fluorescent channels and allows for spatially-resolved downstream assays such as immunofluorescence, Western blot, or mass spectrometry. We have previously demonstrated as a proof-of-principle of this microfluidic cancer-on-chip model on the long-term co-culture of epithelial and mesenchymal PC3 prostate cancer cells12 as well as the emergence of drug-resistance polyploid giant cancer cells using the epithelial PC3 cell line13. While we present the application of this platform to understand the spatiotemporal dynamics of epithelial PC3 and mesenchymal prostate cancer cells under a stress gradient of docetaxel, the microfluidic system can be easily applied to any combination of cell lines and resource (i.e., drug, nutrient, oxygen) gradients.

Protocol

1. Fabrication of microfluidic device

  1. Generate the desired microfluidic pattern using a layout design software (see Supplemental Materials).
  2. Fabricate the photomask. See Table of Materials for more details.
    1. Utilizing a laser writer, write the pattern on a soda-lime glass plate coated with 100 nm of Cr and 500 nm of photoresist AZ1518.
    2. Develop the photoresist with developer AZ300MIF for 60 s.
    3. Etch away the chromium without protection from the photoresist using Cr-7 Chromium Etchant.
    4. Strip off residual photoresist using a photoresist stripper at 70 °C for 45 min.
  3. Pattern the photoresist. See Table of Materials for more details.
    1. Spin coat HMDS on silicon wafer at 4000 rpm for 40 s.
    2. Spin coat photoresist AZ4330 on silicon wafer at 4000 rpm for 40 s.
    3. Soft bake the silicon wafer at 95 °C for 60 s.
    4. Utilize the mask aligner to expose UV to the silicon wafer.
    5. Develop the photoresist with developer AZ300MIF for 4 min.
  4. Perform DRIE etching. See Table of Materials for more details.
    1. Dry-etch the wafer patterned with the photoresist using a Silicon Deep Reactive Ion Etching (DRIE) system for 100 µm depth.
    2. Strip off the photoresist with acetone and plasma etch with a plasma etcher.
  5. Wafer oxidation and silanization. See Table of Materials for more details.
    1. Perform thermal oxidation on the etched silicon wafer in a furnace at 1100 °C for 1 h.
    2. Wait for the silicon wafer to cool down, and then place the wafer into a desiccator with a few drops of trichloro-1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorooctyl-silane (PFOTS) dripped in a small container near the wafer.
    3. Pump the pressure of the desiccator to 0.5 atm at room temperature for 60 min. The silicon wafer mold should become hydrophobic after proper silanization, which can be tested by adding several droplets of water onto the wafer.
  6. Soft lithography. See Table of Materials for more details.
    1. Mix pre-polymer and cross-linker (from polymethylsiloxane (PDMS) kit) at a 10:1 by weight ratio.
    2. Pour the mixed PDMS to create a 10 mm film in height onto the silanized silicon wafer mold.
    3. Degas the resulting PDMS-silicon wafer system in a desiccator for 30 min to 1 h.
    4. Incubate the PDMS-silicon wafer in a 70 °C incubator overnight to cure the PDMS.
    5. Once the PDMS is cured, peel the PDMS film off the silicon wafer carefully.
    6. Using biopsy needles, punch through-holes at the inlet ports based on the location of the pattern on the PDMS and employ a circular punch to cut chips 27 mm in diameter.
  7. PDMS layer bonding.
    1. Heat cure two stacks of 27 mm PDMS cylinders (without patterning), which will become the reservoir layer and the capping layer of the device.
    2. Cut out two 7 mm circles around the inlets on the reservoir layer, and utilize a biopsy needle to punch through-holes at the inlet ports on the capping layer.
    3. Bond three stacks of PDMS (patterned stack, reservoir layer, capping layer) with oxygen plasma treatment.
    4. With the biopsy needle, punch through-holes at the outlets and the center port of the device.

2. Media and cell line preparation

  1. Prepare media for culturing PC3 cell lines, including PC3-EMT and PC3-EPI: mix RPMI 1640 medium with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1x antibiotic-antimycotic. Generate cell lines as described previously14.
    NOTE: PC3 cell lines are maintained in the above media in humidified incubators at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Split cells and subculture every 3 days, before they reach 100% confluency.
  2. Transfect cell lines with cytoplasmic-labeled fluorescent markers for better visualization, as described previously12, such that PC3-EMT expresses cytoplasmic GFP and PC3-EPI expresses cytoplasmic mCherry. Note that the technology is also compatible with any fluorescent-labeled cells as well as brightfield imaging of unlabeled cells.

3. Experimental setup

  1. Fabrication of metal plate holder
    1. Fabricate a plate holder that is sufficient to hold simultaneous gas-permeable culture dishes for parallel experiments by machining or 3D printing. The 3D CAD file ("3-well plate.FCStd") can be found on GitHub as a reference (https://github.com/kechihl/3-well-plate).
    2. Unscrew the components of the holder (Figure 2) with a screwdriver. Disinfect the components via UV exposure for at least 1 h and leave in a sterile environment.
      NOTE: The holder is designed to provide substantial conditions for thermal equilibrium and ideal gas compositions, with gas channel inlets that allow for airflow. More details can be found in our previous work12.
    3. Prepare up to three gas-permeable culture dishes, of which the cell culture membrane is relatively flexible.
  2. Cell line seeding
    1. 24 hours before the start of the experiment, harvest PC3-EPI and PC3-EMT cells by trypsinization for 5 min. Add prewarmed culture media, then centrifuge at 150 x g for 3 min and discard the supernatant.
    2. Count cells of each PC3-EPI and PC3-EMT using a hemocytometer and isolate a total of 2.5 x 104 of each cell type for each gas-permeable culture dish.
    3. Mix and resuspend the two cell types in 2 mL of culture media and seed the cells into each of the gas-permeable culture dish.
    4. Leave the entire plate holder in the incubator overnight for cells to attach.
    5. Disinfect the PDMS devices via UV exposure for at least 1 h and leave in a sterile environment.
  3. Setting up thermal control unit and gas supply system
    1. As shown in Figure 3, set up a gas supply system that consists of both CO2 and O2 control units, a gas pump, a gas mixing chamber, a humidifier or bubbler, and three separate sets of gas valves and pressure gauges. More details can be found in our previous work12.
    2. Set up the CO2 and O2 control units such that they adjust the mixing rate of the gas from CO2 and N2 tanks and the O2 source. Alternatively, any gas supply system that provides gas under normoxia condition would work.
    3. Make sure the gas that is combined in the mixing chamber and humidified by a bubbler such that the relative humidity is increased up to 85% (as read out from a relative humidity monitor) and that the gas leads to three independent gas valves with pressure gauges in order to control and monitor gas flow rate in the plate holder.
    4. Place the entire plate holder in an on-stage incubation thermal control unit with separate heating subunits for the lid and the bottom plate, with all units set at 37 °C. See Table of Materials for more details.
  4. Installation of microfluidic device. See Table of Materials for more details.
    1. Identify that the detailed components of the 3-well plate holder are in order, as in Figure 2. Each of the three wells are identical and independent, with a pair of gas channels for each well. Every well possesses a gas-permeable culture dish holder, a PDMS chip holder, a glass window holder, and a pair of 35 mm glass windows. These components can be assembled using the fitted screws.
      NOTE: The glass windows ensure that there is a thermally-isolated space between the gas-permeable culture membrane and the well such that no water condensation occurs due to temperature differences at the interface. Note that the 3 wells are independent, and 3 experiments can be done separately.
    2. Pre-warm culture medium at 37 °C and degas in a vacuum chamber for 20 min.
    3. Treat the PDMS chips using an oxygen plasma system for 30 s in order to maintain hydrophilicity.
    4. Set up the syringe system. Load two syringes slowly with growth media and other two syringes with desired reagent of interest (media, media with drug, etc.). Connect each individual syringe to a 50 cm tubing (0.020" x 0.060"OD) by a 23 G dispensing needle into one hollow steel pin. Insert a hollow steel pin into the other end of the tubing.
    5. Prime the tubing and insert the steel pin into each PDMS chip through the capping layer. Fill up the reservoir layer and wet the PDMS pattern layer pattern with media. The reservoir layer works as an on-chip bubble trap to prevent air bubbles from getting into the microfluidic pattern.
    6. Load a 1 mL syringe with culture media. Connect the syringe to a 5 cm tubing (0.020" x 0.060"OD) by a 23 G dispensing needle into one hollow steel pin. Insert a hollow steel pin into the other end of the tubing and prime the tubing.
    7. Insert the hollow steel pin into the center hole of the chip, where excessive media can be extracted out from the chip later during the chip sealing process.
    8. As each PDMS device requires four 10 mL syringes loaded onto a syringe pump, load two 10 mL syringes per chip in the forward deck. Place the two other syringes in the withdraw deck of the syringe system.
    9. Place chip directly on top of the gas-permeable culture membranes (with cells already adhered to the membranes). In order to avoid entrapping microbubbles in the microfluidic pattern, dispense 1 mL of prewarmed and degassed media into the 35 mm gas-permeable culture dish before assembly, and then make sure that the chip approaches the liquid surface with a 15-degree tilt angle.
    10. Clamp the gas-permeable culture dish and the well in the gas-permeable culture dish holder for each chip, with the PDMS chip holder pushing the PDMS device downward.
    11. Tape a sheet of a sealer on top of the PDMS device and clamp with the PDMS chip holder in order to prevent the chip from drying out.
    12. Set media flow rate around the array to be 20 µL/h.
    13. Set the entire plate in the on-stage incubator on the motorized stage of an inverted microscope. Connect the gas supply system to the gas channels and pressurizing the gas-permeable culture membrane against the installed PDMS chip to ensure sealing of device. Maintain gauge pressure at 0.2 psi (1.4 x 104 Pa).
    14. Slowly extract excessive media in the chip using the 1-mL syringe from the center hole. Observe the chip under the microscope while extracting media and then stop extracting when the chip is sealed. Chip sealing should be obvious since a part of the cells would be crushed by the micro-structures.
    15. Connect the temperature sensing unit of the on-stage incubator to the 3-well plate and set to 37 °C.

4. Single-cell time-lapse imaging

  1. Set up imaging software utilizing an inverted microscope to time-lapse image acquisition. Note that an inverted fluorescent microscope with fully motorized x-y stage, focus knob, shutter, and filter cubes is required for an EA experiment.
  2. Configure software to acquire images across two channels at 10x magnification for each chip with automatic image-stitching after one round of autofocus. Be aware that automatic correction systems like Perfect Focus do not guarantee satisfying image quality. It is more recommended to generate a customized focus surface for long-term image acquisition based on either autofocus or manual focus across the chip.
  3. Take images every hour and leave experiment running on the time scale of weeks. Monitor image quality on a daily basis and update the focus surface if necessary.
  4. Prepare the PDMS chip and gas-permeable culture dish for subsequent immunofluorescent analysis, as described previously13.

5. Image processing and analysis

  1. Post-experimental processing
    1. Convert images into TIFF format for image processing and measurements utilizing Fiji/ImageJ.
    2. Compress TIFF files for ease of further image processing.
  2. Fiji/ImageJ analysis
    1. To identify cells, perform Background Subtraction and Particle Analysis to identify fluorescent bright-spots for cell location detection and automatic cell counting.
    2. Utilize plugins (Manual Tracking, Chemotaxis, Migration Tool, Trackmate) to analyze cell motility and migration.

Results

Validation of optimum cell growth on chip
A major goal of the experiment platform is to reproduce key components and interactions in a complex tumor microenvironment in a comprehensive manner, yet simple enough to provide quantitative, reliable and reproducible data. This goal can only be achieved if we have full control of the physical and biochemical environmental factors. We must either exclude the undesired factors or figure out a way to incorporate the uncontro...

Discussion

Conventional cell culture was developed almost a century ago and remains the most frequently used preclinical model in biomedical research, despite its proven limited ability to predict clinical results in cancer17. Animal models offer the highest physiological relevance and reasonable genetic similarity to humans, but have long been acknowledged to have significant limitations in predicting human outcomes18. Among all the existing preclinical models, microfluidic cancer-on...

Disclosures

No conflicts of interest declared.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NSF PHY-1659940.

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
10 mL BD Luer-Lok tip syringesBD14-823-16E
Antibiotic-AntimycoticSigma-AldrichA59551x anti-anti
AZ 300 MIFMerck KGaA18441123163Photoresist developer
AZ1518Merck KGaAAZ1518Photoresist
AZ4330Merck KGaAAZ4330Photoresist
Cr Chromium EtchantSigma-Aldrich651826
Fetal bovine serum (FBS)Life Technologies Corporation10437028
Heidelberg DWL 66+ laserwriterHeidelberg InstrumentsDWL66+Writing photomask
Hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS)Sigma-Aldrich379212For photoresist adhesion enhancement
Hollow steel pinsNew England Small TubeNE-1300-01 .025 OD .017 ID x .500 long / type 304 WD fullhard
ibidi Heating System, Multi-Well Plates, K-Frameibidi10929On-stage incubator 
Luer-Lok 23 G dispensing needleMcMaster-Carr75165A684To connect syringes and tubings
Lumox dish 35Sarstedt94.6077.331Gas-permeable cell culture dish
Microposit Remover 1165Dow Electronic MaterialsMicroposit Remover 1165Photoresist stripper
Microseal B Adhesive SealerBio-Rad LaboratoriesMSB1001Adhesive sealer
O-Ring (for Lumox plate sealing)McMaster-Carr9452K114Dash No. 27; 1-5/16" ID x 1-7/16" OD; Duro 70
O-Ring (for bottom glass window sealing)McMaster-Carr9452K74Dash No. 20; 7/8" ID x 1" OD; Duro 70
Plasma-Preen Plasma Cleaning/Etching SystemPlasmatic Systems, IncPlasma-PreenOxygen plasma system
RPMI 1640Life Technologies Corporation11875-093
Samco RIE800iPB DRIESamcoRIE800iPBDeep reactive-ion etching system
Suss MA6 mask alignerSUSS MicroTecMA6Mask aligner 
Sylgard 184 Silicone ElastomerFisher ScientificNC9285739PDMS elastomer
TePla M4L plasma etcherPVA TePlaM4LPlasma etcher
Trichloro-1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorooctyl-silane (PFOTS)Sigma-Aldrich448931For silicon wafer silanization
Tygon microbore tube (0.020" x 0.060"OD)Cole-ParmerEW-06419-01Tubings for media delivery

References

  1. Meacham, C. E., Morrison, S. J. Tumour heterogeneity and cancer cell plasticity. Nature. 501 (7467), 328-337 (2013).
  2. Whiteside, T. L. The tumor microenvironment and its role in promoting tumor growth. Oncogene. 27 (45), 5904-5912 (2008).
  3. Lambert, G., et al. An analogy between the evolution of drug resistance in bacterial communities and malignant tissues. Nature Reviews Cancer. 11 (5), 375-382 (2011).
  4. Tannock, I. F., Lee, C. M., Tunggal, J. K., Cowan, D. S., Egorin, M. J. Limited penetration of anticancer drugs through tumor tissue: a potential cause of resistance of solid tumors to chemotherapy. Clinical Cancer Research. 8 (3), 878-884 (2002).
  5. Grantab, R. H., Tannock, I. F. Penetration of anticancer drugs through tumour tissue as a function of cellular packing density and interstitial fluid pressure and its modification by bortezomib. BMC Cancer. 12, 214 (2012).
  6. Fu, F., Nowak, M. A., Bonhoeffer, S. Spatial Heterogeneity in Drug Concentrations Can Facilitate the Emergence of Resistance to Cancer Therapy. PLoS Computational Biology. 11 (3), e1004142 (2015).
  7. Bogorad, M. I., et al. In vitro microvessel models. Lab on a Chip. 15 (22), 4242-4255 (2015).
  8. Caballero, D., et al. Organ-on-chip models of cancer metastasis for future personalized medicine: From chip to the patient. Biomaterials. 149, 98-115 (2017).
  9. Caballero, D., Blackburn, S. M., De Pablo, M., Samitier, J., Albertazzi, L. Tumour-vessel-on-a-chip models for drug delivery. Lab on a Chip. 17 (22), 3760-3771 (2017).
  10. Zhang, Q., et al. Acceleration of emergence of bacterial antibiotic resistance in connected microenvironments. Science. 333 (6050), 1764-1767 (2011).
  11. Wu, A., et al. Ancient hot and cold genes and chemotherapy resistance emergence. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 112 (33), 10467-10472 (2015).
  12. Lin, K. C., et al. Epithelial and mesenchymal prostate cancer cell population dynamics on a complex drug landscape. Convergent Science Physical Oncology. 3 (4), 045001 (2017).
  13. Lin, K. C., et al. The role of heterogeneous environment and docetaxel gradient in the emergence of polyploid, mesenchymal and resistant prostate cancer cells. Clinical & Experimental Metastasis. 36 (2), 97-108 (2019).
  14. Roca, H., et al. Transcription factors OVOL1 and OVOL2 induce the mesenchymal to epithelial transition in human cancer. PloS One. 8 (10), e76773 (2013).
  15. Schindelin, J., et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature Methods. 9 (7), 676-682 (2012).
  16. Tinevez, J. Y., et al. Trackmate: An open and extensible platform for single-particle tracking. Methods. 115, 80-90 (2017).
  17. Caballero, D., et al. Organ-on-chip models of cancer metastasis for future personalized medicine: From chip to the patient. Biomaterials. 149, 98-115 (2017).
  18. Akhtar, A. The flaws and human harms of animal experimentation. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 24 (4), 407-419 (2015).
  19. Sontheimer-Phelps, A., Hassell, B. A., Ingber, D. E. Modelling cancer in microfluidic human organs-on-chips. Nature Reviews Cancer. 19 (2), 65-81 (2019).
  20. Bogorad, M. I., DeStefano, J., Karlsson, J., Wong, A. D., Gerecht, S., Searson, P. C. Review: in vitro microvessel models. Lab on a Chip. 15, 4242-4255 (2015).
  21. Zañudo, J. G. T., et al. Towards control of cellular decision-making networks in the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Physical Biology. 16 (3), 031002 (2019).
  22. Morris, R. J., et al. Bacterial population solitary waves can defeat rings of funnels. New Journal of Physics. 19 (3), 035002 (2017).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

MicrofluidicsCancer ModelDrug GradientsCancer PopulationsEvolution AcceleratorCellular DynamicsPreclinical Drug DevelopmentTumor Stress LandscapeGas CompositionPC3 Cell LinesTrypsinizationHemocytometerCell CultureSterile EnvironmentLong term Experiment

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved